I have the following BDD given statement in landing.py file
use_step_matcher("re")
#given(u'that I land on the (page_name) landing page with the correct offer id (?:start network traffic)')
My feature file is as follows:
Scenario : DR lil page end2end test starting with utm parameters
Given that I land on the "google page" landing page with the correct offer id start network traffic
When I try to run it says undefined step
I am using the step matcher "re" and the text "start network traffic" in my given statement is optional. Why is it failing
try
#given(u'that I land on the {page_name} landing page with the correct offer id (?:start network traffic)')
Experience Analytics stopped working and it's now not showing any interaction. Upon checking logs I found the below exception but I am not able to find any working solution for this .I need your suggestion on this if any one had faced similar type of issues requesting you to please help me
ERROR [Experience Analytics]: SegmentProcessor failed to process interaction '00d87833-db45-0000-0000-05d25540e158' segment '2db07a51-fad7-4ede-b727-bd49ebb9d6f2' - DescriptorId : 2f421912-f1b3-49d8-82b8-50a64c80e4e3
Sitecore.XConnect.Segmentation.ExpressionBuilder.PredicateDescriptorException: No known predicate type could be determined from 'Sitecore.Analytics.OmniChannel.Conditions.Channel.CurrentInteractionIsOnChannelCondition,Sitecore.Analytics.OmniChannel' specified in the definition item (Id = '2f421912-f1b3-49d8-82b8-50a64c80e4e3', db = 'master') : Could not load type 'Sitecore.Analytics.OmniChannel.Conditions.Channel.CurrentInteractionIsOnChannelCondition' from assembly 'Sitecore.Analytics.OmniChannel'
Here the DescriptorId is a sitecore rule located at the path /sitecore/system/Settings/Rules/Definitions/Elements/Channel/Current Interaction is on channel condition
I am using Sitecore 9.1 /sitecore/system/Settings/Rules/Definitions/Elements/Channel/Current Interaction is on channel condition
I haven't made any changes to the above system item and there is no customization has been made.
Any suggestions please
I'm adding BaseX to an existing web application and currently writing code to import data into it. The documentation is crystal-clear that
An existing database will be overwritten.
Finding this behavior mindboggingly dangerous, I tried it with the hope that the documentation was wrong but unfortunately my test confirmed it. For instance, using basexclient I can do this:
> create db test
Database 'test' created in 12.03 ms.
> create db test
Database 'test' created in 32.43 ms.
>
I can also replicate this behavior with the Python client, which is I what I'm actually using for my application. Reducing my code to the essentials:
session = BaseXClient.Session("127.0.0.1", 1984, "admin", "admin")
session.create("test", "")
It does not matter whether test exists or not, the whole thing is overwritten if it exists.
How can I work around this dangerous default behavior? I'd would like to prevent the possibility of missteps in production.
You can issue a list command before you create your database. For instance with the command line client if the database does not exist:
> list foo
Database 'foo' was not found.
Whereas if the database exists:
> list test
Input Path Type Content-Type Size
------------------------------------
This is a database that is empty so it does not show any contents but at least you do not get the error message. When you use a client you have to check whether it errors out or not. With the Python client you could do:
def exists(session, db):
try:
session.execute("list " + db)
except IOError as ex:
if ex.message == "Database '{0}' was not found.".format(db):
return False
raise
return True
The client raises IOError if the server raises an error, which is a very generic way to report a problem. So you have to test the error message to figure out what is going on. We reraise if it happens that the error message is not the one which pertains to our test. This way we don't swallow exceptions caused by unrelated issues.
With that function you could do:
session = BaseXClient.Session("127.0.0.1", 1984, "admin", "admin")
if exists(session, "test"):
raise SomeRelevantException("Oi! You are about to overwrite your database!")
session.create("test", "")
I am trying to connect to D3 Database with MVSP java api. So far:
I have downloaded the mvapi.jar
added it in project lib folder
written the sample code for connection inside main method
String url = "jdbc:mv:d3:hostname:portNo";
Properties props = new Properties();
props.setProperty("username", "");
props.setProperty("password", "");
String account = "AGCO";
String password = "";
MVConnection connection = null;
try {
// Getting error at this point
connection = new MVConnection(url,props);
MVStatement mvStatement = connection.createStatement();
connection.logTo(account,password);
MVResultSet results = mvStatement.executeQuery(query);
}
com.tigr.mvapi.exceptions.MVException: server error with errorCode 1023.
I checked the console but I'm not able to figure out the actual cause or whether I am entering the wrong username, password.
Please suggest what I am doing wrong.
First, you have to set a breakpoint or trace which function is throwing the errors. Then check the routes, (FileName) probably you will have much more experience than I do, but keep in mind that giving the full route ("account,filename," where the last comma is important) is never a bad idea while keep you safer and is mandatory if the filename is in a different account that you are logged to.
And like always please verify these things:
You have enough licenses. Try to close any terminal you have opened for testing your queries. Yes you know is true. One connection one license. Sometimes MVSP let you two under the same IP but chek this.
MVSP service is running. See Pick D3 documentation.
Your USER and ACCOUNT are both ENABLED to access in the MVSP server otherwise you won't be able to access these files or login with the user through the API. See the documentation to enable in the MVSP.Menu account.
I hope this helps.
