I am working to create a tiny shell in C that can accept multiple commands and pipe them together as needed
I have the below code, it is accepting commands and piping them together but it is quitting my tiny shell after running one command (I beleive an EOF is being returned). I want it to be able to accept many lines of commands.
Any tips/advice would greatly be appreciated!
int i;
pid_t children[numberOfCommands - 1];
pid_t groupId = -1;
for (i = 1; i < numberOfCommands - 1; i++)
{
int pd[2];
if(pipe(pd) < 0){
unix_error("Pipe failed");
}
pid = fork();
children[i] = pid;
if (!pid)
{
dup2(pd[1], 1);
if (execve(argv[cmds[i]], argv, environ) < 0)
{
unix_error("First Execve failed");
}
}
else
{
if (i == 0)
{
groupId = pid;
}
setpgid(pid, groupId);
}
dup2(pd[0], 0);
close(pd[0]);
close(pd[1]);
}
if (execve(argv[0], argv, environ) < 0) // I believe this is where the EOF is coming from
{
unix_error("Second Execve failed");
}
for (int j = 0; j < numberOfCommands; j++)
{
waitpid(children[j], NULL, 0);
}
Im trying to replicate the multiple pipes execution of bash, and Im getting no output from terminal. First I create the number of pipes that my program will need depending on the number of commands, then in a while loop I launch each process executing each command in the child proccess and working with the correct FDs of pipes, in case it is first command, I dont read from any pipe, on the other hand, in case it is last command, I dont redirect the output to any pipe. I printed each fd to check if my program is doing well and it looks everything okay but as I said I dont get any output of the last commands.
Here is a snippet of my code about how I deal with the process and the pipes, if you need something more just let me know.
int i;
int *pipes;
i = 0;
pipes = ft_calloc(sizeof(int), gdata->n_pipes * 2);
while (i < gdata->n_pipes)
{
pipe(pipes + (i * 2));
i++;
}
int cc = 0; //command count
int r = 0;
int m;
pid_t pid;
while (gdata->cmds[r]) //double pointer array that contains the commands to execute ex: [["ls -l"], ["grep i"], ["wc -l"]]
{
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0)
{
perror("Fork: ");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (pid == 0)
{
if (r > 0)
{
if (dup2(pipes[(cc - 1) * 2], STDIN_FILENO) < 0)
{
perror("dup");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
if (r < gdata->commands - 1)
{
if (dup2(pipes[cc * 2 + 1], STDOUT_FILENO) < 0)
{
perror("dup");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
int k = 0;
while (k < gdata->n_pipes * 2)
{
close(pipes[k]);
k++;
}
handle_path(gdata->cmds[r], gdata->envp); // function that calls execve to execute commands
}
waitpid(pid, &m, 0);
r++;
cc++;
}
int y = 0;
while (y < gdata->n_pipes * 2)
{
close(pipes[y]);
y++;
}
Do you have any idea what I'm doing wrong, Thanks for the help!
I am trying to implement multiple pipes in C. This is the main part of the function that takes care of piping
ProcesscommandwithPipes()
{
............................
for (k=0; k <= num_of_pipes; k++)
{
read[k]= -1;
write[k] = -1;
}
//create required number of pipes
for(j=0; j < num_of_pipes; j++)
{
if( pipe(fd) == -1 )
{
perror("Pipe failure");
return;
}
read[j+1] = fd[0];
write[j] = fd[1];
}
for(k=0; k<= num_of_pipes; k++)
{
pid = fork();
if(pid < 0 )
{
printf("fork failed\n");
}
else if (pid == 0)
{
if(write[k] != -1)
{
if( dup2(write[k],1) == -1){
perror("dup2 error");
exit(1);}
}
if(read[k] != -1)
{
if( dup2(read[k],0) == -1)
{
perror("dup2read error");
exit(1);
}
}
for (h=0; h<= num_of_pipes;h++)
{
close(write[h]);
close(read[h]);
}
if(execvp((const char*)commandArgv[k][0], commandArgv[k]) < 1)
{
perror("error");
exit(1);
}
exit(0);
}
else
{
processid[k] = pid;
printf("waiting on process:%d\n", processid[k]);
close(write[k]);
close(read[k]);
waitpid(processid[k], &status, 0);
}
}
For some reason, the following command works fine
ls|grep tmp|sort
But the following command doesn't work, although it is pretty much the same
cat tmp1.out|grep tmp|sort
(tmp1.out contains the list of the files in the cur dir, same as the output of ls)
There is no error message too.But it just exits without printing anything on screen(though the stdout of the last command is not changed)
P.S: cat tmp1.out|grep tmp works fine too.
