I am building this project to try and improve my understanding of react :), so I am a n00b and therefore still learning the ropes of extracting components, states, props etc =)
I have a child Component DescriptionDiv, its parent component is PlusContent and finally the parent component is PlusContentHolder. The user types some input into the DescriptionDiv which then, using a props/callback passes the user input to the PlusContent.
My question/problem is: after setting useState() in the PlusContent component, I am after a button click in the PlusContentHolder component, returned with an undefined in the console.log.
How come I cannot read the useState() in the next parent component, the PlusContentHolder?
I know that useState() is async so you cannot straight up call the value of the state in the PlusContent component, but shouldn't the state value be available in the PlusContentHolder component?
below is my code for the DescriptionDiv
import './DescriptionDiv.css';
const DescriptionDiv = props => {
const onDescriptionChangeHandler = (event) => {
props.descriptionPointer(event.target.value);
}
return (
<div className='description'>
<label>
<p>Description:</p>
<input onChange={onDescriptionChangeHandler} type='text'></input>
</label>
</div>);
}
export default DescriptionDiv;
Next the code for the PlusContent comp
import React, { useState } from "react";
import DescriptionDiv from "./div/DescriptionDiv";
import ImgDiv from "./div/ImgDiv";
import "./PlusContent.css";
import OrientationDiv from "./div/OrientationDiv";
const PlusContent = (props) => {
const [classes, setClasses] = useState("half");
const [content, setContent] = useState();
const [plusContent, setPlusContent] = useState({
orientation: "left",
img: "",
description: "",
});
const onOrientationChangeHandler = (orientationContent) => {
if (orientationContent == "left") {
setClasses("half left");
}
if (orientationContent == "right") {
setClasses("half right");
}
if (orientationContent == "center") {
setClasses("half center");
}
props.orientationInfo(orientationContent);
};
const onDescriptionContentHandler = (descriptionContent) => {
props.descriptionInfo(setPlusContent(descriptionContent));
console.log(descriptionContent)
};
const onImageChangeHandler = (imageContent) => {
props.imageInfo(imageContent);
setContent(
<>
<OrientationDiv
orientationPointer={onOrientationChangeHandler}
orientationName={props.orientationName}
/> {/*
<AltDiv altPointer={onAltDivContentHandler} />
<TitleDiv titlePointer={onTitleDivContentHandler} /> */}
<DescriptionDiv descriptionPointer={onDescriptionContentHandler} />
</>
);
};
return (
<div className={classes}>
<ImgDiv imageChangeExecutor={onImageChangeHandler} />
{content}
</div>
);
};
export default PlusContent;
and lastly the PlusContentHolder
import PlusContent from "../PlusContent";
import React, { useState } from "react";
const PlusContentHolder = (props) => {
const onClickHandler = (t) => {
t.preventDefault();
descriptionInfoHandler();
};
const descriptionInfoHandler = (x) => {
console.log(x) // this console.log(x) returns and undefined
};
return (
<div>
{props.contentAmountPointer.map((content) => (
<PlusContent
orientationInfo={orientationInfoHandler}
imageInfo={imageInfoHandler}
descriptionInfo={descriptionInfoHandler}
key={content}
orientationName={content}
/>
))}
<button onClick={onClickHandler}>Generate Plus Content</button>
</div>
);
};
export default PlusContentHolder;
The reason why the descriptionInfoHandler() function call prints undefined in its console.log() statement when you click the button, is because you never provide an argument to it when you call it from the onClickHandler function.
I think that it will print the description when you type it, however. And I believe the problem is that you need to save the state in the PlusContentHolder module as well.
I would probably add a const [content, setContent] = useState() in the PlusContentHolder component, and make sure to call setContent(x) in the descriptionInfoHandler function in PlusContentHolder.
Otherwise, the state will not be present in the PlusContentHolder component when you click the button.
You need to only maintain a single state in the PlusContentHolder for orientation.
