I am using react app context to store an array of "alerts objects" which is basically any errors that might occur and I would want to show in the top right corner of the website. The issue I am having is that the context is not being up to date inside a timeout. What I have done for testing is gotten a button to add an alert object to the context when clicked and another component maps through that array in the context and renders them. I want them to disappear after 5 seconds so I have added a timeout which filters the item that got just added and removes it. The issue is that inside the timeout the context.alerts array seems to have the same value as 5 seconds ago instead of using the latest value leading to issues and elements not being filtered out. I am not sure if there's something wrong with my logic here or am I using the context for the wrong thing?
onClick={() => {
const errorPopup = getPopup(); // Get's the alert object I need
context.setAlerts([errorPopup, ...context.alerts]);
setTimeout(() => {
context.setAlerts([
...context.alerts.filter(
(element) => element.id !== errorPopup.id,
),
]);
}, 5000);
}}
onClick={() => {
const errorPopup = getPopup(); // Get's the alert object I need
context.setAlerts([errorPopup, ...context.alerts]);
setTimeout(() => {
context.setAlerts(alerts => [
...alerts.filter(
(element) => element.id !== errorPopup.id,
),
]);
}, 5000);
}}
This should fix it. Until react#17 the setStates in an event handler are batched ( in react#18 all setStates are batched even the async ones ), hence you need to use the most fresh state to make the update in second setAlerts.
To be safe it's a good practice using the cb syntax in the first setState as well.
I think the fix would be to move context.setAlerts(...) to a separate function (say removePopupFromContext(id:string)) and then call this function inside the setTimeout by passing the errorPopup.Id as parameter.
I'm not sure of your implementation of context.setAlerts, but if it's based on just setState function, then alternatively, you could do also something similar to how React let's you access prevState in setState using a function which will let you skip the creation of the extra function which may lightly translate to:
setContext(prevContextState =>({
...prevContextState,
alerts: prevContextState.alerts.filter(your condition)
)})
I am working on a dash board, that fetches data from acuity scheduling.
I am making a form and using a function to get list of radio button:
following array has it, just to clarify. It takes time to get the value in from the API so I have used setTimeout, in the function:
setTimeout(() => {
return timeForID.map( obj => {
return (<Radio value={obj.date}>{obj.hours}:{obj.mins}</Radio>);
})
}, 500)
I am getting a blank space in the place of radio buttons.
There are a lot of answers in JavaScript out there about working with the event loop and callbacks -- See: How do I return the response from an asynchronous call?
Essentially, your return inside of setTimeout doesn't go anywhere.
In order to trigger another render in your component, you will have to use setState. You can call setState after your API call completes -- you shouldn't have to use setTimeout. Let's say you're using fetch to get the API:
fetch(apiUrl).then(response => response.json()).then(dates => setState({ dates }))
Now in your render function you can have:
{this.state.dates.map(({ date, hours, mins }) => (
<Radio value={date}>{hours}:{mins}</Radio>
)}
Initialize the dates property of state to an empty array to prevent errors on the initial load.
I am currently working on a website I am building with React, and I am not able to get the Checkbox key value from the onChange event. This is what my code looks like:
handleChange = (e) => {
console.log('it works');
console.log(e.target.key);
}
And my Checkbox code:
<Table.Cell><Checkbox key={singleNews.key} name="myCheckBox1" onChange={this.handleChange}/></Table.Cell>
It simply prints out 'it works', and 'undefined'. I have also used 'this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this) in my constructor. Could anyone please help me find out what the error might be? For the record; I am currently using the Semantic UI React framework - could this be the problem?
Thanks in advance.
First of all the key property in react is a special prop that should not be accessed by your app and treated as internal to react
If you are not trying to use the key for anything and instead just trying to get the updated data from this issue thread it should be possible to access the value in your event handler like this:
handleChange = (e, data) => {
console.log('it works');
console.log(data.value);
}
If you want to pass data into your event handler based on data it received when runnning then what you can do is change your Checkbox code to this:
<Table.Cell>
<Checkbox name="myCheckBox1" onChange={(e, data) => this.handleChange(singleNews.key, data.value)}/>
</Table.Cell>
And your change handler to this
handleChange = (key, value) => {
console.log('here\'s the key', key);
console.log('and the value', value);
}
As per the docs of semantic-ui-react (this is the library you are using according to the tags right?) you get 2 parameters: event and data.
The data is:
All props and proposed checked/indeterminate state.
So your code should be something like:
handleChange = (e, data) => {
console.log('it works');
console.log(data); // the data / props that passed to the component
}
Note that key is reserved for react and won't pass back to the handler.
You can use any other prop though.
I wonder if someone can explain the reason of this behavior:
If on a onChange event from an <input> element I have set to point to this method:
private PasswordChanged = (event: any) => {
this.setState((prevState: IWifiState, props: IWifiProps) => {
prevState.Password = event.target.value;
return prevState;
});
}
This throw me the following error:
Where line 27 is precisely the call to event.target.value on the pasted code.