contents of tmp1.out:
a.out
sample
shell.c
tmp1.out
tmp.out
b.c
Any inputs?
I know you are trying to write a shell, but have you considered using popen?
FILE *p = popen("cat tmp1.out|grep tmp|sort", "r");
The problem might be that you call waitpid() within your loop and thus you won't start the second process before the first one terminates. But now the first one could hang if the pipe buffer size is reached and you have a deadlock or a process might be killed by a broken pipe. Besides, for(k=0; k<= num_of_pipes; k++) looks strange to me, because that loops num_of_pipes+1 times
I'm trying to implement multiple pipes in my shell in C. I found a tutorial on this website and the function I made is based on this example. Here's the function
void executePipes(cmdLine* command, char* userInput) {
int numPipes = 2 * countPipes(userInput);
int status;
int i = 0, j = 0;
int pipefds[numPipes];
for(i = 0; i < (numPipes); i += 2)
pipe(pipefds + i);
while(command != NULL) {
if(fork() == 0){
if(j != 0){
dup2(pipefds[j - 2], 0);
}
if(command->next != NULL){
dup2(pipefds[j + 1], 1);
}
for(i = 0; i < (numPipes); i++){
close(pipefds[i]);
}
if( execvp(*command->arguments, command->arguments) < 0 ){
perror(*command->arguments);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
else{
if(command != NULL)
command = command->next;
j += 2;
for(i = 0; i < (numPipes ); i++){
close(pipefds[i]);
}
while(waitpid(0,0,0) < 0);
}
}
}
After executing it and typing a command like for example ls | grep bin, the shell just hangs there and doesn't output any result. I made sure I closed all pipes. But it just hangs there. I thought that it was the waitpid that's was the problem. I removed the waitpid and after executing I get no results. What did I do wrong? Thanks.
Added code:
void runPipedCommands(cmdLine* command, char* userInput) {
int numPipes = countPipes(userInput);
int status;
int i = 0, j = 0;
pid_t pid;
int pipefds[2*numPipes];
for(i = 0; i < 2*(numPipes); i++){
if(pipe(pipefds + i*2) < 0) {
perror("pipe");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
while(command) {
pid = fork();
if(pid == 0) {
//if not first command
if(j != 0){
if(dup2(pipefds[(j-1) * 2], 0) < 0){
perror(" dup2");///j-2 0 j+1 1
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
//printf("j != 0 dup(pipefd[%d], 0])\n", j-2);
}
//if not last command
if(command->next){
if(dup2(pipefds[j * 2 + 1], 1) < 0){
perror("dup2");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
for(i = 0; i < 2*numPipes; i++){
close(pipefds[i]);
}
if( execvp(*command->arguments, command->arguments) < 0 ){
perror(*command->arguments);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
} else if(pid < 0){
perror("error");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
command = command->next;
j++;
}
for(i = 0; i < 2 * numPipes; i++){
close(pipefds[i]);
puts("closed pipe in parent");
}
while(waitpid(0,0,0) <= 0);
}
}
I believe the issue here is that your waiting and closing inside the same loop that's creating children. On the first iteration, the child will exec (which will destroy the child program, overwriting it with your first command) and then the parent closes all of its file descriptors and waits for the child to finish before it iterates on to creating the next child. At that point, since the parent has closed all of its pipes, any further children will have nothing to write to or read from. Since you are not checking for the success of your dup2 calls, this is going un-noticed.
If you want to keep the same loop structure, you'll need to make sure the parent only closes the file descriptors that have already been used, but leaves those that haven't alone. Then, after all children have been created, your parent can wait.