Here's a sample implementation of your use case
import React, { useState } from 'react';
const PlusContentHolder = () => {
const [orientatation, setOrientation] = useState('');
const orientationInfoHandler = (x) => {
setOrientation(x);
};
const generateOrientation = () => {
console.log('orientatation', orientatation);
};
return (
<>
<PlusContent orientationInfo={orientationInfoHandler} />
<button onClick={generateOrientation}>generate</button>
</>
);
};
const PlusContent = ({ orientationInfo }) => {
const onDescriptionContentHandler = (value) => {
// your custom implementation here,
orientationInfo(value);
};
return <DescriptionDiv descriptionPointer={onDescriptionContentHandler} />;
};
const DescriptionDiv = ({ descriptionPointer }) => {
const handleChange = (e) => {
descriptionPointer(e.target.value);
};
return <input type="text" onChange={handleChange} />;
};
I would suggest to maintain the orientation in redux so that its easier to update from the application.
SetState functions do not return anything. In the code below, you're passing undefined to props.descriptionInfo
const onDescriptionContentHandler = (descriptionContent) => {
props.descriptionInfo(setPlusContent(descriptionContent));
};
This shows a misunderstanding of the use of state. Make sure you're reading about "lifting state" in the docs.
You're also declaring needless functions, e.g. onDescriptionContentHandler in your PlusContent. The PlusContent component could just pass the descriptionInfoHandler from PlusContentHolder prop directly down to DescriptionDiv, since onDescriptionContentHandler doesn't do anything except invoke descriptionInfoHandler.
You may want to consider restructuring your app so plusContent state is maintained in PlusContentHolder, and pass that state down as props. That state would get updated when DescriptionDiv invokes descriptionInfoHandler. It'd subsequently pass the updated state down as props to PlusContent.
See my suggested flowchart.
I am getting this warning in react:
index.js:1 Warning: Cannot update a component (`ConnectFunction`)
while rendering a different component (`Register`). To locate the
bad setState() call inside `Register`
I went to the locations indicated in the stack trace and removed all setstates but the warning still persists. Is it possible this could occur from redux dispatch?
my code:
register.js
class Register extends Component {
render() {
if( this.props.registerStatus === SUCCESS) {
// Reset register status to allow return to register page
this.props.dispatch( resetRegisterStatus()) # THIS IS THE LINE THAT CAUSES THE ERROR ACCORDING TO THE STACK TRACE
return <Redirect push to = {HOME}/>
}
return (
<div style = {{paddingTop: "180px", background: 'radial-gradient(circle, rgba(106,103,103,1) 0%, rgba(36,36,36,1) 100%)', height: "100vh"}}>
<RegistrationForm/>
</div>
);
}
}
function mapStateToProps( state ) {
return {
registerStatus: state.userReducer.registerStatus
}
}
export default connect ( mapStateToProps ) ( Register );
function which triggers the warning in my registerForm component called by register.js
handleSubmit = async () => {
if( this.isValidForm() ) {
const details = {
"username": this.state.username,
"password": this.state.password,
"email": this.state.email,
"clearance": this.state.clearance
}
await this.props.dispatch( register(details) )
if( this.props.registerStatus !== SUCCESS && this.mounted ) {
this.setState( {errorMsg: this.props.registerError})
this.handleShowError()
}
}
else {
if( this.mounted ) {
this.setState( {errorMsg: "Error - registration credentials are invalid!"} )
this.handleShowError()
}
}
}
Stacktrace:
This warning was introduced since React V16.3.0.
If you are using functional components you could wrap the setState call into useEffect.
Code that does not work:
const HomePage = (props) => {
props.setAuthenticated(true);
const handleChange = (e) => {
props.setSearchTerm(e.target.value.toLowerCase());
};
return (
<div key={props.restInfo.storeId} className="container-fluid">
<ProductList searchResults={props.searchResults} />
</div>
);
};
Now you can change it to:
const HomePage = (props) => {
// trigger on component mount
useEffect(() => {
props.setAuthenticated(true);
}, []);
const handleChange = (e) => {
props.setSearchTerm(e.target.value.toLowerCase());
};
return (
<div key={props.restInfo.storeId} className="container-fluid">
<ProductList searchResults={props.searchResults} />
</div>
);
};
I just had this issue and it took me a bit of digging around before I realised what I'd done wrong – I just wasn't paying attention to how I was writing my functional component.
