I am working on project with Apollo on client side. I am using react-apollo-hooks on my client side. And I have a problem with useApolloClient.
When i fire query with my client I got in useApolloClient I don't get back all data I need. FetchMore is missing. If I use regular query (useQuery) I get that. But problem is I need to fire that query on click and i need to use one provided with apollo client.
I have this function for fetching data on click:
const bulkSearch = async data => {
setContent(<Spinner />);
showModal();
try {
const response = await client.query({
query: BULK_SEARCH_PRODUCTS,
variables: { data }
});
if (!response.loading) {
setContent(
<ProductsListDisplay
products={response.data.bulkSearch.products}
fetchMore={response.fetchMore}
count={{ total: 10 }}
/>
);
return 200;
}
} catch (err) {
return 400;
}
};
And response doesn't contain fetchMore.
On the other way classic query returns fetchMore.
const newdata = useQuery(BULK_SEARCH_PRODUCTS, {
variables: { data: { ids: ["536003", "513010"] } }
});
Some help ? Thank you!
According to the apollo-client docs, ApolloClient.query returns a Promise that resolves to an ApolloQueryResult, which is a simpler object that has only data, errors, loading, networkStatus, and stale as properties.
On the other hand, the render prop argument of react-apollo's Query component gets fed a much richer object, with fetchMore being one of its additional properties. If you want to do something similar using the raw ApolloClient object, you would have to use ApolloClient.watchQuery, which returns an ObservableQuery that you can subscribe to consume results. The benefit of this is that you have access to more methods, such as ObservableQuery.fetchMore.
Note this approach is fundamentally different than using ApolloClient.query, since that function requests one query and returns the result as a Promise, while ApolloClient.watchQuery consistently monitors your cache and pushes updated results to your subscribe method when the cache store changes, so it's a more complicated lifecycle. In general, if you're already using react-apollo or one of the #apollo/react-X packages, you probably want to stay away from ApolloClient.watchQuery, since the functionality from those libraries builds directly on top of it and is designed to be easier to consume.
Hope this helps!
You have to create your own FetchMore method for this. This has to be handled by you that's the safer you to go.
In my case I needed
fetchMore
Adding Infinite loading and should event deal with loading state as well.
Problem with default loading state is that it will be always false as return of promise.
When you use await client.query.
In our query we have cursor based pagination.
read this
Create Function that will trigger on scroll ( end of page )
Check on value of after and update it with state management
Loading as well as data also needs to be in state.
Code:
const fetchMoreFilteredData = async (after) => {
try {
setFilteredLoading(true); // set this state in order to show loading indicator
const { data, loading } = await client.query({
query: QUERY,
variables: {
after: after,
...all variables,
},
fetchPolicy: "network-only",
notifyOnNetworkStatusChange: true,
});
const {
query: {
pageInfo: { hasNextPage, endCursor },
},
} = data;
setFilteredData({
// update your data ...filteredData,
});
setHasNextPage(hasNextPage); // check if there is next page
setEndCursor(endCursor); // set end cursor for next page this will guide the query to fetch next page
setFilteredLoading(loading); // set loading state to false
} catch (error) {
error.graphQLErrors.map((error) => {
console.log("error", error.message);
});
setFilteredLoading(false);
} };
const handleLoadMore = () => {
hasNextPage && fetchMoreFilteredData(_endCursor);
};
Related
So at the moment I am having to put my request / api logic directly into my components because what I need to do a lot of the time is set state based on the response I get from the back end.
Below is a function that I have on my settings page that I use to save the settings to recoil after the user hits save on the form:
const setUserConfig = useSetRecoilState(userAtoms.userConfig);
const submitSettings = async (values: UserConfigInterface) => {
try {
const { data: {data} } = await updateUser(values);
setUserConfig({
...data
});
} catch (error) {
console.log('settings form error: ', error);
}
}
This works perfectly...I just dont want the function in my component as most of my components are getting way bigger than they need to be.
