I'm a little surprised there is nothing out there about this that I have found. But just like the title says, I have a React SPA deployed to Netlify. It goes live without error. The only issue is, if the end user has been to the site before, they have to refresh the page to see any changes I have pushed out.
Is there something I need to add to the index file perhaps?
The browser caches the compiled js bundle.
You can read more here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cache-Control
One of your options would be to disable it, or set cache expiration to a lower value during the intense development and increase it if/when you deploy less often.
Another option could be to implement some kind of API method to check if newer version has been deployed and trigger a page refresh. (Please be careful not to discard users work, like data filled in forms, during a refresh)
Each have pros and cons.
I fixed my service worker configuration of my SPA site and now it's not caching the index.html file.
The problem is what can I do with my anonymous old \ existing visitors that already have the old index.html file as part of they service worker cache?
I can not tell them to clear cache or do manual refresh because I don't know them. From time to time they are calling to my office and i explain to them what to do but I am sure that lot's of visitors not calling me and can not use my new release because of that problem.
Again, I don't have problems with visitors that coming to my site since the fix i did to the service worker configuration. I have a problem with visitors that have my old index.html before my fix.
I'm using NGINX and ReactJS.
you need to add some sort of check against the cached assets to see if they need to be updated.
I use different techniques depending on the application.
One is to make a HEAD request and compare the last updated time against the cached value. If it has been updated on the server since it was cache I replace it.
I may also add some sort of time to live value to IndexedDB that corresponds to the cached asset or data. When that time expires I trigger an update.
There is no one answer fits all for this. Cache invalidation can be a complex topic and you need to try different techniques and use what works for the data or asset and within your application's use cases, etc.
Also consider how to handle offline and authentication, etc. See even more layers of complexity.
I'm wondering how does whatsappweb deliver updates?
Do you ever notice a left green card appearing sometimes and asking you to click in a link to refresh page and run the new whatsappweb fresh code updated.
I'm almost sure they use webpack, service workers etc.
Chances are that you already had cache problems using webpack where even refreshing page it remains cached.
So how does whatsappweb solved this issue with a single refresh link?
They use a service worker, if the service worker gets updated, they trigger something in the react app, is easy to do it.
serviceWorker.register({ onUpdate: () => {console.log('new service worker')}});
just dispatch something instead of the console.log
Webpack is a building tool and isn't involved anywhere on a live site. While it offers Hot Module Reload for the development server you will not get it on the production version.
Unlike traditional desktop applications, delivering updates for websites is as straightforward as updating the files on your server (and invalidating any browser caches). You don't need to notify the user to download something, a simple refresh will get the new pages.
If you really want instantaneous updates (without waiting for the user to refresh the page) you can create some sort of WebSocket communication which when a message is received triggers a browser refresh. Nothing special and no deployment mechanisms involved.
DNS Is being handled via Route53. Previously, had a React SPA deployed on AWS S3 (with Cloudfront dist + SSL). Moved off of that to a SSR NextJS app on ElasticBeanstalk, but even after changing the A records and invalidating CF, some users are still reporting their browser is using the old S3 SPA. Only fix is for them to manually clear their cache for the site.
Asking each random user that's cached my site to manually refresh their cache for the page doesn't seem like a good solution ;)
Here's what I've done thus far:
Updated Route53 (A record) to point to the EB server (this is working as intended),
Tried disabling the associated CF distribution,
When that didn't work, I removed the files in S3 and invalidated the CF dist,
EDIT: After deleting the CF dist completely, users are able to go to the new site - but only after hard-refreshing a half-dozen times. I still feel like there should be a more elegant solution to this requiring little/no user know-how.
All of my CSS & JS files had version numbers appended to help with cache-busting. Users report that they see the HTML structure of the page, but the versioned JS & CSS 404 for them (as they should, since the files no longer exist).
I would have thought this would be enough to have the browser swap update its cache - but apparently not. Only solution so far has been for affected users to manually clear their cache.
