I'm trying to access state from useState hook but it is giving me the initial state even after I have modified it.
const quotesURL = "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/camperbot/5a022b72e96c4c9585c32bf6a75f62d9/raw/e3c6895ce42069f0ee7e991229064f167fe8ccdc/quotes.json";
function QuoteGenerator() {
const [quotes, setQuotes] = useState([]);
const [currentQuote, setCurrentQuote] = useState({ quote: "", author: "" });
useEffect(() => {
axios(quotesURL)
.then(result => {
console.log(result);
setQuotes(result.data);
})
.then(() => {
console.log(quotes);
});
}, []);
console.log(quotes) is returning empty array instead of array of objects
Here's how you should do it:
const quotesURL = "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/camperbot/5a022b72e96c4c9585c32bf6a75f62d9/raw/e3c6895ce42069f0ee7e991229064f167fe8ccdc/quotes.json";
function QuoteGenerator() {
const [quotes, setQuotes] = useState([]);
const [currentQuote, setCurrentQuote] = useState({ quote: "", author: "" });
useEffect(() => { // THIS WILL RUN ONLY AFTER YOUR 1ST RENDER
axios(quotesURL)
.then(result => {
console.log(result);
setQuotes(result.data); // HERE YOU SET quotes AND IT WILL TRIGGER A NEW RENDER
})
}, []); // BECAUSE YOU'VE SET IT WITH '[]'
useEffect(() => { // THIS WILL RUN WHEN THERE'S A CHANGE IN 'quotes'
if (quotes.length) {
setSomeOtherState(); // YOU CAN USE IT TO SET SOME OTHER STATE
}
},[quotes]);
}
How this code works:
1st render: You just the the initial states. useEffects are not run yet.
After 1st render: Both effects will run (in that order). The first one will fire the axios request. The second one will do nothing, because quotes has no length yet.
Axios request completes: the thenclause will run and setQuotes will be called to set the new quotes value. This will trigger a re-render.
2nd render: Now the quotes state has beens updated with the new value.
After 2nd render: Only the second useEffect will run, because it's "listening" for changes in the quotes variable that just changes. Then you can use it to set some state like you said.
This is expected. Here's how your code works:
quotes and setQuotes are returned from the useState function.
useEffect runs for the first time once your component is mounted. quotes (empty array) and setQuotes are available within this function.
When your axios request completes, you setQuotes. However, two things: 1 - this doesn't immediately update the value of the state. 2 - within the context of useEffect, quotes is still an empty array - when you do setQuotes(result.data) you're creating a new array, and that will not be directly accessible within this context.
As such, console.log(quotes); will give an empty array.
Depends on what you're trying to use quotes for. Why not just directly work with result.data?
Update: I'm thinking of maybe something like this:
function QuoteGenerator() {
const [quotes, setQuotes] = useState([]);
const [currentQuote, setCurrentQuote] = useState({ quote: "", author: "" });
useEffect(() => {
axios(quotesURL).then(result => {
console.log(result);
setQuotes(result.data);
setSomeOtherState(); // why not do it here?
});
}, []);
}
This way you maintain closer control of the data, without giving it over to lifecycle methods.
Another way you could refactor your code to work:
const quotesURL = "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/camperbot/5a022b72e96c4c9585c32bf6a75f62d9/raw/e3c6895ce42069f0ee7e991229064f167fe8ccdc/quotes.json";
function QuoteGenerator = ({ quote }) => {
const [quotes, setQuotes] = useState([]);
const [currentQuote, setCurrentQuote] = useState({ quote: "", author: "" });
const fetchQuote = async quote => {
const result = await axios.get(quotesURL);
setQuotes(result.data);
};
useEffect(() => {
fetchQuote(quote);
}, [quote]);
};
So now you have a function inside of your QuoteGenerator functional component called fetchQuote. The useEffect hook allows us to use something like lifecycle methods, kind of like combining the componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate lifecycle methods. In this case I called useEffect with a function to be ran everytime this component initially gets rendered to the screen and any time the component update as well.
You see in the other answers, that a second argument is passed as an empty array. I put quote as the first element inside of that empty array as it was passed as a prop in my example, but in others' example it was not, therefore they have an empty array.
