How to overwrite part of a string in C? - c

I have for instance a string. And I only want to change the beginning few characters of the string and leave the rest as they are. What is the best way to do this in C?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
char src[40];
char src2[40];
char dest[12];
memset(dest, '\0', sizeof(dest));
strcpy(src, "This is a string");
strcpy(src2, "That");
strncpy(dest, src, sizeof(src));
strncpy(dest, src2, sizeof(src2));
printf("Final copied string : %s\n", dest);
}
I would like the string to be changed from "This is a string" to "That is a string".
Is there an easy way to accomplish this that I am missing?

There are a few issues here.
First, dest is only 12 bytes long, which is too short to hold "This is a string". Trying to copy that string into dest will overrun the buffer. This invokes undefined behavior. Make it at least 20 bytes.
Second sizeof(src) gives you the size of the whole array, which is 40, not the length of the string. This will also give undefined behavior if the destination buffer is not big enough. Use strlen instead. The same goes for sizeof(src2).
With those changes, you should have this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
char src[40];
char src2[40];
char dest[20];
memset(dest, '\0', sizeof(dest));
strcpy(src, "This is a string");
strcpy(src2, "That");
strncpy(dest, src, strlen(src));
strncpy(dest, src2, strlen(src2));
printf("Final copied string : %s\n", dest);
}

sizeof(src2) is 40 (it's the size of the entire array) - you probably meant strlen(src2) (which is just the amount of characters used for the string) :
strncpy(dest, src2, strlen(src2));
Note btw that your code has a buffer overrun issue : The dest array is not big enough to hold the resulting string. It needs to be at least 17 characters large to accomodate the "This is a string" string. You'll also want to use :
strncpy(dest, src, strlen(src));

I am confused and a little concerned about the memset() call. The memset call allows the use of strncpy() without worrying about the terminating '\0'. Such a call assumes that this logic will be used in a general purpose function that will be called from a higher level function.
If that is not the case, then the first strncpy() should be replaced with a strcpy and the memset should be abandoned:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
char src[40];
char src2[40];
char dest[20];
/* memset(dest, '\0', sizeof(dest)); -- No need for this */
strcpy(src, "This is a string");
strcpy(src2, "That");
strcpy(dest, src, strlen(src)); /* strcpy will put a '\0' at the end */
strncpy(dest, src2, strlen(src2));
printf("Final copied string : %s\n", dest);
}
However, if this will be called from a higher level function, then we really need to check for the lengths of the incoming strings and/or malloc the dest buffer and free it. The memset() is the elephant in the room that suggests that there is more logic to come which should be considered. Otherwise, just replace the first strncpy() with a strcpy().

Expanding on the answer by #dbush:
I think the code is still quite fragile.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
char src[40];
char src2[40];
char dest[20];
Here the first pitfall is created: dest is smaller than both sources. While that can be handled, it requires much more diligence in the subsequent code. It would be better to make the destination always large enough to hold the source(s).
memset(dest, '\0', sizeof(dest)); //Good
But it is also a good idea to initialize the other arrays with 0 as well.
memset(src, '\0', sizeof(src));
memset(src2, '\0', sizeof(src2));
Side note: Of course you could save the trouble of memset by just using the array initialization syntax:
char src[40] = {0};
char src2[40] = {0};
char dest[20] = {0};
The two next lines are potentially dangerous, provided that IRL the two strings might not be string constants. (And even then!) No length checking is provided... Better:
// strcpy(src, "This is a string");
// strcpy(src2, "That");
strncpy(src, "This is a string", sizeof(src)- 1);
strncpy(src2, "That", sizeof(src2) -1);
That way we make sure we don't cause any overflow.
We also make sure that the strings in src and src2 are properly null-terminated.
Now, the copying of src/src2 to dest is also dangerous. We must ensure not to overflow dest.
//strncpy(dest, src, strlen(src));
//strncpy(dest, src2, strlen(src2));
Better:
strncpy(dest, src, sizeof(dest) - 1);
strncpy(dest, "That is a long rubbish string that easily could overflow dest", sizeof(dest) -1);
We only copy as much as dest can hold and preserve the null terminator.
Now to the replacement of the first X characters. Again, we must make sure no overflow occurs. We use strlen to determine the actual size of the null-terminated string in src2, but need to use/evaluate the maximum size of dest. Therefore the mixture of strlen and sizeof.
memcpy just for the fun of it. You could use strncpy just as well.
memcpy(dest, src2, strlen(src2) < sizeof(dest) ? strlen(src2) : sizeof(dest));
printf("Final copied string : %s\n", dest);
}
So the whole, secure implementation looks like this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
char src[40] = {0};
char src2[40] = {0};
char dest[20] = {0};
strncpy(src, "This is a string", sizeof(src)- 1);
strncpy(src2, "That is a long rubbish string and sooooooooooooooooooooooooo much more", sizeof(src2) -1);
strncpy(dest, src, sizeof(dest) - 1);
memcpy(dest, src2, strlen(src2) < sizeof(dest) ? strlen(src2) : sizeof(dest));
printf("Final copied string : %s\n", dest);
}
Please note that the use of sizeof is only seemingly equivalent to strlen; on char types that works, on other types you need to do more.

