Related
This question already has answers here:
How to change a variable in a calling function from a called function? [duplicate]
(3 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
void change_it(int[]);
int main()
{
int a[5],*p=1;
void change_it(int[]);
printf("p has the value %u \n",(int)p);
change_it(a);
p=a;
printf("p has the value %u \n",(int)p);
return 0;
}
void change_it(int[]) {
int i=777, *q=&i;
a = q; // a is assigned a different value
}
For starters, when you initialize p, you're giving a pointer the value of 1, when it needs a memory location. NULL uses 0, but that doesn't mean you can -or should- just assign integer values to pointers.
Just as an fyi, you can cast the value of 1 like this:
int a[5], *p = (int *) 1;
There's like -2 reasons for doing this, though, the -1th reason being that the minimal type safety that C provides should be respected, and the -2th being that it makes the code hard to understand for other people.
I'm going to assume what you meant to do was not declare a pointer with an address value of 1 though, and say you meant to declare a pointer that holds a value of 1. Unless you have another variable that holds the value of 1 already, you're going to have to first dynamically allocate the pointer, then set its value.
int* p = malloc(sizeof(int));
*p = 1;
If you had another variable to use, you could instead create the pointer on the stack rather than dynamically allocating it, like this:
int* q;
q = p;
Now, calling the same print function on both would yield this:
printf("p has the value %d\n", *p);
printf("q has the value %d\n", *q);
Output:
p has the value 1
q has the value 1
Addressing your main problem, you need to name the parameter in the change_it function, for example:
void change_it(int arr[])
Your program needs the parameter to be named, otherwise it has no idea of knowing you're trying to reference the array. The a variable you reference in the function is not bound to anything; the compiler will know be able to deduce what you're talking about.
Also, you don't need to redeclare the function prototype in your main function. The reason this is not a compiler error is that you can have as many declarations as you want, but only one definition. Again though, there's no reason to do this.
Another fyi, you don't have to name the parameters in your function prototypes, but it's good practice to both name them and be consistent with the names between the prototypes and the actual implementations so that people reading your code understand what's going on.
Also, you're using the %u specifier for the printf function, when you're not actually using unsigned decimal numbers. You're using signed decimals so you should use %d.
Lastly, your change_it function commits one crucial error preventing it from correctly changing the value of the passed-in array properly: you're setting the array that you passed in to the value of q.
Look at the function in your original code closely (pretend you named the input array a, as it looks like you mean to). You first declare an integer variable i and set its value to 777. Then, you create an integer-pointer variable q on the stack and correctly set its value to i. Note: You're not setting q to the value of i, but rather the address of i.
Why does this small but significant distinction matter? When you set a to q in the next line, you're changing the address of the array, specifically the first element of a five-element integer array, to point to the address of an integer variable. This is bad for a few reasons. First, the array is five integers long, but now it points to a single element. If and when you try to access elements 2-5, you'll get either meaningless garbage or a segmentation fault for trying to access memory you don't own. Even worse, the variable i is allocated on the stack, so when the function change_it exists, the function's data will be popped off the stack, and trying to access the address of i will yield either garbage or a segmentation fault for trying to access memory you don't own. See a pattern?
I'm not really sure how to correct this code, as I'm not sure what you were trying to accomplish, but correcting the aforementioned errors, your code now looks something like this:
#include <stdio.h>
void change_it(int arr[]);
int main()
{
int a[5];
int *p = a; // Equivalent to int *p = &a[0];
printf("a address: %p\n", a); // Should be equal to p
printf("p address: %p\n", p); // Should be equal to a
a[0] = 1;
printf("a[0] = %d\n", a[0]); // 1
printf("p has the value %d\n", *p); // 1
change_it(a);
p = a;
printf("a address: %p\n", a);
printf("p address: %p\n", p);
printf("a[0] = %d\n", a[0]);
printf("p has the value %d \n", *p);
return 0;
}
void change_it(int arr[])
{
int i=777;
arr[0] = i;
// Could be just:
// arr[0] = 777;
}
Output:
p address: 0x7fffc951e0b0
a[0] = 1
p has the value 1
a address: 0x7fffc951e0b0
p address: 0x7fffc951e0b0
a[0] = 777
p has the value 777
Note: Your memory address can and probably will be different from these, all it matters is that p and a are equal in both.
Anyways, hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.
