Is it possible to give a user read access without seeing the code in Zeppelin? - apache-zeppelin

I can give a user read access but I don't want that user to see the code or run. I'd like to share the notebook as a report for that user. Is that possible? I saw same question was asked here a year ago, but I am not sure if there is any update on this?

Zeppelin 0.8.0 has a bad behaviour on that.
Although a user has only read permission to the note, he can switch button "Show editor" and view code behind the error message "Insufficient privileges to write note."

Related

Cannot open or write to database file

I have a problem, and I hope someone can point me in the right direction.
I'm a retired .Net developer. I have a simple recipe database program on my computer that I wrote for me and my wife to store our recipes. It's a very bare bones program; you can create, edit and delete recipe categories, and create, edit and delete recipes in any category. Very basic; it doesn't even have search or print functionality. It was written in Visual Basic using Visual Studio 19. Its data is stored in a Microsoft Access database.
Today, I was tinkering with the program. I don't know what I did, but now when I run the program, when it tries to access the database, I get the error message "cannot open or write to the file....you need permission to view and write its data." No other process is accessing the database, and the file permissions haven't changed since the last time the program ran successfully. I can access the database using Microsoft Access, but I can't access it with my program.
If anyone can give me any ideas how to fix this issue, I'd be very grateful. Thanks.

One user cannot edit data in Access

I have an inventory tracking Access database where a user should be able to open the "Edit Inventory" table, and edit the on-hand values of items in our department. However, the computer that uses this the most is now displaying a message of "This dataset is not updatable." I tried to edit the data from my computer as well as another user, both of which worked just fine. I checked to make sure the mapping of this computer was correct, and it is.
I am by far no expert on Access. This database pre-dates me and the creator has since retired.
That being said, I am wondering if it has to do with how this computer is logged into. Because it is a shared computer, it has very limited access to tools--it is basically only used for this inventory file. Because of the shared status, every time I open access, it asks the user to log into Microsoft, which we then skip because there is no shared Microsoft account. We log into this computer using "computername[departmentname]." I checked the client settings to ensure everything was shared and no locking was occurring. This just began occurring 2 days ago, so it is a very new issue that came up out of the blue.
Any advice or ideas is appreciated! Thank you in advance!

Getting Error Pipe Notifications bind failure "Bucket already bound from another Snowflake account"

I am getting the error: Pipe Notifications bind failure "Bucket already bound from another Snowflake account"
We have 2 accounts, so I removed the bucket references from one account, but I am still getting this error. I have an S3 Integration setup.
Do I need to re-do the integration to get this working properly? I am unable to create additional / new transforms on this pipe.
Does this require Snowflake hands to fix?
Thanks!
Someone (bstora) answered this yesterday with a correct answer, I'm not sure why it's been deleted, but it was 100% correct.
So, to rewrite what they wrote, if this happens to you then you will need to reach out to Snowflake Support to have them determine the correct course of action. There is currently no action you can take as a user to correct or fix this.
This page will show you how to create a support ticket, if you haven't created one in the past.
https://community.snowflake.com/s/article/How-To-Submit-a-Support-Case-in-Snowflake-Lodge

Working on a microsoft access project. I get the error "Query must have one destination field" when I try to open a form

I've never worked with access before and I'm trying to make a change in a form. But when I try to open it, a window will appear saying "Query must have at least one destination field". I don't really know what that means or how to fix it

How can I keep SSMS Find and replace in files "Look In" from changing

In SSMS when I do a
Find and Replace in Files
(default keystroke CTRL+SHIFT+H)
Edit > Find and Replace > Replace in Files
If I set the "Look In" to "Current Document" then do a change and select the Replace All button, the Look In dropdown changes to select
All Open Documents
How can I keep Look In set to whatever I previously have selected? I want to KEEP it set to Current Document
Frankly this behavior is super annoying.
This appears to be an unresolved bug.
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/2593572/ssms-2016-rc2-find-and-replace-window-reverts-to-all-open-documents-are-replacing-all-within-the-current-document
Attempted to submit feedback on that issue on that site but frankly the site UI and attempts to use it were horrid and would not even allow me to submit feedback or comments. Thanks Microsoft for that mess.
Found 2593572 but in
Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 13.0.16106.4
this still exists. This site UI is pretty horrid BTW with "Please Wait...." all over then, after logging in would not even allow comments etc.
So simply closing this question per that; I might consider other tools besides SSMS as a "workaround".
EDIT: As icing on the cake attempted to submit a comment to the posted site admin email at the bottom of the pages:
Message not delivered Your message couldn't be delivered to
datpconn#microsoft.com because the remote server is misconfigured. See
technical details below for more information.
A workaround for this that works for me; open another query window and leave it blank. When you do a replace it defaults to "All Open Documents" instead of "Entire Solution".

Resources