Related

strcat & Overwrite

I have read the documentation of strcat() C library function on a few websites.
I have also read here: Does strcat() overwrite or move the null?
However, one question is still left - can strcat() function be used to override the characters in the destionation string (assume that dest string has enough space for the source string, so there will be no errors)?
I ran the following code and found that it doesn't have the ability to override the dest string's characters...
char dest[20] = "Hello World";
char src[] = "char";
strcat(dest+1, src);
printf("dest: %s", dest);
Assume that the goal is to have a destination string that contains: "Hchar World!"
(I know that strcat() also copies the NULL characters('\0') to the dest string, so if printf() function is called, it should print Hchar, as I mistakenly thought would happen...).
Is that a possible task to do with strcat()? If not, is strcpy() the answer to the question?
If there is an assignment of '\0' (NULL character) in the middle of the string, for example, will strcat() always treat the first '\0' (NULL character) it meets? I mean, If I had:
char str[] = "Hello";
str[2]= 0;
strcat(str, "ab");
I just want to be sure and clarify the misunderstanding. I will be glad to read explanations.
As noted in the comments, the strcat function will always (attempt to) append the string given as its second argument (traditionally called src) to that given as its first (dest); it will produce undefined behaviour if either string is not null-terminated or if the destination buffer is not large enough.
The cppreference site gives better documentation (for both C and C++) than the website you linked. From that site's strcat page:
(1) … The character src[0] replaces the null terminator at the
end of dest. The resulting byte string is null-terminated.
And:
Notes
Because strcat needs to seek to the end of dest on each call, it is inefficient to concatenate many strings into one using strcat.
So, in the code you show, calling strcat(dest+1, src); has the same effect as calling strcat(dest, src);. However, calling strcpy(dest+1, src); will produce the result you want (printing Hchar).
strcat will write src string at the end of dst.
If you want to override dst with strcat, you first need to make dst "end" where you want to override it.
Take a look at this code sample:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main()
{
char dst[20] = "Hello world";
char src[] = "char";
dst[1] = '\0';
strcat(dst, src);
printf("%s\n", dst);
return (0);
}
However, this is not the aim of strcat, and as said in the comments, the use of strcpy would be more appropriate here.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main()
{
char dst[20] = "Hello world";
char src[] = "char";
strcpy(dst + 1, src);
printf("%s\n", dst);
return (0);
}