I have tried making a separate file to do this but I can only use the recoil hooks (in this instance useSetRecoilState) inside of components and it just complains when I try and do this outside of a react component.
I have tried implementing this with recoils selector and selectorFamily functions but it gets kind of complicated. Here is how I have tried it inside of a file that has atoms / selectors only:
export const languageProgress = atom<LanguageProgress>({
key: "LanguageProgress",
default: {
level: 1,
xp: 0,
max_xp: 0
}
})
export const languageProgressUpdate = selectorFamily<LanguageProgress>({
key: "LanguageProgress",
get: () => async () => {
try {
const { data: { data } } = await getLanguageProgress();
return data;
} catch (error) {
console.log('get language progress error');
}
},
set: (params:object) => async ({set}) => {
try {
const { data: { data } } = await updateLanguageProgress(params);
set(languageProgress, {
level: data.level,
xp: data.xp,
max_xp: data.max_xp
});
} catch (error) {
console.log('language progress update error: ', error);
}
}
});
What I want to do here is get the values I need from the back end and display it in the front which I can do in the selector function get but now I have 2 points of truth for this...my languageProgress atom will initially be incorrect as its not getting anything from the database so I have to use useGetRevoilValue on the languageProgressUpdate selector I have made but then when I want to update I am updating the atom and not the actual value.
I cannot find a good example anywhere that does what I am trying to here (very suprisingly as I would have thought it is quite a common way to do things...get data from back end and set it in state.) and I can't figure out a way to do it without doing it in the component (as in the first example). Ideally I would like something like the first example but outside of a component because that solution is super simple and works for me.
So I dont know if this is the best answer but it does work and ultimately what I wanted to do was seperate the logic from the screen component.
The answer in my situation is a bit long winded but this is what I used to solve the problem: https://medium.com/geekculture/crud-with-recoiljs-and-remote-api-e36581b77168
Essentially the answer is to put all the logic into a hook and get state from the api and set it there.
get data from back end and set it in state
You may be looking for useRecoilValueLoadable:
"This hook is intended to be used for reading the value of asynchronous selectors. This hook will subscribe the component to the given state."
Here's a quick demonstration of how I've previously used it. To quickly summarise: you pass useRecoilValueLoadable a selector (that you've defined somewhere outside the logic of the component), that selector grabs the data from your API, and that all gets fed back via useRecoilValueLoadable as an array of 1) the current state of the value returned, and 2) the content of that API call.
Note: in this example I'm passing an array of values to the selector each of which makes a separate API call.
App.js
const { state, contents } = useRecoilValueLoadable(myQuery(arr));
if (state.hasValue && contents.length) {
// `map` over the contents
}
selector.js
import { selectorFamily } from 'recoil';
export const myQuery = selectorFamily({
key: 'myQuery',
get: arr => async () => {
const promises = arr.map(async item => {
try {
const response = await fetch(`/endpoint/${item.id}`);
if (response.ok) return response.json();
throw Error('API request not fulfilled');
} catch (err) {
console.log(err);
}
});
const items = await Promise.all(promises);
return items;
}
});
I have massive query, which looks like this: https://pastebin.com/pMp4iNDc.
I have made also second query, which task would be to fetch only needed fields and update them in apollo cache, the query looks like that:
export const SCHEMA_TELEPORT_GET_FREE_TIME_LEFT = gql(`query GetFreeTimeLeft {
teleport {
enteredZoneData {
timeToFreeTry
positionPrice {
currency
amount
}
}
}
}
`);
So the main idea is that when the second query data is fetched it should update the cache which is coming from the first query.
My plan currently is to pass callback function to timer component, and execute the callback after time become zero.