More than happy to offer more details if needed, any thoughts/input is super appreciated!
I have done a full Single Page Application (SPA) application using Angularjs.
So far so good.
As anyone knows, all javascript files are loaded in the first time access. Or, some file are loaded in lazy mode style when needed.
So far so good...
The situation is: the server updates all files (html partials, javascripts, css's) and the client remain with a lot of files out-dated.
This would be simply solved refreshing the browser, hit F5 key, control+f5, or refresh button in the browser. But this concept does not exists when working with SPA.
I'm not sure how to solve this problem.
I could detect somehow (doing a ping maybe) and just to re-load that specific file. With document.write strategy. But now rises another problem, I have a single javascript file with all javascript minified.
I could try to force a full reload in the browser or force to re-login (and reload because login are SPA part).
But reloading is an ugly solution, imagine the client lose all data in the form because he was unlucky the server have just updated. And worse, I must now create some "auto-save" feature just because of this.
I'm not sure how to handle this, if possible, doing in "angular way".
I wonder how google gmail handles this because I stay logged for many many hours without logging of.
As others have already suggested, keep the logged user on the old version of your webapp.
Not only what you ask is difficult to do in Angular, but it can also lead to a bad user experience and surprising behaviour, since there may not be a mapping between what the user is doing with the old version and what the new version provides. Views may be removed, renamed, split or merged. The behaviour of the same view may have changed, and doing so without notice for the user may cause mistakes.
You made an example with Gmail, but may have noticed that changes to the UI always happen after you logout, never while you're using it.
First of all, if your app is an intranet website used during office time, just update it while nobody is using it. This is a much simpler solution.
Otherwise, if you need to provide 24/24 availability, my suggestion is:
When you deploy the new version of your SPA, keep the old version in parallel with the new version, keep the current users on the old version, and log new users to the new version. This can be made in a number of ways depending on your setup, but it's not difficult to do.
Keep the old version around until you're confident that nobody is still using it or you're pretty sure that the new version is ok and you don't need to rollback to the old version.
The backend services should be backward-compatible with the old version of the frontend. If that's not possible you should keep multiple version of the backend services too.
As the rest of the guys said a solution can be to versioning your files. So every time that your browser check those files out the browser notice that the files are different to the ones that are in the server so the browser cache the new files.
I suggest to use some build tool like gulp, grunt or webpack, the last one is becoming more popular.
By the moment I use gulp for my projects. I´m moving to webpack though.
if you are interested in gulp you can have a look to gulp-rev and gulp-rev-replace plugins.
What do they do?
let´s say that we have the next file in your project app.js what you get after apply gulp-rev to your project is something like app-4j8888dp.js then your html file where the app.js is injected is still pointing to app.js so you need to replace it. To do that you can use gulp-rev-replace plugin.
eg. gulp task where
var gulp = require('gulp');
var rev = require('gulp-rev');
var revReplace = require('gulp-rev-replace');
var useref = require('gulp-useref');
var filter = require('gulp-filter');
var uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
var csso = require('gulp-csso');
gulp.task("index", function() {
var jsFilter = filter("**/*.js", { restore: true });
var cssFilter = filter("**/*.css", { restore: true });
var indexHtmlFilter = filter(['**/*', '!**/index.html'], { restore: true });
return gulp.src("src/index.html")
.pipe(useref()) // Concatenate with gulp-useref
.pipe(jsFilter)
.pipe(uglify()) // Minify any javascript sources
.pipe(jsFilter.restore)
.pipe(cssFilter)
.pipe(csso()) // Minify any CSS sources
.pipe(cssFilter.restore)
.pipe(indexHtmlFilter)
.pipe(rev()) // Rename the concatenated files (but not index.html)
.pipe(indexHtmlFilter.restore)
.pipe(revReplace()) // Substitute in new filenames
.pipe(gulp.dest('public'));
});
if you want to know further details see the links bellow.
https://github.com/sindresorhus/gulp-rev
https://github.com/jamesknelson/gulp-rev-replace
A single page application is that, a single stack that controls the client logic of your application. Thus, any navigation done through the application should be handled by your client, and not by the server. The goal is to have a one single "fat" HTTP request that loads everything you need, and then perform small HTTP requests.