C - memcpy with char * with length greater than source string length

I have the following code in C now
int length = 50
char *target_str = (char*) malloc(length);
char *source_str = read_string_from_somewhere() // read a string from somewhere
// with length, say 20
memcpy(target_str, source_str, length);
The scenario is that target_str is initialized with 50 bytes. source_str is a string of length 20.
If I want to copy the source_str to target_str i use memcpy() as above with length 50, which is the size of target_str. The reason I use length in memcpy is that, the source_str can have a max value of length but is usually less than that (in the above example its 20).
Now, if I want to copy till length of source_str based on its terminating character ('\0'), even if memcpy length is more than the index of terminating character, is the above code a right way to do it? or is there an alternative suggestion.
Thanks for any help.
The scenario is that target_str is initialized with 50 bytes. source_str is a string of length 20.
If I want to copy the source_str to target_str i use memcpy() as above with length 50, which is the size of target_str.
currently you ask for memcpy to read 30 characters after the end of the source string because it does not care of a possible null terminator on the source, this is an undefined behavior
because you copy a string you can use strcpy rather than memcpy
but the problem of size can be reversed, I mean the target can be smaller than the source, and without protection you will have again a undefined behavior
so you can use strncpy giving the length of the target, just take care of the necessity to add a final null character in case the target is smaller than the source :
int length = 50
char *target_str = (char*) malloc(length);
char *source_str = read_string_from_somewhere(); // length unknown
strncpy(target_str, source_str, length - 1); // -1 to let place for \0
target_str[length - 1] = 0; // force the presence of a null character at end in case
If I want to copy the source_str to target_str i use memcpy() as above
with length 50, which is the size of target_str. The reason I use
length in memcpy is that, the source_str can have a max value of
length but is usually less than that (in the above example its 20).
It is crucially important to distinguish between
the size of the array to which source_str points, and
the length of the string, if any, to which source_str points (+/- the terminator).
If source_str is certain to point to an array of length 50 or more then the memcpy() approach you present is ok. If not, then it produces undefined behavior when source_str in fact points to a shorter array. Any result within the power of your C implementation may occur.
If source_str is certain to point to a (properly-terminated) C string of no more than length - 1 characters, and if it is its string value that you want to copy, then strcpy() is more natural than memcpy(). It will copy all the string contents, up to and including the terminator. This presents no problem when source_str points to an array shorter than length, so long as it contains a string terminator.
If neither of those cases is certain to hold, then it's not clear what you want to do. The strncpy() function may cover some of those cases, but it does not cover all of them.
Now, if I want to copy till length of source_str based on its terminating character ('\0'), even if memcpy length is more than the index of terminating character, is the above code a right way to do it?
No; you'd be copying the entire content of source_str, even past the null-terminator if it occurs before the end of the allocated space for the string it is pointing to.
If your concern is minimizing the auxiliary space used by your program, what you could do is use strlen to determine the length of source_str, and allocate target_str based on that. Also, strcpy is similar to memcpy but is specifically intended for null-terminated strings (observe that it has no "size" or "length" parameter):
char *target_str = NULL;
char *source_str = read_string_from_somewhere();
size_t len = strlen(source_str);
target_str = malloc(len + 1);
strcpy(target_str, source_str);
// ...
free(target_str);
target_str = NULL;
memcpy is used to copy fixed blocks of memory, so if you want to copy something shorter that is terminated by '\n' you don't want to use memcpy.
There is other functions like strncpy or strlcpy that do similar things.
Best to check what the implementations do. I removed the optimized versions from the original source code for the sake of readability.
This is an example memcpy implementation: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/string/memcpy.c
void *memcpy(void *restrict dest, const void *restrict src, size_t n)
{
unsigned char *d = dest;
const unsigned char *s = src;
for (; n; n--) *d++ = *s++;
return dest;
}
It's clear that here, both pieces of memory are visited for n times. regardless of the size of source or destination string, which causes copying of memory past your string if it was shorter. Which is bad and can cause various unwanted behavior.
this is strlcpy from: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/string/strlcpy.c
size_t strlcpy(char *d, const char *s, size_t n)
{
char *d0 = d;
size_t *wd;
if (!n--) goto finish;
for (; n && (*d=*s); n--, s++, d++);
*d = 0;
finish:
return d-d0 + strlen(s);
}
The trick here is that n && (*d = 0) evaluates to false and will break the looping condition and exit early.
Hence this gives you the wanted behaviour.
Use strlen to determine the exact size of source_string and allocate accordingly, remembering to add an extra byte for the null terminator. Here's a full example:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(void) {
char *source_str = "string_read_from_somewhere";
int len = strlen(source_str);
char *target_str = malloc(len + 1);
if (!target_str) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: malloc failed", __FILE__, __LINE__);
return 1;
}
memcpy(target_str, source_str, len + 1);
puts(target_str);
free(target_str);
return 0;
}
Also, there's no need to cast the result of malloc. Don't forget to free the allocated memory.
As mentioned in the comments, you probably want to restrict the size of the malloced string to a sensible amount.

