I have a table dbo.X with DateTime column lastUpdated and a code product column CodeProd which may have hundreds of records, with CodeProd duplicated because the table is used as "stock history"
My Stored Procedure has parameter #Date, I want to get all CodeProd nearest to that date so for example if I have:
+----------+--------------+--------+
| CODEPROD | lastUpdated | STATUS |
+----------+--------------+--------+
| 10 | 2-1-2019 | C1 |
| 10 | 1-1-2019 | C2 |
| 10 | 31-12-2019 | C1 |
| 11 | 31-12-2018 | C1 |
| 11 | 30-12-2018 | C1 |
| 12 | 30-8-2018 | C3 |
+----------+--------------+--------+
and #Date= '1-1-2019'
I wanna get:
+----+--------------+------+
| 10 | 1-1-2019 | C2 |
| 11 | 31-12-2018 | C1 |
| 12 | 30-8-2018 | C3 |
+----+--------------+------+
How to find it?
You can use TOP(1) WITH TIES to get one row with nearest date for each CODEPROD which should be less than provided date.
Try like following code.
SELECT TOP(1) WITH TIES *
FROM [YourTableName]
WHERE lastupdated <= #date
ORDER BY Row_number()
OVER (
partition BY [CODEPROD]
ORDER BY lastupdated DESC);
You can use apply :
select distinct t.CODEPROD, t1.lastUpdated, t1.STATUS
from table t cross apply
( select top (1) t1.*
from table t1
where t1.CODEPROD = t.CODEPROD and t1.lastUpdated <= #date
order by t1.lastUpdated desc
) t1;
Related
I'm having trouble figuring out how I can check if records on a table are in a specific order. The simplified table design is essentially this:
+------------+----------------+--------+
| ID (GUID) | StartDate | NumCol |
+------------+----------------+--------+
| CEE8C17... | 8/17/2019 3:11 | 22 |
| BB22001... | 8/17/2019 3:33 | 21 |
| 4D40B12... | 8/17/2019 3:47 | 21 |
| 3655125... | 8/17/2019 4:06 | 20 |
| 3456CD1... | 8/17/2019 4:22 | 20 |
| 38BAF92... | 8/17/2019 4:40 | 19 |
| E60CBE8... | 8/17/2019 5:09 | 19 |
| 5F2756B... | 8/17/2019 5:24 | 18 |
+------------+----------------+--------+
The ID column is a non-sequential GUID. The table is sorted by default on the StartDate when data is entered. However I am trying to flag instances where the NumCol values are out of descending order. The NumCol values can be identical on adjacent records, but ultimately they must be descending.
+--------+
| NumCol |
+--------+
| 22 |
| *20 | <- I want the ID where this occurs
| 21 |
| 20 |
| 20 |
| 19 |
| 19 |
| 18 |
+--------+
I've tried LEFT JOIN this table to itself, but can't seem to come up with an ON clause that gives the right results:
ON a.ID <> b.ID AND a.NumCol > b.NumCol
I also thought I could use OFFSET n ROWS to compare the default sorted table against one with an ORDER BY NumCol performed on it. I can't come up with anything that works.
I need a solution that will work for both SQL Server and SQL Compact.
With EXISTS:
select t.* from tablename t
where exists (
select 1 from tablename
where numcol > t.numcol and startdate > t.startdate
)
Or with row_number() window function:
select t.id, t.startdate, t.numcol
from (
select *,
row_number() over (order by startdate desc) rn1,
row_number() over (order by numcol) rn2
from tablename
) t
where rn1 > rn2
See the demo.
This might be easiest:
select * from T t1
where NumCol < (select max(NumCol) from T t2 where t2.StartDate > t1.StartDate);
The exists version is probably better to optimize though.
Using analytic functions you could try this approach which finds breaks in the monotonicity of consecutive rows. It might not return all the rows you're interested in seeing:
with data as (
select *, lag(NumCol) over (order by StartDate desc) as prevNumCol
from T
)
select * from data where prevNumCol > NumCol;
Here's a better solution that's probably not available in both of your environments:
with data as (
select *,
max(NumCol) over (
order by StartDate desc
rows between unbounded preceding and current row
) as prevMax
from T
)
select * from data where prevMax > NumCol;
I am looking for some advice or pointers on how to construct this. I have spent the last year self-learning SQL. I am at work and I only have access to the query interface in report builder. Which for me means, no procedures, no create tables and no IDE :(. So thats the limitations!
