SQL: how to do an IF check for data range parameters - sql-server

I am writing a stored procedure that takes in 4 parameters: confirmation_number, payment_amount, start_range, end_range.
The parameters are optional, so I am doing a check in this fashion for the confirmation_number, and the payment_amount parameters:
IF (#s_Confirmation_Number IS NOT NULL)
SET #SQL = #SQL + ' AND pd.TransactionNumber = #s_Confirmation_Number'
IF (#d_Payment_Amount IS NOT NULL)
SET #SQL = #SQL + ' AND pd.PaymentAmount = #d_Payment_Amount'
I would like to ask for help because I am not sure what is the best method to check for the date range parameters.
If someone could give me en example, or several on how this is best achieved it would be great.
Thank you in advance.
UPDATE - after receiving some great help -.
This is what I have so far, I am following scsimon recommendation, but I am not sure about the dates, I got the idea from another post I found and some playing around with it. Would you care looking at it and tell me what you all think?
Many thanks.
#s_Confirmation_Number NVARCHAR(50) = NULL
, #d_Payment_Amount DECIMAL(18, 2) = NULL
, #d_Start_Range DATE = NULL
, #d_End_Range DATE = NULL
...
....
WHERE
ph.SourceType = #s_Source_Type
AND ((pd.TransConfirmID = #s_Confirmation_Number) OR #s_Confirmation_Number IS NULL)
AND ((pd.PaymentAmount = #d_Payment_Amount) OR #d_Payment_Amount IS NULL)
AND (((NULLIF(#d_Start_Range, '') IS NULL) OR CAST(pd.CreatedDate AS DATE) >= #d_Start_Range)
AND ((NULLIF(#d_End_Range, '') IS NULL) OR CAST(pd.CreatedDate AS DATE) <= #d_End_Range))
(The parameter sourceType is a hard-coded value)

This is called a catch all or kitchen sink query. It is usually written as such:
create procedure myProc
(#Payment_Amount int = null
,#Confirmation_Number = null
,#start_range datetime
,#end_range datetime)
as
select ...
from ...
where
(pd.TransactionNumber = #Confirmation_Number or #Confirmation_Number is null)
and (pd.PaymentAmount = #Payment_Amount or #Payment_Amount is null)
The NULL on the two parameters gives them a default of NULL and makes them "optional". The WHERE clause evaluates this to only return rows where your user input matches the column value, or all rows when no user input was supplied (i.e. parameter IS NULL). You can use this with the date parameters as well. Just pay close attention to your parentheses. They matter a lot here because we are mixing and and or logic.
Aaron Bertrand has blogged extensively on this.

I do it like this
WHERE
COALESCE(#s_Confirmation_Number,pd.TransactionNumber) = pd.TransactionNumber AND
COALESCE(#d_Payment_Amount,pd.PaymentAmount) = pd.PaymentAmount
If we have a value for each of these parameters then it will check against the filter value otherwise it will always match the filter value if the parameter is null.
I've found that using COALESCE is faster and clearer than IF control statements or using OR in the WHERE clause.

There is another way.
But I tested and realized that a scsimon query is faster than mine.
AND (CASE
WHEN #Confirmation_Number is not null
THEN (CASE
WHEN pd.TransactionNumber = #Confirmation_Number
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END)
ELSE 1
END = 1)

Related

Is there any way to optimize this query?