That's why you can only have one ng-app in your apps. You are not suppose to have multiple and just load the modules you need (although the AngularJS team wants to move that way). In all cases, you should serve the same minified file and handle everything from your application.
It seems to me that you are more worried about the state of your application. As Tom Dale (EmberJS) described in the last Cage Match, we should aim to have applications that can reflect the same data between server and client at any point of time. You have many ways to do so, either by cookies, sessions or local storage.
Usually a SPA communicates with a REST based server, and hence perform idempotent operations to your data.
tl;dr You are not supposed to refresh anything from the server (styles or scripts, for instance), just the data that your application is handling. An initial single load is what SPA is all about.
separate your data and logic and reload the data using ajax whenever you want, for that i will suggest you use REST API to get the data from server.
SPA helps you to reduce the HTTP request again and again but its also require some http request to update a new data to view.
Well, you would have to unload the old existing code (i.e. the old AngularJS app, modules, controllers, services and so on). Theoretically, you could create a custom (randomized) app name (with all modules have this prefix for each unique build!) and then rebuild your app in the browser. But seriously.. that's a) very complex and b) will probably fail due memory leaks.
So, my answer is: Don't.
Caching issues
I would personally recommend to name/prefix all resources depended by a build with a unique id; either the build id, a scm hash, the timestamp or whatever like that. So, the url to the javascript is not domain.tld/resources/scripts.js but domain.tld/resources-1234567890/scripts.js which ensures that this path's content will never conflict with a (newer) version. You can choose your path/url like you want (depending on the underlaying structure: it is all virtually, can you remap urls, etcpp). It would be even not required that each version will exist forever (i.e. map all resources-(\d+)/ to resources/; however, this would be not nice for the concept of URLs.
Application state
Well, the question is how often will the application change that it would be important that such reloads are required. How long is the SPA open in a browser? Is it really impossible to support two versions at the same time? The client (the app in the browser) could even send its own version within the HTTP requests.
In the beginning of a new application, there are a lot of changes that would require a reload. But soon after your application has a solid state, the changes will be smaller and would not require a reload. The user itself will make more refreshs.. more than we ever expected :/
As with what everyone else is saying...
Don't, and while socket.io could work it's asking for trouble if you are VERY careful.
You have two options, upon server update invalidate any previous session (I would also give users a half hours notice or 5 minutes depending on application before maintenance would be done.
The second option is versioning. If they are on version 10, then they communicate with backend 10. If you release version 11 and they are still on 10 then they can still communicate with backend 10.
Remember Google wave? It failed for a reason. Too many people writing one source as the same time causes more problems then it solves.
use $state service. create state during loading page using ctor. after specified time re create state and load page.
function(state) {
state.stateCtor(action);
$state.transitionTo(action + '.detail', {}, {
notify: true
});
}
Versioning your files, so on every update increment version number and the browser will update it automaticallly.
My solution consists of several points.
While this is not important, but I send one JavaScript file to the client side, I use grunt to prepare my release. The same grunt file adds to the JavaScript tag a query with version number. Regardless of whether you have one file or lots of files, you need to add a version number to them. You may need to do this for resources as well. (check at the end for an example)
I send back in all my responses from the server (I use node) the version number of the app.
In Angular, when I receive any response, I check the version number against the version number loaded, if it has changed (this means the server code has been updated) then I alert the user that the app is going to reload. I use location.reload(true);
Once reloaded the browser will fetch all new files again because the version number in the script tag is different now, and so it will not get it from cache.
Hope this helps.
<script src="/scripts/spa.min.js?v=0.1.1-1011"></script>