I'm trying to add search options on my search form that would allow the user to ensure that all the words he searched for are in the results, or at least one, or an "exact match".
I've found MinimumMatch and it's perfect for that.
I've made a custom viewhelper that I placed in my Result.html, it takes as parameter the type of search the user wants (atLeastOne, AllWords, etc...) and I've dug a bit in the source code and it seems I can override values of the current Solr Typoscript by passing an array to a mergeSolrConfiguration function.
So I tried something like that as a draft to see how it works :
public static function renderStatic(array $arguments, Closure $renderChildrenClosure, RenderingContextInterface $renderingContext)
{
$previousRequest = static::getUsedSearchRequestFromRenderingContext($renderingContext);
$usedQuery = $previousRequest->getRawUserQuery();
$contextConfiguration = $previousRequest->getContextTypoScriptConfiguration();
$override['plugin.']['tx_solr.']['search.']['query.']['minimumMatch'] = '100%';
$contextConfiguration->mergeSolrConfiguration($override, true, true);
return self::getSearchUriBuilder($renderingContext)->getNewSearchUri($previousRequest, $usedQuery);
}
But it simply doesn't work. Solr keeps using the site's Typoscript config instead of my overriden one.
I saw there was a way to also override the Typoscript of the filters, with setSearchQueryFilterConfiguration so I gave it a try with :
public static function renderStatic(array $arguments, Closure $renderChildrenClosure, RenderingContextInterface $renderingContext)
{
$previousRequest = static::getUsedSearchRequestFromRenderingContext($renderingContext);
$usedQuery = $previousRequest->getRawUserQuery();
$previousRequest->getContextTypoScriptConfiguration()
->setSearchQueryFilterConfiguration(['sourceId_intS' => 'sourceId_intS:7']);
return self::getSearchUriBuilder($renderingContext)->getNewSearchUri($previousRequest, $usedQuery);
}
But nope, it keeps using the configuration set in the website's template, completely ignoring my overrides.
Am I going the wrong way with this ? Is the thing I'm trying to do not possible technically ?
I extracted from a previous response an Object of tuple with the following regex :
.check(regex(""""idSc":(.{1,8}),"pasTemps":."codePasTemps":(.),"""").ofType[(String,String)].findAll.saveAs ("OBJECTS1"))
So I get my object :
OBJECTS1 -> List((1657751,2), (1658105,2), (4557378,2), (1657750,1), (916,1), (917,2), (1658068,1), (1658069,2), (4557379,2), (1658082,1), (4557367,1), (4557368,1), (1660865,2), (1660866,2), (1658122,1), (921,1), (922,2), (923,2), (1660875,1), (1660876,2), (1660877,2), (1658300,1), (1658301,1), (1658302,1), (1658309,1), (1658310,1), (2996562,1), (4638455,1))
After that I did a Foreach and need to extract every couple to add them in next requests So we tried :
.foreach("${OBJECTS1}", "couple") {
exec(http("request_foreach47"
.get("/ctr/web/api/seriegraph/bydates/${couple(0)}/${couple(1)}/1552863600000/1554191743799")
.headers(headers_27))
}
But I get the message : named 'couple' does not support index access
I also though that to use 2 regex on the couple to extract both part could work but I haven't found any way to use a regex on a session variable. (Even if its not needed for this case but possible im really interessed to learn how as it could be usefull)
If would be really thankfull if you could provided me help. (Im using Gatling 2 but can,'t use a more recent version as its for work and others scripts have been develloped with Gatling2)
each "couple" is a scala tuple which can't be indexed into like a collection. Fortunately the gatling EL has a function that handles tuples.
so instead of
.get("/ctr/web/api/seriegraph/bydates/${couple(0)}/${couple(1)}/1552863600000/1554191743799")
you can use
.get("/ctr/web/api/seriegraph/bydates/${couple._1}/${couple._2}/1552863600000/1554191743799")
I am working on a drupal7 site.
In Dev, I have enabled and configured simplesamlphp_auth module.
I used features and strongarm to export the configuration to code.
The downloaded feature contain:
myfeature_sso.features.defaultconfig.inc
myfeature_sso.info
myfeature_sso.module
The .inc file contains the configuration values I had put in (admin/config/people/simplesamlphp_auth) correctly
Now, in a few places, I want to replace the hard coded values with variables that change based on the environment. I set the variables at the top of .inc file using variable_get $office_ou = variable_get('office_ou', NULL); ...and . A quick example is $base_url below:
$strongarm = new stdClass();
$strongarm->disabled = FALSE;
$strongarm->api_version = 1;
$strongarm->name = 'simplesamlphp_auth_logoutgotourl';
$strongarm->value = $base_url ;
$export['simplesamlphp_auth_logoutgotourl'] = $strongarm;
When I DPM these variables, they display correct values.
But on a fresh install when I enable myfeature_sso module the value of variables are missing.
missing value from $base_url variable
Can you please point me in the right direction?
Thank you.
I found the answer:
when in features ui, do not add fields relevant to simplesamle to the defaultconfig section. if you have any there remove them.
add fields relevant to simplesaml to storongarm section
export the feature
in your_feature_name.strongarm.inc add any additional php code to function your_feature_name_strongarm()
done
This must be something very simple, I just don't see it (and can not find the answer :(
I am trying to learn DevExpress controls and have read that eXpress Persistent Objects is recommended for O/R mapping.
1) I have an existing SQL Server Compact 4.0 database for which I generated ORM
2) I have a Winform with XtraGrid.GridControl gridControl1
3) In Form_Load event I have this code:
XPCollection cName = new XPCollection(typeof(WindowsFormsApplication1.DUzskv1r6.XPO_TableName));
int c = cName.Count; //didn't help...
cName.DisplayableProperties = "Name;Nr"; //choose columns to display
gridControl1.MainView.PopulateColumns();
gridControl1.DataSource = cName;
I have read that it using "delayed loading" - loading when it is necessary (http://documentation.devexpress.com/#XPO/clsDevExpressXpoXPCollectiontopic), but reading XPcollections record Count didn't do the trick as it was suggested.
As a result I get an empty gridControl1 with columns "Name" and "Nr".
Please help - what am I missing?
I think the issue is somewhere in your datalayer initialization.
You use XPCollection with default session, maybe you forgot to initialize it.
The best way is to specify the session is in the XPCollection contractor.
I want to access two databases in Play Scala with anorm and Magic[T], (one is H2 and another is PostgreSQL). I just don't know how to config it...
I noticed that we can set another database connection in conf/application.conf
db_other.url=jdbc:mysql://localhost/test
db_other.driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
db_other.user=root
db_other.pass=
However, how can I use it with Magic?
(I read the source code of Magic but don't understand it... my am a freshman of Scala)
Anyhow, if multiple database access is impossible with Magic[T] , I wish to do it with anorm, then how can I config it?
var sqlQuery = SQL( //I guess some config params should be set here, but how?
"""
select * from Country
"""
)
In play.api.db.DB it appears you can pass in a string of the name you defined in application.conf.
Then use one of the methods specified here: http://www.playframework.org/documentation/2.0/ScalaDatabase
# play.api.db.DB.class
def withConnection[A](name : scala.Predef.String)(block : scala.Function1[java.sql.Connection, A])(implicit app : play.api.Application) : A = { /* compiled code */ }