I recently got into learning about the waves platform and its various API's.
I want to know if it was possible to generate addresses for other cryptos like bitcoin or ethereum on it.
Also, if it is possible to send crypto to addresses from other wallets.
I've looked at document here but its documentation is not very clear to me.
Which Waves api/lib are you refering to ?
What you mean by " send crypto to addresses from other wallets" ? what type of addresses/wallets ? waves ? be more precise so we can help better.
The other currencies within waves are there because coinomats gateways.
Coinomat has an api available: https://coinomat.com/api.php
I never used it myself/ don't know how powerfull it is, but I guess this is what you are looking for?
However since coinomat is third party, it's always harder to work with these api's then when you want to generate just a waves address.
Are there any adventages or reasons why you want to generate btc/.. addr?
Or what is the exact purpose?
Related
Firstly, I know about the duplicates. We're not talking about iOs/Android/KindOfDevice-only, as the others & cookies are not the way I want to go.
So I want to bypass the need of a password or something by "binding" my service (which is only an idea by now) to the device used.
An E-Mail and stuff would be needed of course, to keep your devices bundled.
What would your approaches be?
My thoughts so far
My first idea was using the mac-adress, because I heard that they're unique. But a quick google told me that's not really true.
On Phones I could use the phone number or the IMEI, but I don't want it to be restricted to phones, it should be usable by web, too.
I guess when we talk about a web-solution, stuff would get even more tricky because browsers won't let the service go really deep into the system and stuff?
Of course I guess there needs to be a combination of two or more things. So two not-so-unique things combine to an 99%-unique-thing?
I just need some help about how to go on with this problem, a direction, because if you google terms like "unique device identification" you only get this medicine-thing..
In my project I use
var secureUDID = (UIDevice.current.identifierForVendor?.uuidString)!
which - Returns a string created from the UUID, such as “E621E1F8-C36C-495A-93FC-0C247A3E6E5F”.
UUID - An alphanumeric string that uniquely identifies a device to the app’s vendor.
I am using asterisk 11.9.0 and i want to generate an outgoing call.I found that for outgoing i have to make a .call file and place it in a var/spool/asterisk/outgoing.I am following the link below
http://the-asterisk-book.com/1.6/call-file.html#call-file-parameter
my code is same as given in the above link,the above example uses only single fixed number to call.
My problem is that
i have to generate an outgoing to a number fetched from database(outgoing to new number everytime),so how to write the code of .call file for multiple numbers outgoing and how to pass these numbers fetched from database to .call file from my extensions.conf
Is there any way to do that.
I am new to asterisk.
Any help would be appreciated.
You can use vicidial.org software to do that things.
Note, it is very bad idea do outboudn dialler-like app in asterisk without understanding asterisk logic and very-hi skills in programming/database.
For more info you also can use this page
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+auto-dial+out
Might be easier using WombatDialer as it has a plain API where you can tell it what you want it to do and it will take care of the rest. We have a plain set up for outbound and it took maybe a couple of days from zero to what we have now. ViciDial would have been overkill.
On why rolling your own is not a great idea, the Wombat manual is quite clear: http://manuals.loway.ch/WD_UserManual-chunked/ch01.html#_why_was_wombatdialer_created
You could also use the AMI (Asterisk Manager Interface), would be easier to program with a deamon running in the back to control what gets dialed and the responses to those dials. Mora info here https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4817239.
It is possible to get the location of a user just with a call from a cellphone? Are there any APIs or technologies to make this possible?
The way I am understanding your question, you aren't asking for GPS location, but more like the large area like state or country? If so, it's possible. Each number has a country and (at least in the US) an area code. You can get it from that. ICS does this by default with numbers from a different area code.
Yes, but only for emergency calls.
For privacy reasons, no-one else can do that.
I'm using Akismet for my spam protection on my web page. It won't even let users post something like, "Hey guys check this out!". I was hoping that I could just get rid of links and have them check the posters IP to see if it had been logged, but not block something so simple.
Is there a way to decrease the harshness through Akismet? I'm using the .NET 2.0 library here http://www.codeplex.com/wikipage?ProjectName=AkismetApi
For questions about Akismet you are always welcome to drop us a line - http://akismet.com/contact/
For cases like this the first thing I suggest is making sure that you are sending the correct data for the Akismet API call - http://akismet.com/development/api/#comment-check - since sending wrong or insufficient data can reduce the accuracy.
Second, if Akismet makes a mistake you should be sending the data back via the Submit Ham and Submit Spam API calls. This allows the Akismet system to learn more about what you consider spam/not spam on your site.
I'd suggest not using Akismet at all and just managing it yourself. You could write a regex to remove the links from postings: http://www.jhartig.com/2010/02/perfect-regex-for-removing-links-when.html
Instead of using one of these anti-spam engines, have you thought about using Facebook the way TechCrunch does? It is very effectively at not allowing spam or flamewars because it's not anonymous.
The other things to use is ReCaptcha, to keep the bots out which is probably the cause of your spam problems in the first place. http://www.google.com/recaptcha
hey here are my two cents to the topic:
try something that webcrawlers hate!! something they can't understand at ALL!!
you guessed it right pal!! FLASH!!
If I were you would use something flash like: flexi commment or something
I'm currently developing a website, into which I've included a filter that attempts to obfuscate any e-mail addresses present in the webpages it serves.
As it is now, it converts the addresses into images.
I've also seen a few other methods in use; some split the address into characters and use generated javascript to include it in the final document, but that requires javascript, so it's not that useful in my opinion. The upside is it can be used to create a working mailto-link.
Another method, quite similar to the above, uses hex-notation to markup the e-mail address. I'm not really convinced it will thwart any serious harvesters though.
Others utilize the human brains' ability to understand language, and will either replace characters like the #-symbol with words, or separate the host and the username etc.
My question now is, how reliable is my method, of using generated images (whose filename do not give the address away) against scrapers, when I'm not using any distortion on the text in the images? Should I prefer a different method?
And as a continuation: if I wan't a fallback method, just in case the image creation should fail for some reason, which would be the smartest way to go?
Here you'll find many ways of obfuscating emails, and their effectiveness.
Hope it helps!
My question now is, how reliable is my method, of using generated images (whose filename do not give the address away) against scrapers, when I'm not using any distortion on the text in the images?
I don't have any data to back that up, but I would say: Quite reliable. Harvesters can get millions of addresses using "conventional" means; I don't think it's economically feasible for them to do image processing just to get a handful more.
And as a continuation: if I wan't a fallback method, just in case the image creation should fail for some reason, which would be the smartest way to go?
Use a good spam filter. :-) No, seriously, it's really hard keeping a mail address hidden from harvesters.
one possibility is to continue using the image, but replace it with text and a mailto link if javascript is enabled.
As long as you don't name the image something obvious, like emailadress.png, you should be pretty safe - I think.
I think it's all about providing some kind of 'are you human test' before you display the email or display the email in a way that is itself a test.
Thinking along the same lines maybe providing a link as the email address and running the tests before displaying the email might be a solution too.
As a user, an image-obfuscated email address is almost as useless as no email address. Whatever method you choose, I should ideally be given a mailto link, second best is some sort of your.name.69 AT longwebsitewhosnameicanteasilytranscribe.net style address.