Count zeroes with Recursion keep crashing - c

My code is supposed to count the number of zeroes using recursion.
However my program keeps crashing.
Expected output:
Input: 10500
Result: 3
Code:
void rCountZeros2(int num, int *result) {
if (num > 0) {
if ((num % 10) == 0) {
rCountZeros2((num / 10) + 1, *result);
}
rCountZeros2(num / 10, *result);
} else if (num == 0) {
*result = 1;
}
*result = num;
}
How do I make it work?

Here's the solution with and without using pointers
Hope this helps
#include <stdio.h> // For C++ #include<iostream>
// Without using pointer
int count_zeros_recursive2(int num) {
if (num % 10 == 0) {
if (num > 19 || num < -19) {
return 1 + count_zeros_recursive2(num / 10);
}
return 1;
}
if (num > 19 || num < -19) {
return count_zeros_recursive2(num / 10);
}
return 0;
}
// Using pointer
void count_zeros_recursive(int num, int *result) {
if (num % 10 == 0)
*result = *result + 1;
if (num > 19 || num < -19)
count_zeros_recursive(num / 10, result);
}
int count_zeros(int num) {
int result = 0;
count_zeros_recursive(num, &result);
//result = count_zeros_recursive2(num);
return result;
}
int main() {
int n;
while (1) {
scanf("%d", &n); // For C++ std::cin >> n;
printf("%d\n", count_zeros(n));// For C++ std::cout << n << "\n";
}
return 0;
}
eg Input: 1010
Output: 2
Input: 0
Output: 1
Input: 10204012410
Output: 4
Input: -101
Output: 1

I prefer returning the result instead of passing the pointer to the result.
Stop condition is when the number is a single digit, then if 0 you have 1 zero, otherwise none.
If the number is not a single digit, calculate the number of zeros in the number without the lowest digit (num/10) and add 1 to the returned value if the lowest digit was 0.
#include <stdio.h>
int count_zeros_recursive(int num)
{
int res = 0;
int num_without_lowest_digit = num/10;
if(num_without_lowest_digit == 0)
{
res = (num == 0);
}
else
{
res = count_zeros_recursive(num_without_lowest_digit);
if (num % 10 == 0)
{
res++;
}
}
return res;
}
int main(void) {
int nums[] = { 202, 7, 100, 10500, 10234, 10000};
int i;
for (i=0; i < sizeof(nums)/sizeof(nums[0]); ++i)
{
printf("Number %d has %d zeros\n", nums[i], count_zeros_recursive(nums[i]));
}
return 0;
}
Tested here
Number 202 has 1 zeros
Number 7 has 0 zeros
Number 100 has 2 zeros
Number 10500 has 3 zeros
Number 10234 has 1 zeros
Number 10000 has 4 zeros

Let's say you really want to use a pointer for some reason. Here's a full solution:
#include <stdio.h>
void rCountZeros2(int num, int *result)
{
if(num>0)
{
if( (num % 10) == 0)
{
*result = *result + 1;
}
rCountZeros2(num/10, result);
}
}
int main() {
int i = 0;
int n;
n = scanf("%d", &n);
int *result = &i;
rCountZeros2(n, result);
printf("%d\n", *result);
}
So what will happen is that you're effectively just updating the value at the location which result is pointing to, which means that you're really just storing the count in the variable i.

There is no need to pass a pointer if you can use a functional approach. Just return the value.
long recursiveZeroesCount(long num) {
if(num == 0) return 1;
if(num < 10) return 0;
if(num % 10 == 0) return 1 + recursiveZeroesCount(num / 10);
else return recursiveZeroesCount(num / 10);
}

Your program has undefined behavior because you pass the value of the *result instead of the pointer to the result variable to recursive calls. Furthermore, your algorithm is flawed as you cannot use this API recursively because the recursive calls update the result as well as the current call, a very impractical situation.
Here is a corrected version without recursion:
void rCountZeros2(int num, int *result) {
int count = 0;
for (;;) {
if (num % 10 == 0)
count++;
num /= 10;
if (num == 0)
break;
}
*result = count;
}
And here is a recursive implementation with a simpler API:
int rCountZeros2(int num) {
if (num % 10 == 0) {
if (num == 0)
return 1;
else
return 1 + rCountZeros2(num / 10);
} else {
if (num < 10)
return 0;
else
return rCountZeros2(num / 10);
}
}
The above function can be simplified as a single statement:
int rCountZeros2(int num) {
return !(num % 10) + ((num < 10) ? 0 : rCountZeros2(num / 10));
}