If you want to understand why we use an empty array as the second argument, I think the best way to explain it is to quote the Hooks API:
If you want to run an effect and clean it up only once (on mount and unmount), you can pass an empty array ([]) as a second argument. This tells React that your effect doesn’t depend on any values from props or state, so it never needs to re-run. This isn’t handled as a special case — it follows directly from how the dependencies array always works.
If you pass an empty array ([]), the props and state as inside the effect will always have their initial values. While passing [] as the second argument is closer to the familiar componentDidMount and componentWillUnmount mental model...
In place of setState we call setQuotes and this is used to update the list of quotes and I passed in the new array of quotes which is result.data.
So I passed in fetchQuote and then passed it the prop that was provided to the component of quote.
That second argument of the empty array in useEffect is pretty powerful and not easy to explain and/or understand for everybody right away. For example, if you do something like this useEffect(() => {}) with no empty array as a second argument, that useEffect function will be making non-stop requests to the JSON server endpoint or whatever.
If you use useEffect(() => {}, []) with an empty array, it will only be invoked one time which is identical to using a componentDidMount in a class-based component.
In the example, I gave above, I am instituting a check to limit how often useEffect gets called, I passed in the value of the props.
The reason I did not put the async function inside of useEffect is because it's my understanding that we cannot use useEffect if we are passing an async function or a function that returns a Promise, at least according to the errors I have seen in the past.
With that said, there is a workaround to that limitation like so:
useEffect(
() => {
(async quote => {
const result = await axios.get(quotesURL);
setQuotes(result.data);
})(quote);
},
[quote]
);
This is a more confusing syntax but it supposedly works because we are defining a function and immediately invoking it. Similar to something like this:
(() => console.log('howdy'))()
Related
I have made a functional component, instead of class (too late to change, I've written almost 1000 lines already), and I have a big problem with using data in a function, because the state is not updated when the function is called, so I'm getting an empty array... I'm not sure what can be done here, so that the function doStuffWithIt() is able to use updated states that are not empty.
So basically this is how I have it setup:
const [objects, setObjects] = useState([])
const [processedObjects, setProcessedObjects] = useState([])
async function loadData() {
await axios.all([
axios.get("/api/objects"),
...etc //multiple other axios.get calls
]).then(axios.spread((...responses) => {
setObjects(responses[0].data)
...etc //multiple setStates
})).catch(errors => {
console.log(errors)
}
useEffect(() => {
loadData()
doStuffWithIt()
}, [])
function doStuffWithIt() {
console.log(objects) // <-- returns empty array []
//process the array with .map function and push the changes into processedObjects with setProcessedObjects,
//so I can use processed objects as options inside a react-select component
}
return (
<Select options={processedObjects} />
)
Note: I will have multiple components like this, that will need to have the fetched data to be processed and set in another state hook.
Just put the code of that function inside effect with needed dependency.
useEffect(()=>{
console.log(objects) // <-- returns empty array []
//process the array with .map function and push the changes into processedObjects with setProcessedObjects,
//so I can use processed objects as options inside a react-select component
}, [objects])
I am trying to set the state of a variable "workspace", but when I console log the data I get an infinite loop. I am calling the axios "get" function inside of useEffect(), and console logging outside of this loop, so I don't know what is triggering all the re-renders. I have not found an answer to my specific problem in this question. Here's my code:
function WorkspaceDynamic({ match }) {
const [proposals, setProposals] = useState([{}]);
useEffect(() => {
getItems();
});
const getItems = async () => {
const proposalsList = await axios.get(
"http://localhost:5000/api/proposals"
);
setProposals(proposalsList.data);
};
const [workspace, setWorkspace] = useState({});
function findWorkspace() {
proposals.map((workspace) => {
if (workspace._id === match.params.id) {
setWorkspace(workspace);
}
});
}
Does anyone see what might be causing the re-render? Thanks!
The effect hook runs every render cycle, and one without a dependency array will execute its callback every render cycle. If the effect callback updates state, i.e. proposals, then another render cycle is enqueued, thus creating render looping.