If I change to code to be like that:
private PasswordChanged = (event: any) => {
const password = event.target.value;
this.setState((prevState: IWifiState, props: IWifiProps) => {
prevState.Password = password;
return prevState;
});
}
It just works as expected... Anyone can explain why?
Thanks!
React does something called Event Pooling.
What this essentially means is that, for performance considerations, they re-use events.
At the time when you call setState, internally the object might not be okay to re-use as it might behave in ways you wouldn't expect it to (properties get nulled out once the event has served it's purpose).
It is best to save off the reference in a variable for the value that you need, as you did, and use that instead.
Basically, you are accessing it asynchronously (inside the setState function) and it is advised against doing so.
There is a workaround, but I would also advise against it.
If you want to access the event properties in an asynchronous way, you should call event.persist() on the event, which will remove the synthetic event from the pool and allow references to the event to be retained by user code.
We use Backbone + ReactJS bundle to build a client-side app.
Heavily relying on notorious valueLink we propagate values directly to the model via own wrapper that supports ReactJS interface for two way binding.
Now we faced the problem:
We have jquery.mask.js plugin which formats input value programmatically thus it doesn't fire React events. All this leads to situation when model receives unformatted values from user input and misses formatted ones from plugin.
It seems that React has plenty of event handling strategies depending on browser. Is there any common way to trigger change event for particular DOM element so that React will hear it?
For React 16 and React >=15.6
Setter .value= is not working as we wanted because React library overrides input value setter but we can call the function directly on the input as context.
var nativeInputValueSetter = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(window.HTMLInputElement.prototype, "value").set;
nativeInputValueSetter.call(input, 'react 16 value');
var ev2 = new Event('input', { bubbles: true});
input.dispatchEvent(ev2);
For textarea element you should use prototype of HTMLTextAreaElement class.
New codepen example.
All credits to this contributor and his solution
Outdated answer only for React <=15.5
With react-dom ^15.6.0 you can use simulated flag on the event object for the event to pass through
var ev = new Event('input', { bubbles: true});
ev.simulated = true;
element.value = 'Something new';
element.dispatchEvent(ev);
I made a codepen with an example
To understand why new flag is needed I found this comment very helpful:
The input logic in React now dedupe's change events so they don't fire
more than once per value. It listens for both browser onChange/onInput
events as well as sets on the DOM node value prop (when you update the
value via javascript). This has the side effect of meaning that if you
update the input's value manually input.value = 'foo' then dispatch a
ChangeEvent with { target: input } React will register both the set
and the event, see it's value is still `'foo', consider it a duplicate
event and swallow it.
This works fine in normal cases because a "real" browser initiated
event doesn't trigger sets on the element.value. You can bail out of
this logic secretly by tagging the event you trigger with a simulated
flag and react will always fire the event.
https://github.com/jquense/react/blob/9a93af4411a8e880bbc05392ccf2b195c97502d1/src/renderers/dom/client/eventPlugins/ChangeEventPlugin.js#L128
At least on text inputs, it appears that onChange is listening for input events:
var event = new Event('input', { bubbles: true });
element.dispatchEvent(event);
Expanding on the answer from Grin/Dan Abramov, this works across multiple input types. Tested in React >= 15.5
const inputTypes = [
window.HTMLInputElement,
window.HTMLSelectElement,
window.HTMLTextAreaElement,
];
export const triggerInputChange = (node, value = '') => {
// only process the change on elements we know have a value setter in their constructor
if ( inputTypes.indexOf(node.__proto__.constructor) >-1 ) {
const setValue = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(node.__proto__, 'value').set;
const event = new Event('input', { bubbles: true });
setValue.call(node, value);
node.dispatchEvent(event);
}
};
I know this answer comes a little late but I recently faced a similar problem. I wanted to trigger an event on a nested component. I had a list with radio and check box type widgets (they were divs that behaved like checkboxes and/or radio buttons) and in some other place in the application, if someone closed a toolbox, I needed to uncheck one.
I found a pretty simple solution, not sure if this is best practice but it works.
var event = new MouseEvent('click', {
'view': window,
'bubbles': true,
'cancelable': false
});
var node = document.getElementById('nodeMyComponentsEventIsConnectedTo');
node.dispatchEvent(event);
This triggered the click event on the domNode and my handler attached via react was indeed called so it behaves like I would expect if someone clicked on the element. I have not tested onChange but it should work, and not sure how this will fair in really old versions of IE but I believe the MouseEvent is supported in at least IE9 and up.
I eventually moved away from this for my particular use case because my component was very small (only a part of my application used react since i'm still learning it) and I could achieve the same thing another way without getting references to dom nodes.
UPDATE:
As others have stated in the comments, it is better to use this.refs.refname to get a reference to a dom node. In this case, refname is the ref you attached to your component via <MyComponent ref='refname' />.
You can simulate events using ReactTestUtils but that's designed for unit testing.
I'd recommend not using valueLink for this case and simply listening to change events fired by the plugin and updating the input's state in response. The two-way binding utils more as a demo than anything else; they're included in addons only to emphasize the fact that pure two-way binding isn't appropriate for most applications and that you usually need more application logic to describe the interactions in your app.