Related

A variable in a for loop is changing without being supposed to change in c

Here is the code:
#include <stdio.h> // printf
#include <cs50.h> // get_long
#include <string.h> // strlen
#include <stdlib.h> // stdlib
int credit_test(string input);
int main(void)
{
string userInput;
// Gets user input, and tests if input is valid
bool isInvalid = false;
do
{
userInput = get_string("Number: "); // Prompts user for input
for(int i = 0, evenIndex = strlen(userInput); evenIndex > i; i++)
{
if(userInput[i] - 48 >= 0 && userInput[i] - 48 <= 9 && (strlen(userInput) == 15 || strlen(userInput) == 16)) // Tests if input is valod
{
isInvalid = false;
}
else
{
isInvalid = true;
break;
}
}
}
while(isInvalid);
int keyValidity = credit_test(userInput);
}
int credit_test(string input)
{
int inputLen;
inputLen = strlen(input);
// Even number calculation
int evenArr[16];
int evenSum = 0;
int evenIndex = 0;
printf("Length: %i\n", inputLen);
for(int i = 0; inputLen > i; i++)
{
int n = i * 2;
evenArr[evenIndex] = input[n] * 2;
if(evenArr[evenIndex] > 0)
{
evenArr[evenIndex] -= 96;
}
if(evenArr[evenIndex] > 9) // Code to split doubles
{
int doubleNum = evenArr[evenIndex];
evenArr[evenIndex] = 1;
evenIndex++;
evenArr[evenIndex] = doubleNum % 10;
}
evenIndex++;
evenSum += evenArr[i];
printf("%i\n", evenArr[i]);
printf("Length: %i\n", inputLen);
}
printf("Length: %i\n", inputLen);
printf("Even Sum: %i\n", evenSum);
// Odd number calculation
int oddArr[16];
int oddSum = 0;
int oddIndex = 1;
for(int i = 0; 16 > i; i++)
{
oddArr[i] = input[oddIndex];
if(oddArr[i] > 0)
{
oddArr[i] -= 48;
}
oddSum += oddArr[i];
oddIndex += 2;
printf("%i\n", oddArr[i]);
}
printf("Odd Sum: %i\n", oddSum);
// Validity test
int finalSum = evenSum + oddSum;
int cardType = finalSum % 10;
printf("Final Sum: %i\n", finalSum);
if(cardType == 0 && (input[0] - 48) == 5)
{
printf("MasterCard \n");
}else if (cardType == 0 && (input[0] - 48) == 4)
{
printf("Visa \n");
}else if(cardType == 0 && (input[0] - 48) == 3)
{
printf("Amex \n");
}else
{
printf("Invalid \n");
}
return 0;
}
I just cannot wrap my head around why, but if you run the code, and keep an eye on the "inputLen" variable it stays what it should be, but in the first for loop which gets the even number in the input, the inputLen stays the same, which is correct, but when the loop finishes, for some reason, the variable changes to 0? So would anyone mind to explain as to why its happening? And sorry if the code is all wonky and bad :)
Thanks so much.
This part of the loop
for(int i = 0; inputLen > i; i++)
{
int n = i * 2;
evenArr[evenIndex] = input[n] * 2;
//...
invokes undefined behavior because the expression input[n] can access memory beyond the used array due to using the expression i * 2 as an index. For example then i is equal to inputLen - 1 then n will bi initialized by the expression 2 * ( inputLen - 1 ) and the value of the expression you are using as an index to access elements of the array input but the array does not have so many elements.
Also in this code snippet
if(evenArr[evenIndex] > 9) // Code to split doubles
{
int doubleNum = evenArr[evenIndex];
evenArr[evenIndex] = 1;
evenIndex++;
evenArr[evenIndex] = doubleNum % 10;
}
evenIndex++;
the variable evenIndex can be incremented twice that again can be a reason of undefined behavior when this variable is used as an index to access elements of the array evenArr.

LeetCode07(Reverse Integer): Why this code works out right ouput in Dev C++ but fails in LeetCode?

As a newcomer to learning to program, I meet a very confusing problem solving LeetCode 7. Reverse Integer
#include<stdio.h>
#include<math.h>
int reverse(int x);
int main()
{
int a;
while(scanf("%d",&a)!=NULL)
{
reverse(a);
}
return 0;
}
int reverse(int x){
if(x==0)
{
printf("0\n");
return 0;
}else
{
int a[10];
int i,rev,ten;
for(i=-1;abs(x)>0;x/=10)
{
a[++i]=x%10;
}
for(ten=1,rev=0;i>=0;ten*=10,i--)
{
rev+=a[i]*ten;
}
if(rev>0)
{
if(rev>pow(2,31)-1)
{
return 0;
}else
{
printf("%d\n",rev);
}
}else if(rev<0)
{
if(rev<-pow(2,31))
{
return 0;
}else
{
printf("%d\n",rev);
}
}
}
return 0;
}
In Dev C++, input test examples like 123, 120. Output: 321, 21. Obviously, it's right. But in LeetCode, input example 321, output is 0. I really don't know why would be that.
How could I get the code I submit accepted without changing the train of thought mentioned above? I need help.
There's a better way to do it:
First, note that in order to get the first digit on the right of n we can simply do n%10, now if we divide by 10 and repeat the same process we then can get all of the digits of a number n. We can write a simple algorithm:
int reverse(int n)
{
int ret = 0;
while(n != 0)
{
ret = ret*10 + n%10;
n = n / 10l
}
}
This is all good but this may result in an overflow, in a 32-bit signed integer we can store the values of [-2^(31), 2^(31)-1]=[-2,147,483,648 , 2,147,483,647]
If we have the number n=2,147,483,647 to reverse it, it will cause an overflow thus we can easily check this as follows:
if(ret > INT_MAX / 10 || (ret == INT_MAX / 10 && ret % 10 > 7) || ret < INT_MIN / 10 || (ret == INT_MIN / 10 && ret % 10 < -8)) return 0;
Thus our code should look something like this:
int reverse(int n) {
int ret = 0;
while (n != 0) {
n /= 10;
if (ret > INT_MAX / 10 || (ret == INT_MAX / 10 && n % 10 > 7)
|| ret < INT_MIN / 10 || (ret == INT_MIN / 10 && n % 10 < -8)) return 0;
ret = ret * 10 + n % 10;
}
return ret;
}
I think
int reverse(int x){
long long ret = 0;
while(x!=0)
{
ret = ret * 10 + x % 10;
x /= 10;
if (ret > INT_MAX || ret < INT_MIN )
{
return 0;
}
}
return ret;
}
will be better
You have to return the answer instead of printing that.
To do that, replace printf("%d\n",rev); with return rev;.

