Calculate Series in C - c

I wrote a program in C for this series. but when I enter n = -8 and m = 2 the result is zero.
Why and how can I fix it?
Series here
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
int main()
{
int n,m;
double sum = 0;
printf("Enter n:\n");
scanf_s("%d",&n);
printf("Enter m:\n");
scanf_s("%d", &m);
for (int i = -10; i <= m; i++)
{
for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++)
{
sum += (pow((i + j), 3) / pow(j,2) );
}
}
printf_s("%f",sum);
}

for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++)
{
sum += (pow((i + j), 3) / pow(j,2) );
}
when you are trying to input n=-8 this loop won't work coz j=1 and condition is set to work until j<=n

In your code, the only expression that modifies the variable named sum is inside the inner loop. The loop will execute only if its controlling expression j <= n is true.
You initialize j with the value of 1. If you give n any value less than 1, the loop will not execute because j <= n would be false.
Since the initial value of the variable sum is 0 and the expression that modifies sum is not executed, the output is 0.

Related

How to make competitive coding solutions more efficient (BIT wise operations)?

How do I make my code more efficient (in time) pertaining to a competitive coding question (source: codechef starters 73 div 4):
(Problem) Chef has an array A of length N. Chef wants to append a non-negative integer X to the array A such that the bitwise OR of the entire array becomes = Y .
Determine the minimum possible value of X. If no possible value of X exists, output -1.
Input Format
The first line contains a single integer T — the number of test cases. Then the test cases follow.
The first line of each test case contains two integers N and Y — the size of the array A and final bitwise OR of the array A.
The second line of each test case contains N space-separated integers A_1, A_2, ..., A_N denoting the array A.
Please don't judge me for my choice of language .
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <math.h>
int* binary_number(int n) // returns pointer to a array of length 20(based on given constrains) representing binary
{
int* ptc;
ptc = (int*) malloc(20*sizeof(int));
for(int i = 0; i < 20; i++)
{
if((n / (int) pow(2,19-i)) > 0){*(ptc + i) = 1;}
else {*(ptc + i) = 0;}
n = n % (int) pow(2,19-i) ;
}
return ptc;
}
int or_value(int* ptc, int n) // Takes in pointers containing 1 or zero and gives the logical OR
{
for(int k = 0; k < n; n++)
{
if(*ptc == *(ptc + 20*k)){continue;} // pointers are 20 units apart
else{return 1;break;}
}
return *ptc;
}
int main(void) {
int t; scanf("%d", &t);
for (int i = 0; i < t; i++)
{
int n, y;
scanf("%d %d", &n, &y);
int a[n];
for(int j = 0; j < n ; j++)
{
scanf("%d", &a[j]);
}
int b[20*n];
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
{
for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++)
{
b[20*j + k] = *(binary_number(a[n])+k);
}
}
int c = 0;
int p = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < 20; j++)
{
if ((*(binary_number(y) + j) == 1) && (or_value((&b[0] + j),n) == 0)){c = c + pow(2,19 - j);}
else if ((*(binary_number(y) + j) == 0) && (or_value((&b[0] + j),n) == 1)){p = 1; break;}
}
if (p==1){printf("-1");}
else {printf("%d\n", c);}
}
return 0;
}