For HTMLSelectElement, i.e. <select>
var element = document.getElementById("element-id");
var trigger = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
window.HTMLSelectElement.prototype,
"value"
).set;
trigger.call(element, 4); // 4 is the select option's value we want to set
var event = new Event("change", { bubbles: true });
element.dispatchEvent(event);
I stumbled upon the same issue today. While there is default support for the 'click', 'focus', 'blur' events out of the box in JavaScript, other useful events such as 'change', 'input' are not implemented (yet).
I came up with this generic solution and refactored the code based on the accepted answers.
export const triggerNativeEventFor = (elm, { event, ...valueObj }) => {
if (!(elm instanceof Element)) {
throw new Error(`Expected an Element but received ${elm} instead!`);
}
const [prop, value] = Object.entries(valueObj)[0] ?? [];
const desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(elm.__proto__, prop);
desc?.set?.call(elm, value);
elm.dispatchEvent(new Event(event, { bubbles: true }));
};
How does it work?
triggerNativeEventFor(inputRef.current, { event: 'input', value: '' });
Any 2nd property you pass after the 'event' key-value pair, it will be taken into account and the rest will be ignored/discarded.
This is purposedfully written like this in order not to clutter arguments definition of the helper function.
The reason as to why not default to get descriptor for 'value' only is that for instance, if you have a native checkbox <input type="checkbox" />, than it doesn't have a value rather a 'checked' prop/attribute. Then you can pass your desired check state as follows:
triggerNativeEventFor(checkBoxRef.current, { event: 'input', checked: false });
I found this on React's Github issues: Works like a charm (v15.6.2)
Here is how I implemented to a Text input:
changeInputValue = newValue => {
const e = new Event('input', { bubbles: true })
const input = document.querySelector('input[name=' + this.props.name + ']')
console.log('input', input)
this.setNativeValue(input, newValue)
input.dispatchEvent(e)
}
setNativeValue (element, value) {
const valueSetter = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(element, 'value').set
const prototype = Object.getPrototypeOf(element)
const prototypeValueSetter = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
prototype,
'value'
).set
if (valueSetter && valueSetter !== prototypeValueSetter) {
prototypeValueSetter.call(element, value)
} else {
valueSetter.call(element, value)
}
}
Triggering change events on arbitrary elements creates dependencies between components which are hard to reason about. It's better to stick with React's one-way data flow.
There is no simple snippet to trigger React's change event. The logic is implemented in ChangeEventPlugin.js and there are different code branches for different input types and browsers. Moreover, the implementation details vary across versions of React.
I have built react-trigger-change that does the thing, but it is intended to be used for testing, not as a production dependency:
let node;
ReactDOM.render(
<input
onChange={() => console.log('changed')}
ref={(input) => { node = input; }}
/>,
mountNode
);
reactTriggerChange(node); // 'changed' is logged
CodePen
well since we use functions to handle an onchange event, we can do it like this:
class Form extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handlePasswordChange = this.handlePasswordChange.bind(this);
this.state = { password: '' }
}
aForceChange() {
// something happened and a passwordChange
// needs to be triggered!!
// simple, just call the onChange handler
this.handlePasswordChange('my password');
}
handlePasswordChange(value) {
// do something
}
render() {
return (
<input type="text" value={this.state.password} onChange={changeEvent => this.handlePasswordChange(changeEvent.target.value)} />
);
}
}
The Event type input did not work for me on <select> but changing it to change works
useEffect(() => {
var event = new Event('change', { bubbles: true });
selectRef.current.dispatchEvent(event); // ref to the select control
}, [props.items]);
This ugly solution is what worked for me:
let ev = new CustomEvent('change', { bubbles: true });
Object.defineProperty(ev, 'target', {writable: false, value: inpt });
Object.defineProperty(ev, 'currentTarget', {writable: false, value: inpt });
const rHandle = Object.keys(inpt).find(k => k.startsWith("__reactEventHandlers"))
inpt[rHandle].onChange(ev);
A working solution can depend a bit on the implementation of the onChange function you're trying to trigger. Something that worked for me was to reach into the react props attached to the DOM element and call the function directly.
I created a helper function to grab the react props since they're suffixed with a hash like .__reactProps$fdb7odfwyz
It's probably not the most robust but it's good to know it's an option.
function getReactProps(el) {
const keys = Object.keys(el);
const propKey = keys.find(key => key.includes('reactProps'));
return el[propKey];
}
const el = document.querySelector('XX');
getReactProps(el).onChange({ target: { value: id } });
Since the onChange function was only using target.value I could pass a simple object to onChange to trigger my change.
This method can also help with stubborn react owned DOM elements that are listing for onMouseDown and do not respond to .click() like you'd expect.
getReactProps(el).onMouseDown(new Event('click'));
If you are using Backbone and React, I'd recommend one of the following,
Backbone.React.Component
react.backbone
They both help integrate Backbone models and collections with React views. You can use Backbone events just like you do with Backbone views. I've dabbled in both and didn't see much of a difference except one is a mixin and the other changes React.createClass to React.createBackboneClass.