I need to optimize the following query:
IF object_id('tempdb..#TAB001') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #TAB001;
select *
into #TAB001
from dbo.uvw_TAB001
where 1 = 1
and isnull(COD_CUSTOMER,'') = isnull(#cod_customer,isnull(COD_CUSTOMER,''))
and isnull(TAXCODE,'') = isnull(#taxcode, isnull(TAXCODE,''))
and isnull(SURNAME,'') = isnull(#surname,isnull(SURNAME,''))
and isnull(VATCODE,'') = isnull(#vatCode,isnull(VATCODE,''))
The goal is to improve the performance of this query.
It is currently quite fast but I would like to speed it up even more.
This query has the optional parameters for which it is necessary to make a query that regardless of whether all or 1 parameter is set, returns results in the shortest possible time.
What you have here is known as a "catch-all" or "kitchen sink" query, which need a little helping hand sometimes.
Firstly, you need to get rid of those ISNULLs; they are making the query non-SARGable. Also, I would suggest getting rid of the SELECT * and limiting the query to the columns you need.
Then, finally, we can add OPTION (RECOMPILE) to the query; why is discussed in the articles I linked above. This gives you the following:
SELECT * --Replace with Column Names
INTO #TAB001 --Do you actually need to do this?
FROM dbo.uvw_TAB001
--Removed WHERE 1 = 1 as it's always true, thus pointless
WHERE (COD_CUSTOMER = #cod_customer OR #cod_customer IS NULL)
AND (TAXCODE = #taxcode OR #taxcode IS NULL)
AND (SURNAME = #surname OR #surname IS NULL)
AND (VATCODE = #vatCode OR #vatCode IS NULL)
OPTION (RECOMPILE);
Note I am assuming that when a variable (for example #cod_customer) has the value NULL you mean that the variable should be "ignored" and not matched against NULL.
If you actually want {Column} = #{Variable} including NULL then use SQL with the format below instead:
({Column} = #{Variable} OR ({Column} IS NULL AND #{Variable} IS NULL))

Select with Contains parameter not working with null

With my select below, if blank string is passed in I get the following error: Null or empty full-text predicate
in my DBAdapter when fetching rows from the database. If I provide a value, such as Well, I do not get results when I should as Well is in the r.[Desc] column. If I pass in Well One, I get: Syntax error near 'one' in the full-text search condition 'Well one'.
If I pass in One, I get nothing.
I've read similar questions here and have not seen a pattern where the value passed in can be nothing, the beginning of the column data, a word in the middle of the column data or more than one word in any order of the column data. I thought Contains returns the row if the column contains the value or part of the value passed in.
What am I doing wrong?
if #Drawing = ''
set #Drawing = null
if #ItemName = ''
set #ItemName = null
if #CF3 = ''
set #CF3 = null
if #Desc = ''
set #Desc = null
if #Design = ''
set #Design = null
if #MaxPSI = 0
set #MaxPSI = null
Select distinct
,r.[DRAWING]
,r.[DESC]
,r.[OP_PSI]
,r.[MAX_PSI]
,r.[MAX_TEMP]
,r.[Insulated]
,r.[DESIGN]
From Ref r
inner join Eng e on e.[DRAWING] = r.[DRAWING]
where r.SurveyNumber = #SurveyNumber
And (rtrim(#Drawing) is NUll or rtrim(r.DRAWING) like rtrim(#Drawing) + '%')
And (rtrim(#Design) is NUll or rtrim(r.DESIGN) like rtrim(#Design) + '%')
And (rtrim(#MaxPSI) is NUll or rtrim(r.MAX_PSI) like rtrim(#MaxPSI) + '%')
And (rtrim(#CF3) is NUll or rtrim(e.CF3) like rtrim(#CF3) + '%')
And (rtrim(#ItemName) is NUll or rtrim(e.ITEM_NAME) like rtrim(#ItemName) + '%')
AND ((#Desc = '""') OR CONTAINS( (r.[Desc]), #Desc))
I think you can try checking for empty as follows:
AND ((#Desc = '""' OR #Desc = '') OR CONTAINS( (r.[Desc]), #Desc))
I suspect the empty predicate may be getting passed as '' instead of "".
Have not used Contains much but from section in the doc [here][1] it seems you either need operators between the words or need to wrap expression in double quotes "". So what you can do is try passing params like this:
AND ((#Desc = '""' OR #Desc = '') OR CONTAINS( (r.[Desc]), '"'+#Desc+'"'))
What possible purpose is
rtrim(#Drawing) is NUll
If it is NULL the rtrim has no meaning. Besides comparison of string basically does an rtrim.