EDIT: I mixed up the parent/child in my answer, but the reasoning still holds: the process that goes on to fork again closes all of its copies of the pipes, so any process after the first fork will not have valid file descriptors to read to/write from.
pseudo code, using an array of pipes created up-front:
/* parent creates all needed pipes at the start */
for( i = 0; i < num-pipes; i++ ){
if( pipe(pipefds + i*2) < 0 ){
perror and exit
}
}
commandc = 0
while( command ){
pid = fork()
if( pid == 0 ){
/* child gets input from the previous command,
if it's not the first command */
if( not first command ){
if( dup2(pipefds[(commandc-1)*2], 0) < ){
perror and exit
}
}
/* child outputs to next command, if it's not
the last command */
if( not last command ){
if( dup2(pipefds[commandc*2+1], 1) < 0 ){
perror and exit
}
}
close all pipe-fds
execvp
perror and exit
} else if( pid < 0 ){
perror and exit
}
cmd = cmd->next
commandc++
}
/* parent closes all of its copies at the end */
for( i = 0; i < 2 * num-pipes; i++ ){
close( pipefds[i] );
}
In this code, the original parent process creates a child for each command and therefore survives the entire ordeal. The children check to see if they should get their input from the previous command and if they should send their output to the next command. Then they close all of their copies of the pipe file descriptors and then exec. The parent doesn't do anything but fork until it's created a child for each command. It then closes all of its copies of the descriptors and can go on to wait.
Creating all of the pipes you need first, and then managing them in the loop, is tricky and requires some array arithmetic. The goal, though, looks like this:
cmd0 cmd1 cmd2 cmd3 cmd4
pipe0 pipe1 pipe2 pipe3
[0,1] [2,3] [4,5] [6,7]
Realizing that, at any given time, you only need two sets of pipes (the pipe to the previous command and the pipe to the next command) will simplify your code and make it a little more robust. Ephemient gives pseudo-code for this here. His code is cleaner, because the parent and child do not have to do unnecessary looping to close un-needed file descriptors and because the parent can easily close its copies of the file descriptors immediately after the fork.
As a side note: you should always check the return values of pipe, dup2, fork, and exec.
EDIT 2: typo in pseudo code. OP: num-pipes would be the number of pipes. E.g., "ls | grep foo | sort -r" would have 2 pipes.
Here's the correct functioning code
void runPipedCommands(cmdLine* command, char* userInput) {
int numPipes = countPipes(userInput);
int status;
int i = 0;
pid_t pid;
int pipefds[2*numPipes];
for(i = 0; i < (numPipes); i++){
if(pipe(pipefds + i*2) < 0) {
perror("couldn't pipe");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
int j = 0;
while(command) {
pid = fork();
if(pid == 0) {
//if not last command
if(command->next){
if(dup2(pipefds[j + 1], 1) < 0){
perror("dup2");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
//if not first command&& j!= 2*numPipes
if(j != 0 ){
if(dup2(pipefds[j-2], 0) < 0){
perror(" dup2");///j-2 0 j+1 1
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
for(i = 0; i < 2*numPipes; i++){
close(pipefds[i]);
}
if( execvp(*command->arguments, command->arguments) < 0 ){
perror(*command->arguments);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
} else if(pid < 0){
perror("error");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
command = command->next;
j+=2;
}
/**Parent closes the pipes and wait for children*/
for(i = 0; i < 2 * numPipes; i++){
close(pipefds[i]);
}
for(i = 0; i < numPipes + 1; i++)
wait(&status);
}
The (shortened) relevant code is:
if(fork() == 0){
// do child stuff here
....
