Using GtkAda, I'm trying to use the resource API to include the Glade file directly inside my code.
For this, we can generate C code from a set of resources using glib-compile-resources which can then be linked to the Ada code.
The problem is that this C code requires Gtk includes which we usually get from the pkg-config command under Linux such as
gcc -c -x c `pkg-config --cflags gio-2.0` myglade.gresource.c
I'd like to know how to provide the same kind of information in a GPRBuild project file.
FYI, I already tried to use the pkg-config command inside the compiler package for C language without any success. Of course, I managed to build by hand but that's a bit long :)
This might work for you:
project Config_Demo is
Pkg_Config := external_as_list ("PKG_CONFIG", " ");
package Compiler is
-- only this file needs the extra switches
for Switches ("myglade.gresource.c") use Pkg_Config;
end Compiler;
end Config_Demo;
and then
gprbuild -P config_demo -XPKG_CONFIG="`pkg-config -cflags gio-2.0`"
Your best bet will be to do what GtkAda does: Look at its shared.gpr.in file, it uses the token #GTK_LIBS_GPR# which will be replaced by the configure script, giving a usable shared.gpr.
Thing is, you need to issue the pkg-config call and build your gpr file from the result somehow. GPRBuild is not equipped to do this for you and process the result. If you're comfortable with GNU autotools, you can look further at how GtkAda achieves it:
GTK_LIBS_GPR is set in aclocal.m4 using a macro that converts the C-style flags to a GPR array. The value comes from GTK_LIBS which is queried here via pkg-config.
If you're not comfortable with GNU autotools, you can write your configure script using basic shell commandos, a scripting language like Python or with whatever other tool you're comfortable with.
Related
I have already known that the GCC's argument -finstrument-functions can hook the functions and the argument -finstrument-functions-exclude-file(functions)-list can exclude some files/functions to be traced.
But now I have a lot of files to be compiled and only some of them need to be traced. I wonder if I can include some specific functions/files to be traced, such as something like -finstrument-functions-include-file(functions)-list?
Thanks a lot!
GCC does not support this out-of-the-box (it's more a task for your build system). One common hack to achieve what you want is to write a shell wrapper which replaces GCC and adds flags where needed:
$ cat path/to/fake/gcc
#!/bin/sh
FLAGS=
if echo "$*" | grep -q 'myfile1.c'; then
FLAGS=-finstrument-functions
fi
exec /usr/bin/gcc "$#" $FLAGS
$ export PATH="path/to/fake:$PATH"
If you use cmake to build your project you may benefit from adding COMPILE_OPTIONS at a specific level. Use
add_compile_options()
for directory-wide settings
target_compile_options()
for target-specific settings and
set_source_files_properties()
for file specific settings.
In your case
set_source_files_properties(
myfile1.cc PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -finstrument-functions)
Recent GCC compilers can be extended by GCC plugins.
But now I have a lot of files to be compiled and only some of them need to be traced.
You should consider writing your own GCC plugin to do that job. See also this draft report.
You may configure your build automation tool (e.g. GNU make or ninja) to help you.
At last, some of your C code (e.g. #include-ed files) could be generated. Think of meta-programming approaches (e.g. with SWIG or ANTLR or Bison or GPP or your own C code generator), perhaps using X-macros.
Let's say I have a source file with many preprocessor directives. Is it possible to see how it looks after the preprocessor is done with it?
cl.exe, the command line interface to Microsoft Visual C++, has three different options for outputting the preprocessed file (hence the inconsistency in the previous responses about Visual C++):
/E: preprocess to stdout (similar to GCC's -E option)
/P: preprocess to file
/EP: preprocess to stdout without #line directives
If you want to preprocess to a file without #line directives, combine the /P and /EP options.
Most compilers have an option to just run the preprocessor. e.g., gcc provides -E:
-E Stop after the preprocessing stage; do not run the compiler proper.
The output is in the form of preprocessed source code, which is sent
to the standard output.
So you can just run:
gcc -E foo.c
If you can't find such an option, you can also just find the C preprocessor on your machine. It's usually called cpp and is probably already in your path. Invoke it like this:
cpp foo.c
If there are headers you need to include from other directories , you can pass -I/path/to/include/dir to either of these, just as you would with a regular compile.
For Windows, I'll leave it to other posters to provide answers as I'm no expert there.
Right-click on the file on the Solution Explorer, goto Properties. Under Configuration Properties->C/C++->Preprocessor, "Generate Preprocessed File" is what you are looking for. Then right-click on the file in the Solution Explorer and select "Compile". The preprocessed file is created in the output directory (e.g. Release, Debug) with an extension .i (thanks to Steed for his comment).
