I have an existing 'c' code written by a researcher and I want to debug it. The project is compiled using MAkE. I am trying to debug using gdb debugger.
suppose 'A' folder contains 'myproject.c', 'myproject', MAKEFILE and some subfolders B,C,D etc.
Now I debug the file gdb myproject. I created breakpoint at a function1. This function 1 is located in a file x.c in folder B. When I pass step command, it is executing the whole function but I want to see it line by line.
When I pass step command, it is executing the whole function but I want to see it line by line.
This means that x.c is compiled without debug info (without -g flag).
The Make File already has -g flag included
What the Makefile has is somewhat irrelevant. What matters is the command line that make constructs to compile x.c.
Run make clean all. That should (assuming proper Makefile) rebuild the entire program, recompiling x.c. Now look at the command line used to compile x.c. It will not have -g option. You'll need to modify the Makefile so it does.
Related
I was trying to execute Makefile and wanted to execute a C program with it. First, how can I include test.c file for makefile?
I've placed makefile in root directly as there will be other .c files later added.
Can anyone hep me executing this?
File structure:
Makefile code so far not working (it will work if I place it inside src still not getting the output of file.)
# -o : object file
Test: test.c
gcc -o Test test.c
Glad if anyone can help or suggest anything!
I don't usually follow links but I was curious so I did so. Your problem isn't related to make or makefiles or how your code is built. As best as can be determined from the screenshots, all that is fine.
The problem is that when you try to run the program, it's not found.
When the shell tries to run a program it looks in the directories contained in the PATH environment variable, and only there. It won't look in the current directory, unless the current directory is on the PATH.
So when you type the name of a program without a pathname to tell the shell where to find it, such as Test (by the way it's not a good idea to call your program Test because there is a system program named test on POSIX systems and it can cause confusion), it will search the directories on PATH for Test, and if the program is not found there it will fail.
If you don't want to rely on PATH you need to give the shell the pathname of the program you want to run. So you can run .\Test instead (on POSIX systems it would be ./Test), to tell the shell that you want to run Test from the current directory.
I have couple of questions on how to convert C code to Assembly and vice versa but with files program.asm, program.o, program, makefile.
First, I have a lab12.asm file that is a text file that contains assembly code. Second, I have a makefile with the following contents:
lab12: lab12.o
ld -o lab12 lab12.o
lab12.o: lab12.asm
nasm -f elf64 -g -F dwarf lab12.asm
Now, to generate an executable file called "lab12" and object file called "lab12.o", in Linux terminal we run the command "make".
Now we can call debugger and compiler by typing command "kdbg lab12".
This is how to compile and run the Assembly code.
Now, the second case - C to Assembly.
I am using the following two tutorials:
tutorial_1
tutorial_2
In these cases, we get the following files: program.c, program.s, program. I am interested in that how to create "makefile" for this case to be able to call the "make" command and "kdbg program" command. In this state as it is, we can't call the "kdbg" command.
So, my question for this case is, how to generate files program.asm, program.o, program, makefile, to be able to call "make" command and "kdbg program" command?
Third case - Assembly to C. How to do this. Again, I want program.asm, program.o, program, makefile files and to be able to call commands "make" and "kdbg program".
Best Regards.
I have a problem with compiling and running C codes in notepad++.
I am using the nppexec plugin and wrote the following in the script section after pressing F6:
C:\MinGW\bin\gcc.exe -g "$(FULL_CURRENT_PATH)" -o "$(CURRENT_DIRECTORY)\$(NAME_PART).exe"
$(CURRENT_DIRECTORY)\$(NAME_PART).exe
After pressing OK, I get the following on the console:
C:\MinGW\bin\gcc.exe -g "D:\Silent\Documents\College Stuff\6th sem\NETWORKING lab\substitutioncypher.C" -o "D:\Silent\Documents\College Stuff\6th sem\NETWORKING lab\substitutioncypher.exe"
Process started >>>
<<< Process finished. (Exit code 0)
D:\Silent\Documents\College Stuff\6th sem\NETWORKING lab\substitutioncypher.exe
Process started >>>
Here, substitution.c is my program to be run. The problem is that the gcc part is working fine but I am not able to execute the program from here as there is no response.
As you see, it just says process started and after that nothing. No response to a key being pressed, it just accepts everything like a text editor.
If I go to the working directory and execute the program from there (double clicking the exe file) then it seems to run perfectly fine. The problem seems to be in my script or the plugin.
Please, can anyone find out what is wrong with my compiling and running script?
In addition to #paxdiablo 's answer, you may also find useful the following NppExec script for single file projects:
npp_save
cd "$(CURRENT_DIRECTORY)"
cmd /c del "$(NAME_PART)".o "$(NAME_PART)".exe *.o
C:\MinGW\bin\gcc.exe -g3 -std=c89 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Wno-nonnull "$(NAME_PART)".c -o "$(NAME_PART)".exe
npp_run "$(NAME_PART)".exe
The 1st line saves the document that is currently active inside notepad++.
The 2nd line ensures your current directory is the one of the active document. This let you refraining from using the "$(CURRENT_DIRECTORY)" variable in the rest of the lines.