}
else{
// do parent stuff here
if(command != NULL)
command = command->next;
j += 2;
for(i = 0; i < (numPipes ); i++){
close(pipefds[i]);
}
while(waitpid(0,0,0) < 0);
}
Which means the parent (controlling) process does this:
fork
close all pipes
wait for child process
next loop / child
But it should be something like this:
fork
fork
fork
close all pipes (everything should have been duped now)
wait for childs
You only need two pipes alternating like below:
typedef int io[2];
extern int I; //piped command current index
extern int pipe_count; //count of '|'
#define CURRENT 0
#define PREVIOUS 1
#define READ 0
#define WRITE 1
#define is_last_command (I == pipe_count)
bool connect(io pipes[2])
{
if (pipe_count)
{
if (is_last_command || I != 0)
dup2(pipes[PREVIOUS][READ], STDIN_FILENO);
if (I == 0 || !is_last_command)
dup2(pipes[CURRENT][WRITE], STDOUT_FILENO);
}
return (true);
}
void close_(io pipes[2])
{
if (pipe_count)
{
if (is_last_command || I != 0)
close(pipes[PREVIOUS][READ]);
if (I == 0 || !is_last_command)
close(pipes[CURRENT][WRITE]);
}
}
void alternate(int **pipes)
{
int *pipe_current;
pipe_current = pipes[CURRENT];
pipes[CURRENT] = pipes[PREVIOUS];
pipes[PREVIOUS] = pipe_current;
}
Example usage:
#define ERROR -1
#define CHILD 0
void execute(char **command)
{
static io pipes[2];
if (pipe_count && pipe(pipes[CURRENT]) == ERROR)
exit_error("pipe");
if (fork()==CHILD && connect(pipes))
{
execvp(command[0], command);
_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
while (wait(NULL) >= 0);
close_(pipes);
alternate((int **)pipes);
}
static void run(char ***commands)
{
for (I = 0; commands[I]; I++)
if (*commands[I])
execute(commands[I]);
}
I'll leave a link to a full working code for someone who needs it.
Building upon the idea of using a maximum of two pipes at a given time mentioned by Christopher Neylan, I put together pseudocode for n-pipes. args is an array of character pointers of size 'args_size' which is a global variable.
// MULTIPLE PIPES
// Test case: char *args[] = {"ls", "-l", "|", "head", "|", "tail", "-4",
0};// "|", "grep", "Txt", 0};
enum fileEnd{READ, WRITE};
void multiple pipes( char** args){
pid_t cpid;
// declare pipes
int pipeA[2]
int pipeB[2]
// I have done getNumberofpipes
int numPipes = getNumberOfPipes;
int command_num = numPipes+1;
// holds sub array of args
// which is a statement to execute
// for example: cmd = {"ls", "-l", NULL}
char** cmd
// iterate over args
for(i = 0; i < args_size; i++){
//
// strip subarray from main array
// cmd 1 | cmd 2 | cmd3 => cmd
// cmd = {"ls", "-l", NULL}
//Open/reopen one pipe
//if i is even open pipeB
if(i % 2) pipe(pipeB);
//if i is odd open pipeA
else pipe(pipeA);
switch(cpid = fork(){
case -1: error forking
case 0: // child process
childprocess(i);
default: // parent process
parentprocess(i, cpid);
}
}
}
// parent pipes must be closed in parent
void parentprocess(int i, pid_t cpid){
// if first command
if(i == 0)
close(pipeB[WRITE]);
// if last command close WRITE
else if (i == numPipes){
// if i is even close pipeB[WRITE]
// if i is odd close pipeA[WRITE]
}
// otherwise if in middle close READ and WRITE
// for appropriate pipes
// if i is even
close(pipeA[READ])
close(pipeB[WRITE])
// if i is odd
close(pipeB[READ])
close(pipeA[WRITE])
}
int returnvalue, status;
waitpid(cpid, returnvalue, status);
}
void childprocess(int i){
// if in first command
if(i == 0)
dup2(pipeB[WRITE], STDOUT_FILENO);
//if in last command change stdin for
// the necessary pipe. Don't touch stdout -
// stdout goes to shell
else if( numPipes == i){
// if i is even
dup2(pipeB[READ], STDIN_FILENO)
//if i is odd
dup2(pipeA[READ], STDIN_FILENO);
}
// otherwise, we are in middle command where
// both pipes are used.
else{
// if i is even
dup2(pipeA[READ], STDIN_FILENO)
dupe(pipeB[WRITE], STDOUT_FILENO)
// if i is odd
dup2(pipeB[READ], STDIN_FILENO)
dup2(pipeA[WRITE], STDOUT_FILENO)
}
// execute command for this iteration
// check for errors!!
