I am trying to call an API in second feature file , passing arguments from first feature file . These has to be passed as a param for second API
* def activeDetails =
"""
function(times){
for(i=0;i<=times;i++){
karate.log('Run test round: '+(i+1));
karate.call('getActiveRouteDetails.feature', { token: token, currentPage: i });
}
java.lang.Thread.sleep(1*1000);
}
"""
* call activeDetails totalPages
In my second feature , I am able to print the values passed , Getting error while passing it as a param 'no step-definition method match found for: param pageNumber'
And print currentPage
And print token
And param pageNumber = '#currentPage'
And param token = token
Watch the white space around the = sign. Normally if you use IDE support you can avoid these issues. You seem to have an extra space after pageNumber.
So make this change:
And param pageNumber = currentPage
I request you to please read the docs and examples. You are still un-necessarily making 2 calls. And over complicating your test.
Related
I’m a beginner in Laravel but have a problem at first. I wrote this query and I’m waiting for Sonya Bins as result but unexpectedly I see ["Sonya Bins"]. what’s the problem?
Route::get('products', function () {
$articles=DB::table('users')->where('id','2')->get()->pluck('name');
return view('products',compact('articles'));
});
pluck will return array if you want to get only single value then use value
// will return array
$articles=DB::table('users')->where('id','2')->get()->pluck('name');
//will return string
$articles=DB::table('users')->where('id','2')->value('name');
// output Sonya Bins
here is an example from the documentation:
if you don't even need an entire row, you may extract a single value from a record using the value method. This method will return the value of the column directly:
$email = DB::table('users')->where('name', 'John')->value('email');
Read more about it here
Hope it helps.
Thanks
pluck() used to return a String before Laravel 5.1, but now it returns an array.
The alternative for that behavior now is value()
Try this:
Route::get('products', function () {
$articles=DB::table('users')->where('id','2')->get()->value('name');
return view('products',compact('articles'));
});
I think it's easier to use the Model + find function + value function.
Route::get('products', function () {
$articles = User::find(2)->value('name');
return view('products',compact('articles'));
});
pluck will return the collection.
I think id is your primary key.
You can just get the first record, and call its attribute's name:
DB::table('users')->where('id','2')->first()->name;
or
DB::table('users')->find(2)->name;
First thing is that you used invalid name for what you pass to view - you don't pass articles but user name.
Second thing is that you use get method to get results instead of first (or find) - you probably expect there is only single user with id = 2.
So to sum up you should use:
$userName = DB::table('users')->find(2)->name;
return view('products',compact('userName'));
Of course above code is for case when you are 100% sure there is user with id = 2 in database. If it might happen there won't be such user, you should use construction like this:
$userName = optional(DB::table('users')->find(2))->name;
($userName will be null if there is no such record)
or
$userName = optional(DB::table('users')->find(2))->name ?? 'No user';
in case you want to use custom string.
I am using a postman to automate apis.
Now I am using following request , lets say :-
{
"customerId": "{{currentClientId}}"
}
Where clientid is a dynamic variable whose value is substituted dynamically as 1 , 2, 3,4 so on..
I call this request multiple times using setNextRequest call in this eg lets say 10.This is being done using a counter variable. I am initialising the counter in my previous request to 0 and using for loop with value as counter as 10 calling the request 10 times.There is no response in body just successful http code 204.
I want to store all these clientids coming in request into an environment Client array variable so I wrote a following pre-request script:-
counter = pm.environment.get("counter");
ClientArray = pm.environment.get("ClientArray");
ClientArray.push(pm.environment.get("currentClientId"));
pm.environment.set("ClientArray",ClientArray);
In Test Script, wrote following code :-
counter = pm.environment.get("counter");
if(counter<=10) {
console.log("hi");
postman.setNextRequest("Request");
counter++;
pm.environment.set("counter",counter);
console.log("Counter",counter);
}
The above scipts is throwing
TypeError | ClientArray.push is not a function.
Could someone please advice how to achieve this.
When you retrieve a value from an environment variable like you're doing:
ClientArray = pm.environment.get("ClientArray");
You're not getting an array, you're getting a string which is why you're getting that error. You need to treat the variable like a string, append the currentClientId much like you do for the counter. Something like:
var currentClientIds = pm.environment.get("ClientArray");
currentClientIds = currentClientIds + "," + currentClientId
When you're done appending i.e. out of your loop simply take the string and convert it to an array:
var currentClientIds = pm.environment.get("ClientArray");
var idsArr = curentClientIds.split(',');
I encounter an issue using Gatling EL in ELFileBody.
I have the following exec :
exec(myFunction("${myEmail}", otherParameters))
and the function :
def myFunction((email: String) = {
exec((s: Session) => s.set("email", email))
.exec(http("MyFunction")
.put("/myUrl")
.headers(Headers.basic_headers_json)
.body(ElFileBody("LinkToMyJsonFile"))
.asJson
.check(status.is(200)))
}
my myEmail is set in session. Yet, when the exec runs myFunction, the variable is replaced in the json by "${myEmail}" instead of beeing evaluated.
Have you an idea how I can resolve it be able to pass myEmail session variable in the exec through myFunction?