How to calculate the number of triangles that can be formed

The code below should have counted the number of triangles that can be formed out of every triplet of 3 distinct integers from the given range 1...N. However, when I input 5, it gives me 34, while the right answer is 3: the only possible triangles are (2, 3, 4), (2, 4, 5) and (3, 4, 5).
// C code to count the number of possible triangles using
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{ int N, count=0;
setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
printf("Please input the value of N: \n");
scanf("%d", &N );
for (int i = 1; i < N; i++) {
for (int j = 1; j < N; j++) {
// The innermost loop checks for the triangle
// property
for (int k = 1; k < N; k++) {
// Sum of two sides is greater than the
// third
if (i + j > k && i + k > j && k + j > i)
{
count++;
}
}
}
}
printf ("Total number of triangles possible is %d ",count);
return 0;
}
You do not ensure that the numbers are distinct.
You can do this be chosing your loop limits correctly:
for (int i = 1; i <= N-2; i++) {
for (int j = i+1; j <= N-1; j++) {
for (int k = j+1; k <= N; k++) {
Start each inner loop one higher than current counter of outer loop. It also does not make any sense to run each loop up to N. If they must be distinct, you can stop at N-2, N-1, N
This creates triples where numbers are increasing.
If you consider triangles (3,4,5) and (4,3,5) to be different, we must also account for permuations of these triples.
As all values are distinct, we have 6 possible permutations for each triple that was found in the inner loop.
I'm sorry, I can't go for a comment so let's go for an answer.
I don't really get what you wish to do. As I am understanding it, you wish to print this :
1, 2, 3, 4, 5-> [2, 3, 4], [2, 4, 5], [3, 4, 5] -> 3
Except, with your code, you'll never check your N since you go out of your loop when i turns into N.
Also, your "j" and "k" don't have to move starting 1 since you already tried that position with "i", so you'll only get doublons doing that.
EDIT : some changes for a smarter code (I removed my +1 but go check for "<=", which I personnaly dislike :) ):
// since [1, 2, 3] can't bring any triangle
if (N < 4) return 0;
// since there is no possible triangle with 1 as a border, start at 2
for (int i = 2; i <= N-2; i++) {
for (int j = i+1; j <= N-1; j++) {
// The innermost loop checks for the triangle
// property
for (int k = j+1; k <= N; k++) {
// Sum of two sides is greater than the
// third
// simplified as suggested by S M Samnoon Abrar
if (i + j > k)
{
count++;
}
}
}
You need to do the following:
run first loop through 1 to N, i.e.: 1 <= i <= N
don't start each nested loop from index 1. So, you need to run first nested loop in range i+1 <= j <= N and second nested loop in range j+1 <= k <=N.
Explanation
First, if you run all 3 loops from 1 to N, then you are not doing distinct counting because all numbers in the range will be iterated 3 times. So it would give an incorrect result.
Secondly, since we need to count distinct numbers only, it is efficient to count +1 from the previous outer loop each time. In this way, we are ensuring that we are not iterating over any number twice.
Check the following code:
// C code to count the number of possible triangles using
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{ int N, count=0;
setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
printf("Please input the value of N: \n");
scanf("%d", &N );
for (int i = 1; i <= N; i++) {
for (int j = i+1; j <= N; j++) {
// The innermost loop checks for the triangle
// property
for (int k = j+1; k <= N; k++) {
// Sum of two sides is greater than the
// third
if (i + j > k && i + k > j && k + j > i)
{
count++;
}
}
}
}
printf ("Total number of triangles possible is %d ",count);
return 0;
}
Spot the extra line of code that enforces the constraint that the 3 numbers are "distinct" (read "unique"). Funny what a little "print debugging" can turn up...
printf("Please input the value of N: ");
scanf("%d", &N );
for (int i = 1; i < N; i++) {
for (int j = 1; j < N; j++) {
for (int k = 1; k < N; k++) {
if (i + j > k && i + k > j && k + j > i) {
if( i != j && j != k && k != i ) {
printf( "%d %d %d\n", i, j, k );
count++;
}
}
}
}
}
printf ("Total number of triangles possible is %d ",count);
Output
Please input the value of N: 5
2 3 4
2 4 3
3 2 4
3 4 2
4 2 3
4 3 2
Total number of triangles possible is 6
The OP code was counting (1,1,1) or (2,3,3) in contravention of "distinct" digits.
AND, there is now ambiguity from the OP person as to whether, for instance, (4,2,3) and (4,3,2) are distinct.
printf() - the coder's friend when things don't make sense...