the program must determine if it is a power of 2 or -2. If N is a power of 2 or -2, the program must print yes. Else the program must print no

#include<stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
long long int a;
int flag = 0;
scanf("%lld", &a);
if (a > 0)
{
while (a > 0)
{
if (a % 2 == 0 || a == 1)
{
a = a / 2;
flag = 1;
}
else
{
flag = 0;
break;
}
}
}
if (a < 0)
{
while (a <= -1)
{
if (a % 2 == 0 || a == -1)
{
a = a / 2;
flag = 1;
}
else
{
flag = 0;
break;
}
}
}
if (flag == 1)
{
printf("yes");
}
else
{
printf("no");
}
}
click this for output image
Given an integer N, the program must determine if it is a power of 2 or -2. If N is a power of 2 or -2, the program must print yes. Else the program must print no.
Boundary Condition(s):
-10^17 <= N <= 10^17
Input Format:
The first line contains the value of N.
Output Format:
The first line contains either yes or no
For the input -4503599627370496 it should print no but it prints yes. Solution, please
In case of negative numbers, you should also count which power of 2 is it. If it is even it won't work. -2 to the power 52 gives 4503599627370496 instead of -4503599627370496.
The code below solves this puzzle using bitwise shift operator:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
long long int a, aPositive, l = 1;
scanf("%lld", &a);
aPositive = a > 0 ? a : -a;
int count = 0;
while (l < aPositive)
{
l = l << 1;
count++;
//printf("%d\t%lld\n", count, l);
}
if (l == aPositive && (a > 0 || count % 2 == 1))
{
printf("yes");
}
else
{
printf("no");
}
return 0;
}
Very similar problem has been solved here: how-to-check-if-a-number-is-a-power-of-2
bool IsPowerOfTwo(long long x)
{
return (x != 0) && ((x & (x - 1)) == 0);
}
int main()
{
bool result = IsPowerOfTwo(256);
if (result )
{
printf("yes");
}
else
{
printf("no");
}
return 0;
}

Recursive Caching Based Fibonacci

I am trying to implement caching based Fibonacci sequence. But it gave me the wrong output for example (fibcache(8) gave me an answer of 13 instead of 21. However in some cases it gave me the correct output. For example fibcache(6) gave me 8. Cant figure out whats wrong
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define DCACHE_SIZE 5
int fibcache(int number);
long cacheodd[DCACHE_SIZE] = {0};
long cacheeven[DCACHE_SIZE] = {0};
int i_odd, i_even;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fibNum = fibcache(6);
printf("The Fibonacci number is %d\n", fibcache(fibNum));
}
int fibcache(int n)
{
int result;
if (n == 0)
return 0;
if (n == 1)
return 1;
if(n%2==0)
{
if (cacheodd[i_odd] != 0)
result = cacheodd[i_odd];
else
{
cacheodd[i_odd] = fibcache(n-1) + fibcache(n-2);
result = cacheodd[i_odd];
}
}
else
if(n%2==1)
{
if (cacheeven[i_even] != 0)
result = cacheeven[i_even];
else
{
cacheeven[i_even] = fibcache(n-1) + fibcache(n-2);
result = cacheeven[i_even];
}
}
return result;
}
You have some problems:
You actually print fib(fib(6)), a much larger number than fib(6).
Your caching function is too complicated: why handle even and odd numbers differently? You should make a special case of numbers larger than the cache size and verify if the cached value has been computed.
Here is a simpler version:
#include <stdio.h>
#define DCACHE_SIZE 5
long fibcache(int number);
long fibcache_values[DCACHE_SIZE] = { 0 };
int main(void) {
printf("List of Fibonacci numbers:\n");
for (int i = 0; i < 47; i++) {
printf(" fib(%d) = %ld\n", fibcache(i));
}
return 0;
}
long fibcache(int n) {
if (n <= 0)
return 0;
if (n == 1)
return 1;
if (n < DCACHE_SIZE) {
if (fibcache_values[n] != 0)
return fibcache_values[n];
else
return fibcache_values[n] = fibcache(n - 1) + fibcache(n - 2);
} else {
return fibcache(n - 1) + fibcache(n - 2);
}
}

How to format number adding points between each 3 numbers [duplicate]