If you want to only run effect once when the component mounts then use an empty dependency array.
useEffect(() => {
getItems();
}, []);
If you want it to only run at certain time, like if the match param updates, then include a dependency in the array.
useEffect(() => {
getItems();
}, [match]);
Your use of useEffect is not correct. If you do not include a dependency array, it gets called every time the component renders. As a result your useEffect is called which causes setProposals then it again causes useEffect to run and so on
try this
useEffect(() => {
getItems();
} , []); // an empty array means it will be called once only
I think it's the following: useEffect should have a second param [] to make sure it's executed only once. that is:
useEffect(() => {
getItems();
}, []);
otherwise setProposal will modify the state which will trigger a re-render, which will call useEffect, which will make the async call, which will setProposal, ...
I have a problem when using the useEffect hook, it is generating an infinite loop.
I have a list that is loaded as soon as the page is assembled and should also be updated when a new record is found in "developers" state.
See the code:
const [developers, setDevelopers] = useState<DevelopersData[]>([]);
const getDevelopers = async () => {
await api.get('/developers').then(response => {
setDevelopers(response.data);
});
};
// This way, the loop does not happen
useEffect(() => {
getDevelopers();
}, []);
// This way, infinte loop
useEffect(() => {
getDevelopers();
}, [developers]);
console.log(developers)
If I remove the developer dependency on the second parameter of useEffect, the loop does not happen, however, the list is not updated when a new record is found. If I insert "developers" in the second parameter of useEffect, the list is updated automatically, however, it goes into an infinite loop.
What am I doing wrong?
complete code (with component): https://gist.github.com/fredarend/c571d2b2fd88c734997a757bac6ab766
Print:
The dependencies for useEffect use reference equality, not deep equality. (If you need deep equality comparison for some reason, take a look at use-deep-compare-effect.)
The API call always returns a new array object, so its reference/identity is not the same as it was earlier, triggering useEffect to fire the effect again, etc.
Given that nothing else ever calls setDevelopers, i.e. there's no way for developers to change unless it was from the API call triggered by the effect, there's really no actual need to have developers as a dependency to useEffect; you can just have an empty array as deps: useEffect(() => ..., []). The effect will only be called exactly once.
EDIT: Following the comment clarification,
I register a developer in the form on the left [...] I would like the list to be updated as soon as a new dev is registered.
This is one way to do things:
The idea here is that developers is only ever automatically loaded on component mount. When the user adds a new developer via the AddDeveloperForm, we opportunistically update the local developers state while we're posting the new developer to the backend. Whether or not posting fails, we reload the list from the backend to ensure we have the freshest real state.
const DevList: React.FC = () => {
const [developers, setDevelopers] = useState<DevelopersData[]>([]);
const getDevelopers = useCallback(async () => {
await api.get("/developers").then((response) => {
setDevelopers(response.data);
});
}, [setDevelopers]);
useEffect(() => {
getDevelopers();
}, [getDevelopers]);
const onAddDeveloper = useCallback(
async (newDeveloper) => {
const newDevelopers = developers.concat([newDeveloper]);
setDevelopers(newDevelopers);
try {
await postNewDeveloperToAPI(newDeveloper); // TODO: Implement me
} catch (e) {
alert("Oops, failed posting developer information...");
}
getDevelopers();
},
[developers],
);
return (
<>
<AddDeveloperForm onAddDeveloper={onAddDeveloper} />
<DeveloperList developers={developers} />
</>
);
};
The problem is that your getDevelopers function, calls your setDevelopers function, which updates your developers variable. When your developers variable is updated, it triggers the useEffect function
useEffect(() => {
getDevelopers();
}, [developers]);
because developers is one of the dependencies passed to it and the process starts over.
Every time a variable within the array, which is passed as the second argument to useEffect, gets updated, the useEffect function gets triggered
Use an empty array [] in the second parameter of the useEffect.
This causes the code inside to run only on mount of the parent component.
useEffect(() => {
getDevelopers();
}, []);
I'm working on a react native app.
In my main component, I use a UseEffect hook in order to store a database response in a 'food' varialbe. I will then create a list with the data contained in this variable.