I am trying to reconstruct account balances. I have no intervening balances. I have the current balance and a table full of the transaction history
My current approach is to sum the transactions by posting week (Which I have done) in my CTE named
[SUMTRANSREF]
+--------------+------------+-----------+
| TNCY-SYS-REF | POSTING-WK | SUM-TRANS |
+--------------+------------+-----------+
| 1 | 47 | 37.95 |
| 1 | 46 | 37.95 |
| 1 | 45 | 37.95 |
| 2 | 47 | 50.00 |
| 2 | 46 | 25.00 |
| 2 | 45 | 25.00 |
+--------------+------------+-----------+
I then get the current balances in another CTE called
[CBAL]
+--------------+-------------+-----------+
| TNCY-SYS-REF | CUR-BALANCE | CURR-WEEK |
+--------------+-------------+-----------+
| 1 | 27.52 | 47 |
| 1 | 52.00 | 47 |
+--------------+-------------+-----------+
Now I am assuming I could create intervening CTEs to sum and then splice those altogether but is there a smarter (more automated) way?
Ideally my result should be
+--------------+-------------+----------+----------+
| TNCY-SYS-REF | CUR-BALANCE | BAL-WK46 | BAL-Wk45 |
+--------------+-------------+----------+----------+
| 1 | 27.52 | -10.43 | -48.38 |
| 2 | 52.00 | 2.00 | -48.00 |
+--------------+-------------+----------+----------+
I just am uncertain because each column requires the sum of intervening transactions
So BAL-WK46 is (CURR-BALANCE) - SUM(Transactions from 47)
So BAL-WK46 is (CURR-BALANCE) - SUM(Transactions 46+47)
So BAL-WK45 is (CURR-BALANCE) - SUM(Transactions 45+46+47)
and so on.
Normally I have an idea where to start but I am flummoxed by this one.
Any help you can give would be appreciated. Thank you
Here is some T-SQL that gets the result you require. Should be easy enough to play with to get what you want.
It makes use of Recursive CTE and a PIVOT
IF OBJECT_ID('Tempdb..#SUMTRANSREF') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #SUMTRANSREF
IF OBJECT_ID('Tempdb..#CBAL') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #CBAL
IF OBJECT_ID('Tempdb..#TEMP') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #TEMP
CREATE TABLE #SUMTRANSREF
(
[TNCY-SYS-REF] int,
[POSTING-WK] int,
[SUM-TRANS] float
)
CREATE TABLE #CBAL
(
[TNCY-SYS-REF] int ,
[CUR-BALANCE] float , [CURR-WEEK] int
)
INSERT INTO #SUMTRANSREF
VALUES (1 ,47 , 37.95),
(1 ,46 , 37.95),
(1 ,45 , 37.95),
(2 ,47 , 50.00),
(2 ,46 , 25.00),
(2 ,45 , 25.00 )
INSERT INTO #CBAL
VALUES (1,27.52,47),(2,52.00,47);
WITH CBAL AS
(SELECT * FROM #CBAL),
SUMTRANSREF AS(SELECT * FROM #SUMTRANSREF),
RecursiveTotals([TNCY-SYS-REF],[CURR-WEEK],[CUR-BALANCE],RunningBalance)
AS
(
select C.[TNCY-SYS-REF], C.[CURR-WEEK],C.[CUR-BALANCE],C.[CUR-BALANCE] + S.RunningTotal RunningBalance from CBAL C
JOIN (select *,-SUM([SUM-TRANS]) OVER (PARTITION BY [TNCY-SYS-REF] ORDER BY [POSTING-WK] DESC) RunningTotal
from SUMTRANSREF) S
ON C.[CURR-WEEK]=S.[POSTING-WK] AND C.[TNCY-SYS-REF]=S.[TNCY-SYS-REF]
UNION ALL
select RT.[TNCY-SYS-REF], RT.[CURR-WEEK] -1 [CURR_WEEK],RT.[CUR-BALANCE],RT.[CUR-BALANCE] + S.RunningTotal RunningBalance FROM RecursiveTotals RT
JOIN (select *,-SUM([SUM-TRANS]) OVER (PARTITION BY [TNCY-SYS-REF] ORDER BY [POSTING-WK] DESC) RunningTotal
from #SUMTRANSREF) S ON RT.[TNCY-SYS-REF] = S.[TNCY-SYS-REF] AND RT.[CURR-WEEK]-1 = S.[POSTING-WK]
)
select [TNCY-SYS-REF],[CUR-BALANCE],[46] as 'BAL-WK46',[45] as 'BAL-WK45',[44] as 'BAL-WK44'
FROM (
select [TNCY-SYS-REF],[CUR-BALANCE],RunningBalance,BalanceWeek from (SELECT *,R.[CURR-WEEK]-1 'BalanceWeek' FROm RecursiveTotals R
) RT) AS SOURCETABLE
PIVOT
(
AVG(RunningBalance)
FOR BalanceWeek in ([46],[45],[44])
) as PVT
I am having trouble ranking top customers by month. I created a new Rank column - but how do I break it up by month? Any help plz. Code and tables below:
The logic for ranking is selecting the top two customers per month from the tables. Also wrapped into the code (attempted at least) is renaming the date field and setting it to reflect end of month date only.
