we're curruntly working on a C project and we've downloaded and used the header dirent.h, the problem is the code was compiled successfully on my teammate laptop but in mine it doesn't compile, telling me this :
In file included from utils.c:6:0:
dirent.h: In function '_wopendir':
dirent.h:383:28: error: missing binary operator before token "("
#if WINAPI_FAMILY_PARTITION(WINAPI_PARTITION_DESKTOP)
^
dirent.h:405:28: error: missing binary operator before token "("
#if WINAPI_FAMILY_PARTITION(WINAPI_PARTITION_DESKTOP)
^
dirent.h:413:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'wcsncpy_s' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
wcsncpy_s (dirp->patt, n+1, dirname, n);
^
I searched for the problem and find that it's a preproccessor error and currently on the #if
i've tried to add #define WINAPI_FAMILY_PARTITION(Partitions) but it doesn't work.
Please suggest me a solution to compile it successfully, and does the windows version affect on preprocessing?
WINAPI_FAMILY_PARTITION is defined in <winapifamily.h>, probably included by <windows.h>. Look at this question for more explanations, but windows intricacies are largely irrelevant for your compilation issue. You might want include <windows.h> before <dirent.h>?
You did not publish the source code for your program, nor did you specify what OS you compile for not what compiler you use, but you mention we've downloaded and used the header dirent.h... This sounds wrong: system include files such as <dirent.h> are automatically installed with the compiler, they are specific to the OS and compiler, you cannot just download one from the net and expect it to work on your system. It might work by chance on your teammate's PC because the OS might be different.
Related
I am trying to compile a glib application in windows 10, but i keep getting this error:
In file included from C:\Users\DamŔa\Desktop\C\glib-2.0/glibconfig.h:9,
from C:\Users\DamŔa\Desktop\C\glib-2.0/glib/gtypes.h:32,
from C:\Users\DamŔa\Desktop\C\glib-2.0/glib/galloca.h:32,
from C:\Users\DamŔa\Desktop\C\glib-2.0/glib.h:30,
from main.c:3:
C:\Users\DamŔa\Desktop\C\glib-2.0/glib/gtypes.h: In function '_GLIB_CHECKED_ADD_U64':
C:\Users\DamŔa\Desktop\C\glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:818:31: error: static assertion failed: "Expression evaluates to false"
#define G_STATIC_ASSERT(expr) _Static_assert (expr, "Expression evaluates to false")
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C:\Users\DamŔa\Desktop\C\glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:818:31: note: in definition of macro 'G_STATIC_ASSERT'
#define G_STATIC_ASSERT(expr) _Static_assert (expr, "Expression evaluates to false")
while trying to compile it with this command:
gcc -I"C:\Users\Damča\Desktop\C\glib-2.0" main.c
I did some research and found out that it could be because i am not using pkg-config, but it doesn't work on windows, because it cant find the file glib-2.0.pc.
so, how can i compile it withnout pkg-config? or how do i make it work on windows?
The GLib source code for Linux won't work for Windows. Use the Windows version and try again. Set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH to the .pc file
I am attempting to build a project that comes with an automake/autoconf build system. This is a well-used project, so I'm skeptical about a problem with the configure scripts, makefiles, or code as I received them. It is likely some kind of environment, path, flag, etc problem - something on my end with simply running the right commands with the right parameters.
The configuration step seems to complete in a satisfactory way. When I run make, I'm shown a set of errors primarily of these types:
error: ‘TRUE’ undeclared here (not in a function)
error: ‘struct work’ has no member named ‘version’
error: expected ‘)’ before ‘PRIu64’
Let's focus on the last one, which I have spent time researching - and I suspect all the errors are related to missing definitions. Apparently the print-friendly extended definitions from the C standard library header file inttypes.h is not being found. However, in the configure step everything is claimed to be in order:
configure:4930: checking for inttypes.h
configure:4930: /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5
configure:4930: $? = 0
configure:4930: result: yes
All the INTTYPES flags are set correctly if I look in confdefs.h, config.h, config.log Output Variables, etc:
HAVE_INTTYPES_H='1'
#define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
The problem is the same whether doing a native build, or cross-compiling (for arm-linux-gnueabihf, aka armhf).