Filter SQL datatable according to different parameters, without a WHERE clause

I'm building an application that needs to allow the user to filter a data table according to different filters. So, the user will have three different filter posibilites but he might use only one, or two or the three of them at the same tame.
So, let's say I have the following columns on the table:
ID (int) PK
Sede (int)
Programa (int)
Estado (int)
All of those columns will store numbers, integers. The "ID" column is the primary key, "Sede" stores 1 or 2, "Programa" is any number between 1 and 15, and "Estado" will store numbers between 1 and 13.
The user may filter the data stored in the table using any of those filters (Sede, Programa or Estado). But the might, as well, use two filters, or the three of them at the same time.
The idea is that this application works like the data filters on Excel. I created a simulated table on excel to show what I want to achieve:
This first image shows the whole table, without applying any filter.
Here, the user selected a filter for "Sede" and "Programa" but leaved the "Estado" filter empty. So the query returns the values that are equal to the filter, but leaves the "Estado" filter open, and brings all the records, filering only by "Sede" (1) and "Programa" (6).
In this image, the user only selected the "Estado" filter (5), so it brings all the records that match this criteria, it doesn't matter if "Sede" or "Programa" are empty.
If I use a SELECT clasuse with a WHERE on it, it will work, but only if the three filters have a value:
DECLARE #sede int
DECLARE #programa int
DECLARE #estado int
SET #sede = '1'
SET #programa = '5'
SET #estado = '12'
SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Inscripciones]
WHERE
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] = #sede)
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] = #programa)
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] = #estado)
I also tryed changing the "AND" for a "OR", but I can't get the desired result.
Any help will be highly appreciated!! Thanks!
common problem: try using coalesce on the variable and for the 2nd value use the field name you're comparing to. Be careful though; Ensure it's NULL and not empty string being passed!
What this does is take the first non-null value of the variable passed in or the value you're comparing to.. Thus if the value passed in is null the comparison will always return true.
WHERE
[dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] = coalesce(#sede, [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede])
AND
[dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] = coalesce(#programa, [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa])
AND
[dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] = coalesce(#estado, [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado])
If sede is null and programa and estado are populated the compare would look like...
?=? (or 1=1)
?=programa variable passed in
?=Estado variable passed in
Boa Sorte!
Thank you all for your anwers. After reading the article posted in the comments by #SeanLange I was finally able to achieve what was needed. Using a CASE clause in the WHERE statement solves the deal. Here's the code:
SELECT
*
FROM [dbo].[Inscripciones]
WHERE
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] = (CASE WHEN #sede = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] ELSE #sede END))
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] = (CASE WHEN #programa = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] ELSE #programa END))
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] = (CASE WHEN #estado = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] ELSE #estado END))
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[TipoIngreso] = (CASE WHEN #tipoingreso = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[TipoIngreso] ELSE #tipoingreso END))
Thanks again!!

How to get all values including null in a SQL Server case statement?