// The exec() functions only return if an error has occurred. The return value is -1, and errno is set to indicate the error.
if(exec(cmd, cmd) < 0)
printf("Oh dear, something went wrong with read()! %s\n", strerror(errno));
}
}
Basically what you wanna do is a recursive function where the child executes the first command and the parent executes the second one if no other commands are left or calls the function again.
I'm trying to create a simple shell in C for Unix. I've been able to do all the parsing of commands and execution, but I'm having a problem with piping. I think the problem is that I'm not hooking into the correct pipe for the input of the second command.
For example, if I type "ls | wc", it will pause after the "wc" command, which I think is because its waiting for input. I think the problem is when I use dup2(reading[i],0), and its not hooking into the correct pipe.
I know this is a bit of a broad question, but if there are any pointers I could get, I would appreciate it. Here is the code that creates new processes and tries to pipe them.
int fileds[2];
int reading[num_cmds];
int writing[num_cmds];
int p;
for(p=0; p < num_cmds; p++)
{
reading[p] = -1;
writing[p] = -1;
}
int j;
for(j=0; j < num_cmds-1; j++) //Create pipes for commands
{
int fileds[2];
pipe(fileds);
reading[j+1] = fileds[0];
writing[j] = fileds[1];
}
int i = 0;
for(i = 0; i < num_cmds;i++)
{
cmd_args = parse_cmd(cmds[i],output_file,input_file,&run_bg); //Get command and args
pid_t childpid;
int status;
childpid=fork();
if (childpid >= 0)
{
if (childpid == 0)
{
if(writing[i] != -1)
{
dup2(writing[i],1);
close(writing[i]);
}
if(reading[i] != -1)
{
dup2(reading[i],0);
close(reading[i]);
}
int h;
for(h = 0; h < num_cmds; h++)
{
close(writing[h]);
close(reading[h]);
}
if(execvp(cmd_args[0],cmd_args) == -1)
{
perror("Problem with command");
exit(0);
}
}
else
{
wait(&status);
int m;
for(m = 0; m < num_cmds; m++)
{
if( writing[m] != -1) close(writing[m]);
if( reading[m] != -1) close(reading[m]);
}
}
}
else
{
perror("fork");
continue;
}
input_file[0] = 0;
output_file[0] = 0;
run_bg = 0;
}
}
UPDATE: I was able to figure it out, thanks to Richard. It was a combination of closing the file descriptors in the wrong order and not closing some at all. Here's the working code.
int fileds[2];
int reading[num_cmds];
int writing[num_cmds];
int p;
for(p=0; p < num_cmds; p++)
{
reading[p] = -1;
writing[p] = -1;
}
int j;
for(j=0; j < num_cmds-1; j++)
{
int fileds[2];
pipe(fileds);
reading[j+1] = fileds[0];
writing[j] = fileds[1];
}
int i = 0;
for(i = 0; i < num_cmds;i++)
{
cmd_args = parse_cmd(cmds[i],output_file,input_file,&run_bg);
pid_t childpid;
int status;
childpid=fork();
if (childpid >= 0)
{
if (childpid == 0)
{
if(writing[i] != -1)
{
close(1);
dup2(writing[i],1);
}
if(reading[i] != -1)
{
close(0);
dup2(reading[i],0);
}
if(execvp(cmd_args[0],cmd_args) == -1)
{
perror("Problem with command");
exit(0);
}
}
else
{
wait(&status);
close(writing[i]);
if(i > 0)
{
close(reading[i]);
}
}
}
else
{
perror("fork");
}
input_file[0] = 0;
output_file[0] = 0;
run_bg = 0;
}
I think your problem may be that you wait for each process inside the loop and then close all the file descriptors. This makes the file descriptors invalid for the next call to dup2() and results in stdin for the next process staying unchanged.
Just a guess, I haven't run the code.
When I type "ls | wc" wc does as expected and prints the number of words output by the ls command. Remember that when you are piping commands using "|" you don't need to create pipes in your application. The first command needs to output to stdout and the second command needs to read that output from standard in.