The source .c file in question does have config.h included as you'd expect, which by my understanding via the m4 macros mechanic should be adding an
#include <inttypes.h>
line. Yes, as you may be inclined to ask, if I enter this line myself into the .c file it appears to work and the PRIu64 errors go away.
I'm left with wondering how to debug this type of problem - essentially, everything I am aware of tells me I've done the configure properly, but I'm left with a bogus make process. Aside from trying every ./configure tweak and trick I can find, I've started looking at the auto-generated Makefile.in itself, but nothing so far. Also looking into how I can get the C pre-processor to tell me which header files it's actually inserting.
EDIT: I've confirmed that the -DHAVE_CONFIG_H mechanic looks good through configure, config.log, Makefile, etc.
autoconf does not automatically produce #include directives. You need to do that on your own based on the HAVE_* macros. So you'll have to add something like this:
#ifdef HAVE_INTTYPES_H
# include <inttypes.h>
#endif
If these lines show up in confdefs.h, a temporary header file used by configure scripts, this does excuse your application from performing these #includes. If configure writes them to confdefs.h, this is solely for the benefit of other configure tests, and not for application use.
First, run make -n for the target that failed. This is probably some .o file; you may need some tweaking to get its path correctly.
Now you have the command used to compile your file. If you don't find the problem by meditating on this command, try to run it, adding the -E to force preprocessor output text instead of invoking the compiler.
Note that now the .o file will be text, and you must rebuild it without -E later.
You may find some preprocessor flags useful to get more details: -dM or -dD, or others.
I am using Visual studio 2010 for building C project. My project contains a number of header files,source file and parsers. It uses lex and bason files. I am getting a single error during the compilation and íé the following
abc.y:error C2065: 'INPUT' : undeclared identifier
I tried the solutions I am getting like including
#define WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0501
in my main.c file before the inclusion of any of the header files.I am not able to get rid of this error. Could you please let me know what Can be the reasons for this error?
EDIT
The snippet of code that is showing error is:
list_Cons(0, list_List((POINTER)INPUT)
The surprising thing is that If i alter INPUT into INPUT1, I get the same error. It is stoic to change.
Presumably you read this and this.
#define WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0501 wont work. You should try using #define WIN32_WINNT 0x0501 instead.
Also, check that you are actually #including winuser.h
A C++ compiler cannot process a *.y file. For that you need a yacc / bison program, which does not come included with Visual Studio 2010.
For myself I use CMake which can generate MSVC projects along with other build types. You can tell it that a .y needs to be processed outwith the C/C++ files and it will instruct MSVC to invoke whatever external tools are necessary to preprocess the non-C/C++ parts.
I have been trying to compile netcat.c on AIX for some time (using the command make aix), but the compiler gives me some weird feedback such as :
"netcat.c", line 117.12: 1506-275 (S) Unexpected text 'int' encountered.
when checked the file netcat.c at line 117, I would find the line (second line in code below):
#ifdef HAVE_BIND
extern int h_errno;
/* stolen almost wholesale from bsd herror.c */
even if I changed the int into char for the same of testing, save the file and re-run the command I get the same error
am I missing something in reading the error code?
If you're using xlc (especially older ones), it's normally caused by declarations after statements, something like:
i = i + 1;
int x;
You probably need to give us a little more context, such as 10 or so lines before the error line.
My advice would be to get gcc running on that box if you are using an older xlc. IBM makes some fine compilers now but the earlier ones weren't so crash hot (in my opinion).
When innocent-looking code produces bizarre errors, try running the code through the C preprocessor stage, and looking at it then. Sometimes macros do very funny things.
Also note that a problem on an earlier line (missing semicolon, etc.) might produce an error message on a later line.
The post maybe already a little outdated, but just in case someone else comes along with the same problem ...