I was doing this:
const LiveMatches = (props: LiveMatchesProps) => {
const {
dateMatches,
draftingConfig,
sportId,
getDateMatches,
} = props;
if (!dateMatches) {
const date = new Date();
getDateMatches({ sportId, date });
};
return (<div>{component stuff here..}</div>);
};
I had just forgotten to use useEffect before dispatching my redux call of getDateMatches()
So it should have been:
const LiveMatches = (props: LiveMatchesProps) => {
const {
dateMatches,
draftingConfig,
sportId,
getDateMatches,
} = props;
useEffect(() => {
if (!dateMatches) {
const date = new Date();
getDateMatches({ sportId, date });
}
}, [dateMatches, getDateMatches, sportId]);
return (<div>{component stuff here..}</div>);
};
please read the error message thoroughly, mine was pointing to SignIn Component that had a bad setState. which when i examined, I had an onpress that was not an Arrow function.
it was like this:
onPress={navigation.navigate("Home", { screen: "HomeScreen" })}
I changed it to this:
onPress={() => navigation.navigate("Home", { screen: "HomeScreen" }) }
My error message was:
Warning: Cannot update a component
(ForwardRef(BaseNavigationContainer)) while rendering a different
component (SignIn). To locate the bad setState() call inside
SignIn, follow the stack trace as described in
https://reactjs.org/link/setstate-in-render
in SignIn (at SignInScreen.tsx:20)
I fixed this issue by removing the dispatch from the register components render method to the componentwillunmount method. This is because I wanted this logic to occur right before redirecting to the login page. In general it's best practice to put all your logic outside the render method so my code was just poorly written before. Hope this helps anyone else in future :)
My refactored register component:
class Register extends Component {
componentWillUnmount() {
// Reset register status to allow return to register page
if ( this.props.registerStatus !== "" ) this.props.dispatch( resetRegisterStatus() )
}
render() {
if( this.props.registerStatus === SUCCESS ) {
return <Redirect push to = {LOGIN}/>
}
return (
<div style = {{paddingTop: "180px", background: 'radial-gradient(circle, rgba(106,103,103,1) 0%, rgba(36,36,36,1) 100%)', height: "100vh"}}>
<RegistrationForm/>
</div>
);
}
}
I think that this is important.
It's from this post that #Red-Baron pointed out:
#machineghost : I think you're misunderstanding what the message is warning about.
There's nothing wrong with passing callbacks to children that update state in parents. That's always been fine.
The problem is when one component queues an update in another component, while the first component is rendering.
In other words, don't do this:
function SomeChildComponent(props) {
props.updateSomething();
return <div />
}
But this is fine:
function SomeChildComponent(props) {
// or make a callback click handler and call it in there
return <button onClick={props.updateSomething}>Click Me</button>
}
And, as Dan has pointed out various times, queuing an update in the same component while rendering is fine too:
function SomeChildComponent(props) {
const [number, setNumber] = useState(0);
if(props.someValue > 10 && number < 5) {
// queue an update while rendering, equivalent to getDerivedStateFromProps
setNumber(42);
}
return <div>{number}</div>
}
If useEffect cannot be used in your case or if the error is NOT because of Redux
I used setTimeout to redirect one of the two useState variables to the callback queue.
I have one parent and one child component with useState variable in each of them. The solution is to wrap useState variable using setTimeout:
setTimeout(() => SetFilterData(data), 0);
Example below
Parent Component
import ExpenseFilter from '../ExpensesFilter'
function ExpensesView(props) {
const [filterData, SetFilterData] = useState('')
const GetFilterData = (data) => {
// SetFilterData(data);
//*****WRAP useState VARIABLE INSIDE setTimeout WITH 0 TIME AS BELOW.*****
setTimeout(() => SetFilterData(data), 0);
}
const filteredArray = props.expense.filter(expenseFiltered =>
expenseFiltered.dateSpent.getFullYear().toString() === filterData);
return (
<Window>
<div>
<ExpenseFilter FilterYear = {GetFilterData}></ExpenseFilter>
Child Component
const ExpensesFilter = (props) => {
const [filterYear, SetFilterYear] = useState('2022')
const FilterYearListener = (event) => {
event.preventDefault()
SetFilterYear(event.target.value)
}
props.FilterYear(filterYear)
return (
Using React and Material UI (MUI)
I changed my code from:
<IconButton onClick={setOpenDeleteDialog(false)}>
<Close />
</IconButton>
To:
<IconButton onClick={() => setOpenDeleteDialog(false)}>
<Close />
</IconButton>
Simple fix
If you use React Navigation and you are using the setParams or setOptions you must put these inside method componentDidMount() of class components or in useEffects() hook of functional components.
