I've an Azure AD B2C setup that no matter which email I insert in forgot password email's field it will send the verification code email to that email.
Even if the email doesn't exists in the Users list.
Is this the default behavior?
This is the link I have for recover password
Is there any missing property in the url that force check if the email exists in User list ?
I can confirm the behavior but I couldn't find any reference on why exactly it works that way. Like many things in security, I'm pretty sure it's a design trade-off.
Some services (e.g. Evernote) do the same, i.e. they send a password reset email no matter if the address is registered with them or not.
On the upside, this is an early alert for the user that someone is trying to get access their (nonexistent) account, so a phishing attempt coming from a different website is likely.
The problem is that the user gets an unsolicited email message, and if somebody wants to annoy him/her, all it has to do is to send multiple reset password requests. The user is helpless, there's nothing he can do to stop the emails. So I presume the service mitigates this by limiting the number of reset password requests to a reasonable amount (say max 10/hour, but no more than 3 in any 5 minutes).
Other services (e.g. Dropbox) take the other approach and only send email messages to addresses registered with their service.
this prevents the "email bomb" issue
on the other hand, it doesn't alert the user about the login attempt
Like you, I would argue that the latter approach is better, as the only benefit I can see in the former one is the "early warning" issued to a user that's not even registered with your service. Also, understanding the early warning requires some user sophistication. But obviously Microsoft went the other way.
There's a Password Reset item in the Users blade, but the only options are None and All. Interestingly, the tooltip on this option mentions an nonexistent "Selected" option, so some more fine-grained settings may appear here in the future.
If you want to exists if the users exist before sending messages then you have to edit the SendCode Action . So it will only send verification code when user exists in B2C side.
Below is the very good link which can help you with that.
https://github.com/azure-ad-b2c/samples/tree/master/policies/pwd-reset-email-exists
It is by design. And it will try to send out the verification code without validating whether email exists or not.
By considering security measures this is how it should work.
Related
I am working on a integration with Salesforce using REST APIs and, as part of the project, I need to send updates to Salesforce and these updates are not user triggered, they are system triggered.
Because of that, what I expect to see on Salesforce Field History is not a user name but the name of our Connected App (the app that made the update).
What I see today is the user name because the way the integration was made initially using OAuth Authorization Code flow.
To change that part of the project, I followed the link (OAuth 2.0 JWT Bearer Flow for Server-to-Server Integration): https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=sf.remoteaccess_oauth_flows.htm&type=5
Making that, I was expeting to generate a token for a System, not for a User, but that's not what happened: when I used the token generate from the JWT Bearer Flow and ran the update, the Field History still shows the user name.
What could I do then?
Which are the options in Salesforce to achieve the behavior I'm expecting?
The most important, in my opinion, is to have a Token for our system, not for a user.
Thanks!
Everybody is an user in Salesforce. Even if you access unauthenticated pages (some contact us form? case or lead capture) - it gets tracked under special Guest User.
It sounds stupid but gives you unified interface to control permissions (Profiles/Permission sets). You want guests to access only FAQ articles and make cases? Sure thing, do it in profile, don't get paranoid about people trying to guess right URLs. You think an app was hacked? You can terminate the session just like any other "user". Want to allow login only in certain hours and from certain IP? Sure.
An app connecting with JWT will still need username (main difference being it's "just" certificate for signing the request instead of password).
Your best bet is to create dedicated "Mr System", "SystemX integration" account. It sounds like waste of license but in the long run saves you questions "why did you edit my account at 1 am" and you could even use it as backup account if you use SSO and it ever fails...
I need to allow a user of my App to email themselves when an even occurs. I am not sure how to do this.
My first idea is to create a dummy gmail account, and have my App sign-in and send from there via java code. This means hardcoding the password BUT as account not used for anything other than one way emailing - it does not seem to be a problem.
However, I understand that google is pretty proactive about security and if my App (which is global) tries to log into same account in several different countries during a 24 hour period - it will block the email.
I have seen the "delegate" functionality, but that would mean that each user needs their own gmail account which is not practical.
Is there a way to force gmail to allow the sign-ins to happen from wherever?
Or is there a better approach to this problem?
probably not a good idea to have your app to mail from a private account, if I understand you correctly. Best to use email service like http://expresspigeon.com or http://sendgrid.com and simply send a transactional email from your app account. In other words, use an ESP.
The safest would be to ask the user for all the configuration information necessary to access their email server as themself, then send the email as themself to themself. You can use JavaMail to send the message, but you'll need to ask for all the configuration information that any other email application would ask for in order to configure access to their mail server.
There may also be Android-specific ways to do this using the default email application.
So I'm writing a mobile app and have reached a point where I need to allow users to register a username. I'm doing this by asking for an email address, username and password.
Typically, it's been normal to set this sort of thing up on the web by having the user confirm his email address by clicking on a link sent to his inbox.
Needless to say, on a mobile app this is a bit clunky as the user will be redirected out of your app and into his browser.
So I had a look at how other mobile apps are doing it (WP7) and was surprised to see that DropBox and Evernote both allow you to sign up without confirming your email address. The end result of this is that I was able to sign up with completely bogus email addresses and/or valid email addresses that don't belong to me.