In C, how can I format a large number from e.g. 1123456789 to 1,123,456,789?
I tried using printf("%'10d\n", 1123456789), but that doesn't work.
Could you advise anything? The simpler the solution the better.
If your printf supports the ' flag (as required by POSIX 2008 printf()), you can probably do it just by setting your locale appropriately. Example:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <locale.h>
int main(void)
{
setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, "");
printf("%'d\n", 1123456789);
return 0;
}
And build & run:
$ ./example
1,123,456,789
Tested on Mac OS X & Linux (Ubuntu 10.10).
You can do it recursively as follows (beware INT_MIN if you're using two's complement, you'll need extra code to manage that):
void printfcomma2 (int n) {
if (n < 1000) {
printf ("%d", n);
return;
}
printfcomma2 (n/1000);
printf (",%03d", n%1000);
}
void printfcomma (int n) {
if (n < 0) {
printf ("-");
n = -n;
}
printfcomma2 (n);
}
A summmary:
User calls printfcomma with an integer, the special case of negative numbers is handled by simply printing "-" and making the number positive (this is the bit that won't work with INT_MIN).
When you enter printfcomma2, a number less than 1,000 will just print and return.
Otherwise the recursion will be called on the next level up (so 1,234,567 will be called with 1,234, then 1) until a number less than 1,000 is found.
Then that number will be printed and we'll walk back up the recursion tree, printing a comma and the next number as we go.
There is also the more succinct version though it does unnecessary processing in checking for negative numbers at every level (not that this will matter given the limited number of recursion levels). This one is a complete program for testing:
#include <stdio.h>
void printfcomma (int n) {
if (n < 0) {
printf ("-");
printfcomma (-n);
return;
}
if (n < 1000) {
printf ("%d", n);
return;
}
printfcomma (n/1000);
printf (",%03d", n%1000);
}
int main (void) {
int x[] = {-1234567890, -123456, -12345, -1000, -999, -1,
0, 1, 999, 1000, 12345, 123456, 1234567890};
int *px = x;
while (px != &(x[sizeof(x)/sizeof(*x)])) {
printf ("%-15d: ", *px);
printfcomma (*px);
printf ("\n");
px++;
}
return 0;
}
and the output is:
-1234567890 : -1,234,567,890
-123456 : -123,456
-12345 : -12,345
-1000 : -1,000
-999 : -999
-1 : -1
0 : 0
1 : 1
999 : 999
1000 : 1,000
12345 : 12,345
123456 : 123,456
1234567890 : 1,234,567,890
An iterative solution for those who don't trust recursion (although the only problem with recursion tends to be stack space which will not be an issue here since it'll only be a few levels deep even for a 64-bit integer):
void printfcomma (int n) {
int n2 = 0;
int scale = 1;
if (n < 0) {
printf ("-");
n = -n;
}
while (n >= 1000) {
n2 = n2 + scale * (n % 1000);
n /= 1000;
scale *= 1000;
}
printf ("%d", n);
while (scale != 1) {
scale /= 1000;
n = n2 / scale;
n2 = n2 % scale;
printf (",%03d", n);
}
}
Both of these generate 2,147,483,647 for INT_MAX.
All the code above is for comma-separating three-digit groups but you can use other characters as well, such as a space:
void printfspace2 (int n) {
if (n < 1000) {
printf ("%d", n);
return;
}
printfspace2 (n/1000);
printf (" %03d", n%1000);
}
void printfspace (int n) {
if (n < 0) {
printf ("-");
n = -n;
}
printfspace2 (n);
}
Here's a very simple implementation. This function contains no error checking, buffer sizes must be verified by the caller. It also does not work for negative numbers. Such improvements are left as an exercise for the reader.
void format_commas(int n, char *out)
{
int c;
char buf[20];
char *p;
sprintf(buf, "%d", n);
c = 2 - strlen(buf) % 3;
for (p = buf; *p != 0; p++) {
*out++ = *p;
if (c == 1) {
*out++ = ',';
}
c = (c + 1) % 3;
}
*--out = 0;
}
Egads! I do this all the time, using gcc/g++ and glibc on linux and yes, the ' operator may be non-standard, but I like the simplicity of it.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <locale.h>
int main()
{
int bignum=12345678;
setlocale(LC_ALL,"");
printf("Big number: %'d\n",bignum);
return 0;
}
Gives output of:
Big number: 12,345,678
Just have to remember the 'setlocale' call in there, otherwise it won't format anything.
Perhaps a locale-aware version would be interesting.
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <locale.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <limits.h>
static int next_group(char const **grouping) {
if ((*grouping)[1] == CHAR_MAX)
return 0;
if ((*grouping)[1] != '\0')
++*grouping;
return **grouping;
}
size_t commafmt(char *buf, /* Buffer for formatted string */
int bufsize, /* Size of buffer */
long N) /* Number to convert */
{
int i;
int len = 1;
int posn = 1;
int sign = 1;
char *ptr = buf + bufsize - 1;
struct lconv *fmt_info = localeconv();
char const *tsep = fmt_info->thousands_sep;
char const *group = fmt_info->grouping;
char const *neg = fmt_info->negative_sign;
size_t sep_len = strlen(tsep);
size_t group_len = strlen(group);
size_t neg_len = strlen(neg);
int places = (int)*group;
if (bufsize < 2)
{
ABORT:
*buf = '\0';
return 0;
}
*ptr-- = '\0';
--bufsize;
if (N < 0L)
{
sign = -1;
N = -N;
}
for ( ; len <= bufsize; ++len, ++posn)