Minimal reproducing example
I was a bit confused as to what exactly triggers the problem, having a minimal immediately runnable example helped me grasp it a little better:
index.html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#17/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#17/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/#babel/standalone#7.14.7/babel.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="root"></div>
<script type="text/babel">
function NotMain(props) {
props.setN(1)
return <div>NotMain</div>
}
function Main(props) {
const [n, setN] = React.useState(0)
return <>
<NotMain setN={setN} />
<div>Main {n}</div>
</>
}
ReactDOM.render(
<Main/>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
</script>
</body>
</html>
fails with error:
react-dom.development.js:61 Warning: Cannot update a component (`Main`) while rendering a different component (`NotMain`). To locate the bad setState() call inside `NotMain`, follow the stack trace as described in https://reactjs.org/link/setstate-in-render
followed by a stack trace:
at NotMain (<anonymous>:16:9)
at Main (<anonymous>:21:31)
Presumably 16:9 would be the exact line where props.setN(1) is being called from, but the line numbers are a bit messed up because of the Babel JSX translation.
The solution like many other answers said is to do instead:
function NotMain(props) {
React.useEffect(() => { props.setN(1) }, [])
return <div>NotMain</div>
}
Intuitively, I think that the general idea of why this error happens is that:
You are not supposed to updat state from render methods, otherwise it could lead to different results depending on internal the ordering of how React renders things.
and when using functional components, the way to do that is to use hooks. In our case, useEffect will run after rendering is done, so we are fine doing that from there.
When using classes this becomes slightly more clear and had been asked for example at:
Calling setState in render is not avoidable
Calling setState() in React from render method
When using functional components however, things are conceptually a bit more mixed, as the component function is both the render, and the code that sets up the callbacks.
I was facing same issue, The fix worked for me was if u are doing
setParams/setOptions
outside of useEffect then this issue is occurring. So try to do such things inside useEffect. It'll work like charm
TL;DR;
For my case, what I did to fix the warning was to change from useState to useRef
react_devtools_backend.js:2574 Warning: Cannot update a component (`Index`) while rendering a different component (`Router.Consumer`). To locate the bad setState() call inside `Router.Consumer`, follow the stack trace as described in https://reactjs.org/link/setstate-in-render
at Route (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:126692:29)
at Index (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:144246:25)
at Switch (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:126894:29)
at Suspense
at App
at AuthProvider (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:144525:23)
at ErrorBoundary (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:21030:87)
at Router (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:126327:30)
at BrowserRouter (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:125948:35)
at QueryClientProvider (http://localhost:3000/main.bundle.js:124450:21)
The full code for the context of what I did (changed from the lines with // OLD: to the line above them). However this doesn't matter, just try changing from useState to useRef!!
import { HOME_PATH, LOGIN_PATH } from '#/constants';
import { NotFoundComponent } from '#/routes';
import React from 'react';
import { Redirect, Route, RouteProps } from 'react-router-dom';
import { useAccess } from '#/access';
import { useAuthContext } from '#/contexts/AuthContext';
import { AccessLevel } from '#/models';
type Props = RouteProps & {
component: Exclude<RouteProps['component'], undefined>;
requireAccess: AccessLevel | undefined;
};
export const Index: React.FC<Props> = (props) => {
const { component: Component, requireAccess, ...rest } = props;
const { isLoading, isAuth } = useAuthContext();
const access = useAccess();
const mounted = React.useRef(false);
// OLD: const [mounted, setMounted] = React.useState(false);
return (
<Route
{...rest}
render={(props) => {
// If in indentifying authentication state as the page initially loads, render a blank page
if (!mounted.current && isLoading) return null;
// OLD: if (!mounted && isLoading) return null;
// 1. Check Authentication is one step
if (!isAuth && window.location.pathname !== LOGIN_PATH)
return <Redirect to={LOGIN_PATH} />;
if (isAuth && window.location.pathname === LOGIN_PATH)
return <Redirect to={HOME_PATH} />;
// 2. Authorization is another
if (requireAccess && !access[requireAccess])
return <NotFoundComponent />;
mounted.current = true;
// OLD: setMounted(true);
return <Component {...props} />;
}}
/>
);
};
export default Index;
My example.