I have a big stored procedure, and basically I want to select all values (including null) if my variable #DimBrowserId is set to 0. I am using a case statement, however this is only catching values that actually have something and ignoring the NULL valued fields. Because I am using the = clause in the WHERE I cannot do IS NULL. I do not want to have to write 2 IF statements because the stored procedure would then be enormous, so I want to know how to get null values as well. Here is my code:
SELECT
DATEPART(yy, DATEADD(mi, #Mdelta, d.DimDateValue)),
DisableCount = COUNT(*)
FROM
dbo.FactDisable AS f
JOIN
dbo.DimDate AS d ON f.DimDateId = d.DimDateId
JOIN
dbo.DimDevice AS v ON f.DimDeviceId = v.DimDeviceId
WHERE
d.DimDateValue >= #StartDateGMT
AND d.DimDateValue <= #EndDateGMT
AND f.IsTest = #IncludeTest
AND f.DimProductId = #DimProductId
AND v.DimBrowserId = CASE
WHEN #DimBrowserId = 0 THEN v.DimBrowserId
ELSE #DimBrowserId
END
GROUP BY
DATEPART(yy, DATEADD(mi, #Mdelta, d.DimDateValue))
The code is near the CASE clause.
Thanks
Change that line to be
AND (#DimBrowserID = 0 OR #DimBrowserID = v.DimBrowserId)
If #DimBroserID is 0 then no filtering will be applied for this line.
Use ISNULL:
SELECT DATEPART(yy,DATEADD(mi,#Mdelta,d.DimDateValue)),
DisableCount=COUNT(*)
FROM dbo.FactDisable AS f
JOIN dbo.DimDate AS d ON f.DimDateId = d.DimDateId
JOIN dbo.DimDevice AS v ON f.DimDeviceId = v.DimDeviceId
WHERE d.DimDateValue >= #StartDateGMT AND d.DimDateValue <= #EndDateGMT
AND f.IsTest = #IncludeTest AND f.DimProductId = #DimProductId
AND v.DimBrowserId = CASE WHEN ISNULL(#DimBrowserId,0) = 0 THEN v.DimBrowserId ELSE #DimBrowserId END
GROUP BY DATEPART(yy,DATEADD(mi,#Mdelta,d.DimDateValue))
CASE WHEN COALESCE(#MightBeNull, 0) = 0 THEN ZeroResult ...
will be treated as zero if #MightBeNull is null, and whatever #MightBeNull is if it's not null.
Assuming null means any browser, a better data model for this scenario might be to set an ID that identifies any browser, instead of setting it to null.
You probably know what you are running into is NULL does not equal NULL in a comparison.
Assuming you don't have control of the data model to fix that, one option would be to coalesce your NULL values to an unused id.
The resulting WHERE clause would look like this, assuming -1 is the unused value you choose.
AND COALESCE(v.DimBrowserId, -1) = CASE WHEN #DimBrowserId = 0 THEN COALESCE(v.DimBrowserId, -1) ELSE #DimBrowserId END

Using a bit input in stored procedure to determine how to filter results in the where clause

I'm beating my head against the wall here... can't figure out a way to pull this off.
Here's my setup:
My table has a column for the date something was completed. If it was never completed, the field is null. Simple enough.
On the front end, I have a checkbox that defaults to "Only show incomplete entries". When only pulling incomplete entries, it's easy.
SELECT
*
FROM Sometable
WHERE Completed_Date IS NULL
But offering the checkbox option complicates things a great deal. My checkbox inputs a bit value: 1=only show incomplete, 0=show all.
The problem is, I can't use a CASE statement within the where clause, because an actual value uses "=" to compare, and checking null uses "IS". For example:
SELECT
*
FROM Sometable
WHERE Completed_Date IS <---- invalid syntax
CASE WHEN
...
END
SELECT
*
FROM Sometable
WHERE Completed_Date =
CASE WHEN #OnlyIncomplete = 1 THEN
NULL <----- this translates to "WHERE Completed_Date = NULL", which won't work.. I have to use "IS NULL"
...
END
Any idea how to accomplish this seemly easy task? I'm stumped... thanks.
...
WHERE #OnlyIncomplete = 0
OR (#OnlyIncomplete = 1 AND Completed_Date IS NULL)
Hmmm... I think what you want is this:
SELECT
*
FROM Sometable
WHERE Completed_Date IS NULL OR (#OnlyIncomplete = 0)
So that'll show Date=NULL plus, if OnlyIncomplete=0, Date != Null. Yeah, I think that's it.
If you still want to use a CASE function (although it may be overkill in this case) :
SELECT
*
FROM Sometable
WHERE 1 =
(CASE WHEN #OnlyIncomplete = 0 THEN 1
WHEN #OnlyIncomplete = 1 AND Completed_Date IS NULL THEN 1
END)

Resources