how to list all pairs of sexy primes

How can i write a program that lists all sexy prime pairs that exist in n numbers.
For example if n = 10 the output should be (5, 11) and (7, 13)
My idea was to generate all primes within n and then add 6 to each and check if the i + 6 is a prime. But it doesnt work, there's no output and the program ends.
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
int i, j, n, k, isprime = 1, prime2, flag = 0;
scanf("%d", &n);
for (i = 3; i <= n; i++){
for (j = 2; j <= i; j++){
if (i % j == 0)
break;
}
if (i == j){
prime2 = i + 6;
for (k = 3; k <= prime2; k++){
if (prime2 % k == 0){
flag++;
break;
}
}
if (flag == 0){
printf("%d %d\n", i, prime2);
}
}
}
return 0;
}
Any ideas of what im doing wrong or any tips on how to solve it? (with loops only)
As there're a lot of resources about finding a prime number, I'm not going to discuss that. Rather I'll try to point out the bug in your code.
First problem:
for (k = 3; k <= prime2; k++)
Here you need to run the loop till prime2 - 1. Also you should start checking from 2 rather than 3, just like you did previously. That means,
for (k = 2; k < prime2; k++)
or
for (k = 2; k <= prime2 - 1; k++)
Reason: when k = prime2, prime2 % k will be 0. For finding out whether a number is prime we don't need to check if that number is divisible by 1 and that number itself.
Note: Now you might think why the first prime number loop for (j = 2; j <= i; j++) is working .
It's working because you've given an additional condition if (i == j) after it.
Second problem:
You need to declare the flag variable within the first loop.
for (i = 2; i <= n; i++)
{
int flag = 0;
.... (rest of the code)
....
}
Reason: Basically with the flag value, you're trying to find out whether prime2 is a prime number.
Every time you'll get a prime number from the first loop, you'll have a new value of prime2. In your code, once you're incrementing the value of flag, you're never resetting the flag value.
That's why once your code detects a prime2 which is not a prime, it'll never detect the second prime number again (prime2 which is actually prime).
Overall code:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int i, j, n, k, isprime = 1, prime2;
scanf("%d", &n);
for (i = 3; i <= n; i++)
{
int flag = 0; // changing point
for (j = 2; j <= i; j++)
{
if (i % j == 0)
break;
}
if (i == j)
{
prime2 = i + 6;
for (k = 2; k < prime2; k++) // changing point
{
if (prime2 % k == 0)
{
flag++;
break;
}
}
if (flag == 0)
{
printf("%d %d\n", i, prime2);
}
}
}
return 0;
}
Few resources to know more about finding out prime numbers:
Prime Numbers
C Program to Check Whether a Number is Prime or not
Sieve of Eratosthenes
You can use Sieve to speed up the program. It can generate all pairs in O(N log N) time. Here's the Algorithm.
Now, you have a boolean array, is_prime where is_prime[i] is true if i is a prime, false otherwise.
Now, iterate from i = 1 to i = N and check if is_prime[i] && is_prime[i + 6], if the condition is true, output the pair.

Calculating primes using wiki algorithm

I have just started using C and I am currently working on calculating primes using the wikipedia algorithm here:
algorithm Sieve of Eratosthenes is
input: an integer n > 1.
output: all prime numbers from 2 through n.
let A be an array of Boolean values, indexed by integers 2 to n,
initially all set to true.
for i = 2, 3, 4, ..., not exceeding √n do
if A[i] is true
for j = i2, i2+i, i2+2i, i2+3i, ..., not exceeding n do
A[j] := false
return all i such that A[i] is true.
When I try implementing what I think turns out like the code above, I get what I believe is an 'infinite loop', where might I have gone wrong?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void) {
//create empty array to store values
int isPrime[] = {};
//set a large number
int n = 1000;
//create for loop
for(int i = 2; i < n; i++){
///create another for loop taking the exponents
for(int j = i; j < pow(i, 2); j++){
//if i is equal to j is true then return those values true
if(isPrime[i] == isPrime[j]){
printf("%d", isPrime[i]);
}
}
}
There's many errors in your code including an empty array, use of pow (which is a floating-point function) and numerous logic errors that deviate from the wikipedia example code.
Here's a corrected, working version that follows the logic of the wikipedia version, with a loop afterwards to print out all the primes less than n:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
int n = 1000;
int isPrime[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
isPrime[i] = 1;
}
for (int i = 2; i * i < n; i++) {
if (isPrime[i]) {
for (int j = i * i; j < n; j += i) {
isPrime[j] = 0;
}
}
}
for (int i = 2; i < n; i++) {
if (isPrime[i]) {
printf("%d ", i);
}
}
printf("\n");
}
(Note that a small deviation from the wikipedia algorithm is that this prints primes less than n rather than primes less than or equal to n).

in C ,why result is different after only changing loop boundary?

I met this problem when verifying whether points in a finite field GF(13) is on elliptic curve y^2 = x^3 + x + 1:
first I set the loop boundary as i<2,the results came out right.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
void main ()
{
int a[13], b[13];
int j, i, m, k = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
for (j = 0; j < 13; j++)
if ((i * i * i + i + 1) % 13 == (j * j) % 13) {
a[k] = i;
b[k] = j;
k++;
}
printf ("\n There are %d points on the curve\nThe points are: ", k);
for (m = 0; m < k; m++)
printf ("\nx=%d,y=%d \n", a[m], b[m]);
}
The result is link 1
after I change the i<2 to i<13,
for(i=0;i<13;i++)
the first 4 points changed: link 2
You are entering undefined behavior. If you set a break inside the loop you will notice that k >= 13 which is outside the bounds of your arrays.
You could add some bounds checking and consider the size of your arrays.

Resources