Code with that error:
<Form
initialValues={{ ...kgFormValues, dataflow: dataflows.length > 0 ? dataflows[0].df_tpl_key : "" }}
onSubmit={() => {}}
render={({values, dirtyFields }: any) => {
const kgFormValuesUpdated = {
proj_key: projectKey,
name: values.name,
description: values.description,
public: values.public,
dataflow: values.dataflow,
flavours: flavoursSelected,
skipOCR: values.skipOCR
};
if (!_.isEqual(kgFormValues, kgFormValuesUpdated)) {
setNewKgFormValues(kgFormValuesUpdated);
}
Working Code:
<Form
initialValues={{ ...kgFormValues, dataflow: dataflows.length > 0 ? dataflows[0].df_tpl_key : "" }}
onSubmit={() => {}}
render={({ values, dirtyFields }: any) => {
useEffect(() => {
const kgFormValuesUpdated = {
proj_key: projectKey,
name: values.name,
description: values.description,
public: values.public,
dataflow: values.dataflow,
flavours: flavoursSelected,
skipOCR: values.skipOCR
};
if (!_.isEqual(kgFormValues, kgFormValuesUpdated)) {
setNewKgFormValues(kgFormValuesUpdated);
}
}, [values]);
return (
I had the same problem. I was setting some state that was storing a function like so:
// my state definition
const [onConfirm, setOnConfirm] = useState<() => void>();
// then I used this piece of code to update the state
function show(onConfirm: () => void) {
setOnConfirm(onConfirm);
}
The problem was from setOnConfirm. In React, setState can take the new value OR a function that returns the new value. In this case React wanted to get the new state from calling onConfirm which is not correct.
changing to this resolved my issue:
setOnConfirm(() => onConfirm);
I was able to solve this after coming across a similar question in GitHub which led me to this comment showing how to pinpoint the exact line within your file causing the error. I wasn't aware that the stack trace was there. Hopefully this helps someone!
See below for my fix. I simply converted the function to use callback.
Old code
function TopMenuItems() {
const dispatch = useDispatch();
function mountProjectListToReduxStore(projects) {
const projectDropdown = projects.map((project) => ({
id: project.id,
name: project.name,
organizationId: project.organizationId,
createdOn: project.createdOn,
lastModifiedOn: project.lastModifiedOn,
isComplete: project.isComplete,
}));
projectDropdown.sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name));
dispatch(loadProjectsList(projectDropdown));
dispatch(setCurrentOrganizationId(projectDropdown[0].organizationId));
}
};
New code
function TopMenuItems() {
const dispatch = useDispatch();
const mountProjectListToReduxStore = useCallback((projects) => {
const projectDropdown = projects.map((project) => ({
id: project.id,
name: project.name,
organizationId: project.organizationId,
createdOn: project.createdOn,
lastModifiedOn: project.lastModifiedOn,
isComplete: project.isComplete,
}));
projectDropdown.sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name));
dispatch(loadProjectsList(projectDropdown));
dispatch(setCurrentOrganizationId(projectDropdown[0].organizationId));
}, [dispatch]);
};
My case was using setState callback, instead of setState + useEffect
BAD ❌
const closePopover = useCallback(
() =>
setOpen((prevOpen) => {
prevOpen && onOpenChange(false);
return false;
}),
[onOpenChange]
);
GOOD ✅
const closePopover = useCallback(() => setOpen(false), []);
useEffect(() => onOpenChange(isOpen), [isOpen, onOpenChange]);
I got this when I was foolishly invoking a function that called dispatch instead of passing a reference to it for onClick on a button.
const quantityChangeHandler = (direction) => {
dispatch(cartActions.changeItemQuantity({title, quantityChange: direction}));
}
...