There is my hook:
const [ food, setFood ] = useState([]);
const [listData, setListData] = useState([]);
const load_food = async () => {
db.listProduct().then(row => setFood(row))
setListData(
Array(food.length)
.fill('')
.map((_, i) => ({ key: `${i}`, product: `${food[i].PRODUCTNAME}`,
date: `${food[i].DATE}`,
uri: `${food[i].IMAGEURL}`,
id: `${food[i].IDPRODUCT}`})))
};
useEffect( () => { load_food(food) }, [food] );
But the problem is that this hook is called indefinitely. If I put a console.log('test') in the hook, the log will be infinite.
Because of that, my app is very laggy
From what I understood of similar problem, I must leave an empty array in my hook like this:
useEffect( () => { load_food(food) }, [] );
But by doing so, my list does not initialize.
I can't find a solution
useEffect( () => { load_food(food) }, [food] ); this is wrong, here you need to use props value to update the state rather than another state value to update the component, in place of [food] , make it [] and use below useEffect. I guess this should work otherwise please check the logic whether it's returning proper values when you are doing setListData call.
useEffect (() => {
db.listProduct().then(row => setFood(row))
setListData(
Array(food.length)
.fill('')
.map((_, i) => ({ key: `${i}`, product: `${food[i].PRODUCTNAME}`,
date: `${food[i].DATE}`,
uri: `${food[i].IMAGEURL}`,
id: `${food[i].IDPRODUCT}`})))
},[])
you can try this way
const [ food, setFood ] = useState([]);
const [listData, setListData] = useState([]);
const load_food = async () => {
const row = await db.listProduct();
setFood(row);
setListData(row.map(
(item,i) => ({
key: i,
product: item.PRODUCTNAME,
date: item.DATE,
uri:item.IMAGEURL,
id:item.IPRODUCT
})));
useEffect( () => { load_food() }, [] );
This is a late response, but nonetheless, I think it’s worth explaining.
The second argument you are passing, [food], is telling react to re-render every time the variable “food” is changed. The fact that your component is re-rendering infinitely means that “food” is constantly being changed. If you want a single call to load_food, you are correct when you mentioned that you should pass in a second argument or just [].
As a side note, I can’t test out the code, but my assumption is that this line:
db.listProduct().then(row => setFood(row))
is causing the infinite loop, as you are generating a new array and updating food infinitely, which is why load_food is being called infinitely.
My guess on why passing in [] doesn’t work is because you are updating the food state variable, and then immediately you are trying to use that food state variable, assuming that the state has been updated. setFood is an asynchronous function, meaning that you are not guaranteed to update the variable immediately. There are two fixes to this:
Set the initial food state to be whatever array you retrieve from your database. However, this would require you to retrieve from the database the first time the component is rendered, and that might not be what you are looking for.
Instead of updating food with whatever array you retrieve, store that array into some temporary variable (ex. db.listProduct().then(row => tmpArray). Then you can call setFood(tmpArray), updating your food variable, and then you can make your call to setListData using tmpArray instead of food, as tmpArray is guaranteed to be the array you want to use.
I've been playing around with the new hook system in React 16.7-alpha and get stuck in an infinite loop in useEffect when the state I'm handling is an object or array.
First, I use useState and initiate it with an empty object like this:
const [obj, setObj] = useState({});
Then, in useEffect, I use setObj to set it to an empty object again. As a second argument I'm passing [obj], hoping that it wont update if the content of the object hasn't changed. But it keeps updating. I guess because no matter the content, these are always different objects making React thinking it keep changing?
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients]);
The same is true with arrays, but as a primitive it wont get stuck in a loop, as expected.
Using these new hooks, how should I handle objects and array when checking weather the content has changed or not?
Passing an empty array as the second argument to useEffect makes it only run on mount and unmount, thus stopping any infinite loops.
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, []);
This was clarified to me in the blog post on React hooks at https://www.robinwieruch.de/react-hooks/
Had the same problem. I don't know why they not mention this in docs. Just want to add a little to Tobias Haugen answer.
