I have a table of sales info, and am interested in Grouping by customer, and returning the sum, count, max of a few columns. Any ideas please.
I checked all the Select columns are included in the Group By statement, a detail is returned not the Groupings and aggregate values.
I tried some explicit naming but that didn't help.
SELECT
customerID AS CUST,
COUNT([InvoiceID]) AS Count_Invoice,
SUM([Income]) AS Total_Income,
SUM([inc2015]) AS Tot_2015_Income,
SUM([inc2016]) AS Tot_2016_Income,
MAX([prodA]) AS prod_A,
FROM [table_a]
GROUP BY
customerID, InvoiceID,Income,inc2015, inc2016, prodA
There are multiple rows of CUST, i.e. there should be one row for CUST 1, 2 etc.... it should say this...
---------------------------------------------
CUST Count_Invoice Total_Income Tot_2015_Income Tot_2016_Income prod_A
1 2 600 300 300 2
BUT IT IS RETURNING THIS
======================================
CUST Count_Invoice Total_Income Tot_2015_Income Tot_2016_Income prod_A
1 1 300 300 0 1
1 1 300 0 300 1
2 1 300 0 300 1
2 1 500 0 500 0
3 2 800 0 800 0
3 1 300 0 300 1
You don't need to group by other columns, since they are already aggregating by count, min, max or sum.
So you may try this
SELECT customerID as CUST
,count([InvoiceID]) as Count_Invoice
,sum([Income]) as Total_Income
,sum([inc2015]) as Tot_2015_Income
,sum([inc2016]) as Tot_2016_Income
,max([prodA]) as prod_A --- here you are taking Max but in output it seems like sum
FROM [table_a]
Group By customerID
Note: For column prod_A you are using max which gives 1 but in result it is showing 2 which is actually sum or count. Please check.
for more info you may find this link of Group by.
From the description of your expected output, you should be aggregating by customer alone:
SELECT
customerID A CUST,
COUNT([InvoiceID]) AS Count_Invoice,
SUM([Income]) AS Total_Income,
SUM([inc2015]) AS Tot_2015_Income,
SUM([inc2016]) AS Tot_2016_Income,
MAX([prodA]) AS prod_A
FROM [table_a]
GROUP BY
customerID;
Related
I have 2 tables, Tbl1 and Tbl2 :
Tbl1:
ID Col1 Col2 Sold Total
1 AA 0 100
1 BB CC 2 200
1 DD EE 3 300
2 FF GG 1 100
Tbl2:
ID Sold Total TotalPerPax
I need to calculate the TotalPerPax in Tbl2 depending on the ID But the calculation of the TotalPerPax is like this. Example:
ID = 1
Sold: 0 + 2 + 3 = 5
Total = 100 + 200 + 300 = 600
TotalPerPax = (Total minus the Total of the row that has 0 sold / Sold )
(600 -100 ) / 5 = 500
The output should look like this
Tbl2:
ID Sold Total TotalPerPax
1 5 600 100 -- (500 Total / 5 Sold)
2 1 100 100
So far I have this:
When executing it throws an error "Divide by zero error encountered" thus I can't compute the totalPerPax correctly. Can anyone can help me to with this? Thanks
SELECT ID,
Col1
Col2,
Sold,
Total,
SUM(COALESCE(Total, 0))/SUM(COALESCE(Sold, 0)) As TotalPerPax
FROM Tbl1 t1
Where ID = 1
GROUP BY ID, Col1, Col2,Sold, Total
Sample sql fiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!18/09971/2
aI would phrase this as:
SELECT
ID,
SUM(Sold) AS Sold,
SUM(Total) AS Total,
CASE WHEN SUM(Sold) > 0
THEN SUM(CASE WHEN Sold > 0 THEN Total ELSE 0 END) /
SUM(CASE WHEN Sold > 0 THEN Sold ELSE 0 END)
ELSE 0 END AS TotalPerPax
FROM TBl1
GROUP BY ID;
Demo
The CASE expression for TotalPerPax uses logic which does not include any total or sold amount when the latter happens to be zero. As a note, for any ID which only might have zero sold amounts, TotalPerPax would be reported as zero.
My table looks like this:
ID | ItemID | ItemQualityID | Amount | UnitPrice
My goal is to find the top x% rows for each ItemID + ItemQualityID pair based on Amount cumulative sum and ordered by UnitPrice.
For example:
ID | ItemID | ItemQualityID | Amount | UnitPrice
1 1 1 18 2
2 1 1 1 1
3 1 1 1 1
4 2 1 18 2
5 2 1 1 1
6 2 1 1 1
7 1 1 1 3
and I want the top 10%, then the resulting table should contain row #2, 3, 5, 6. Since the total amount for ItemID 1 and 2 are 21 and 20 respectively, thus 10% would be 2 items each. If I want the top 20%, the resulting table should still be the same since if I include row 1 and 4 it would make it 100%. Row #7 has unit price > row #1 so if row #1 is not included then row #7 shouldn't be included as well.