<button onClick={() => quantityChangeHandler(-1)}>-</button>
<button onClick={() => quantityChangeHandler(1)}>+</button>
Initially, I was directly calling without the fat arrow wrapper.
Using some of the answers above, i got rid of the error with the following:
from
if (value === "newest") {
dispatch(sortArticlesNewest());
} else {
dispatch(sortArticlesOldest());
}
this code was on my component top-level
to
const SelectSorting = () => {
const dispatch = useAppDispatch();
const {value, onChange} = useSelect();
useEffect(() => {
if (value === "newest") {
dispatch(sortArticlesNewest());
} else {
dispatch(sortArticlesOldest());
}
}, [dispatch, value]);
My project takes in a display name that I want to save in a context for use by future components and when posting to the database. So, I have an onChange function that sets the name in the context, but when it does set the name, it gets rid of focus from the input box. This makes it so you can only type in the display name one letter at a time. The state is updating and there is a useEffect that adds it to local storage. I have taken that code out and it doesn't seem to affect whether or not this works.
There is more than one input box, so the auto focus property won't work. I have tried using the .focus() method, but since the Set part of useState doesn't happen right away, that hasn't worked. I tried making it a controlled input by setting the value in the onChange function with no changes to the issue. Other answers to similar questions had other issues in their code that prevented it from working.
Component:
import React, { useContext } from 'react';
import { ParticipantContext } from '../../../contexts/ParticipantContext';
const Component = () => {
const { participant, SetParticipantName } = useContext(ParticipantContext);
const DisplayNameChange = (e) => {
SetParticipantName(e.target.value);
}
return (
<div className='inputBoxParent'>
<input
type="text"
placeholder="Display Name"
className='inputBox'
onChange={DisplayNameChange}
defaultValue={participant.name || ''} />
</div>
)
}
export default Component;
Context:
import React, { createContext, useState, useEffect } from 'react';
export const ParticipantContext = createContext();
const ParticipantContextProvider = (props) => {
const [participant, SetParticipant] = useState(() => {
return GetLocalData('participant',
{
name: '',
avatar: {
name: 'square',
imgURL: 'square.png'
}
});
});
const SetParticipantName = (name) => {
SetParticipant({ ...participant, name });
}
useEffect(() => {
if (participant.name) {
localStorage.setItem('participant', JSON.stringify(participant))
}
}, [participant])
return (
<ParticipantContext.Provider value={{ participant, SetParticipant, SetParticipantName }}>
{ props.children }
</ParticipantContext.Provider>
);
}
export default ParticipantContextProvider;
Parent of Component:
import React from 'react'
import ParticipantContextProvider from './ParticipantContext';
import Component from '../components/Component';
const ParentOfComponent = () => {
return (
<ParticipantContextProvider>
<Component />
</ParticipantContextProvider>
);
}
export default ParentOfComponent;
This is my first post, so please let me know if you need additional information about the problem. Thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide.
What is most likely happening here is that the context change is triggering an unmount and remount of your input component.
A few ideas off the top of my head:
Try passing props directly through the context provider:
// this
<ParticipantContext.Provider
value={{ participant, SetParticipant, SetParticipantName }}
{...props}
/>
// instead of this
<ParticipantContext.Provider
value={{ participant, SetParticipant, SetParticipantName }}
>
{ props.children }
</ParticipantContext.Provider>
I'm not sure this will make any difference—I'd have to think about it—but it's possible that the way you have it (with { props.children } as a child of the context provider) is causing unnecessary re-renders.
If that doesn't fix it, I have a few other ideas:
Update context on blur instead of on change. This would avoid the context triggering a unmount/remount issue, but might be problematic if your field gets auto-filled by a user's browser.