Alright, you I believe do not have basic understanding of a function: First lets start with declaration and definition:
void change_it(int[]); // THIS IS DECLARATION
int main ()
{
void change_it(int[]); // THIS IS DECLARATION (duplicate and unnecessary
....
}
void change_it(int[] a) // THIS IS DEFINITION
{
int i=777, *q=&i;
a = q; // a is assigned a different value
}
declaration of the function only needs (you can put parameter name for readability) a parameter type, where as definition has to have name of the parameter because in definition parameters are local variables.
printf("p has the value %u \n",(int)p);
This will print the address of p not the value of p. So this should be
printf("p has the value %u \n", *p);
And finally we get to the body of a function. Where you are depending on somthing that have been locally assigned and putting it back into parameters
void change_it(int[] a)
{
int i=777, *q=&i;
a = q; // a is assigned a different value
}
so q is pointer and you are assigning address of local variable i to it. Well what happens when your program exists the function? i might disappear thus loosing its values and its address, which is assigned to q which means q is loosing its variable and value, and which is assigned to a which might loos its variable because it is pointing to i in your function.
This part here:
int a[5],*p=1;
void change_it(int[]); // Here, doesn't compile
printf("p has the value %u \n",(int)p);
That statement isn't just valid, as far as I know, you can't declare a function inside another function in C.
Also:
void change_it(int[]) // Here, an error
{
int i = 777, *q = &i;
a = q;
}
This function needs an argument, but you supplied only its type (being int[]),
void change_it(int a[]) fixes the problem
Your program does not compile and produce warnings. It would not work as you intended.
1) p is a pointer. To access value which it points to you have to dereference it using * dereference opearator.
2)
void change_it(int[]);
is not needed in the body of main.
3)
the invocation of change_it() seems to have no effect
If you want to change a[0] element inside the function change_it name the passing parameter to a and dereference the q pointer,
The working program may look as this:
#include <stdio.h>
void change_it(int a[]);
int main()
{
int a[5] = {0}; // init all element of `a` to `0`
int *p; // declare int pointer
p = a; // p point to array `a`
// print the first element of array `a`
printf("a[0] has the value %d \n",(int)*p);
// call function change_it, pass `a` as the argument
change_it(a);
printf("a[0] has the value %d \n",(int)*p);
return 0;
}
// change the value of the first element of array `a` to 777
void change_it(int a[]) {
int i=777, *q; // declare int i and pointer
q = &i; // pointer `q` points to the `i` now
a[0] = *q; // a[0] is assigned value = 777;
}
Output:
a[0] has the value 0
a[0] has the value 777
I am having trouble with this problem:
#include <stdio.h>
void change_number(int *x);
int main()
{
int x;
printf("Enter the number x: ")
scanf("%d", &x);
printf("In the main program: x = %d\n", x);
change_number(&x);
printf("In the main program: x = %d\n", x);
return 0;
}
void change_number(int *x)
{
x = *x+3;
printf("In the subroutine: x = %d\n", x);
}
Expected output:
Enter the number x: 555
In the main program: x = 555
In the subroutine: x = 558
In the main program: x = 558
Two notes:
I cannot modify main, or anything that comes before it. I can only modify the void change_number function, and the code inside it is my own code.
I cannot get the required output – my code only outputs x+3 in the subroutine, but doesn't change it in the main program.
How would I go about changing the value in the main routine? Please keep in mind that I am very new to C, and don't know many things yet (in fact, I just covered pointers yesterday).
The code
void change_number(int *x)
{
x = *x+3;
printf("In the subroutine: x = %d\n", x);
}
should read
void change_number(int *x)
{
*x = *x+3;
printf("In the subroutine: *x = %d\n", *x);
}
This will use the pointers as intended (you need to dereference them on the LHS as well)
I think an answer to the OP question needs a little bit explanation as C syntax may be confusing at times:
The function is declared as
void change_number(int *x)
The * means that the input parameter x is a pointer to a variable of type int. In other words x represents a location in memory.
Inside the function:
x is the address in memory of the int value
*x is the "content" of the memory address pointed by x
So, as other correctly pointed out, the function should be written as
void change_number(int *x)
{
*x = *x+3;
printf("In the subroutine: x = %d\n", *x);
}
Because as you act on *x you're acting on the content pointed by x
What is happening into main() ?
x is an int variable.
And you call:
change_number(&x);
The amplersand & means that you're not passing the value of x.
Instead you're passing a pointer to x, in other words the address in memory where the content of x is stored.
In other-other words x is passed by reference.