How to copy data from string to fields in struct

I know this code is sloppy, I'm trying to relearn string manipulation in C. If I have a string ABBCCCD and I want to store the separate letters in a struct, is there an efficient way to do so? I have some code down below to demonstrate the long way of what I'm trying to do. (Also, do I have to manually add the null-terminator when I'm doing a strncpy?)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
typedef struct dst_struct {
char a[2];
char b[3];
char c[4];
char d[2];
} dst_struct_t;
int main(void) {
char* test = "ABBCCCD";
char* src = malloc(strlen(test)+1);
strncpy(src, test, strlen(test)+1);
printf("%s\n", src);
dst_struct_t dst;
strncpy(dst.a, src, 1);
strncpy(dst.b, src+1, 2);
strncpy(dst.c, src+3, 3);
strncpy(dst.d, src+6, 1);
printf("dst.a: %s\n", dst.a);
printf("dst.b: %s\n", dst.b);
printf("dst.c: %s\n", dst.c);
printf("dst.d: %s\n", dst.d);
free(src);
}
There isn't really any better way to do this, except that you don't need to copy test to src first.
You also need to add the null terminators to all the strings. It would probably be best to write a function that does both steps: strncpy() and adding the null terminator.
function copy_n(char *dest, char *src, size_t offset, size_t len) {
strncpy(src+offset, dest, len);
dest[len] = '\0';
}
int main(void) {
char* test = "ABBCCCD";
copy_n(dst.a, test, 0, 1);
copy_n(dst.b, test, 1, 2);
copy_n(dst.c, test, 3, 3);
copy_n(dst.d, test, 6, 1);
printf("dst.a: %s\n", dst.a);
printf("dst.b: %s\n", dst.b);
printf("dst.c: %s\n", dst.c);
printf("dst.d: %s\n", dst.d);
}
From the strcpy/strncpy man page:
char *strcpy(char *dest, const char *src);
char *strncpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t n);
The strcpy() function copies the string pointed to by src, including the terminating null byte ('\0'), to the buffer pointed to by dest. The strings may not overlap, and the destination string dest must be large enough to receive the copy. Beware of buffer overruns! (See BUGS.)
The strncpy() function is similar, except that at most n bytes of src are copied. Warning: If there is no null byte among the first n bytes of src, the string placed in dest will not be null-terminated.
The n argument of strncpy is generally meant to be the length of the destination buffer, as the point of the function is to be like strcpy but prevent overflowing the destination buffer if the source string is too long or not NULL-terminated. If used in that manner, your destination string will be NULL-terminated if the source string fits that length, otherwise the final byte of the buffer will contain the nth character of the source string.
However, the way you seem to be using strncpy is to set the exact number of characters you want to copy from the source buffer to place in the destination buffer. That is not really the intended purpose of strncpy. Instead, what you'd want to use is memcpy, since you are really not concerned with the zero-termination of the source string, but rather just copying a set number of characters from a set location. And yes, you will have to manually add the null-terminator if you use memcpy.

how to touch a file to a particular location which was #defined [duplicate]