Another possibility to consider would be whether you could keep it in component state until unmount, and set context via an effect cleanup:
const [name, setName] = useState('');
useEffect(() => () => SetParticipant({ ...participant, name }), [])
<input value={name} onChange={(e) => setName(e.target.value)} />
You might also consider setting up a hook that reads/writes to storage instead of using context:
const useDisplayName = () => {
const [participant, setParticipant] = useState(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('participant') || {}));
const updateName = newName => localStorage.setItem('participant', {...participant, name} );
return [name, updateName];
}
Then your input component (and others) could get and set the name without context:
const [name, setName] = useDisplayName();
<input value={name} onChange={(e) => setName(e.target.value)} />
I've created this codesandbox example and here is the code:
import React, { ReactNode, useState } from "react";
import { Formik, FormikConfig, FormikProps, Form, FormikErrors } from "formik";
import { useEffect } from "react";
import { scrollToValidationError } from "./scrollToValidationError";
// const isEmpty = (a: unknown): boolean =>
// typeof a === "object" && Object.keys(a).length > 0;
export type FormContainerProps<V> = {
render({
values,
errors,
invalid,
submitCount,
isSubmitting
}: {
values: V;
invalid: boolean;
errors: FormikErrors<V>;
submitCount: number;
isSubmitting: boolean;
}): ReactNode;
additionalContent?: ReactNode;
nextButtonText?: string;
} & Pick<FormikConfig<V>, "initialValues" | "validate"> &
Partial<Pick<FormikConfig<V>, "onSubmit">>;
export const FormContainer = function FormContainer<V>({
initialValues,
additionalContent,
validate,
render,
...rest
}: FormContainerProps<V>) {
const [hasValidationError, setHasValidationError] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
if (!hasValidationError) {
return;
}
scrollToValidationError();
}, [hasValidationError]);
return (
<>
<Formik
initialValues={initialValues}
validate={validate}
onSubmit={async (values, { validateForm }) => {}}
>
{({
isSubmitting,
submitCount,
isValid,
errors,
values
}: FormikProps<V>) => {
const invalid = !isValid;
if (submitCount > 0 && invalid) {
setHasValidationError(true);
}
return (
<>
<div data-selector="validation-summary">Validation Summary</div>
<Form>
<div>
<div>
{render({
values,
errors,
isSubmitting,
invalid,
submitCount
})}
</div>
<div>
<button type="submit">SUBMIT</button>
</div>
</div>
</Form>
</>
);
}}
</Formik>
</>
);
};
Basically I am calling setHasValidationError(true) which breaks the dependency watcher on useEffect
useEffect(() => {
if (!hasValidationError) {
return;
}
scrollToValidationError();
setTimeout(() => setHasValidationError(false));
}, [hasValidationError]);
But if this is a form with multiple errors then I want to trigger the useEffect every time but I don't know when to reset it to false or if there is a better way.
In order to scroll to the first error field upon clicking on submit then you can do the following:
Write a custom component (eg: FocuseabelField) that renders formik field which also handles automatic scroll to element and focus on error input
Use Formik's innerRef
Just use the formik's isSubmitting and errors to handle logic for scrolling and focussing
FocuseabelField custom component
const FocuseabelField: any = props => {
const elementRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>();
if (
props.isSubmitting &&
elementRef.current !== undefined &&
props.errors.hasOwnProperty(props.name)
) {
elementRef.current.scrollIntoView();
elementRef.current.focus();
}
return <Field {...props} innerRef={elementRef} />;
};
Usage
<FocuseabelField
errors={errors}
isSubmitting={isSubmitting}
name="name"
placeholder="enter name"
className={errors && errors.name ? "input error" : "input"}
/>
I have taken your code and have commented the stuff like scrollToValidationerror.ts, dom.ts, wait.ts, useState(hasValidationError), useEffect etc.
Simplified working copy of the code is here. I have used 2 fields to demonstrate multiple errors & auto scroll & focus to the error field:
https://codesandbox.io/s/usemachine-typescript-problems-tns0c?file=/src/components/Home/index.tsx
When the forms gets bigger it becomes complicated to manage so its good to consider outsourcing the form validation part and use libraries such as yup and maintain a validation schema and pass it on to formik.
