I'm working on a WPF/C# application who are exposing commands to be called called by magnet link.
Our application create registry key when msi in installed but, when we use the magnet link, we have a security message each time, even if we check allow access.
Does someone know how we can do to not have this message or at least, just the first time?
We can have dev solution, registry entry, gpo, ...
thanks by advance for any help.
Regards
Related
I have two C binaries which tries to open network connection for communication.
This is for external communication. When i run that for the first time, OS X' firewall pops up the message as given in title. How can I get rid of this?
I suspect this is related to code-signing? How to do code-sign this binary?
Basically I have to build this binary in one Mac machine, and distribute outside app store.
How can I get rid of the firewall pop up if the OS X firewall is enabled in the machine?
You can resolve this by signing the offending application binary yourself.
Disclaimer: Signing an application yourself will make an application appear more
secure to the operating system, when in reality it isn’t. Only sign applications
that you are 100% sure are not spyware or otherwise malicious. If you have any
doubts, just uninstall/reinstall.
Part 1: Create a Signing Identity
The solution I’m going for – signing the app myself – requires that I create a Signing Identity, also known as Signing Certificate. This is very easy to do:
Open Applications > Utilities > Keychain Access.
From the Keychain Access menu, choose Certificate Assistant > Create a Certificate.
Fill in a name for the certificate. This name appears in the Keychain Access utility as the name of the certificate. This is also the name you will use when referencing this certificate. Personally, I used the name, “My Signing Identity.”
Choose Code Signing from the Certificate Type menu.
Choose Self Signed Root from the Type popup menu.
Check the Let me override defaults checkbox.
Click Continue.
Specify a serial number for the certificate. Any number will do as long as you have no other certificate with the same name and serial number.
Click Continue.
Fill in the information for the certificate. You can use real or fake data, I used real data personally.
Click Continue.
Accept the defaults for the rest of the dialogs.
Once completed, you will see your certificate in Keychain Access. Verify the name you picked, and you’re done with this step. Well done!
Step 2: (Re-)Sign your application
Now you have to sign your application. To do this, open up Terminal again and use the following command:
codesign -s "My Signing Identity" -f /path/to/your/binary/app
A dialog will appear, click "Allow".
Now start your application again. You will get the accept incoming connections dialog one last time. Click "Allow".
From now on you should no longer get the warnings anymore! Now it is possible to enjoy the security of your firewall being active without the inconvenience of having to click "allow" constantly.
Credit: The original source which served as a starting place for this updated and annotated solution guide was http://silvanolte.com/blog/2011/01/18/do-you-want-the-application-to-accept-incoming-network-connections/
In my case this alert appeared when i run Python project from PyCharm after updating MacOS to 10.15 Cataline. I fixed it with
codesign -vvv /Applications/PyCharm.app/
I was trying to apply this solution to fix python as used by Arduino OTA, I found another solution describing self-signing the app that stated $(which python) as the file path to sign, but in my case that resolved to /usr/bin/python. Self-signing this not only required I drop to Rootless mode to allow writing to /usr/bin, but when I went back and tested it, python was STILL asking for permission to allow incoming connections!
The correct python file to self-sign is in fact (in my case at least) /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/Python.app
Once I self-signed this correct file path, the Arduino OTA process no longer required me clicking allow incoming connections - Hoorah!
Hope that helps someone.
I have a .NET WinForms application that uses CHM help file. Both executable and CHM are on a network share. I used http://www.helpandmanual.com/products_hhreg.html to create registry entries that could allow display of the help contents. If I open the file itself from the share all is OK. However, when I press F1 in my application to invoke help, I get the familiar "Navigation to the webpage was canceled" error. No matter what I do, including setting zone security level = 2 will help.
How do I go about using CHM help in my application when launched from a network share?
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(path);
I found this other approach https://stackoverflow.com/a/928156/1757491 which seems to allow me to view the help but when I use
System.Windows.Forms.Help.ShowHelp(null, path);
I get what you describe.
After too many hours of research I have come up with nothing to solve this problem.
I am running a WPF program in an .xbap page file being hosted on internet explorer. Running the project in Visual Studio 2010 works just fine and generates no errors.
I want to be able to host the webpage on IIS 7.0 and to browse to it with a windows forms application. To test this I created a new website on port 80 in IIS manager. I then published the project to the local website folder and added the autogenerated project certificate file (projectName_TemporaryKey.pfx) to my Trusted Publishers and Trusted Root Certification Authorities.
My problem is this: whenever I try to browse to the file with internet explorer or with my windows forms program, the wpf program stops working. When pulling up the just-in-time debugger, I am informed that there is a System.ExecutionEngineException but am given no source code, no stack trace, and no data outside of an empty Dictionary enumerable. My guess is that this might have something to do with the database call made in the program to another machine, but I can't prove that.
I've tried several things to solve this including repairing my .NET 4.0 framework and altering permissions but nothing seems to be affect the error.
Does anyone know of a way to get more information on this error, or perhaps a step I may have missed when publishing this project?
Thanks very much.