Here (AIX 7.1) h_errno is defined as macro in netdb.h.
/usr/include/netdb.h:#define h_errno (*(int *)h_errno_which())
Therefore the declaration in netcat.c line 117 does not work.
I just changed the line into
#ifndef h_errno
extern int h_errno;
#endif
and the compilation worked smoothly.
#A.Rashad, I moved the HAVE_BIND #ifdef block from line 117 to line 30 which is just under the #include "generic.h" declaration. This permitted the xlc to compile it. The (S)yntax error messages are gone and while there are some (W)arning messages, I do get an nc binary at the end!
hth,
Kevin
Im trying to compile z/lib on z/OS USS(thats right a mainframe). ive got gmake and the c89 compiler (which im assuming is c89 standards compliant) and USS is supposed to be POSIX compliant.
But zlib seems to be tripping up on
struct internal_state FAR *state; /* not visible by applications */
with the following error(s)
c89 -O3 -DUSE_MMAP -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1 -D_POSIX_SOURCE -c -o example.o example.c
ERROR CCN3277 ./zlib.h:92 Syntax error: possible missing ';' or ','?
ERROR CCN3007 ./zlib.h:92 "struct internal_state" is undefined.
ERROR CCN3166 ./zlib.h:103 Definition of function FAR requires parentheses.
ERROR CCN3276 ./zlib.h:103 Syntax error: possible missing '{'?
ERROR CCN3273 ./zlib.h:124 Missing type in declaration of gz_header.
ERROR CCN3166 ./zlib.h:126 Definition of function gz_header requires parentheses.
ERROR CCN3276 ./zlib.h:126 Syntax error: possible missing '{'?
WARNING CCN3137 ./zlib.h:1346 Declaration must declare at least one declarator, tag, or the members of an enumeration.
ERROR CCN3275 ./zlib.h:1350 Unexpected text z encountered.
ERROR CCN3282 ./zlib.h:1350 The type of the parameters must be specified in a prototype.
ERROR CCN3275 ./example.c:95 Unexpected text file encountered.
ERROR CCN3045 ./example.c:95 Undeclared identifier gzFile.
ERROR CCN3046 ./example.c:96 Syntax error.
ERROR CCN3045 ./example.c:98 Undeclared identifier file.
ERROR CCN3019 ./example.c:523 Expecting an array or a pointer to object type.
ERROR CCN3280 ./example.c:527 Function argument assignment between types "const char*" and "int" is not allowed.
CCN0793(I) Compilation failed for file ./example.c. Object file not created.
FSUM3065 The COMPILE step ended with return code 12.
FSUM3017 Could not compile example.c. Correct the errors and try again.
gmake: *** [example.o] Error 3
when i progressively take out the FAR * (i think its a far pointer but im really not that sure) the errors go away. But as this is a library, im not sure what other artifacts are going to be produced by removing this.
has anybody got any ideas?
any old mainframe heads out there?
it turns out there is a previous version of zlib that compiles on USS, version 1.1.4 or close to that. Its a back level, but i presume this works because it is before the implementation of the FAR pointer in the latest code. So atm i think ive got it to work.
thanks for all your help.
Regards
Mark.
FAR is not a C89 keyword, it is a Microsoft/Intelism and is probably #defined somewhere. If not, you need to define it as nothing:
#define FAR
However, this will probably only fix one of many problems. I would guess that the library uses some form of conditional compilation to handle things like FAR pointers - you need to read the docs to find which configuration is most suitabkle for your platform.
I'd use xlc instead of c89 since xlc is your system default compiler but you'll still probably have issues. I'd subscribe to the MVS-OE email list, the people on it are quite helpful. The link to info about the list appears to be down now so send email to
LISTSERV#VM.MARIST.EDU
with the message: INFO MVS-OE
FWIW, IBM provides a prebuilt version of zlib that includes support for the compression hardware (so-called zEDC) available on recent-vintage mainframes. See zlib for zEnterprise Data Compression