A final note: when writing a program in c (well, in any language, but expecially in c) the compiler warnings/errors and the debugger are your best friends.
Furthermore a good IDE will show you warnings as you type the code.
Anyway... the compiler should have warned you that
x = *x+3;
involves an implicit conversion from a int to int * (pointer to int) and most likely is a mistake.
You should use
*x = *x+3;
instead of
x = *x + 3;
What a function does with its parameters is, it makes a copy to work on and once the function's scope is ended, the copy is released which cannot change a value of a parameter passed to a function from outside.This is where pointers come in.
when passing a pointer to a function, think of it as a copy of the real address where in your case x is stored.
Thus in order to use x or change x, you have to use or change respectively *x(and it gets later dereferenced in the main program by &.
so like many others mentioned x = *x+3; should be *x = *x+3; and you'll get the desired results
Instead of printing in the change function you can also print in the main function by doing
*x=*x+3
This question already has answers here:
What's the difference between passing by reference vs. passing by value?
(18 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I dont understand what this means. If I were to try and guess I'd say byValue argument passing is when you pass an argument based on the value of an variable, so I'm thinking:
if (a == 1){
PassAnArgumentOrSomething()
}
However that is probably wrong :/
As for byReference, I have no idea.
If anyone can help me out that be awesome of you :)
With the exception of arrays and functions (see below), C always passes arguments `by value': a copy of the value of each argument is passed to the function; the function cannot modify the actual argument passed to it:
void foo(int j) {
j = 0; /* modifies the copy of the argument received by the function */
}
int main(void) {
int k=10;
foo(k);
/* k still equals 10 */
}
If you do want a function to modify its argument you can obtain the desired effect using pointer arguments instead:
void foo(int *j) {
*j = 0;
}
int main(void) {
int k=10;
foo(&k);
/* k now equals 0 */
}
This is sometimes known as `pass by reference' in other languages.
There is no pass by reference in c language
Passing by value: means that you are creating a temporary copy of the variable and sending to the parameter.
Passing by reference(no such concept in c language): means that you are just giving another name to the original variable while calling and no temporary copy of the variable is being created.
Calling by value:
int foo(int temp)
{
/.../
}
int main()
{
int x;
foo(x); /* here a temporary copy of the 'x' is created and sent to the foo function.*/
}
Calling by reference(no such concept in c language)
int foo(int& temp)
{
/.../
}
int main()
{
int x;
foo(x); /* here no temporary copy of 'x' is being created rather the variable *temp* in the calling function is just another name of the variable a in the main function*/
}
Passing an argument by value means you are passing a copy:
void f(int x)
{
x = 7;
// x is 7 here, but we only changed our local copy
}
void g()
{
int y = 3;
f(y);
// y is still 3 here!
}
Passing an argument by reference means you are not passing a copy, but instead passing some way of referencing the original variable. In C, all arguments are pass by value, but what is typically done to get the same effect as passing by reference is to pass a pointer:
void f(int *x_ptr) { *x_ptr = 7; }
void g()
{
int y = 3;
f(&y);
// y is 7 here
}
Arrays are passed in such a way that it appears similar to pass-by-reference, however what is actually happening is more complicated. For example:
void f(int a[]) { a[0] = 7; }
void g()
{
int b[3] = {1,2,3};
f(b);
// b[0] is 7 here! looks like it was passed by reference.
}
What is actually happening here is that the array b is implicitly converted to a pointer to the first element (this is known as decay). The int a[] notation for the parameter to f is actually syntactic sugar for a pointer. The above code is equivalent to:
void f(int *a) { a[0] = 7; }
void g()
{
int b[3] = {1,2,3};
f(&b[0]);
// b[0] is 7 here
}
Passing by value is passing the value itself; it makes a copy of the value, and any changes you make in the new function are NOT saved to the original variable:
void foo(int num)
{
num = 5; // Does not save to the original variable that was passed when foo was called
...
}
Passing by reference is passing the location of the variable; it allows the new function to directly edit the original variable:
void bar(int * num)
{
*num = 5; // Changes the variable in the original function
...
}
in-depth explanation
whenever a program loads, it gets a memory area so called address space which gets divided into various regions
code/text : contains the statements of program (collections of statements).
global : contains the global variable if any.
constant : used for constant or literal storage.
heap : used for dynamic memory need.
stack : function used its for variable.
consider a function so defined as
void doSomething(int x)
{
x++;
}//end of function
is called as doSomething(5) or doSomething(y) in another function or main function .
here
x is local variable to function "doSomething". It gets its home (memory location) somewhere in stack region.