I'm working in C, and I have to concatenate a few things.
Right now I have this:
message = strcat("TEXT ", var);
message2 = strcat(strcat("TEXT ", foo), strcat(" TEXT ", bar));
Now if you have experience in C I'm sure you realize that this gives you a segmentation fault when you try to run it. So how do I work around that?
In C, "strings" are just plain char arrays. Therefore, you can't directly concatenate them with other "strings".
You can use the strcat function, which appends the string pointed to by src to the end of the string pointed to by dest:
char *strcat(char *dest, const char *src);
Here is an example from cplusplus.com:
char str[80];
strcpy(str, "these ");
strcat(str, "strings ");
strcat(str, "are ");
strcat(str, "concatenated.");
For the first parameter, you need to provide the destination buffer itself. The destination buffer must be a char array buffer. E.g.: char buffer[1024];
Make sure that the first parameter has enough space to store what you're trying to copy into it. If available to you, it is safer to use functions like: strcpy_s and strcat_s where you explicitly have to specify the size of the destination buffer.
Note: A string literal cannot be used as a buffer, since it is a constant. Thus, you always have to allocate a char array for the buffer.
The return value of strcat can simply be ignored, it merely returns the same pointer as was passed in as the first argument. It is there for convenience, and allows you to chain the calls into one line of code:
strcat(strcat(str, foo), bar);
So your problem could be solved as follows:
char *foo = "foo";
char *bar = "bar";
char str[80];
strcpy(str, "TEXT ");
strcat(str, foo);
strcat(str, bar);
Avoid using strcat in C code. The cleanest and, most importantly, the safest way is to use snprintf:
char buf[256];
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s%s%s", str1, str2, str3, str4);
Some commenters raised an issue that the number of arguments may not match the format string and the code will still compile, but most compilers already issue a warning if this is the case.
Strings can also be concatenated at compile time.
#define SCHEMA "test"
#define TABLE "data"
const char *table = SCHEMA "." TABLE ; // note no + or . or anything
const char *qry = // include comments in a string
" SELECT * " // get all fields
" FROM " SCHEMA "." TABLE /* the table */
" WHERE x = 1 " /* the filter */
;
Folks, use strncpy(), strncat(), or snprintf().
Exceeding your buffer space will trash whatever else follows in memory!
(And remember to allow space for the trailing null '\0' character!)
Also malloc and realloc are useful if you don't know ahead of time how many strings are being concatenated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
void example(const char *header, const char **words, size_t num_words)
{
size_t message_len = strlen(header) + 1; /* + 1 for terminating NULL */
char *message = (char*) malloc(message_len);
strncat(message, header, message_len);
for(int i = 0; i < num_words; ++i)
{
message_len += 1 + strlen(words[i]); /* 1 + for separator ';' */
message = (char*) realloc(message, message_len);
strncat(strncat(message, ";", message_len), words[i], message_len);
}
puts(message);
free(message);
}
Best way to do it without having a limited buffer size is by using asprintf()
char* concat(const char* str1, const char* str2)
{
char* result;
asprintf(&result, "%s%s", str1, str2);
return result;
}
If you have experience in C you will notice that strings are only char arrays where the last character is a null character.
Now that is quite inconvenient as you have to find the last character in order to append something. strcat will do that for you.
So strcat searches through the first argument for a null character. Then it will replace this with the second argument's content (until that ends in a null).
Now let's go through your code:
message = strcat("TEXT " + var);
Here you are adding something to the pointer to the text "TEXT" (the type of "TEXT" is const char*. A pointer.).
That will usually not work. Also modifying the "TEXT" array will not work as it is usually placed in a constant segment.
message2 = strcat(strcat("TEXT ", foo), strcat(" TEXT ", bar));
That might work better, except that you are again trying to modify static texts. strcat is not allocating new memory for the result.
I would propose to do something like this instead:
sprintf(message2, "TEXT %s TEXT %s", foo, bar);
Read the documentation of sprintf to check for it's options.
And now an important point:
Ensure that the buffer has enough space to hold the text AND the null character. There are a couple of functions that can help you, e.g., strncat and special versions of printf that allocate the buffer for you.
Not ensuring the buffer size will lead to memory corruption and remotely exploitable bugs.
Do not forget to initialize the output buffer. The first argument to strcat must be a null terminated string with enough extra space allocated for the resulting string:
char out[1024] = ""; // must be initialized
strcat( out, null_terminated_string );
// null_terminated_string has less than 1023 chars
As people pointed out string handling improved much. So you may want to learn how to use the C++ string library instead of C-style strings. However here is a solution in pure C
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void appendToHello(const char *s) {
const char *const hello = "hello ";
const size_t sLength = strlen(s);
const size_t helloLength = strlen(hello);
const size_t totalLength = sLength + helloLength;
char *const strBuf = malloc(totalLength + 1);
if (strBuf == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, "malloc failed\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
strcpy(strBuf, hello);
strcpy(strBuf + helloLength, s);
puts(strBuf);
free(strBuf);
}
int main (void) {
appendToHello("blah blah");
return 0;
}