SELECT * FROM table1;
UPDATE table1
SET DATE=EOMONTH(DATE) AS MO_END;
ALTER TABLE table1
ADD COLUMN RANK INT AFTER SALES;
UPDATE table1
SET RANK=
RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY cust ORDER BY sales DESC);
LIMIT 2
Starting wtih
------+----------+-------+--+
| CUST | DATE | SALES | |
+------+----------+-------+--+
| 36 | 3-5-2018 | 50 | |
| 37 | 3-15-18 | 100 | |
| 38 | 3-25-18 | 65 | |
| 37 | 4-5-18 | 95 | |
| 39 | 4-21-18 | 500 | |
| 40 | 4-45-18 | 199 | |
+------+----------+-------+--+
desired end result
+------+---------+-------+------+--+
| CUST | MO_END | SALES | RANK | |
+------+---------+-------+------+--+
| 37 | 3-31-18 | 100 | 1 | |
| 38 | 3-25-18 | 65 | 2 | |
| 39 | 4-30-18 | 500 | 1 | |
| 40 | 4-45-18 | 199 | 2 | |
+------+---------+-------+------+--+
As a simple selection:
select *
from (
select
table1.*
, DENSE_RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY cust, EOMONTH(DATE) ORDER BY sales DESC) as ranking
from table1
)
where ranking < 3
;
If storing is important: I would not use [rank] as a column name as I avoid any words that are used in SQL, maybe [sales_rank] or similar.
with cte as (
select
cust
, DENSE_RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY cust, EOMONTH(DATE) ORDER BY sales DESC) as ranking
from table1
)
update cte
set sales_rank = ranking
where ranking < 3
;
There is really no reason to store the end of month, just use that function within the partition of the over() clause.
LIMIT 2 is not something that can be used in SQL Server by the way, and it sure can't be used "per grouping". When you use a "window function" such as rank() or dense_rank() you can use the output of those in the where clause of the next "layer". i.e. use those functions in a subquery (or cte) and then use a where clause to filter rows by the calculated values.
Also note I used dense_rank() to guarantee that no rank numbers are skipped, so that the subsequent where clause will be effective.
I'm trying to add rank by sales by month and also change the date column to a 'month end' field that would show only last day of month.
Can i do two sets in a row like that without adding an update?
I'm looking for top 2 within each month - does limit and group by work?
I feel like this is right and most efficient query, but its not working - any help appreciated!!
UPDATE table1
SET DATE=EOMONTH(DATE) AS MONTH_END;
ALTER TABLE table1
ADD COLUMN RANK INT AFTER sales;
UPDATE table1
SET RANK=
RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY cust ORDER BY sales DESC);
LIMIT 2
orig table
+------+----------+-------+--+
| CUST | DATE | SALES | |
+------+----------+-------+--+
| 36 | 3-5-2018 | 50 | |
| 37 | 3-15-18 | 100 | |
| 38 | 3-25-18 | 65 | |
| 37 | 4-5-18 | 95 | |
| 39 | 4-21-18 | 500 | |
| 40 | 4-45-18 | 199 | |
+------+----------+-------+--+
desired output
+------+-----------+-------+------+
| CUST | Month End | SALES | Rank |
+------+-----------+-------+------+
| | | | |
| 37 | 3-31-18 | 100 | 1 |
| 38 | 3-31-18 | 65 | 2 |
| 39 | 4-30-18 | 500 | 1 |
| 40 | 4-30-18 | 199 | 2 |
+------+-----------+-------+------+
I do not know why you want EOMONTH as a stored value, but what you have for that will work.
I would not use [rank] as a column name as I avoid any words that are used in SQL, maybe [sales_rank] or similar.
ALTER TABLE table1
ADD COLUMN [sales_rank] INT AFTER sales;
with cte as (
select
cust
, DENSE_RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY cust ORDER BY sales DESC) as ranking
from table1
)
update cte
set sales_rank = ranking
where ranking < 3
;
LIMIT 2 is not something that can be used in SQL Server by the way, and it sure can't be used "per grouping". When you use a "window function" such as rank() or dense_rank() you can use the output of those in the where clause of the next "layer". i.e. use those functions in a subquery (or cte) and then use a where clause to filter rows by the calculated values.
