why does this make my display go mad? (but only sometimes) - c

Question

it seems this code make my display go crazy sometimes (but only sometimes). But when I remove dat=~dat; it seems to work fine.
why?
what I am trying to do here is just make the ascii letters be the oposite: so for example:
11001000 will be:
00110111
or
10101111 would be:
01010000
the reason for doing this is that i want to have one row (the active row) in the diplay window with black on white pixels instead of opostie like the rest of the display window.
Is there some other way I could do this? (invert the numbers)
FYI: I am programing in C. Atmel studio. atmega 4809, SSD1305z display, SPI-simular interface.
void displayinvertedString(char str[], uint8_t ypos,uint8_t xpos)
{
Set_Page_Address(ypos);
Set_Column_Address(xpos);
int len = strlen(str);
uint8_t dat;
int temp;
for (int e=0; e<len; e++)
{
dat = 0xff;
Write_Data(dat); //to get an extra space between the
// numbers/letters for
//making it easier to read the text on the display
temp = str[e];
temp=temp-0x20; // As the lookup table starts from Space(0x20)
for (int w=0; w<5; w++)
{
dat= OledFontTable[temp][w]; // Get the data to be displayed for LookUptable
dat =~ dat;
Write_Data(dat);
}
}
}
----------
static uint8_t OledFontTable[][FONT_SIZE]={
//static uint8_t OledFontTable[] = {
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // space
0x00, 0x00, 0x2f, 0x00, 0x00, // !
0x00, 0x07, 0x00, 0x07, 0x00, // "
0x14, 0x7f, 0x14, 0x7f, 0x14, // #
0x24, 0x2a, 0x7f, 0x2a, 0x12, // $
0x23, 0x13, 0x08, 0x64, 0x62, // %
0x36, 0x49, 0x55, 0x22, 0x50, // &
ETC. Etc.
just more raw pixel data here. this part ends like this:
0x00, 0x00, 0xFF, 0x00, 0x00, // |
0x00, 0x82, 0x7C, 0x10, 0x00, // }
0x00, 0x06, 0x09, 0x09, 0x06 // ~ (Degrees)
};
void Write_Data(unsigned char Data)
{
PORTA.OUTCLR = PIN7_bm; //cs
PORTB.OUTSET = PIN2_bm; //dc
Write_Command(Data); //
}
void Write_Command(unsigned char data)
{
SPI0.DATA = data; // copy data to DATA register
while ((SPI0.INTFLAGS & SPI_RXCIF_bm) == 0) ; //wait
}
I have asked a bit about this before. but i thought i would look "cleaner" with a new tread since info was missing from the last one.

Answer 1

It turned out I needed to toggle the chip select (CS) so the clock did not get out of sync with time.
The clock sync drifted with time.
It was going crazy faster for the non inverted data for some reason. But with the normal data it happend after some time also.
Thank you for the answers.