Having issues running gatsby build with gatsby-starter-wordpress-advanced theme:
Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'C:\Users\Tobias\Desktop\Gatsby\gatsby-starter-wordpress-advanced\.template-cache\tmp-\.js'"
I figured this might be a problem with the path. The path should rather look like:
writing tmp-new-page/ template: open '.template-cache/tmp-new-page.js'
See repo: https://github.com/henrikwirth/gatsby-starter-wordpress-advanced/blob/master/create/utils.js
Line 53 you find the function createPageWithTemplate. I've tried console.log(page.uri) to see what's going on. It outputs the filename correctly. I've also tried with gatsby clean to clear the cache. It seems to be some kind of backslash issue where the path comes with a \ .js at the end instead of sample-page.js:
no such file or directory, open 'C:\Users\Tobias\Desktop\Gatsby\gatsby-starter-wordpress-advanced\.template-cache\sample-page\.js'
The issue have been resolved. The problem was related to update in WPGraphQL WordPress plugin. Had to update the paths, because the page.uri is different in the newer versions of WPGraphQL. Before it was just: some-page now it is /some-page/.
Secondly in the page template creation process the theme was using the uri, therefore, this messed up the paths for the template files. This has been switched to page.slug instead now and some extra checks, to make sure the frontPage is not ending up producing a wrong path.
The master branch of the starter theme have been updated.
Related
I'm really a newbie in front-end development. I'm currently involved in a project that does front-end development. I hope I can explain this clearly.
Whenever I call http://localhost:8080/test, it is loaded by page1.jsp.
Now I would like to load a TSX file instead of a JSP. I tried changing my <welcome-file> from page1.jsp to html/js/page2.tsx in web.xml but I don't know why it is not working.
What happened is that a download file window will pop up instead of loading http://localhost:8080/test.
I placed the TSX file in the html/js directory because that's where the package for Typescript and React is located. By the way, the TSX file I'm talking about is a React component that uses Typescript.
Is it possible to configure the web.xml to render the TSX file? If not, is there any other way for me to load it?
Is web.xml still important if I want to load a TSX file?
No, for several reasons:
A .jsp is a "Java server page". You are probably running an application server like Tomcat (I haven't done that in fifteen years or so, so bear with me). It is compiled into a Servlet, which then runs to produce your page as output. Your .tsx file doesn't fit in that process.
Your application server probably has a directory somewhere where you can put static files that don't need to be run on the server side; see if you have a "WebContent" directory or so. In it you can place pure HTML files, Javascript files, fixed images and so on.
But if you put your TSX file there, your browser still won't be able to use it: browsers don't understand Typescript. Typescript needs to be compiled into Javascript, and if you put the resulting .js file there, then a HTML file could use it (with a tag), and that would work.
But your file isn't only Typescript, it's a tsx -- it probably also contains JSX, which also needs to be translated to Javascript.
There are also dependencies, like React, that you'll also need to download in your HTML.
On the whole this is what a bundler like Webpack is for (if you used create-react-app, for instance, you'll get a working Webpack configuration from the start). It can create a "bundle.js" containing all the Javascript needed in one file, including all the dependencies and all your TSX code compiled to Javascript.
Place that in a WebContent or similar directory, call that from a tag in some HTML file -- and you'll hopefully get a nice error message in the console that'll lead you to the first thing I forgot to mention :-)
This is an XY problem; answering any part would do.
X: I want to generate multiple bundles out of a single source tree. I'm aware of webpack supporting this, but I'm afraid, I can't use it. For example, my Router gets fed by one or more maps mapping a route (string) to a page (component). I'm storing these maps in separate files and comment importing and using them out as needed (I wrote a simple script doing this for me).
Is there a better solution?
Y: So when building the admin bundle, the user pages are not reachable from the index.tsx. Nonetheless, I'm getting typescript errors for them. The same happens even when I create a new unused file containing an error.
How can I avoid compiling unused files?
I'm not posting here all my config files as I hope, there's a simple setting for this somewhere. I'll do it when needed. Alone the list makes me depressed:
.babelrc
.env
.eslintrc
.gitignore
config-overrides.js
package.json
tsconfig.json
tslint-imports.json
This is a partial answer, but hopefully it will take you in the right direction. Typescript looks at tsconfig.json. Assuming your initiation is from an npm script, you can specify which tsconfig to use with the --project flag, like tsc --project tsconfig-1.json.