When doSomething(5) is called 5 gets copied to x's memory or doSomething(y) is called value/content of y (different memory location) gets copied to x's memory. Whatever operations applied on x, will not affect y 's content/value at all. Since its memory location is different.
Whenever execution flow reachs at end of function x dies/gets destroyed. Whatever value of x is not accessible/available. In short, update is lost and y is unaffected (Change is not reflected).
This is what so called Call by Value
Now
Consider an another function so defined as
void doSomething(int *x)
{
(*x)++;
}
is called as doSomething(&y)
here x is called pointer (conceptually called reference*).It will also gets home somewhere in stack region
When doSomething(&y) is called address of y gets copied to x's location block. Since this x is special variable so called pointer that holds address and it is said that x refers/points to y.
When (*x)++ is applied, here * is indirection operator which will bring whom x refer to the context ie. (*x)++ will indirectly change the value of y by 1. Nothing will happen to x's value itself.
Whenever execution flow reach at end of function *x dies/gets destroyed as expected but this time change is made to y (indirectly) which is still alive somewhere in stack region (change is reflected).
Also not that this time doSomething(&5) or doSomething(any literal) is not possible because it's illegal to get address of any literal.
This is what so called Call by Reference/Call by Pointer.
note that Call by Reference has another meaning in C++ but conceptually remains same.
Let's look at the "calling" of functions first.
In C, the arguments to a function are typically "by value". Below, after calling sqrt(x), the value x is not changed for sqrt() received a copy of the value x, thus never gaining an ability to affect x.
y = sqrt(x);
// x did not change
printf("%f is the square root of %f\n", y, x);
Array parameters to a function appear to be "by reference". After fgets() is called, buf is expected to be altered. fgets() did not receive a copy of, but a "reference" to the char array. Thus fgets() could affect the contents of the array.
char buf[80] = { 0 }; // array 80 of char
printf("Before <%s>\n", buf); // "<>"
fgets(buf, sizeof buf, stdin);
printf("After <%s>\n", buf); // "<Hello World!>"
Let's now look at the "receiving" part: the function.
Function parameters of type double, int, struct types are received by value. The value of f here is the copy of the x above. Any changes made to f do not affect the x in the calling code.
double sqrt(double f) {
double y;
... // lots of code
return y;
}
Now comes the tricky bit and this is where there is lots of discussion in C.
The parameter s in fgets() below was not assigned the buf above (array 80 of char), instead s was assigned the pointer type derived from buf: address of the first element of an buf. By knowing the address of the array elements of buf (via s), fgets() affects what was printed above.
char *fgets(char * restrict s, int n, FILE * restrict stream) {
// code
s[i] = ThisAndThat();
// code
return s;
}
Let's now see how fgets() otherwise might be called:
char *p = malloc(80);
*p = '\0';
printf("Before <%s>\n", p); // "<>"
fgets(p, 80, stdin);
printf("After <%s>\n", p); // "<Hello World!>"
In this 2nd example, p is a "pointer to char". It is passed by value to fgets(). fgets() received, via s, a copy of p.
The central idea: fgets() does not know if it received an "address of the first element of an array" or a copy of a "pointer to char". In both cases, it treats s as a "pointer to char".
Let's assume fgets() did the following. Before s being changed, it affects the data pointed to by s. Then s, the pointer, changed. s is a local variable and this assignment does not change the calling routines variables buf nor p.
char *fgets(char * restrict s, int n, FILE * restrict stream) {
// lots of code
s[0] = '\0';
// more code
s = NULL;
return s;
}
Note: There are other issues such as passing functions as parameters and encapsulating arrays in structures to consider.
" Double pointers are also sometimes employed to pass pointers to functions by reference "
can somebody can explain me the above statement, what exactly does point to function by reference means ?
I believe this example makes it clearer :
//Double pointer is taken as argument
void allocate(int** p, int n)
{
//Change the value of *p, this modification is available outside the function
*p = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int) * n);
}
int main()
{
int* p = NULL;
//Pass the address of the pointer
allocate(&p,1);
//The pointer has been modified to point to proper memory location
//Hence this statement will work
*p=10;
//Free the memory allocated
free(p);
return 0;
}
It means that you have a function that takes a pointer pointer (type int ** for example). This allows you to modify the pointer (what data it is pointing to) much in the way passing a pointer by reference would allow.
void change (int *p) {*p = 7;}
void Really_Change (int **pp) {*pp = null;}
int p = 1;
int *pp = &p;
// now, pp is pointing to p. Let's say it has address 0x10;
// this makes a copy of the address of p. The value of &p is still 0x10 (points to p).