The 3rd line removes any executables and object-file leftovers from previous successful compilations. Removing the last executable is a nice idea, because if you don't then the last line will cause your .exe produced by the last compilation to be run anyway, even if your current compilation fails. A failed compilation does not produce an .exe, so normally you don't want NppExec to run the previous .exe. Removing the previously produced object-file is optional, but it does ensure that it will not affect fresh compilations (it makes more sense in multi-file projects, as an alternative to the touch command-line tool).
The 4th line compiles the active document. Feel free to modify gcc's options according to your needs. If you add C:\MinGW\bin into the Windows PATH environment variable, and assuming you are using only one gcc installation on your system, then you can skip the absolute path, and write just gcc instead.
The last line executes the produced executable. The npp_run command tells NppExec to launch a new command-prompt window, and run your program in it (unless it is a WIN32 GUI program). I personally find it more convenient compared to the NppExec console embed in notepad++. It looks more natural and it also avoids some I/O redirection problems of the NppExec console.
However, if your program is a console app that does not interact with the user say via a loop, then this approach will cause the launched command-prompt window to close immediately after your program terminates, not giving you the chance to inspect its output. In that case you should have you program waiting for a key to be pressed by the user just before its termination. A quick-and-dirty way is to put a system("pause"); right before your main() function's return and/or exit() statements (it is much better though to write a simple cross-platform function or macro for this).
You may experiment with the above script by typing it in F6's <temporary script> and save it permanently for general use when you are happy with its behavior.
On a side note, you may also find it useful to have a look at this post, where I'm trying to explain how to setup NppExec so it jumps to the appropriate line in the source code, by double-clicking on any error gcc spits in the NppExec console during compilation.
I'm trying to code to refresh my memory preparing myself for a course.
int main(){
int x;
for( x = 0;x < 10; x++){
printf("Hello world\n");
}
return 0;
}
But when I tried to run this I get Too few arguments
I compiled the code above using gcc -o repeat file.c Then to run this I just type repeat
Sorry if this was a stupid question, it has been a while since I took the introduction class.
When you type
filename
at a prompt, your OS searches the path. By default, Linux doesn't include the current directory in the path, so you end up running something like /bin/filename, which complains because it wants arguments. To find out what file you actually ran, try
which filename
To run the filename file gcc created in the working directory, use
./filename
Your code compiles fine. Try:
gcc -o helloworld file.c
./helloworld
UPDATE :
Based on more recent comments, the problem is that the executable is named repeat, and you're using csh or tcsh, so repeat is a built-in command.
Type ./repeat rather than repeat.
And when asking questions, don't omit details like that; copy-and-paste your source code, any commands you typed, and any messages you received.
The executable is named file, which is also a command.
To run your own program, type
./file
EDIT :
The above was an educated guess, based on the assumption that:
The actual compilation command was gcc file.c -o file or gcc -o file file.c; and
The predefined file command (man file for information) would produce that error message if you invoke it without arguments.
The question originally said that the compilation command was gcc file.c; now it says gcc -o filename file.c. (And the file command prints a different error message if you run it without arguments).
The correct way to do this is:
gcc file.c -o filename && ./filename
(I'd usually call the executable file to match the name of the source file, but you can do it either way.)
The gcc command, if it succeeds, gives you an executable file in your current directory named filename. The && says to execute the second command only if the first one succeeds (no point in trying to run your program if it didn't compile). ./filename explicitly says to run the filename executable that's in the current directory (.); otherwise it will search your $PATH for it.
If you get an error message Too few arguments, it's not coming from your program; you won't see that message unless something prints it explicitly. The explanation must be that you're running some other program. Perhaps there's already a command on your system called filename.
So try doing this:
gcc file.c -o filename && ./filename
and see what happens; it should run your program. If that works, try typing just
filename
and see what that does. If that doesn't run your program, then type
type -a filename
or
which filename
to see what you're actually executing.
And just to avoid situations like this, cultivate the habit of using ./whatever to execute a program in the current directory.
hello everyone
i try to debug a program, which have been installed by makefile.
it have a binary file of OpenDPI_demo.o and a shell shellscript OpenDPI_demo.
when i gdb OpenDPI_demo.o,i have a problem. i can't run it. the error is:
Starting program: /home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi/src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/OpenDPI_demo.o
/bin/bash: /home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi/src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/OpenDPI_demo.o：can't execute the binary file.
please tell me why. actually i can run the program by ./OpenDPI_demo.
thank you.
Based on the extension, the file is an object file. It is used by the linker (alongside other object files) to produce an executable. It's the real executable the one you want to run/debug.
This is another example of difficulties encountered with programs using libtool.
the file OpenDPI_demo alongside OpenDPI_demo.o is actually, as you said, a shell script which wraps the execution of the real compiled file, probably in .libs/OpenDPI_demo.
libtool needs this wrapper to adjust the runtime library paths and such so that you can execute the program transparently, as if it was actually installed on your system.
The way to correctly debug this application is not
/home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi $ gdb src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/.libs/OpenDPI_demo
but rather using libtool --mode=execute on the shell script, like the following (it's an example):
/home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi $ ./libtool --mode=execute gdb --args \
src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/OpenDPI_demo -f capture.pcap
Suggest you use
gdb OpenDPI_demo
instead
In your makefile if it depens on the object, make it depend on OpenDPI_demo, e.g.