To run in every component/parent rerender you need to use:
useEffect(() => {
// don't know where it can be used :/
})
To run anything only one time after component mount(will be rendered once) you need to use:
useEffect(() => {
// do anything only one time if you pass empty array []
// keep in mind, that component will be rendered one time (with default values) before we get here
}, [] )
To run anything one time on component mount and on data/data2 change:
const [data, setData] = useState(false)
const [data2, setData2] = useState('default value for first render')
useEffect(() => {
// if you pass some variable, than component will rerender after component mount one time and second time if this(in my case data or data2) is changed
// if your data is object and you want to trigger this when property of object changed, clone object like this let clone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(data)), change it clone.prop = 2 and setData(clone).
// if you do like this 'data.prop=2' without cloning useEffect will not be triggered, because link to data object in momory doesn't changed, even if object changed (as i understand this)
}, [data, data2] )
How i use it most of the time:
export default function Book({id}) {
const [book, bookSet] = useState(false)
const loadBookFromServer = useCallback(async () => {
let response = await fetch('api/book/' + id)
response = await response.json()
bookSet(response)
}, [id]) // every time id changed, new book will be loaded
useEffect(() => {
loadBookFromServer()
}, [loadBookFromServer]) // useEffect will run once and when id changes
if (!book) return false //first render, when useEffect did't triggered yet we will return false
return <div>{JSON.stringify(book)}</div>
}
I ran into the same problem too once and I fixed it by making sure I pass primitive values in the second argument [].
If you pass an object, React will store only the reference to the object and run the effect when the reference changes, which is usually every singe time (I don't now how though).
The solution is to pass the values in the object. You can try,
const obj = { keyA: 'a', keyB: 'b' }
useEffect(() => {
// do something
}, [Object.values(obj)]);
or
const obj = { keyA: 'a', keyB: 'b' }
useEffect(() => {
// do something
}, [obj.keyA, obj.keyB]);
If you are building a custom hook, you can sometimes cause an infinite loop with default as follows
function useMyBadHook(values = {}) {
useEffect(()=> {
/* This runs every render, if values is undefined */
},
[values]
)
}
The fix is to use the same object instead of creating a new one on every function call:
const defaultValues = {};
function useMyBadHook(values = defaultValues) {
useEffect(()=> {
/* This runs on first call and when values change */
},
[values]
)
}
If you are encountering this in your component code the loop may get fixed if you use defaultProps instead of ES6 default values
function MyComponent({values}) {
useEffect(()=> {
/* do stuff*/
},[values]
)
return null; /* stuff */
}
MyComponent.defaultProps = {
values = {}
}
Your infinite loop is due to circularity
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients]);
setIngredients({}); will change the value of ingredients(will return a new reference each time), which will run setIngredients({}). To solve this you can use either approach:
Pass a different second argument to useEffect
const timeToChangeIngrediants = .....
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [timeToChangeIngrediants ]);
setIngrediants will run when timeToChangeIngrediants has changed.
I'm not sure what use case justifies change ingrediants once it has been changed. But if it is the case, you pass Object.values(ingrediants) as a second argument to useEffect.
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, Object.values(ingrediants));
As said in the documentation (https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-effect.html), the useEffect hook is meant to be used when you want some code to be executed after every render. From the docs:
Does useEffect run after every render? Yes!
If you want to customize this, you can follow the instructions that appear later in the same page (https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-effect.html#tip-optimizing-performance-by-skipping-effects). Basically, the useEffect method accepts a second argument, that React will examine to determine if the effect has to be triggered again or not.
useEffect(() => {
document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
}, [count]); // Only re-run the effect if count changes
You can pass any object as the second argument. If this object remains unchanged, your effect will only be triggered after the first mount. If the object changes, the effect will be triggered again.
I'm not sure if this will work for you but you could try adding .length like this:
useEffect(() => {
// fetch from server and set as obj
}, [obj.length]);
In my case (I was fetching an array!) it fetched data on mount, then again only on change and it didn't go into a loop.
If you include empty array at the end of useEffect:
useEffect(()=>{
setText(text);
},[])
It would run once.
If you include also parameter on array:
useEffect(()=>{
setText(text);
},[text])
It would run whenever text parameter change.
I often run into an infinite re-render when having a complex object as state and updating it from useRef:
const [ingredients, setIngredients] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({
...ingredients,
newIngedient: { ... }
});
}, [ingredients]);
In this case eslint(react-hooks/exhaustive-deps) forces me (correctly) to add ingredients to the dependency array. However, this results in an infinite re-render. Unlike what some say in this thread, this is correct, and you can't get away with putting ingredients.someKey or ingredients.length into the dependency array.
