Im trying to update all the values in 2 particular columns for two different tables we have to HEX so far without luck in our PostgreSQL 8.4.7 on Centos.
Here are the two columns types and the table name they belong too:
-node_id is a smallint column default 1. this belongs to table1
-value is a bytea column that belongs to table2
I can do a select on table2 for the value:bytea column with the following selec:
SELECT encode(value::bytea, 'hex') FROM table2;
But this syntax does not work for table1 node_id:smallint column.
I've try the following commands without luck in and effort to change the values of the columns to hex on the respective tables.
ALTER TABLE table2 SET value TO 'hex';
ALTER TABLE table2 MODIFY value TO 'hex';
UPDATE table1 (value::bytea, 'hex');
UPDATE tbl table2 SET value::bytea TO 'hex';
SET encode(value::bytea, 'hex') FROM table2;
There is any proper way to do this in a one command like the above?
Thanks in advance for any help.
I was able to solve my problem with the following command:
CREATE TABLE "name" AS select *, encode(value, 'hex') as "column_name" from "table";
Related
I have two tables in MS Access: table1 and table2. In table1 I have fields: ID, name (text), short_name (text), description (text), use_in_table2 (checkbox). In table2 I have fields: ID, name (text), max (num), min (unm) and others. I want to copy object from table1 to table2 with use_in_table2 == True. Also if I reset checkbox use_in_table2 in table1, I will delete corresponding object from table2. I use same ID for same objects in both tables. I use simple python script for my task. How can I solve this problem in MS Access?
The short answer is don't do it this way. Don't Repeat Yourself(DRY). In most cases there is no need for Table 2. Just create Table 2 every time you need it with a select query. You can use the Query Designer to help you write the sql. You can even hit make table and create a table rather than a query but for most purposes they work the same.
'select query
SELECT Table1.Table1ID, Table1.Month, Table1.X, Table1.Y, Table1.use_in_table2
FROM Table1
WHERE (((Table1.use_in_table2)=True));
'make table query
SELECT Table1.Table1ID, Table1.Month, Table1.X, Table1.Y, Table1.use_in_table2 INTO Table2
FROM Table1
WHERE (((Table1.use_in_table2)=True));
To answer the question posed. Note the Delete and Update Tabs. After Making Table2 you must run two queries rather than just 1. A delete Query for records where use_in_table2 is false and an update query where use_in_table2 is true. I ran out of time; look those up
I have an insert Query and inserting data using SELECT query and certain joins between tables.
While running that query, it is giving error "String or binary data would be truncated".
There are thousands of rows and multiple columns I am trying to insert in that table.
So it is not possible to visualize all data and see what data is throwing this error.
Is there any specific way to identify which column is throwing this error? or any specific record not getting inserted properly and resulted into this error?
I found one article on this:
RareSQL
But this is when we insert data using some values and that insert is one by one.
I am inserting multiple rows at the same time using SELECT statements.
E.g.,
INSERT INTO TABLE1 VALUES (COLUMN1, COLUMN2,..) SELECT COLUMN1, COLUMN2,.., FROM TABLE2 JOIN TABLE3
Also, in my case, I am having multiple inserts and update statements and even not sure which statement is throwing this error.
You can do a selection like this:
select TABLE2.ID, TABLE3.ID TABLE1.COLUMN1, TABLE1.COLUMN2, ...
FROM TABLE2
JOIN TABLE3
ON TABLE2.JOINCOLUMN1 = TABLE3.JOINCOLUMN2
LEFT JOIN TABLE1
ON TABLE1.COLUMN1 = TABLE2.COLUMN1 and TABLE1.COLUMN2 = TABLE2.COLUMN2, ...
WHERE TABLE1.ID = NULL
The first join reproduces the selection you have been using for the insert and the second join is a left join, which will yield null values for TABLE1 if a row having the exact column values you wanted to insert does not exist. You can apply this logic to your other queries, which were not given in the question.
You might just have to do it the hard way. To make it a little simpler, you can do this
Temporarily remove the insert command from the query, so you are getting a result set out of it. You might need to give some of the columns aliases if they don't come with one. Then wrap that select query as a subquery, and test likely columns (nvarchars, etc) like this
Select top 5 len(Col1), *
from (Select col1, col2, ... your query (without insert) here) A
Order by 1 desc
This will sort the rows with the largest values in the specified column first and just return the rows with the top 5 values - enough to see if you've got a big problem or just one or two rows with an issue. You can quickly change which column you're checking simply by changing the column name in the len(Col1) part of the first line.
If the subquery takes a long time to run, create a temp table with the same columns but with the string sizes large (like varchar(max) or something) so there are no errors, and then you can do the insert just once to that table, and run your tests on that table instead of running the subquery a lot
From this answer,
you can use temp table and compare with target table.
for example this
Insert into dbo.MyTable (columns)
Select columns
from MyDataSource ;
Become this
Select columns
into #T
from MyDataSource;
select *
from tempdb.sys.columns as TempCols
full outer join MyDb.sys.columns as RealCols
on TempCols.name = RealCols.name
and TempCols.object_id = Object_ID(N'tempdb..#T')
and RealCols.object_id = Object_ID(N'MyDb.dbo.MyTable)
where TempCols.name is null -- no match for real target name
or RealCols.name is null -- no match for temp target name
or RealCols.system_type_id != TempCols.system_type_id
or RealCols.max_length < TempCols.max_length ;
I'm trying to update a column in one table (#TEMPTABLE) using data in another table (#PEOPLE) by using the REPLACE() function.