Example:
const TeleportGrid = () => {
const eventData = useApolloClient().cache.readQuery({query: SCHEMA_TELEPORT_GET_DATA}).teleport;
const [fetchNewTime] = useLazyQuery(SCHEMA_TELEPORT_GET_FREE_TIME_LEFT);
return (
<TimerElement timerId={"counterNextFreeTry"} translation={__('event_teleport_position_time_until_free_try')} time={eventData.enteredZoneData.timeToFreeTry} callback={() => {
return fetchNewTime();
}}
/>
);
}
What I have tried till now ?
Use onComplete option from useLazyQuery and manually do writeQuery to update the cache
Use promise chain after fetchNewTime() and manually do writeQuery to update the cache
I haven't tried the useMutation because in this case we are not really mutating anything we are getting new data and updating cache.
Thanks for any advices in advance !
Have an awesome day <3
I haven't worked with Apollo's cache, but according to the documentation, normalized data should update itself in the cache. In your case, this does not happen.
Try setting fetchPolicy: network-only;
If that doesn't work, try tweaking your cache;
You can also directly use cache.modify in onCompleted() with fetchPolicy: no-cache;
const TeleportGrid = () => {
const {cache} = useApolloClient();
const eventData = cache.readQuery({query: SCHEMA_TELEPORT_GET_DATA}).teleport;
const [fetchNewTime] = useLazyQuery(SCHEMA_TELEPORT_GET_FREE_TIME_LEFT, {
onCompleted: (data) => {
cache.modify(...modify logic)
}
});
return ...;
}
PS. Let me remind you that queries have option pollInterval. Good luck!
I have a code like this
const [inputComment, setInputComment] = useState('');
const [
commentPost,
{ data: data4, loading: loading4, errorCreate4 },
] = useMutation(COMMENT_POST);
const { error: error2, loading: loading2, data: data2 } = useQuery(
GET_POST_BY_ID,
{
variables: {
postid: item.id,
},
},
);
const doComment = () => {
commentPost({
variables: {
postId: item.id,
userEmail: email,
comment: inputComment,
},
})
.then(({ data }) => {
setInputComment('');
console.log('success');
})
.catch((e) => {
console.log('not success');
});
};
This is supposed to get the data, and when I do comment then it runs the mutation and re-render everything.
My problem is, it re-render alright BUT the data that the useQuery fetch is not the newest data a.k.a the data before I add a new comment.
Does anyone know how to fix this problem??
Please help :(
Your mutation modifies data on the server side.
Once your mutation is done, you should refetch your data in order to get the modified version in your local cache on the client side.
By guessing how your mutation and query actually work, here is how it would look like:
const [
commentPost,
{ data: data4, loading: loading4, errorCreate4 },
] = useMutation(COMMENT_POST, {
refetchQueries: [
{ query: GET_POST_BY_ID, variables: { postid: item.id } }
]
});
Otherwise, intead of refetching from the server, you could update the local cache directly.
More info can be found here in the official documentation.
I assume commentPost is an insert operation, not an update of a single record. In this case, Apollo useMutation will not update the cache for you. You need to modify the cache yourself. The official Apollo documentation has covered this use case with an example. You may want to revise the usage of writeFragment as well.
Below are directly from apollo docs on cache update for list fields.
In most cases, a mutation response should include any object(s) the
mutation modified. This enables Apollo Client to normalize those
objects and cache them according to their __typename and id fields (by
default).
...
When a mutation's response is insufficient to update all modified
fields in your cache (such as certain list fields), you can define an
update function to apply manual changes to your cached data after a
mutation.
const [addTodo] = useMutation(ADD_TODO, {
update(cache, { data: { addTodo } }) {
cache.modify({
fields: {
todos(existingTodos = []) {
const newTodoRef = cache.writeFragment({
data: addTodo,
fragment: gql`
fragment NewTodo on Todo {
id
type
}
`
});
return [...existingTodos, newTodoRef];
}
}
});
}
});
EDIT
I noticed another answer suggests using refetch, which is not a bad option for starters. However, updating the cache is the recommended approach over refetch. You can refer to the Apollo blog article When To Use Refetch Queries in Apollo Client.