I am not sure whether it is correct/safe but right now I could not find a better way to do this in ANSI C.
It is undefined behaviour to attempt to modify string literals, which is what something like:
strcat ("Hello, ", name);
will attempt to do. It will try to tack on the name string to the end of the string literal "Hello, ", which is not well defined.
Try something this. It achieves what you appear to be trying to do:
char message[1000];
strcpy (message, "TEXT ");
strcat (message, var);
This creates a buffer area that is allowed to be modified and then copies both the string literal and other text to it. Just be careful with buffer overflows. If you control the input data (or check it before-hand), it's fine to use fixed length buffers like I have.
Otherwise, you should use mitigation strategies such as allocating enough memory from the heap to ensure you can handle it. In other words, something like:
const static char TEXT[] = "TEXT ";
// Make *sure* you have enough space.
char *message = malloc (sizeof(TEXT) + strlen(var) + 1);
if (message == NULL)
handleOutOfMemoryIntelligently();
strcpy (message, TEXT);
strcat (message, var);
// Need to free message at some point after you're done with it.
The first argument of strcat() needs to be able to hold enough space for the concatenated string. So allocate a buffer with enough space to receive the result.
char bigEnough[64] = "";
strcat(bigEnough, "TEXT");
strcat(bigEnough, foo);
/* and so on */
strcat() will concatenate the second argument with the first argument, and store the result in the first argument, the returned char* is simply this first argument, and only for your convenience.
You do not get a newly allocated string with the first and second argument concatenated, which I'd guess you expected based on your code.
You can write your own function that does the same thing as strcat() but that doesn't change anything:
#define MAX_STRING_LENGTH 1000
char *strcat_const(const char *str1,const char *str2){
static char buffer[MAX_STRING_LENGTH];
strncpy(buffer,str1,MAX_STRING_LENGTH);
if(strlen(str1) < MAX_STRING_LENGTH){
strncat(buffer,str2,MAX_STRING_LENGTH - strlen(buffer));
}
buffer[MAX_STRING_LENGTH - 1] = '\0';
return buffer;
}
int main(int argc,char *argv[]){
printf("%s",strcat_const("Hello ","world")); //Prints "Hello world"
return 0;
}
If both strings together are more than 1000 characters long, it will cut the string at 1000 characters. You can change the value of MAX_STRING_LENGTH to suit your needs.
You are trying to copy a string into an address that is statically allocated. You need to cat into a buffer.
Specifically:
...snip...
destination
Pointer to the destination array, which should contain a C string, and be large enough to contain the concatenated resulting string.
...snip...
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/clibrary/cstring/strcat.html
There's an example here as well.
Assuming you have a char[fixed_size] rather than a char*, you can use a single, creative macro to do it all at once with a <<cout<<like ordering ("rather %s the disjointed %s\n", "than", "printf style format"). If you are working with embedded systems, this method will also allow you to leave out malloc and the large *printf family of functions like snprintf() (This keeps dietlibc from complaining about *printf too)
#include <unistd.h> //for the write example
//note: you should check if offset==sizeof(buf) after use
#define strcpyALL(buf, offset, ...) do{ \
char *bp=(char*)(buf+offset); /*so we can add to the end of a string*/ \
const char *s, \
*a[] = { __VA_ARGS__,NULL}, \
**ss=a; \
while((s=*ss++)) \
while((*s)&&(++offset<(int)sizeof(buf))) \
*bp++=*s++; \
if (offset!=sizeof(buf))*bp=0; \
}while(0)
char buf[256];
int len=0;
strcpyALL(buf,len,
"The config file is in:\n\t",getenv("HOME"),"/.config/",argv[0],"/config.rc\n"
);
if (len<sizeof(buf))
write(1,buf,len); //outputs our message to stdout
else
write(2,"error\n",6);
//but we can keep adding on because we kept track of the length
//this allows printf-like buffering to minimize number of syscalls to write
//set len back to 0 if you don't want this behavior
strcpyALL(buf,len,"Thanks for using ",argv[0],"!\n");
if (len<sizeof(buf))
write(1,buf,len); //outputs both messages
else
write(2,"error\n",6);
Note 1, you typically wouldn't use argv[0] like this - just an example
Note 2, you can use any function that outputs a char*, including nonstandard functions like itoa() for converting integers to string types.
Note 3, if you are already using printf anywhere in your program there is no reason not to use snprintf(), since the compiled code would be larger (but inlined and significantly faster)
int main()
{
char input[100];
gets(input);
char str[101];
strcpy(str, " ");
strcat(str, input);
char *p = str;
while(*p) {
if(*p == ' ' && isalpha(*(p+1)) != 0)
printf("%c",*(p+1));
p++;
}
return 0;
}
Try something similar to this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(int argc, const char * argv[])
{
// Insert code here...
char firstname[100], secondname[100];
printf("Enter First Name: ");
fgets(firstname, 100, stdin);
printf("Enter Second Name: ");
fgets(secondname,100,stdin);
firstname[strlen(firstname)-1]= '\0';
printf("fullname is %s %s", firstname, secondname);
return 0;
}
This was my solution
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
char *strconcat(int num_args, ...) {
int strsize = 0;
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, num_args);
for (int i = 0; i < num_args; i++)
strsize += strlen(va_arg(ap, char*));
char *res = malloc(strsize+1);
strsize = 0;
va_start(ap, num_args);
for (int i = 0; i < num_args; i++) {
char *s = va_arg(ap, char*);
strcpy(res+strsize, s);
strsize += strlen(s);
}
va_end(ap);
res[strsize] = '\0';
return res;
}
but you need to specify how many strings you're going to concatenate
char *str = strconcat(3, "testing ", "this ", "thing");