{
*ptr-- = (char)((N % 10L) + '0');
if (0L == (N /= 10L))
break;
if (places && (0 == (posn % places)))
{
places = next_group(&group);
for (int i=sep_len; i>0; i--) {
*ptr-- = tsep[i-1];
if (++len >= bufsize)
goto ABORT;
}
}
if (len >= bufsize)
goto ABORT;
}
if (sign < 0)
{
if (len >= bufsize)
goto ABORT;
for (int i=neg_len; i>0; i--) {
*ptr-- = neg[i-1];
if (++len >= bufsize)
goto ABORT;
}
}
memmove(buf, ++ptr, len + 1);
return (size_t)len;
}
#ifdef TEST
#include <stdio.h>
#define elements(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]))
void show(long i) {
char buffer[32];
commafmt(buffer, sizeof(buffer), i);
printf("%s\n", buffer);
commafmt(buffer, sizeof(buffer), -i);
printf("%s\n", buffer);
}
int main() {
long inputs[] = {1, 12, 123, 1234, 12345, 123456, 1234567, 12345678 };
for (int i=0; i<elements(inputs); i++) {
setlocale(LC_ALL, "");
show(inputs[i]);
}
return 0;
}
#endif
This does have a bug (but one I'd consider fairly minor). On two's complement hardware, it won't convert the most-negative number correctly, because it attempts to convert a negative number to its equivalent positive number with N = -N; In two's complement, the maximally negative number doesn't have a corresponding positive number, unless you promote it to a larger type. One way to get around this is by promoting the number the corresponding unsigned type (but it's is somewhat non-trivial).
Without recursion or string handling, a mathematical approach:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
void print_number( int n )
{
int order_of_magnitude = (n == 0) ? 1 : (int)pow( 10, ((int)floor(log10(abs(n))) / 3) * 3 ) ;
printf( "%d", n / order_of_magnitude ) ;
for( n = abs( n ) % order_of_magnitude, order_of_magnitude /= 1000;
order_of_magnitude > 0;
n %= order_of_magnitude, order_of_magnitude /= 1000 )
{
printf( ",%03d", abs(n / order_of_magnitude) ) ;
}
}
Similar in principle to Pax's recursive solution, but by calculating the order of magnitude in advance, recursion is avoided (at some considerable expense perhaps).
Note also that the actual character used to separate thousands is locale specific.
Edit:See #Chux's comments below for improvements.
Based on #Greg Hewgill's, but takes negative numbers into account and returns the string size.
size_t str_format_int_grouped(char dst[16], int num)
{
char src[16];
char *p_src = src;
char *p_dst = dst;
const char separator = ',';
int num_len, commas;
num_len = sprintf(src, "%d", num);
if (*p_src == '-') {
*p_dst++ = *p_src++;
num_len--;
}
for (commas = 2 - num_len % 3;
*p_src;
commas = (commas + 1) % 3)
{
*p_dst++ = *p_src++;
if (commas == 1) {
*p_dst++ = separator;
}
}
*--p_dst = '\0';
return (size_t)(p_dst - dst);
}
Needed to do something similar myself but rather than printing directly, needed to go to a buffer. Here's what I came up with. Works backwards.
unsigned int IntegerToCommaString(char *String, unsigned long long Integer)
{
unsigned int Digits = 0, Offset, Loop;
unsigned long long Copy = Integer;
do {
Digits++;
Copy /= 10;
} while (Copy);
Digits = Offset = ((Digits - 1) / 3) + Digits;
String[Offset--] = '\0';
Copy = Integer;
Loop = 0;
do {
String[Offset] = '0' + (Copy % 10);
if (!Offset--)
break;
if (Loop++ % 3 == 2)
String[Offset--] = ',';
Copy /= 10;
} while (1);
return Digits;
}
Be aware that it's only designed for unsigned integers and you must ensure that the buffer is large enough.
There's no real simple way to do this in C. I would just modify an int-to-string function to do it:
void format_number(int n, char * out) {
int i;
int digit;
int out_index = 0;
for (i = n; i != 0; i /= 10) {
digit = i % 10;
if ((out_index + 1) % 4 == 0) {
out[out_index++] = ',';
}
out[out_index++] = digit + '0';
}
out[out_index] = '\0';
// then you reverse the out string as it was converted backwards (it's easier that way).
// I'll let you figure that one out.
strrev(out);
}
My answer does not format the result exactly like the illustration in the question, but may fulfill the actual need in some cases with a simple one-liner or macro. One can extend it to generate more thousand-groups as necessary.
The result will look for example as follows:
Value: 0'000'012'345
The code:
printf("Value: %llu'%03lu'%03lu'%03lu\n", (value / 1000 / 1000 / 1000), (value / 1000 / 1000) % 1000, (value / 1000) % 1000, value % 1000);
#include <stdio.h>
void punt(long long n){
char s[28];
int i = 27;
if(n<0){n=-n; putchar('-');}
do{
s[i--] = n%10 + '0';
if(!(i%4) && n>9)s[i--]='.';
n /= 10;
}while(n);
puts(&s[++i]);
}
int main(){
punt(2134567890);
punt(987);
punt(9876);
punt(-987);
punt(-9876);
punt(-654321);
punt(0);
punt(1000000000);
punt(0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF);
punt(0x8000000000000001); // -max + 1 ...
}
My solution uses a . instead of a ,
It is left to the reader to change this.
This is old and there are plenty of answers but the question was not "how can I write a routine to add commas" but "how can it be done in C"? The comments pointed to this direction but on my Linux system with GCC, this works for me:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <locale.h>
int main()
{
unsetenv("LC_ALL");
setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, "");
printf("%'lld\n", 3141592653589);
}
When this is run, I get:
$ cc -g comma.c -o comma && ./comma
3,141,592,653,589
If I unset the LC_ALL variable before running the program the unsetenv is not necessary.
Another solution, by saving the result into an int array, maximum size of 7 because the long long int type can handle numbers in the range 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 to -9,223,372,036,854,775,807. (Note it is not an unsigned value).
Non-recursive printing function
static void printNumber (int numbers[8], int loc, int negative)
{
if (negative)
{
printf("-");
}
if (numbers[1]==-1)//one number
{
printf("%d ", numbers[0]);
}
else
{
printf("%d,", numbers[loc]);
while(loc--)
{
if(loc==0)
{// last number
printf("%03d ", numbers[loc]);
break;
}
else
{ // number in between
printf("%03d,", numbers[loc]);
}
}
}
}
main function call
static void getNumWcommas (long long int n, int numbers[8])
{
int i;
int negative=0;
if (n < 0)
{
negative = 1;
n = -n;
}
for(i = 0; i < 7; i++)
{
if (n < 1000)
{
numbers[i] = n;
numbers[i+1] = -1;
break;
}
numbers[i] = n%1000;
n/=1000;
}
printNumber(numbers, i, negative);// non recursive print
}
testing output
-9223372036854775807: -9,223,372,036,854,775,807
-1234567890 : -1,234,567,890
-123456 : -123,456
-12345 : -12,345
-1000 : -1,000
-999 : -999
-1 : -1
0 : 0
1 : 1
999 : 999
1000 : 1,000
12345 : 12,345
123456 : 123,456
1234567890 : 1,234,567,890
9223372036854775807 : 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
In main() function:
int numberSeparated[8];
long long int number = 1234567890LL;
getNumWcommas(number, numberSeparated);
If printing is all that's needed then move int numberSeparated[8]; inside the function getNumWcommas and call it this way getNumWcommas(number).
Another iterative function
int p(int n) {
if(n < 0) {
printf("-");
n = -n;
}
int a[sizeof(int) * CHAR_BIT / 3] = { 0 };
int *pa = a;
while(n > 0) {
*++pa = n % 1000;
n /= 1000;
}
printf("%d", *pa);
while(pa > a + 1) {
printf(",%03d", *--pa);
}
}
Here is the slimiest, size and speed efficient implementation of this kind of decimal digit formating:
const char *formatNumber (
int value,
char *endOfbuffer,
bool plus)
{
int savedValue;
int charCount;
savedValue = value;
if (unlikely (value < 0))
value = - value;
*--endOfbuffer = 0;
charCount = -1;
do
{
if (unlikely (++charCount == 3))
{
charCount = 0;
*--endOfbuffer = ',';
}
*--endOfbuffer = (char) (value % 10 + '0');
}
while ((value /= 10) != 0);
if (unlikely (savedValue < 0))
*--endOfbuffer = '-';
else if (unlikely (plus))
*--endOfbuffer = '+';
return endOfbuffer;
}
Use as following:
char buffer[16];
fprintf (stderr, "test : %s.", formatNumber (1234567890, buffer + 16, true));
Output:
test : +1,234,567,890.
Some advantages:
Function taking end of string buffer because of reverse ordered formatting. Finally, where is no need in revering generated string (strrev).
This function produces one string that can be used in any algo after. It not depends nor require multiple printf/sprintf calls, which is terrible slow and always context specific.
Minimum number of divide operators (/, %).
Secure format_commas, with negative numbers:
Because VS < 2015 doesn't implement snprintf, you need to do this
#if defined(_WIN32)
#define snprintf(buf,len, format,...) _snprintf_s(buf, len,len, format, __VA_ARGS__)
#endif
And then
char* format_commas(int n, char *out)
{
int c;
char buf[100];
char *p;
char* q = out; // Backup pointer for return...
if (n < 0)
{
*out++ = '-';
n = abs(n);
}
snprintf(buf, 100, "%d", n);
c = 2 - strlen(buf) % 3;
for (p = buf; *p != 0; p++) {
*out++ = *p;
if (c == 1) {
*out++ = '\'';
}
c = (c + 1) % 3;
}
*--out = 0;
return q;
}
Example usage:
size_t currentSize = getCurrentRSS();
size_t peakSize = getPeakRSS();
printf("Current size: %d\n", currentSize);
printf("Peak size: %d\n\n\n", peakSize);
char* szcurrentSize = (char*)malloc(100 * sizeof(char));
char* szpeakSize = (char*)malloc(100 * sizeof(char));
printf("Current size (f): %s\n", format_commas((int)currentSize, szcurrentSize));
printf("Peak size (f): %s\n", format_commas((int)currentSize, szpeakSize));
free(szcurrentSize);
free(szpeakSize);
A modified version of #paxdiablo solution, but using WCHAR and wsprinf:
static WCHAR buffer[10];
static int pos = 0;
void printfcomma(const int &n) {
if (n < 0) {
wsprintf(buffer + pos, TEXT("-"));
pos = lstrlen(buffer);
printfcomma(-n);
return;
}
if (n < 1000) {
wsprintf(buffer + pos, TEXT("%d"), n);
pos = lstrlen(buffer);
return;
}
printfcomma(n / 1000);
wsprintf(buffer + pos, TEXT(",%03d"), n % 1000);
pos = lstrlen(buffer);
}
void my_sprintf(const int &n)
{
pos = 0;
printfcomma(n);
}
I'm new in C programming. Here is my simple code.
int main()
{
// 1223 => 1,223
int n;
int a[10];
printf(" n: ");
scanf_s("%d", &n);
int i = 0;
while (n > 0)
{
int temp = n % 1000;
a[i] = temp;
n /= 1000;
i++;
}
for (int j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--)
{
if (j == 0)
{
printf("%d.", a[j]);
}
else printf("%d,",a[j]);
}
getch();
return 0;
}
Require: <stdio.h> + <string.h>.
Advantage: short, readable, based on the format of scanf-family. And assume no comma on the right of decimal point.