Have a look at the formik docs for examples.
What about creating an Object with keys for each form field? That way you can maintain a specific form validation error for each input and use that Object in the useEffect second parameter, it will make sure it's triggered for each form error update
To answer your original question,
useEffect does reference check for its dependencies, so you could use Object instead of value. So something like this.
const [hasValidationError, setHasValidationError] = useState({value: false});
useEffect(() => {
if (!hasValidationError.value) {
return;
}
scrollToValidationError();
}, [hasValidationError]);
setHasValidationError({value: true});
But in regards to Formik usage, I highly recommend you follow what #gdh pointed out.
I don't understand the need of effects here.
Why don't you call the method directly instead of using hooks?
You can avoid 2 re-renders by doing that, and the component can also be stateless!
...
}: FormikProps<V>) => {
const invalid = !isValid;
if (submitCount > 0 && invalid) {
scrollToValidationError();
}
...
I am currently building a multi-step form during a user onboarding process, which is why I need to centralize all form data in a parent React component state.
I need to update initialValues with user information but this is an async process.
I thought of creating a useEffect hook calling setState, but maybe there is a more elegant way of doing so...
Having initialValues as one of useEffect dependencies seems to create an infinite loop (Maximum update depth exceeded). This is why the working solution I found was to duplicate all initialValues within... 😒
So how could I update only specific values from initialValues after getting async user information?
Here is a simplified version of the implementation:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'
// Auth0 hook for authentication (via React Context).
import { useAuth0 } from '../../contexts/auth/auth'
import { Formik, Form, Field } from 'formik'
export default () => {
const { user } = useAuth0()
const initialValues = {
profile: {
name: '',
address: '',
// Other properties...
},
personalInfo: {
gender: '',
birthday: '',
// Other properties...
},
}
const [formData, setFormData] = useState(initialValues)
const [step, setStep] = useState(1)
const nextStep = () => setStep((prev) => prev + 1)
useEffect(() => {
const updateInitialValues = (user) => {
if (user) {
const { name = '', gender = '' } = user
const updatedInitialValues = {
profile: {
name: name,
// All other properties duplicated?
},
personalInfo: {
gender: gender,
// All other properties duplicated?
},
}
setFormData(updatedInitialValues)
}
}
updateInitialValues(user)
}, [user, setFormData])
switch (step) {
case 1:
return (
<Formik
enableReinitialize={true}
initialValues={formData}
onSubmit={(values) => {
setFormData(values)
nextStep()
}}
>
<Form>
<Field name="profile.name" type="text" />
<Field name="profile.address" type="text" />
{/* Other fields */}
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</Form>
</Formik>
)
case 2:
return (
<Formik
enableReinitialize={true}
initialValues={formData}
onSubmit={(values) => {
setFormData(values)
nextStep()
}}
>
<Form>
<Field name="personalInfo.gender" type="text" />
<Field name="personalInfo.birthday" type="text" />
{/* Other fields */}
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</Form>
</Formik>
)
// Other cases...
default:
return <div>...</div>
}
}
it's probably late for me to see this question and I just happen to work on a similar project recently.
For my use case, I'm using only one Formik, and using theory similar to Formik Multistep form Wizard: https://github.com/formium/formik/blob/master/examples/MultistepWizard.js for my multistep forms.
And on each step, I need to fetch API to prefill data, I also use useEffect but since I just call the API onetime when I load the specific step, I force it to behave the same as ComponentDidMount(), which is to leave the [] empty with the comment // eslint-disable-next-line so it won't give me warning.
And I use setFieldValue in the useEffect after data is successfully loaded. I feel mine is also not a good way to handle this situation, and I just found something that might be useful: https://github.com/talor-hammond/formik-react-hooks-multi-step-form, it has a Dynamic initialValues. (Though it's typescript)
I am going to refer to this and also try to use for each of my steps, and probably use Context or Wrap them in a parent and store data in the parent Formik.
And getting infinite loop for you might because setFormData should not be in the dependency, since when you setState, the component re-render, the useEffect calls again.
Not sure if this can help you or you already find out how to implement it, I'll look into this deeper.