Thanks a lot in advance
JF
your function takes a string and you are then putting that string into a session variable - so when you pass in "${myEmail}" gatling is putting that string literal into the session var. So when gatling does the substitution in the ELFile body it's using exactly what you've specified.
I'm assuming you already have the email you want in the ${myEmail} session var - why not just edit the file to use ${myEmail} in place of "${email}"?
a more idiomatic approach would be to pass in an Expression[String], validate it and set the result into the ${email} var
def myFunction((email: Expression[String]) = {
exec((s: Session) => email.apply(s) match {
case Success(address) => s.set("email", address)
case Failure(error) => {
println(s"There was an error: $error")
s
}
}
...
This will retrieve the value of ${myEmail} if there is one or just the string literal if that's the case, and put it in the ${email} var. The error would be thrown if you provided a session var for which there was no value
I am trying to iterate through the array get the value and search the database, then concatenate the database result to the string translation
app.get('/translate',function(req,res) {
let translate = '';
['hello','love'].forEach(async (word) => {
let trans = await
NaijaLang.find({"engword": word, "naijalang": "yoruba"});
translate +=" " + trans[0].translation;
//Returns values
console.log(translate)
});
//Returns Empty String;
console.log(translate)
res.send(translate);
});
Because you do some async stuff there, but you send the value synchronously. Basically, this code will run in this order:
run let translate='';
run ['hello','love'].forEach(...)
run await NaijaLang.find(...) asynchronously for word=hello
run await NaijaLang.find(...) asynchronously for word=love
run console.log(translate) and res.send(translate);
resolve the value of await NaijaLang.find(...) -> this is the time when the translate is updated for the first time (either for word=hello or word=love. Whatever finishes earlier)
resolve the value of second call await NaijaLang.find(...) -> this is the time when the translate is updated for the second time. But the value was already send in the 5th step.
You can find more detailed explanation here: https://blog.lavrton.com/javascript-loops-how-to-handle-async-await-6252dd3c795
And you can also find there how to fix it. You can use the for-of loop instead of forEach:
app.get('/translate',function(req,res){
let translate='';
for (let word of ['hello','love']) {
let trans=await NaijaLang.find({"engword":word,"naijalang":"yoruba"});
translate+=" " + trans[0].translation;
//Returns values
console.log(translate)
}
//Returns Empty String;
console.log(translate)
res.send(translate);
});
This time, the code will execute as you probably want. First, the find method will be called for word=hello, then, after the execution is finished, the find method will be called for word=love and finally after both calls are finished, the res.send will be called.
Problem
Calling repeater('#myTable tr','Rows').count(); returns a Future, not an integer. I need to get the integer value so I can confirm that an additional row was added to a table.
Code
it('should add a new user when save button is clicked',function()
{
showModal();
//here I'm trynig to store the row count of my table into a local variable.
//a future is returned who's 'value' field is undefined.
var memberCount = repeater('#memberTable tr','Member Rows').count();
//this outputs 'undefined'
console.log(memberCount.value);
input('editedMember.name').enter('John');
input('editedMember.grade').enter(5);
input('editedMember.ladderPosition').enter(3);
element('#saveMemberButton').click();
sleep(1);
expect(element(modalId).css('display')).toBe('none');
//here is where I want to do the comparison against the above stored memberCount
expect(repeater('#memberTable tr', 'Member Rows').count()).toBe(memberCount.value + 1);
});
Test Result
Chrome 25.0 e2e should add a new user when save button is clicked FAILED
expect repeater 'Member Rows ( #memberTable tr )' count toBe null
/Users/jgordon/learning/chessClub/web-app/test/e2e/scenarios.js:45:3: expected null but was 6
Chrome 25.0: Executed 2 of 2 (1 FAILED) (1 min 4.117 secs / 1 min 3.773 secs)
Drilling into the source code for Angularjs' e2e support reveals that you have to call execute() on the Future to have it populate its value. Also, when you call execute you have to provide a "done" function to the execute() otherwise Testacular will (oddly enough!) skip your test.
Code
var rowCountFuture = repeater('#memberTable tr','Member Rows').count();
rowCountFuture.execute(function(){
});
var memberCount = rowCountFuture.value;
While I'm jazzed to see this works, I'm concerned there may be some asynchronous bugs that could come out of this, also, I feel like this is a hack and not the right way to do it. Any ideas?
Based on the latest Protractor version:
it('should add a new user when save button is clicked', function() {
var memberCount;
element.all(by.repeater('#memberTable tr','Member Rows')).count().then(function(value) {
memberCount = value;
});
...
// then do all your entering user info, saving etc.
...
browser.refresh(); // or however you want to load new data
expect(element.all(by.repeater('#memberTable tr','Member Rows')).count()).toEqual(memberCount + 1);
});
I've run into the same issue, and have seen confusing results when testing value returned after calling execute(). I've found this method works more reliably:
var getCount = repeater('ul li').count();
getCount.execute(function(value) {
expect(value).toEqual(3);
});
You can do this most easily in the async promise returned by the locator
element.all(By.repeater 'thing in things').then(function(elements){
count = elements.length;
expect(count).toEqual(3);
});