You typically need to do some postprocessing on the output of the preprocessor, otherwise all the macros just expand to one liners, which is hard to read and debug. For C code, something like the following would suffice:
gcc -E code.c | sed '/^\#/d' | indent -st -i2 > code-x.c
For C++ code, it's actually a lot harder. For GCC/g++, I found this Perl script useful.
I don't know anything about Microsoft compiler, but on GCC you can use this:
gcc -E -P -o result.c my_file.h
If you want to see comments use this:
gcc -E -C -P -o result.c my_file.h
More options avaliable on this page.
Try cl /EP if you are using Microsoft's C++ compiler.
As bk1e and Andreas M. answered, the /P option for the compiler will cause it to preprocess a file. However, in my project using VS2005 and Platform Builder (for an embedded ARM processor), the project did not present an option in the dialog box (as described by Jim B) to enable that option.
I could run CL manually and add /P, but it failed because I did not know all of the appropriate command-line options that were invisibly being activated by Platform Builder during the full build. So I needed to know all of those options.
My solution was to go look in the build.log file, and find the line that executed
CL blah-blah-blah myfile.c
I copied this line to the clipboard. The "blah-blah-blah" part contained the build options, and was huge.
Back in the IDE, I right-clicked on myfile.c, chose "Open Build Window", and then in that window I pasted the build command-line, and added a "/P".
CL /P blah-blah-blah myfile.c
Done. The myfile.i file was produced, which contained the preprocessor output.
In Visual Studio you can compile a file (or project) with /P.
CPIP is a new C/C++ preprocessor written in Python. If you want a detailed visual representation of a preprocessed file, give it a shot.
CPIP is a C/C++ pre-processor implemented in Python. Most pre-processors regard pre-processing as a dirty job that just has to be done as soon as possible. This can make it very hard to track down subtle defects at the pre-processing stage as pre-processors throw away a lot of useful information in favor of getting the result as cheaply as possible.
Few developers really understand pre-processing, to many it is an obscure bit of black magic. CPIP aims to improve that and by recording every detail of preprocessing so CPIP can can produce some wonderfully visual information about file dependencies, macro usage and so on.
CPIP is not designed to be a replacement for cpp (or any other established pre-processor), instead CPIP regards clarity and understanding as more important than speed of processing.
On Windows OS, a simple one line answer to this question is to use the below command in DOS prompt to see the preprocessed file:
CL /P /C myprogram.c
This will generate a file called myprogram.i. Open it and look out for your expanded preprocessors.
I'm trying to find a way to convert simple C code to NASM assembly. I have tried using objconv and downloaded and unzipped and built it since I am using a MAC; however, it doesn't seem to be working. I keep getting "-bash: objconv: command not found". Does anyone know another way or can help me solve the -bash error.
Bash is the program that takes the words you type in a terminal and launches other programs. If it is reporting an error, it is because it cannot find the program you want to run (at least in this case).
You need to either find a pre-packaged installation of objconv, or you need to do the work to "integrate" your copy of objconv yourself.
If you can identify the executable you want to run (probably called objconv) you need to add that to your path. The easiest way (if it is just for you) is to verify that your ~/.bashrc or ~/.bashprofile has a line that looks something like
PATH=$PATH:${HOME}/bin
Don't worry if it doesn't look exactly the same. Just make sure there's a ${HOME}/bin or ~/bin (~ is the short version of ${HOME}).
If you have that then type the commands
cd ~/bin
ln -fs ../path/to/objconv
and you will create a soft link (a type of file) in your home binary directory, and the program should be available to the command line.
If you create the file, and nothing above has any errors, but it is not available to the command line, you might need to set the executable bit on your "real" (not link) copy of objconv.
If this doesn't work, by now you should be well primed for a better, more specific question.
If you have gcc installed, try gcc -masm=intel -S source.c to generate assembly files in a syntax very similar to that of MASM.
I am constructing an R package where I have few third party C functions which use GSL and OpenMP, and I then call these from R using wrappers made with Rcpp (which just modify some arguments and call the appropriate C function). Everything works fine in my Windows machine, but I am not sure how to define the Makevars.win and Makevars file in a portable way. My Makevars.win looks like this:
## This assumes that the LIB_GSL variable points to working GSL libraries
PKG_CPPFLAGS=-I$(LIB_GSL)/include -I../inst/include
PKG_LIBS=-L$(LIB_GSL)/lib/x64 -lgsl -lgslcblas $(SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS)
PKG_CFLAGS=$(SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS)
It is basically copied from various sources. Like said, this compiles in my computer (using toolchain of from Rtools), and if I remove PKG_CFLAGS=$(SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS) I can also compile without OpenMP (for some reason I don't understand I get error if I remove OpenMP flag in PKG_LIBS).