// but, it uses that address to change p to 7.
change(&p);
printf("%d\n", p); // prints 7;
// this call gets the address of pp. It can change pp's value
// much like p was changed above.
Really_Change(&pp);
// pp has been set to null, much like p was set to 7.
printf("%d\n", *pp); // error dereference null. Ka-BOOM!!!
So, in the same way that you can pass a pointer to an int and change the value, you can pass a pointer to a pointer and change its value (which changes what it points to.)
I'll try to explain with both code and plain english :). The explanation may get long, but it will be worth the while.
Suppose we have a program, running its main() function, and we make a call to another function that takes an int parameter.
Conceptually, When you pass a variable as a parameter to a function, you can do so in (roughly speaking) two ways: by value, or by reference.
"By value" means giving the function a copy of your variable. The function will receive its "content" (value), but it won't be able to change the actual variable outside its own body of code, because it was only given a copy.
"By reference", on the other hand, means giving the function the actual memory address of our variable. Using that, the function can find out the variable's value, but it can also go to that specified address and modify the variable's content.
In our C program, "by value" means passing a copy of the int (just taking int as argument), and "by reference" means passing a pointer to it.
Let's see a small code example:
void foo(int n) {
n = 10;
printf("%d\n", n);
}
int main() {
int n = 5;
foo(n);
printf("%d\n", n);
return 0;
}
What will the output of this program be? 10 10? Nope. 10 5! Because we passed a copy of the int, by value and not by reference, foo() only modified the number stored in its copy, unable to reach main()'s copy.
Now, if we do it this way:
void foo(int* n) {
*n = 10;
printf("%d\n", *n);
}
int main() {
int n = 5;
foo(&n);
printf("%d\n", n);
return 0;
}
This time we gave foo() our integer by reference: it's actual memory address. foo() has full power to modify it by accessing it's position in memory, foo() and main() are working with the same copy, and so the output will be 10 10.
As you see, a pointer is a referece,... but also a numerical position in memory. It's similar to an int, only the number contained inside is interpreted differently. Think of it this way: when we pass our int by reference, we're passing an int pointer by value!. So the same by value/by reference logic can be applied to pointers, even though they already are references.
If our actual variable was not an int, but an int reference (pointer), and we wanted main() and foo() to share the same copy of that reference so that foo() can modifiy it, what would we do? Why of course, we'd need a reference to our reference! A pointer to a pointer. That is:
int n; /* integer */
int* n; /* integer reference(pointer). Stores an int's position in memory */
int** n; /* reference to integer reference, or double pointer.
Stores int*'s memory address so we can pass int*s by reference. */
I hope this was useful.
The following code is trying to make a point (probably the difference between arrays and local variables) I only have a vague idea on the code. Would someone please elaborate? Thanks
void doit(int x[10], int y) {
y = 30;
x[0] = 50;
}
void main(void) {
int x[10];
int y = 3;
x[0] = 5;
printf("x[0] is %d and y is %d\n", x[0], y);
doit(x, y);
printf("x[0] is %d and y is %d\n", x[0], y);
}
It is showing that arrays are not really passed directly to functions - instead, the address of the first member of the array is passed.
That means that if the called function modifies the array that was "passed", it is modifying the original array in the caller.
On the other hand, when the called function modifies the plain int parameter y, it is modifying a local copy of the variable, and the change is not reflected in the caller.
In C, all arguments are passed by value. However, arrays decay into a pointer to the first element to the array when they get passed; the result is effectively as if the array was passed by reference.
In your code, the doit() function can mutate the array pointed to by x, but it cannot mutate the simple int value in y.
y is passed by value meaning that a temporary copy is created, you have to pass it as a pointer to modify it:
void doit(int x[10], int* y) {
*y = 30;
x[0] = 50;
}
Declaring an array is also not really needed. The compiler anyway understands only that it is a pointer and does (usually) not check the boundaries.
void doit(int* x, int* y) {
*y = 30;
x[0] = 50;
}
Local variables are passed as value where as in arrays the reference is passed not the actual values. so when you change the value in child array the parent array will get changed. Arrays are same as pointers in using the reference