Some things to check:
Windows event log often includes additional exception information (although usually in an awful format)
Output some trace information from your application so you can follow what's happening
Try attaching a debugger to the WPFHost and then stepping through the code
I have registered my Phone 7 app as a Share Picker Extension. It works—my app is in the list of Share options and it gets launched and I can load the chosen image. Okay, great.
But then things go wrong in my code. I would like to be able to debug the issues, but I can't seem to keep the debugger attached.
I cannot debug this in the simulator, since the Pictures app (and thus the Share Picker functionality) is not present in the simulator.
I cannot debug this on the phone because as soon as I pick my app from the Share list, the debugger detaches... right as my app is "launching" again.
Is it possible to attach the debugger to a running WP7 app? Is it possible to keep the debugger attached? Am I doing it wrong? Any suggestions, advice or guesses are welcome because I'm tearing my hair out.
When doing M+V hub integration (sorry, haven't done any pictures hub integration yet) I initially used a crude debug technique (Messagebox.Show, etc. - like Justin mentioned) to verify what was being passed to the NavigationEventArgs of OnNavigatedTo and wrapped the whole method in a try..catch block to learn what was going on. I then refactored the code when I knew what could be expected. (Remember OnNavigatedTo will be called when your app is launched normally too and so e won't be populated in the same way.)
When the app is launched from a/the hub it creates a new instance of the app and there is currently no way to connect to this for debugging while the main page is being navigated to.
Great question. I'm unsure if that's possible. As far as I know, there's no way to attach the debugger to when the WP7 O/S starts an app (which wasn't triggered by the debugger).
Photo Share picker extensibility, music+Video hub extensibility and other O/S extensibility points seem to not play nicely with the VS debugger. Normally I resort to MessageBox.Show to debug any problems with WP7 O/S integration.
1) Connect the Device
2) Turn off Zune
3) Start C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows Phone\v7.1\Tools\WPConnect\x86\WPConnect.exe
To properly debug your application that uses the Media Library, you'll need to use the Windows Phone Connect Tool (WPConnect.exe) as described on MSDN. Jaime has some additional tips on his blog.
Once you are connected, you should be able to debug your application. Fingers crossed anyway. If that doesn't help, I'll dig a bit further.
It's not so much about the WPConnect tool. The nature of your application means that you have to have it closed and the user should pick a photo. Only after that the data is returned to the application.
You should read about the application execution model on Windows Phone 7. Also a good explanation is available here.
Initially, I would say that you should look at tombstoning (a good explanation here) but then again, the image returned will re-start the app and won't allow you to directly attach the debugger.
Yeah, looks like this is impossible...
All the answers above seem to be missing the point: I presume you're able to debug your app in the "standalone" mode (when it's launched normally), but not when it's launched via the Share Picker Extension. Am I write? This is the wall I'm hitting... :-(
I thought the proper way would be to attach to the process once it's launched.
I tried to use Debug > Attach to Process, then select Smart Device as the Transport and Windows Phone Device as the Qualifier... But in return I get the ugly "Unable to connect to 'Windows Phone Device'. Not implemented" message.
Bummer :-(
I have a requirement where my client want to install a custom "Print to File" printer (apparently MS has an SDK for this?). They want to be able to install this as a kind of "application" so that if someone chooses to print to this printer, they have to answer a few questions, and the file gets "printed" to a path of our choosing. (we will then do some other things with the file such as rename it and SFTP it)
I have tried googling, looking for things such as "customize print to file" and I have found nothing. Does anyone have any experience with this and can give me a kick in the right direction?
EDIT: I would rather have a c# oriented solution but I am willing to take anything right now.
Edit 2: The idea is for this "custom print driver" is for a document imaging company to provide an easy method for their customers to store/archive documents. The idea, is that the customer, if they want to store/archive a document, they would print, from standard windows applications such as Word, Excell, Acrobat Reader, Web Pages, etc., to the "company X" printer driver. When doing so, the document would get "printed" to a file in a specific location that another application (which has a filewatcher service on it, which would rename it and send it to the SFTP server), knows to watch. The document that is printed to the file, should ideally also be able to come out on paper (AKA just like normal). When printing to the "Custom print driver", we also need to have a form filled in which would provide meta-tags for the archiving system, which would also be uploaded to the document imaging system.
I am not looking to recreate a printing application, nor am I looking to add "printing" into a custom application. This needs to work at the Windows level.
I have no problems with the SFTP, FileWatcher, Alchemy integration (the document archiving application) or the document renaming portion. It's the "custom print driver" that I am having issues with. This is all compounded by the fact that when installing the application, I need to automatically install the "custom print driver", and configure it during the install process. Essentially the solution needs to be installed as a printer available under "My Printers" and should be available for any type of document, Word, Excell, PDF, etc. Oh, and it needs to be availabe for XP, Vista, and Windows 7 . . . . :(
Thanks in advance for everyones help. I have a feeling that this one is going to be a doozy :(
Hah! I knew I'd seen at least one...
ActMask Virtual Printer Driver
Can't make a recommendation of any sort not having tried this particular toolkit - but it would appear to me to bear a strong resemblence to the sort of solution you're after.
What kind of customization you are talking about? Can't you use the .Net inbuilt one?