Ideally I want the table with all the filtered rows for some other calculations but I will be happy even if I can only get the sum of Amount * UnitPrice of the filtered table. Something like
ItemID | ItemQualityID | Sum
1 1 2
2 1 2
for the above example.
You can use SUM OVER :
DECLARE #percent DECIMAL(5, 2) = .1
;WITH CteSum AS(
SELECT *,
TotalSum = SUM(Amount) OVER(PARTITION BY ItemID, ItemQualityID),
CumSum = SUM(Amount) OVER(PARTITION BY ItemID, ItemQualityID ORDER BY UnitPrice, ID)
FROM tbl
)
SELECT
ItemID,
ItemQualityID,
[Sum] = SUM(Amount * UnitPrice)
FROM CteSum
WHERE CumSum <= #percent * TotalSum
GROUP BY ItemID, ItemQualityID
ONLINE DEMO
I have a result set from a SQL Server query as below:
Item Week Amount
1 1 500
1 2 -100
1 3 -200
2 1 800
2 2 -600
2 3 -800
What I want to know is, is it possible to derive a fourth column that gives a running total of amount for each item?
My desired result is as follows:
Item Week Amount Total
1 1 500 500
1 2 -100 400
1 3 -200 200
2 1 800 800
2 2 -600 200
2 3 -800 -600
I am using SQL Server 2008
try SUM() OVER
SELECT
item,
week,
amount,
SUM(amount) over (partition by item order by Week) as Total
FROM yourTable
You will need a SQL Server 2012 to support ROWS PRECEDING functions.
SELECT
item,
week,
amount,
SUM(amount) over (partition by item order by Week
ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
) as Total
FROM yourTable
http://stevestedman.com/2012/03/rows-preceding-and-following-in-tsql-2012/
Say I have to following PaymentTransaction Table:
ID Amount PayMethodID
----------------------------
10254 100 1
15789 150 1
15790 200 0
16954 300 0
17864 400 1
19364 500 1
PayMethodID Desc
----------------------------
0 CASH
1 VISA
2 MASTER
3 AMEX
4 ETC
I can simply use a group by to group the PayMethodID under 1 and 0.
What i am trying to do is to show also the non-exist PayMethodID under GROUP BY
My current result with simple group by statement is
PayMethodID TotalAmount
-------------------------
0 500
1 1150
Expected result (to show 0 if its not exits in the transaction table):
PayMethodID TotalAmount
-------------------------
0 500
1 1150
2 0
3 0
4 0
This might be a simple and duplicated question, but i just cant find the keyword to search around. I would remove this post if you can find me any duplication. Thanks.
You can use LEFT JOIN, so all rows from leftmost table (TableA) will be shown whether it has a matching values on the other table or not.
SELECT a.PayMethodID,
TotalAmount = ISNULL(SUM(b.Amount), 0)
FROM TableA AS a -- <== contains list of card type
LEFT JOIN TableB AS b -- <== contains the payment list
ON a.PayMethodID = b.PayMethodID
GROUP BY a.PayMethodID
A regular OUTER (LEFT) JOIN will give you all rows from the PayMethod table no matter if they exist in the PaymentTransaction table, the rest of the sums being NULL. You can then use a COALESCE to make the null rows zero;
SELECT pm.PayMethodID, COALESCE(SUM(pt.Amount), 0) TotalAmount
FROM PayMethod pm
LEFT JOIN PaymentTransaction pt
ON pm.PayMethodID = pt.PayMethodID
GROUP BY pm.PayMethodID
An SQLfiddle to test with.
I want to find the rows which are similar to each other, and replace them with a new row. My table looks like this:
OrderID | Price | Minimum Number | Maximum Number | Volume
1 45 2 10 250
2 46 2 10 250
3 60 2 10 250
"Similar" in this context means that the rows that have same Maximum Number, Minimum Number, and Volume. Prices can be different, but the difference can be at most 2.
In this example, orders with OrderID of 1 and 2 are similar, but 3 is not (since even if it has same Minimum Number, Maximum Number, and Volume, its price is not within 2 units from orders 1 and 2).
Then, I want orders 1 and 2 be replaced by a new order, let's say OrderID 4, which has same Minimum Number and Maximum Number. Its Volume hass to be sum of volumes of the orders it is replacing. Its price can be the Price of any of the previous orders that will be deleted in the output table (45 or 46 in this example). So, the output for the example above would be:
OrderID | Price | Minimum Number | Maximum Number | Volume
4 45 2 10 500
3 60 2 10 250
Here is a way to do this in SQL Server 2012 or Oracle. The idea is to use lag() to find where groups should begin and end and then aggregate.
select min(id) as id, min(price) as price, MinimumNumber, MaximumNumber, sum(Volume)
from (select t.*,
sum(case when prev_price < price - 2 then 1 else 0 end) over
(partition by MinimumNumber, MaximumNumber, Volume order by price) as grp
from (select t.*,
lag(price) over (partition by MinimumNumber, MaximumNumber, Volume
order by price
) as prev_price
from table t
) t
) t
group by grp, price, MinimumNumber, MaximumNumber;
The only issue is the setting of the id. I'm not sure what the exact rule is for that.