In your tsconfig.json file, only include the entry file, like
include: [
"src/app/index.ts"
]
If you have something like "src/**/*", then it will process all files. But it you specify only the entry file, then it will process only the files in that import tree. The tree is defined by the import/import() statements.
For reference: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/tsconfig-json.html
If you want to create multiple bundles, then you'll need to run multiple npm scripts and have multiple tsconfig files or else specify the files from the command line.
I am currently looking into React, React-habitat, and Webpack.
My question is does Webpack also bundle the index.html file where I reference the bundle or is this kept separate? Is it possible to exclude this without specifically stating this in the Webpack config file?
this is the current structure am envisioning.
https://imgur.com/a/98or9
I know that all the dependencies found in my entry file for Webpack are bundled. The reason I would like to know this is because I am doing some research on how a CMS can be built around the three topics I mentioned above. I need to know if the index.html file is also bundled or not because I would like to edit the original index file(if it is not bundled) instead of repackaging everything for every change.
Hope someone understands what am looking for.
I am new to meteor + angular and i am learning this from http://www.angular-meteor.com/
When i reach 3-way data binding section and create folder called collections in socially folder and create file called parties.ts it is giving me error i write following two lines in that file.
import {Mongo} from 'meteor/mongo';
export let Parties = new Mongo.Collection('parties');
here is the error log.
C:\<user>\AppData\Local\.meteor\packages\meteor-tool\1.3.2_4\mt-os.windows.x86_32\dev_bundle\server-lib\node_modules\fibers\future.js:245
throw(ex);
^
Error: A method named '/parties/insert' is already defined
at packages/ddp-server/livedata_server.js:1548:15
at Function._.each._.forEach (packages/underscore/underscore.js:113:1)
at Server.methods (packages/ddp-server/livedata_server.js:1544:7)
at packages/allow-deny/allow-deny.js:191:24
at [object Object].CollectionPrototype._defineMutationMethods (packages/allow-deny/allow-deny.js:190:5)
at new Mongo.Collection (packages/mongo/collection.js:226:8)
at meteorInstall.collections.parties.js (collections/parties.ts:2:22)
at fileEvaluate (packages/modules-runtime/.npm/package/node_modules/install/install.js:141:1)
at require (packages/modules-runtime/.npm/package/node_modules/install/install.js:75:1)
at collections/parties.ts:2:54
Exited with code: 8
Your application is crashing. Waiting for file change.
I hope i will get help from this community. Thanks.
I had the same problem and successfully fixed it. I was also using Atom with the Atom TypeScript plugin, which was automatically compiling the TypeScript files to JavaScript separate from Meteor and creating unnecessary files.
Here are the steps that I took to fix the problem:
Check your tsconfig.json file and make sure it has these lines (add or change them if necessary):
"buildOnSave": false,
"compileOnSave": false,
Close and restart Atom to make sure the Atom TypeScript plugin uses the new settings and stops automatically compiling TypeScript to JavaScript on save.
Delete all *.js and *.map files in your "client", "server", and "both" directories.
Stop your Meteor instance if it is currently running (probably "ctrl-c" or "command-c", depending on your OS).
Run "meteor reset" on the command line.
Run "meteor" on the command line to recompile your TypeScript files and restart Meteor.
After that, everything worked fine for me.
Problem could be sometime type script might not be compiled properly into js. Try deleting js file in that folder , edit your typescript file and save. Next recompilation should remove this error.
I have the same error. Did you ever figure it out?
I ended up solving my issue and I had to add "compileOnSave": false" to my tsconfig file. I'm using Atom and it was automatically compiling.
By default (in project's grunt file) the templates.js file located in .tmp directory (generator-backbone), so am I missing something or this feature just don't work out of the box and I need to put additional paths in require.config?
Obviously if I will not add anything the JST will not be defined, right?
Note that I initiated the projects with Handlebars as the templating framework.
Ah - sorry for trashing SO. Obviously I've messed up paths in my Grunt.js.
Only .tmp/scripts directory is mounted and I've added app to the path additionally, so the files was not served at all.