I assume this is done on purpose.
Your thoughts?
I came across the same issue when writing a social networking style app. I chose to have the user create a username and then provide and email and password. I do not verify the email address and I've never attempted to send any email to them (yet).
What I would suggest would be alternate ways to validate a users email address. My app allows users to do Facebook Connect. All they have to do is log into Facebook, and the app talks to Facebook to confirm that they are using a valid email address. No need to verify it with a URL in an email.
I believe Twitter has a similar service and there may even be a few others that provide an API.
I've also discovered that a lot of people just want to tinker around in the app and not create an account at all. It's definitely a balancing act
I'd say it depends on your app and how important it is to ensure users have valid email addresses. In an app I'm creating now, we want to discourage users from signing up with multiple bogus accounts (because our system could be gamed that way) so we're not allowing users to log in until their email address if verified. On other sites however, it might not be such a big deal so why bother users with that extra step?
As for a mobile device, I don't see why you can't still send a verification email that sends them to your website to verify their email address. There are plenty of mobile apps that also have a website users can log into to manage their account.
Another option is have multiple "states" for users. Before they validate their email, they are in a "pending" state. Once they click it, they're in an "active" state. If you store the createDate for the user, you can periodically remove pending users older than 1 week (or however long).
The bonus is that you can easily add more states, such as suspended or deleted.
Personally, I wasn't too happy for users to create accounts with any old email address.
I think a few decent options are:
send a confirmation email with a link that uses a Custom Url Schema to redirect back to the app (although this is only good if they use the link on the same device)
send a short PIN in the email for them to enter back in the app.
send a confirmation email with a web link, have your server confirm the valid email/token, and have your app check the account status either periodically or with some sort of realtime tech like SignalR or Firebase.
I prefer the last one, although hardest to implement. A user might well have their phone in their hand and their laptop next to them, register in the app and try to click the link in the email that just showed up on their laptop. I like the idea of the app then just "knowing" that they've validated.
Do you have a web server? Write a web service that does the validation for you on the server side, and sends back the result.
Either you can use some platform, such as Facebook connect as #Brian replied above, or you may give users a reasonable timeframe to verify, for example, a few days or even a week. After that, the account gets removed.
You can even have your app issue notifications to remind the user to verify his account (such as every day, or on the last date of the verification.
Don't ask for email confirmation on mobile and allow the user to use the service. When the user is using a PC, then ask the user to confirm his email.
I won't defend my recommendation because most of the solutions here are valid. There isn't one correct way. You asked for ideas and here's one.
A good strategy is to allow people to use as much of your app as possible given the amount of data they've provided.
For example, in the case of a newsreader you might let someone browse your app without registering, then require an account for offline syncing, and a verified email for alerts. Always give people a good reason to take the next step, and build engagement first, then people will forgive you pestering them later.
I have an application that uses email addresses for user authentication.
I know that some universities use Shibboleth for user authentication, and I was wondering what the process is for being able to read emails from the university database that is used for Shibboleth. Note that I do not care about authentication through Shibboleth, I only need to be able to read the email addresses.
Is it general for all universities that use Shibboleth, or is each a unique case?
Any links to documentation on how to do this process would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Shibboleth can be configured (IdP-side) to release user attributes along with authentication data, for example the user's email address. Client-side, assuming you're going though shibd, you'll need a setting in your attribute-map.xml that says "map attribute with OID x.y.z.a to environment variable USERMAIL" and then you get the result in that environment variable. The example config should already contain it.
This would be the same for everybody insofar as the OID for "email" is always the same, but you'd have to negotiate with the IdPs (universities) or their federations so that they will actually release that attribute to you.
Shibboleth is used by many institutions, but by no means all. Many use Athens, proxies or IP recognition, among other things.
As far as I am aware, a user's email address is not tied directly to the Shib system. When a user tries to access a Shibboleth-protected resource they are taken to their institution's login page to authenticate themselves. They might enter their email address to authenticate or they might enter a username, they might be auto logged-in based on their IP address, or something else.
The institution does send back an affiliation through Shib data transfer upon successful login, something like student#brown.ac.uk but this is not necessarily the email address the user used to login. I guess they could send that but it has not been used in system's I've worked on.
Shibboleth is commonly used to check that the user is from an institution that has purchased access to a protected resource rather than identifying a particular user from that institution so the user's email isn't needed.
Not sure if this helps at all: http://middleware.internet2.edu/eduperson/docs/internet2-mace-dir-eduperson-200806.html#eduPersonAffiliation
I'm working on a free service web application where a user registers with username, email, password... standard user account stuff. There is a referral system where if the user refers three other users to sign up (using their referral code) the original user gets account upgrades.
There is incentive to game this by creating three other accounts using their referral code. Any ideas on how to prevent this? Could block IP or use a cookie but these seem like they are easily defeated. I want to make it easy for a user to create an account so I'd rather not do anything that requires extensive effort in account creation.
You could send them a text message and make them reply via text message or email from the mobile.