void add_commas(char *in, char *out) {
int len_in = strlen(in);
int len_int = -1; /* len_int(123.4) = 3 */
for (int i = 0; i < len_in; ++i) if (in[i] == '.') len_int = i;
int pos = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < len_in; ++i) {
if (i>0 && i<len_int && (len_int-i)%3==0)
out[pos++] = ',';
out[pos++] = in[i];
}
out[pos] = 0; /* Append the '\0' */
}
Example, to print a formatted double:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define COUNT_DIGIT_MAX 100
int main() {
double sum = 30678.7414;
char input[COUNT_DIGIT_MAX+1] = { 0 }, output[COUNT_DIGIT_MAX+1] = { 0 };
snprintf(input, COUNT_DIGIT_MAX, "%.2f", sum/12);
add_commas(input, output);
printf("%s\n", output);
}
Output:
2,556.56
Using C++'s std::string as return value with possibly the least overhead and not using any std library functions (sprintf, to_string, etc.).
string group_digs_c(int num)
{
const unsigned int BUF_SIZE = 128;
char buf[BUF_SIZE] = { 0 }, * pbuf = &buf[BUF_SIZE - 1];
int k = 0, neg = 0;
if (num < 0) { neg = 1; num = num * -1; };
while(num)
{
if (k > 0 && k % 3 == 0)
*pbuf-- = ',';
*pbuf-- = (num % 10) + '0';
num /= 10;
++k;
}
if (neg)
*pbuf = '-';
else
++pbuf;
int cc = buf + BUF_SIZE - pbuf;
memmove(buf, pbuf, cc);
buf[cc] = 0;
string rv = buf;
return rv;
}
Here is a simple portable solution relying on sprintf:
#include <stdio.h>
// assuming out points to an array of sufficient size
char *format_commas(char *out, int n, int min_digits) {
int len = sprintf(out, "%.*d", min_digits, n);
int i = (*out == '-'), j = len, k = (j - i - 1) / 3;
out[j + k] = '\0';
while (k-- > 0) {
j -= 3;
out[j + k + 3] = out[j + 2];
out[j + k + 2] = out[j + 1];
out[j + k + 1] = out[j + 0];
out[j + k + 0] = ',';
}
return out;
}
The code is easy to adapt for other integer types.
There are many interesting contributions here. Some covered all cases, some did not. I picked four of the contributions to test, found some failure cases during testing and then added a solution of my own.
I tested all methods for both accuracy and speed. Even though the OP only requested a solution for one positive number, I upgraded the contributions that didn't cover all possible numbers (so the code below may be slightly different from the original postings). The cases that weren't covered include: 0, negative numbers and the minimum number (INT_MIN).
I changed the declared type from "int" to "long long" since it's more general and all ints will get promoted to long long. I also standardized the call interface to include the number as well as a buffer to contain the formatted string (like some of the contributions) and returned a pointer to the buffer:
char* funcName(long long number_to_format, char* string_buffer);
Including a buffer parameter is considered by some to be "better" than having the function: 1) contain a static buffer (would not be re-entrant) or 2) allocate space for the buffer (would require caller to de-allocate the memory) or 3) print the result directly to stdout (would not be as generally useful since the output may be targeted for a GUI widget, file, pty, pipe, etc.).
I tried to use the same function names as the original contributions to make it easier to refer back to the originals. Contributed functions were modified as needed to pass the accuracy test so that the speed test would be meaningful. The results are included here in case you would like to test more of the contributed techniques for comparison. All code and test code used to generate the results are shown below.
So, here are the results:
Accuracy Test (test cases: LLONG_MIN, -999, -99, 0, 99, 999, LLONG_MAX):
----------------------------------------------------
print_number:
-9,223,372,036,854,775,808, -999, -99, 0, 99, 999, 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
fmtLocale:
-9,223,372,036,854,775,808, -999, -99, 0, 99, 999, 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
fmtCommas:
-9,223,372,036,854,775,808, -999, -99, 0, 99, 999, 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
format_number:
-9,223,372,036,854,775,808, -999, -99, 0, 99, 999, 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
itoa_commas:
-9,223,372,036,854,775,808, -999, -99, 0, 99, 999, 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
Speed Test: (1 million calls, values reflect average time per call)
----------------------------------------------------
print_number: 0.747 us (microsec) per call
fmtLocale: 0.222 us (microsec) per call
fmtCommas: 0.212 us (microsec) per call
format_number: 0.124 us (microsec) per call
itoa_commas: 0.085 us (microsec) per call
Since all contributed techniques are fast (< 1 microsecond on my laptop), unless you need to format millions of numbers, any of the techniques should be acceptable. It's probably best to choose the technique that is most readable to you.
Here is the code:
#line 2 "comma.c"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <locale.h>
#include <limits.h>
// ----------------------------------------------------------
char* print_number( long long n, char buf[32] ) {
long long order_of_magnitude = (n == 0) ? 1
: (long long)pow( 10, ((long long)floor(log10(fabs(n))) / 3) * 3 ) ;