Also note I used dense_rank() to guarantee that no rank numbers are skipped, so that the subsequent where clause will be effective.
I have a table with a million records. I need to update some columns which are null based on the existing 'not null' records of a particular id based columns. I've tried with one query, it seems to be working fine but I don't have confidence in it that it will be able to update all those 1 million records exactly the way I need. I'm providing you some sample data how my table looks like.Any help will be appreciated
SELECT * INTO #TEST FROM (
SELECT 1 AS EMP_ID,10 AS DEPT_ID,15 AS ITEM_NBR ,NULL AS AMOUNT,NULL AS ITEM_NME
UNION ALL
SELECT 1,20,16,500,'ABCD'
UNION ALL
SELECT 1,30,17,NULL,NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT 2,10,15,1000,'XYZ'
UNION ALL
SELECT 2,30,16,NULL,NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT 2,40,17,NULL,NULL
) AS A
Sample data:
+--------+---------+----------+--------+----------+
| EMP_ID | DEPT_ID | ITEM_NBR | AMOUNT | ITEM_NME |
+--------+---------+----------+--------+----------+
| 1 | 10 | 15 | NULL | NULL |
| 1 | 20 | 16 | 500 | ABCD |
| 1 | 30 | 17 | NULL | NULL |
| 2 | 10 | 15 | 1000 | XYZ |
| 2 | 30 | 16 | NULL | NULL |
| 2 | 40 | 17 | NULL | NULL |
+--------+---------+----------+--------+----------+
Expected result:
+--------+---------+----------+--------+----------+
| EMP_ID | DEPT_ID | ITEM_NBR | AMOUNT | ITEM_NME |
+--------+---------+----------+--------+----------+
| 1 | 10 | 15 | 500 | ABCD |
| 1 | 20 | 16 | 500 | ABCD |
| 1 | 30 | 17 | 500 | ABCD |
| 2 | 10 | 15 | 1000 | XYZ |
| 2 | 30 | 16 | 1000 | XYZ |
| 2 | 40 | 17 | 1000 | XYZ |
+--------+---------+----------+--------+----------+
I tried this but I'm unable to conclude whether it is updating all the 1 million records properly.
SELECT * FROM #TEST T
inner JOIN #TEST T1 ON T1.EMP_ID=T.EMP_ID
WHERE T1.AMOUNT IS NOT NULL
UPDATE T SET AMOUNT=T1.AMOUNT
FROM #TEST T
inner JOIN #TEST T1 ON T1.EMP_ID=T.EMP_ID
WHERE T1.AMOUNT IS not NULL
I have used UPDATE using inner join
UPDATE T
SET T.AMOUNT = X.AMT,T.ITEM_NME=X.I_N
FROM #TEST T
JOIN
(SELECT EMP_ID,MAX(AMOUNT) AS AMT,MAX(ITEM_NME) AS I_N
FROM #TEST
GROUP BY EMP_ID) X ON X.EMP_ID = T.EMP_ID
SELECT * into #Test1
FROM #TEST
WHERE AMOUNT IS NOT NULL
For records validation run this query first
SELECT T.AMOUNT, T1.AMOUNT, T1.EMP_ID,T1.EMP_ID
FROM #TEST T
inner JOIN #TEST1 T1 ON T1.EMP_ID=T.EMP_ID
WHERE T.AMOUNT IS NULL
Begin Trans
UPDATE T
SET T.AMOUNT=T1.AMOUNT, T.ITEM_NME= = T1.ITEM_NME
FROM #TEST T
inner JOIN #TEST1 T1 ON T1.EMP_ID=T.EMP_ID
WHERE T.AMOUNT IS NULL
rollback
SELECT EMP_ID,MAX(AMOUNT) as AMOUNT MAX(ITEM_NAME) as ITEM_NAME
INTO #t
FROM #TEST
GROUP BY EMP_ID
UPDATE t SET t.AMOUNT = t1.AMOUNT, t.ITEM_NAME = t1.ITEM_NAME
FROM #TEST t INNER JOIN #t t1
ON t.emp_id = t1.emp_id
WHERE t.AMOUNT IS NULL and t.ITEM_NAME IS NULL
Use MAX aggregate function to get amount and item name for each employee and then replace null values of amount and item name with those values. For validation use COUNT function to calculate the number of rows with values of amount and item name as null. If the number of rows is zero then table is updated correctly