How do I concatenate const/literal strings in C?

I'm working in C, and I have to concatenate a few things.
Right now I have this:
message = strcat("TEXT ", var);
message2 = strcat(strcat("TEXT ", foo), strcat(" TEXT ", bar));
Now if you have experience in C I'm sure you realize that this gives you a segmentation fault when you try to run it. So how do I work around that?
In C, "strings" are just plain char arrays. Therefore, you can't directly concatenate them with other "strings".
You can use the strcat function, which appends the string pointed to by src to the end of the string pointed to by dest:
char *strcat(char *dest, const char *src);
Here is an example from cplusplus.com:
char str[80];
strcpy(str, "these ");
strcat(str, "strings ");
strcat(str, "are ");
strcat(str, "concatenated.");
For the first parameter, you need to provide the destination buffer itself. The destination buffer must be a char array buffer. E.g.: char buffer[1024];
Make sure that the first parameter has enough space to store what you're trying to copy into it. If available to you, it is safer to use functions like: strcpy_s and strcat_s where you explicitly have to specify the size of the destination buffer.
Note: A string literal cannot be used as a buffer, since it is a constant. Thus, you always have to allocate a char array for the buffer.
The return value of strcat can simply be ignored, it merely returns the same pointer as was passed in as the first argument. It is there for convenience, and allows you to chain the calls into one line of code:
strcat(strcat(str, foo), bar);
So your problem could be solved as follows:
char *foo = "foo";
char *bar = "bar";
char str[80];
strcpy(str, "TEXT ");
strcat(str, foo);
strcat(str, bar);
Avoid using strcat in C code. The cleanest and, most importantly, the safest way is to use snprintf:
char buf[256];
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s%s%s", str1, str2, str3, str4);
Some commenters raised an issue that the number of arguments may not match the format string and the code will still compile, but most compilers already issue a warning if this is the case.
Strings can also be concatenated at compile time.
#define SCHEMA "test"
#define TABLE "data"
const char *table = SCHEMA "." TABLE ; // note no + or . or anything
const char *qry = // include comments in a string
" SELECT * " // get all fields
" FROM " SCHEMA "." TABLE /* the table */
" WHERE x = 1 " /* the filter */
;
Folks, use strncpy(), strncat(), or snprintf().
Exceeding your buffer space will trash whatever else follows in memory!
(And remember to allow space for the trailing null '\0' character!)
Also malloc and realloc are useful if you don't know ahead of time how many strings are being concatenated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
void example(const char *header, const char **words, size_t num_words)
{
size_t message_len = strlen(header) + 1; /* + 1 for terminating NULL */
char *message = (char*) malloc(message_len);
strncat(message, header, message_len);
for(int i = 0; i < num_words; ++i)
{
message_len += 1 + strlen(words[i]); /* 1 + for separator ';' */
message = (char*) realloc(message, message_len);
strncat(strncat(message, ";", message_len), words[i], message_len);
}
puts(message);
free(message);
}
Best way to do it without having a limited buffer size is by using asprintf()
char* concat(const char* str1, const char* str2)
{
char* result;
asprintf(&result, "%s%s", str1, str2);
return result;
}
If you have experience in C you will notice that strings are only char arrays where the last character is a null character.
Now that is quite inconvenient as you have to find the last character in order to append something. strcat will do that for you.
So strcat searches through the first argument for a null character. Then it will replace this with the second argument's content (until that ends in a null).
Now let's go through your code:
message = strcat("TEXT " + var);
Here you are adding something to the pointer to the text "TEXT" (the type of "TEXT" is const char*. A pointer.).
That will usually not work. Also modifying the "TEXT" array will not work as it is usually placed in a constant segment.
message2 = strcat(strcat("TEXT ", foo), strcat(" TEXT ", bar));
That might work better, except that you are again trying to modify static texts. strcat is not allocating new memory for the result.
I would propose to do something like this instead:
sprintf(message2, "TEXT %s TEXT %s", foo, bar);
Read the documentation of sprintf to check for it's options.
And now an important point:
Ensure that the buffer has enough space to hold the text AND the null character. There are a couple of functions that can help you, e.g., strncat and special versions of printf that allocate the buffer for you.
Not ensuring the buffer size will lead to memory corruption and remotely exploitable bugs.
Do not forget to initialize the output buffer. The first argument to strcat must be a null terminated string with enough extra space allocated for the resulting string:
char out[1024] = ""; // must be initialized
strcat( out, null_terminated_string );
// null_terminated_string has less than 1023 chars
As people pointed out string handling improved much. So you may want to learn how to use the C++ string library instead of C-style strings. However here is a solution in pure C
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void appendToHello(const char *s) {
const char *const hello = "hello ";
const size_t sLength = strlen(s);
const size_t helloLength = strlen(hello);
const size_t totalLength = sLength + helloLength;
char *const strBuf = malloc(totalLength + 1);
if (strBuf == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, "malloc failed\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
strcpy(strBuf, hello);
strcpy(strBuf + helloLength, s);
puts(strBuf);
free(strBuf);
}
int main (void) {
appendToHello("blah blah");