My Makevars file looks identical, but I don't have access to Unix platforms so I am not sure how to deal with that side. My guess is that I need to replace LIB_GSL with something?
EDIT:
Okay, I think I finally understand how configure etc. works and was able to get everything working.
My Makevars.win:
## This assumes that the LIB_GSL variable points to working GSL libraries
PKG_CPPFLAGS=-I$(LIB_GSL)/include -I../inst/include
PKG_LIBS="-L$(LIB_GSL)/lib/$(R_ARCH)" -lgsl -lgslcblas $(SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS)
PKG_CFLAGS=$(SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS)
My Makevars.in:
GSL_CFLAGS = #GSL_CFLAGS#
GSL_LIBS = #GSL_LIBS#
PKG_LIBS=$(GSL_LIBS) $(SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS)
PKG_CFLAGS=$(GSL_CFLAGS) $(SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS)
And my configure.ac:
AC_INIT([testpackage], 0.0.1)
## Use gsl-config to find arguments for compiler and linker flags
##
## Check for non-standard programs: gsl-config(1)
AC_PATH_PROG([GSL_CONFIG], [gsl-config])
## If gsl-config was found, let's use it
if test "${GSL_CONFIG}" != ""; then
# Use gsl-config for header and linker arguments
GSL_CFLAGS=`${GSL_CONFIG} --cflags`
GSL_LIBS=`${GSL_CONFIG} --libs`
else
AC_MSG_ERROR([gsl-config not found, is GSL installed?])
fi
# Now substitute these variables in src/Makevars.in to create src/Makevars
AC_SUBST(GSL_CFLAGS)
AC_SUBST(GSL_LIBS)
AC_OUTPUT(src/Makevars)
I then run autoconf in testpackage directory in order to get configure file, which in turn converts Makevars.in to Makevars when running R CMD INSTALL.
There are a few CRAN packages using the GSL, and/or our RcppGSL bindings. Here is what I do in one of these (my RcppZiggurat package):
PKG_CPPFLAGS = -I. -I../inst/include
## Use the R_HOME indirection to support installations of multiple R version
PKG_LIBS = `$(R_HOME)/bin/Rscript -e "RcppGSL:::LdFlags()"`
That is the entire /src/Makevars. You can trivially add the same OpenMP variable from R. This does of course create a dependency on RcppGSL (as I already use it in RcppZiggurat). Else you can look into the R/init.R of RcppGSL and see how it tries to talk to gsl-config and store those values. You can do the same in src/Makevars -- it is just basic Make usage and nothing Rcpp specific.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Is there an interpreter for C?
I want to practice C a bit and I would like to have something that allows to write and test C code quickly. I want to have an interpreter with UI where I can write my code and execute it.
Are there any good solutions for that?
The closest solution to what you are looking for seems to be the C shell (CSH) or C Scripting Language (CSL).
Alternatively, have an editor open where you will write your C sample, then have console window where you will execute your favourite C compiler. The idea is to have simple workflow like this:
$ gvim test.c
$ gcc test.c
$ ./a.out
Don't forget, C is not a scripting language.
However, you may find JIT compiler for C, C++, and the likes discussion helpful.
Though "interpreters" per se don't exist (or not practically), I'd advise on using a modern IDE. Eclipse + CDT allows you to have "on the fly compilation", just like in java. Your project is ready to run whenever you are, with reduced latency due to compilation (if you have a decent computer).
For other answers, I advise on NOT using directly gcc test.c. Use a makefile or use at least gcc -Wall -g -o myapp test.c top have additional information during compilation (useful as C has many more pitfalls than python). Please note as well that testis astandard program and that . might not be in your PATH : myapp is a better name than test ;-)
There is Cling. Never used it, so I can't really tell you more, but it looks like what you are looking for.
You might also find other lead in this question: Is there an interpreter for C?
you can take a look at : http://codepad.org/
or the easy way is to create a sh script like :
vim $1 ; gcc $1 ; ./a.out
You can't interpret C++ code as far as I know...
What you could do (and what I do when I quickly need to write some simple things ) is set up a simple make file and open a new file with some simple text editor like Kate that has a console plugin. Then you can write some code and type "make" to see the result of your code in the konsole / whichever shell you are using