char *ptr = buf;
sprintf(ptr, "%d", n / order_of_magnitude ) ;
for( n %= order_of_magnitude, order_of_magnitude /= 1000;
order_of_magnitude > 0;
n %= order_of_magnitude, order_of_magnitude /= 1000 )
{
ptr += strlen(ptr);
sprintf(ptr, ",%03d", abs(n / order_of_magnitude) );
}
return buf;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------
char* fmtLocale(long long i, char buf[32]) {
sprintf(buf, "%'lld", i); // requires setLocale in main
return buf;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------
char* fmtCommas(long long num, char dst[32]) {
char src[27];
char *p_src = src;
char *p_dst = dst;
const char separator = ',';
int num_len, commas;
num_len = sprintf(src, "%lld", num);
if (*p_src == '-') {
*p_dst++ = *p_src++;
num_len--;
}
for (commas = 2 - num_len % 3;
*p_src;
commas = (commas + 1) % 3)
{
*p_dst++ = *p_src++;
if (commas == 1) {
*p_dst++ = separator;
}
}
*--p_dst = '\0';
return dst;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------
char* format_number(long long n, char out[32]) {
int digit;
int out_index = 0;
long long i = (n < 0) ? -n : n;
if (i == LLONG_MIN) i = LLONG_MAX; // handle MIN, offset by 1
if (i == 0) { out[out_index++] = '0'; } // handle 0
for ( ; i != 0; i /= 10) {
digit = i % 10;
if ((out_index + 1) % 4 == 0) {
out[out_index++] = ',';
}
out[out_index++] = digit + '0';
}
if (n == LLONG_MIN) { out[0]++; } // correct for offset
if (n < 0) { out[out_index++] = '-'; }
out[out_index] = '\0';
// then you reverse the out string
for (int i=0, j = strlen(out) - 1; i<=j; ++i, --j) {
char tmp = out[i];
out[i] = out[j];
out[j] = tmp;
}
return out;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------
char* itoa_commas(long long i, char buf[32]) {
char* p = buf + 31;
*p = '\0'; // terminate string
if (i == 0) { *(--p) = '0'; return p; } // handle 0
long long n = (i < 0) ? -i : i;
if (n == LLONG_MIN) n = LLONG_MAX; // handle MIN, offset by 1
for (int j=0; 1; ++j) {
*--p = '0' + n % 10; // insert digit
if ((n /= 10) <= 0) break;
if (j % 3 == 2) *--p = ','; // insert a comma
}
if (i == LLONG_MIN) { p[24]++; } // correct for offset
if (i < 0) { *--p = '-'; }
return p;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------
// Test Accuracy
// ----------------------------------------------------------
void test_accuracy(char* name, char* (*func)(long long n, char* buf)) {
char sbuf[32]; // string buffer
long long nbuf[] = { LLONG_MIN, -999, -99, 0, 99, 999, LLONG_MAX };
printf("%s:\n", name);
printf(" %s", func(nbuf[0], sbuf));
for (int i=1; i < sizeof(nbuf) / sizeof(long long int); ++i) {
printf(", %s", func(nbuf[i], sbuf));
}
printf("\n");
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------
// Test Speed
// ----------------------------------------------------------
void test_speed(char* name, char* (*func)(long long n, char* buf)) {
int cycleCount = 1000000;
//int cycleCount = 1;
clock_t start;
double elapsed;
char sbuf[32]; // string buffer
start = clock();
for (int i=0; i < cycleCount; ++i) {
char* s = func(LLONG_MAX, sbuf);
}
elapsed = (double)(clock() - start) / (CLOCKS_PER_SEC / 1000000.0);
printf("%14s: %7.3f us (microsec) per call\n", name, elapsed / cycleCount);
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------
int main(int argc, char* argv[]){
setlocale(LC_ALL, "");
printf("\nAccuracy Test: (LLONG_MIN, -999, 0, 99, LLONG_MAX)\n");
printf("----------------------------------------------------\n");
test_accuracy("print_number", print_number);
test_accuracy("fmtLocale", fmtLocale);
test_accuracy("fmtCommas", fmtCommas);
test_accuracy("format_number", format_number);
test_accuracy("itoa_commas", itoa_commas);
printf("\nSpeed Test: 1 million calls\n\n");
printf("----------------------------------------------------\n");
test_speed("print_number", print_number);
test_speed("fmtLocale", fmtLocale);
test_speed("fmtCommas", fmtCommas);
test_speed("format_number", format_number);
test_speed("itoa_commas", itoa_commas);
return 0;
}
Can be done pretty easily...
//Make sure output buffer is big enough and that input is a valid null terminated string
void pretty_number(const char* input, char * output)
{
int iInputLen = strlen(input);
int iOutputBufferPos = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < iInputLen; i++)
{
if((iInputLen-i) % 3 == 0 && i != 0)
{
output[iOutputBufferPos++] = ',';
}
output[iOutputBufferPos++] = input[i];
}
output[iOutputBufferPos] = '\0';
}
Example call:
char szBuffer[512];
pretty_number("1234567", szBuffer);
//strcmp(szBuffer, "1,234,567") == 0
void printfcomma ( long long unsigned int n)
{
char nstring[100];
int m;
int ptr;
int i,j;
sprintf(nstring,"%llu",n);
m=strlen(nstring);
ptr=m%3;
if (ptr)
{ for (i=0;i<ptr;i++) // print first digits before comma
printf("%c", nstring[i]);
printf(",");
}
j=0;
for (i=ptr;i<m;i++) // print the rest inserting commas
{
printf("%c",nstring[i]);
j++;
if (j%3==0)
if(i<(m-1)) printf(",");
}
}
// separate thousands
int digit;
int idx = 0;
static char buffer[32];
char* p = &buffer[32];
*--p = '\0';
for (int i = fCounter; i != 0; i /= 10)
{
digit = i % 10;
if ((p - buffer) % 4 == 0)
*--p = ' ';
*--p = digit + '0';
}

Resources