return 0;
}
I am not sure whether it is correct/safe but right now I could not find a better way to do this in ANSI C.
It is undefined behaviour to attempt to modify string literals, which is what something like:
strcat ("Hello, ", name);
will attempt to do. It will try to tack on the name string to the end of the string literal "Hello, ", which is not well defined.
Try something this. It achieves what you appear to be trying to do:
char message[1000];
strcpy (message, "TEXT ");
strcat (message, var);
This creates a buffer area that is allowed to be modified and then copies both the string literal and other text to it. Just be careful with buffer overflows. If you control the input data (or check it before-hand), it's fine to use fixed length buffers like I have.
Otherwise, you should use mitigation strategies such as allocating enough memory from the heap to ensure you can handle it. In other words, something like:
const static char TEXT[] = "TEXT ";
// Make *sure* you have enough space.
char *message = malloc (sizeof(TEXT) + strlen(var) + 1);
if (message == NULL)
handleOutOfMemoryIntelligently();
strcpy (message, TEXT);
strcat (message, var);
// Need to free message at some point after you're done with it.
The first argument of strcat() needs to be able to hold enough space for the concatenated string. So allocate a buffer with enough space to receive the result.
char bigEnough[64] = "";
strcat(bigEnough, "TEXT");
strcat(bigEnough, foo);
/* and so on */
strcat() will concatenate the second argument with the first argument, and store the result in the first argument, the returned char* is simply this first argument, and only for your convenience.
You do not get a newly allocated string with the first and second argument concatenated, which I'd guess you expected based on your code.
You can write your own function that does the same thing as strcat() but that doesn't change anything:
#define MAX_STRING_LENGTH 1000
char *strcat_const(const char *str1,const char *str2){
static char buffer[MAX_STRING_LENGTH];
strncpy(buffer,str1,MAX_STRING_LENGTH);
if(strlen(str1) < MAX_STRING_LENGTH){
strncat(buffer,str2,MAX_STRING_LENGTH - strlen(buffer));
}
buffer[MAX_STRING_LENGTH - 1] = '\0';
return buffer;
}
int main(int argc,char *argv[]){
printf("%s",strcat_const("Hello ","world")); //Prints "Hello world"
return 0;
}
If both strings together are more than 1000 characters long, it will cut the string at 1000 characters. You can change the value of MAX_STRING_LENGTH to suit your needs.
You are trying to copy a string into an address that is statically allocated. You need to cat into a buffer.
Specifically:
...snip...
destination
Pointer to the destination array, which should contain a C string, and be large enough to contain the concatenated resulting string.
...snip...
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/clibrary/cstring/strcat.html
There's an example here as well.
Assuming you have a char[fixed_size] rather than a char*, you can use a single, creative macro to do it all at once with a <<cout<<like ordering ("rather %s the disjointed %s\n", "than", "printf style format"). If you are working with embedded systems, this method will also allow you to leave out malloc and the large *printf family of functions like snprintf() (This keeps dietlibc from complaining about *printf too)
#include <unistd.h> //for the write example
//note: you should check if offset==sizeof(buf) after use
#define strcpyALL(buf, offset, ...) do{ \
char *bp=(char*)(buf+offset); /*so we can add to the end of a string*/ \
const char *s, \
*a[] = { __VA_ARGS__,NULL}, \
**ss=a; \
while((s=*ss++)) \
while((*s)&&(++offset<(int)sizeof(buf))) \
*bp++=*s++; \
if (offset!=sizeof(buf))*bp=0; \
}while(0)
char buf[256];
int len=0;
strcpyALL(buf,len,
"The config file is in:\n\t",getenv("HOME"),"/.config/",argv[0],"/config.rc\n"
);
if (len<sizeof(buf))
write(1,buf,len); //outputs our message to stdout
else
write(2,"error\n",6);
//but we can keep adding on because we kept track of the length
//this allows printf-like buffering to minimize number of syscalls to write
//set len back to 0 if you don't want this behavior
strcpyALL(buf,len,"Thanks for using ",argv[0],"!\n");
if (len<sizeof(buf))
write(1,buf,len); //outputs both messages
else
write(2,"error\n",6);
Note 1, you typically wouldn't use argv[0] like this - just an example
Note 2, you can use any function that outputs a char*, including nonstandard functions like itoa() for converting integers to string types.
Note 3, if you are already using printf anywhere in your program there is no reason not to use snprintf(), since the compiled code would be larger (but inlined and significantly faster)
int main()
{
char input[100];
gets(input);
char str[101];
strcpy(str, " ");
strcat(str, input);
char *p = str;
while(*p) {
if(*p == ' ' && isalpha(*(p+1)) != 0)
printf("%c",*(p+1));
p++;
}
return 0;
}
Try something similar to this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(int argc, const char * argv[])
{
// Insert code here...
char firstname[100], secondname[100];
printf("Enter First Name: ");
fgets(firstname, 100, stdin);
printf("Enter Second Name: ");
fgets(secondname,100,stdin);
firstname[strlen(firstname)-1]= '\0';
printf("fullname is %s %s", firstname, secondname);
return 0;
}
This was my solution
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
char *strconcat(int num_args, ...) {
int strsize = 0;
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, num_args);
for (int i = 0; i < num_args; i++)
strsize += strlen(va_arg(ap, char*));
char *res = malloc(strsize+1);
strsize = 0;
va_start(ap, num_args);
for (int i = 0; i < num_args; i++) {
char *s = va_arg(ap, char*);
strcpy(res+strsize, s);
strsize += strlen(s);
}
va_end(ap);
res[strsize] = '\0';
return res;
}
but you need to specify how many strings you're going to concatenate
char *str = strconcat(3, "testing ", "this ", "thing");

Resources