The solution is that setters provide the old value that you can refer to. You should use this, rather than referring to ingredients directly:
const [ingredients, setIngredients] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients(oldIngedients => {
return {
...oldIngedients,
newIngedient: { ... }
}
});
}, []);
If you use this optimization, make sure the array includes all values from the component scope (such as props and state) that change over time and that are used by the effect.
I believe they are trying to express the possibility that one could be using stale data, and to be aware of this. It doesn't matter the type of values we send in the array for the second argument as long as we know that if any of those values change it will execute the effect. If we are using ingredients as part of the computation within the effect, we should include it in the array.
const [ingredients, setIngredients] = useState({});
// This will be an infinite loop, because by shallow comparison ingredients !== {}
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients]);
// If we need to update ingredients then we need to manually confirm
// that it is actually different by deep comparison.
useEffect(() => {
if (is(<similar_object>, ingredients) {
return;
}
setIngredients(<similar_object>);
}, [ingredients]);
The main problem is that useEffect compares the incoming value with the current value shallowly. This means that these two values compared using '===' comparison which only checks for object references and although array and object values are the same it treats them to be two different objects. I recommend you to check out my article about useEffect as a lifecycle methods.
The best way is to compare previous value with current value by using usePrevious() and _.isEqual() from Lodash.
Import isEqual and useRef. Compare your previous value with current value inside the useEffect(). If they are same do nothing else update. usePrevious(value) is a custom hook which create a ref with useRef().
Below is snippet of my code. I was facing problem of infinite loop with updating data using firebase hook
import React, { useState, useEffect, useRef } from 'react'
import 'firebase/database'
import { Redirect } from 'react-router-dom'
import { isEqual } from 'lodash'
import {
useUserStatistics
} from '../../hooks/firebase-hooks'
export function TMDPage({ match, history, location }) {
const usePrevious = value => {
const ref = useRef()
useEffect(() => {
ref.current = value
})
return ref.current
}
const userId = match.params ? match.params.id : ''
const teamId = location.state ? location.state.teamId : ''
const [userStatistics] = useUserStatistics(userId, teamId)
const previousUserStatistics = usePrevious(userStatistics)
useEffect(() => {
if (
!isEqual(userStatistics, previousUserStatistics)
) {
doSomething()
}
})
In case you DO need to compare the object and when it is updated here is a deepCompare hook for comparison. The accepted answer surely does not address that. Having an [] array is suitable if you need the effect to run only once when mounted.
Also, other voted answers only address a check for primitive types by doing obj.value or something similar to first get to the level where it is not nested. This may not be the best case for deeply nested objects.
So here is one that will work in all cases.
import { DependencyList } from "react";
const useDeepCompare = (
value: DependencyList | undefined
): DependencyList | undefined => {
const ref = useRef<DependencyList | undefined>();
if (!isEqual(ref.current, value)) {
ref.current = value;
}
return ref.current;
};
You can use the same in useEffect hook
React.useEffect(() => {
setState(state);
}, useDeepCompare([state]));
You could also destructure the object in the dependency array, meaning the state would only update when certain parts of the object updated.
For the sake of this example, let's say the ingredients contained carrots, we could pass that to the dependency, and only if carrots changed, would the state update.
You could then take this further and only update the number of carrots at certain points, thus controlling when the state would update and avoiding an infinite loop.
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients.carrots]);
An example of when something like this could be used is when a user logs into a website. When they log in, we could destructure the user object to extract their cookie and permission role, and update the state of the app accordingly.
my Case was special on encountering an infinite loop, the senario was like this:
I had an Object, lets say objX that comes from props and i was destructuring it in props like:
const { something: { somePropery } } = ObjX
and i used the somePropery as a dependency to my useEffect like:
useEffect(() => {
// ...
}, [somePropery])
and it caused me an infinite loop, i tried to handle this by passing the whole something as a dependency and it worked properly.
Another worked solution that I used for arrays state is:
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients(ingredients.length ? ingredients : null);
}, [ingredients]);