Greetings,
Well I am bewildered. I have been tasked with updating a PHP script that uses the BulkAPI to upsert some data into the Opportunity entity.
This is all going well except that the Bulk API is returning this error for some clearly defined custom fields:
InvalidBatch : Field name not found : cv__Acknowledged__c
And similar.
I thought I finally found the problem when I discovered the WSDL version I was using was quite old (Partner WSDL). So I promptly regenerated the WSDL. Only problem? Enterprise, Partner, etc....all of them...do not include these fields. They're all coming from the Common Ground package and start with cv_
I even tried to find them in the object explorer in Workbench as well as the schema explorer in Force.com IDE.
So, please...lend me your experience. How can I update these values?
Thanks in advance!
Clif
Screenshots to prove I have the correct access:
EDIT -- Here is my code:
require_once 'soapclient/SforcePartnerClient.php';
require_once 'BulkApiClient.php';
$mySforceConnection = new SforcePartnerClient();
$mySoapClient = $mySforceConnection->createConnection(APP.'plugins'.DS.'salesforce_bulk_api_client'.DS.'vendors'.DS.'soapclient'.DS.'partner.wsdl.xml');
$mylogin = $mySforceConnection->login('redacted#redacted.com', 'redactedSessionredactedPassword');
$myBulkApiConnection = new BulkApiClient($mylogin->serverUrl, $mylogin->sessionId);
$job = new JobInfo();
$job->setObject('Opportunity');
$job->setOpertion('upsert');
$job->setContentType('CSV');
$job->setConcurrencyMode('Parallel');
$job->setExternalIdFieldName('Id');
$job = $myBulkApiConnection->createJob($job);
$batch = $myBulkApiConnection->createBatch($job, $insert);
$myBulkApiConnection->updateJobState($job->getId(), 'Closed');
$times = 1;
while($batch->getState() == 'Queued' || $batch->getState() == 'InProgress')
{
$batch = $myBulkApiConnection->getBatchInfo($job->getId(), $batch->getId());
sleep(pow(1.5, $times++));
}
$batchResults = $myBulkApiConnection->getBatchResults($job->getId(), $batch->getId());
echo "Number of records processed: " . $batch->getNumberRecordsProcessed() . "\n";
echo "Number of records failed: " . $batch->getNumberRecordsFailed() . "\n";
echo "stateMessage: " . $batch->getStateMessage() . "\n";
if($batch->getNumberRecordsFailed() > 0 || $batch->getNumberRecordsFailed() == $batch->getNumberRecordsProcessed())
{
echo "Failures detected. Batch results:\n".$batchResults."\nEnd batch.\n";
}
And lastly, an example of the CSV data being sent:
"Id","AccountId","Amount","CampaignId","CloseDate","Name","OwnerId","RecordTypeId","StageName","Type","cv__Acknowledged__c","cv__Payment_Type__c","ER_Acknowledgment_Type__c"
"#N/A","0018000000nH16fAAC","100.00","70180000000nktJ","2010-10-29","Gary Smith $100.00 Single Donation 10/29/2010","00580000001jWnq","01280000000F7c7AAC","Received","Individual Gift","Not Acknowledged","Credit Card","Email"
"#N/A","0018000000nH1JtAAK","30.00","70180000000nktJ","2010-12-20","Lisa Smith $30.00 Single Donation 12/20/2010","00580000001jWnq","01280000000F7c7AAC","Received","Individual Gift","Not Acknowledged","Credit Card","Email"
After 2 weeks, 4 cases, dozens of e-mails and phone calls, 3 bulletin board posts, and 1 Stackoverflow question, I finally got a solution.
The problem was quite simple in the end. (which makes all of that all the more frustrating)
As stated, the custom fields I was trying to update live in the Convio Common Ground package. Apparently our install has 2 licenses for this package. None of the licenses were assigned to my user account.
It isn't clear what is really gained/lost by not having the license other than API access. As the rest of this thread demonstrates, I was able to see and update the fields in every other way.
If you run into this, you can view the licenses on the Manage Packages page in Setup. Drill through to the package in question and it should list the users who are licensed to use it.
Thanks to SimonF's professional and timely assistance on the Developer Force bulletin boards:
http://boards.developerforce.com/t5/Perl-PHP-Python-Ruby-Development/Bulk-API-So-frustrated/m-p/232473/highlight/false#M4713
I really think this is a field level security issue. Is the field included in the opportunity layout for that user profile? Field level security picks the most restrictive option, so if you seem to have access from the setup screen but it's not included in the layout, I don't think the system will give you access.
If you're certain that your user's profile has FLS access to the fields and the assigned layouts include the fields, then I'd suggest looking into the definition of the package in question. I know the bulk API allows use of fields in managed packages normally (I've done this).
My best guess at this point is that your org has installed multiple versions of this package over time. Through component deprecation, it's possible the package author deprecated these custom fields. Take a look at two places once you've logged into salesforce:
1.) The package definition page. It should have details about what package version was used when the package was first installed and what package version you're at now.
2.) The page that has WSDL generation links. If you choose to generate the enterprise WSDL, you should be taken to a page that has dropdown elements that let you select which package version to use. Try fiddling with those to see if you can get the fields to show up.
These are just guesses. If you find more info, let me know, and I can try to provide additional guidance.