#TEMPTABLE has a column called "NameString' that is a long string with a user's name and ID.
#PEOPLE has a column for ID, and IDnumber.
UPDATE #TEMPTABLE
SET NAMEString = REPLACE(NAMEString, a.[ID], a.[IDNumber]) FROM #PEOPLE a
I'm trying to replace all the ID's in the NameString Column with the IDnumbers coming from #People table.
You need to give it a join criterion. For example:
update #TEMPTABLE
set NAMEString = replace(a.NAMEString, a.ID, b.IDNumber)
from #TEMPTABLE a
left join #PEOPLE b
on a.id = b.ID
Also, make sure to reference the right table when you use the IDNumber column - your original query doesn't actually use the table containing IDNumber at all, as far as I can tell from your description of your tables.
Note that my example assumes there's an ID field in #TempTable, or something else to join on - otherwise, you may need to extract it from the NameString column first.
I want to join 2 tables using an Inner Join on 2 columns, both are of (nvarchar, null) type. The 2 columns have the same data in them, but the join condition is failing. I think it is due to the spaces contained in the column values.
I have tried LTRIM, RTRIM also
My query:
select
T1.Name1, T2.Name2
from
Table1 T1
Inner Join
Table2 on T1.Name1 = T2.Name2
I have also tried like this:
on LTRIM(RTRIM(T1.Name1)) = LTRIM(RTRIM(T2.Name2))
My data:
Table1 Table2
------ ------
Name1(Column) Name2(Column)
----- ------
Employee Data Employee Data
Customer Data Customer Data
When I check My data in 2 tables with
select T1.Name1,len(T1.Name1)as Length1,Datalength(T1.Name1)as DataLenght1 from Table1 T1
select T2.Name2,len(T2.Name2)as Length2,Datalength(T2.Name2)as DataLenght2 from Table2 T2
The result is different Length and DataLength Values for the 2 tables,They are not same for 2 tables.
I can't change the original data in the 2 tables. How can I fix this issue.
Thank You
Joins do not have special rules for equality. The equality operator always works the same way. So if a = b then the join on a = b would work. Therefore, a <> b.
Check the contents of those fields. They will not be the same although you think they are:
select convert(varbinary(max), myCol) from T
Unicode has invisible characters (that only ever seem to cause trouble).
declare #t table (name varchar(20))
insert into #t(name)values ('Employee Data'),('Customer Data')
declare #tt table (name varchar(20))
insert into #tt(name)values ('EmployeeData'),('CustomerData')
select t.name,tt.name from #t t
INNER JOIN #tt tt
ON RTRIM(LTRIM(REPLACE(t.name,' ',''))) = RTRIM(LTRIM(REPLACE(tt.name,' ','')))
I would follow the following schema
Create a new table to store all the possible names
Add needed keys and indexes
Populate with existing names
Add columns to your existing tables to store the index of the name
Create relative foreign keys
Populate the new columns with correct indexes
Create procedure to perform an insert in new tables names only in case the value is not existing
Perform the join using the new indexes
I have a problem where I need to check that two columns in each table in a database are unique.
We have the database with barcode entries called uid and rid.
Table 1: T1.uid
And
Table 2: T2.rid
No barcodes in the two table columns must be the same.
How can we ensure that.
If a insertion of a barcode into table T1.uid matches an entry in
T2.rid we want to throw an error.
The tables are cleaned up and is in a consistent state where the entries in
T1.uid and T2.rid are unique over both table columns.
It is not possible to insert NULL values in the tables respective uid and tid column(T1.uid and T2.rid)
It is not possible to create a new table for all barcodes.
Because we don't have full control of the database server.
EDIT 19-02-2015
This solution cannot work for us, because we cannot make a new table
to keep track of the unique names(see table illustration).
We want to have a constraint over two columns in different tables without changing the schema.
Per the illustration we want to make it impossible for john to exist in
T2 because he already exists in table T1. So an error must be "thrown"
when we try to insert John in T2.Name.
The reason is that we have different suppliers that inserts into these tables
in different ways, if we change the schema layout, all suppliers would
need to change their database queries. The total work is just to much,
if we force every suppplier to make changes.
So we need something unobtrusive, that doesnt require the suppliers to change
their code.
A example could be that T1.Name is unique and do not accept NULL values.
If we try insert an existing name, like "Alan", then an exception will occur
because the column has unique values.
But we want to check for uniqueness in T2.Name at the same time.
The new inserted value should be unique over the two tables.
Maybe something like this:
SELECT uid FROM Table1
Where Exists (
SELECT rid FROM Table2
WHERE Table1.uid = rid )
This will show all rows from Table1 where their column uid has an equivalent in column rid of Table2.
The condition before the insertion happens could look like below. #Idis the id you need to insert the data for.
DECLARE #allowed INT;
SELECT #allowed = COUNT(*)
FROM
(
SELECT T1.uid FROM T1 WHERE T1.uid = #Id
UNION ALL
SELECT T2.rid FROM T2 WHERE T2.rid = #id
)
WHERE
#id IS NOT NULL;
IF #allowed = 0
BEGIN
---- insert allowed
SELECT 0;
END
Thanks to all who answered.
I have solved the problem. A trigger is added to the database
everytime an insert or update procedure is executed, we catch it
check that the value(s) to be inserted doens't exist in the columns of the two
tables. if that check is succesfull we exceute the original query.
Otherwise we rollback the query.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/25600/Triggers-SQL-Server
Instead Of Triggers