Below are some quotes you should note from this article.
If you’re just getting started with GraphQL, I think the mental model of passing in the queries that you’d like to re-run after a mutation is an easy one to wrap your head around.
...
The advantage here is that this approach is straightforward. The disadvantage is that we’re fetching the entire list of data again when we might not need to.
...
For a more efficient use of bandwidth and network round-trips, we can rely on cache normalization and update functions.
I have a very basic app that fetches a user and allows to change his name. I fetch the user with React query so I can benefit from the cache feature. It works.
However, when I want to update the user, I use a classic post request with axios. Once the user is updated in the database, I need to update the cache directly in the updateUser() function. I've seen tutorials on the web that use queryCache.setCache, but it doesn't work here. How to fix this? Or maybe there is a better way to handle such queries?
Also, I notice a huge number of rendering... (see the "user render" console.log in the app file).
For the convenience, I've made a small script on a codesandbox with the pokeapi:
https://codesandbox.io/s/api-service-syxl8?file=/src/App.js:295-306
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
So, I'll show you what I do:
const updateUser = async (userUpdates: User) => {
const data = await UserService.updateUser(userUpdates); // return axios data
return data;
}
// if you want optimistic updating:
const { mutate: mutateUser } = useMutation(updateUser, {
onMutate: async (userUpdates) => {
// Cancel any outgoing refetches (so they don't overwrite our optimistic update)
await queryClient.cancelQueries(['user', userUpdates.id]);
// Snapshot the previous value
const previousUser = queryClient.getQueryData(['user', userUpdates.id]);
// Optimistically update to the new value
queryClient.setQueryData(['user', userUpdates.id], userUpdates);
// Return a context with the previous user and updated user
return { previousUser, userUpdates }; // context
},
// If the mutation fails, use the context we returned above
onError: (err, userUpdates, context) => {
queryClient.setQueryData(['user', context.userUpdates.id], context.previousUser);
},
// Always refetch after error or success:
onSettled: (userUpdates) => {
queryClient.invalidateQueries(['user', userUpdates.id]);
}
});
// then to update the user
const handleUpdateUser = (userUpdates: User) => mutateUser(userUpdates);
This all comes from the docs:
Optimistic Updates
I am coming here as a last resort! I have been searching for 1-2 weeks now and haven’t came across anything!
I want to use GraphQL in react (I have an Apollo react client and Apollo backend), but I want to be able to call a query and return the results as an object without it needing to be done using a component or class.
I have a tried using client.query but whatever way I try I only get promises returned.
I want something like this:
const myData = some kind of query call
edit:
Want I want to do is pass an array of objects into a component which will then render the data how I want it.
An example would be passing a list of events into a calendar cell to be displayed for that day.
Here's a better example of what I want to do:
const CustomCellOne = () => (
<Query query={my_query} variables={ vars }>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
const dataPoints = data.blahQuery;
return (
<CustomCellTwo data={dataPoints} />
)
}}
</Query>
);
Network requests are asynchronous to prevent blocking UI. The Fetch API, which Apollo uses under the hood, utilizes Promises instead of the more traditional callbacks to handle asynchronously requesting resources across the network, so Apollo's API is based on Promises as well. There is no method available that will allow you to synchronously fetch a GraphQL query -- you just need to structure your code appropriately to handle the Promise once it resolves.
The following examples assume you've correctly configured a client instance. Using then:
function doSomething () {
client.query({ query: SOME_QUERY })
.then(({ data }) => {
// Use the returned data however you like
})
.catch(error => {
// Handle error
})
}
Using async/await:
async function doSomething () {
try {
const { data } = await client.query({ query: SOME_QUERY })
} catch (error) {
// Handle error
}
}
If you are unfamiliar with Promises, it would be to your benefit to review the appropriate documentation and check out some tutorials.