I want to reload my Form on screen wake is there any way to do so? The header disappears since we only call the method to create the form with the title once.
Pre screen lock/app switch
After screen lock/app switch
Whenever I click one of the menu options the header reappears since we then load a new Form
This is implicit and you don't need to do it. I'm assuming that you did something else such as disable the Toolbar or setCommandBehavior which work inconsistently between platforms.
Related
I'm using React, and have a material UI Card that toggles on and off when clicked. I am trying to 1) get the card to toggle on/off correctly if the user long-presses it, and 2) disable the card toggling if the user presses it and slides(drags) away, then releases. Performing these actions with a mouse has all the desired effects, and there are no problems. However, my app is used on a touch-screen monitor (without a mouse) and so I must replicate the same outcomes with touching the screen.
Initially, I was using the onClick event handler to toggle the card. Long pressing with your finger (the first issue) was not properly toggling it. After a bit of research, I learned that mouse and touch events were combined into one: pointer events. So I switched onClick to onPointerUp and it worked magically.
However, this is where the second issue comes in. If the user clicks the card and drags his or her finger away from it and releases, it still gets toggled (using the mouse doesn't have this same effect). I did some digging and according to MDN, pointer capture could be related:
Pointer capture allows events for a particular pointer event (PointerEvent) to be re-targeted to a particular element instead of the normal (or hit test) target at a pointer's location. This can be used to ensure that an element continues to receive pointer events even if the pointer device's contact moves off the element (such as by scrolling or panning).
My question is, why is the mouse click working correctly while touching doesn't? And how does one go about disabling the card getting toggled when your finger is dragged away from it?
Codesandbox of sample
Edit: Forgot to mention, I want the card to toggle correctly as long as the touch is released while on the card (even if it is dragged away and returns). This works fine with the mouse, but for touching, it toggles regardless of where your finger is released.
Edit2: Added codesandbox link.
Some things of note: touch-action is set to none (CSS) and this is where the strange behavior happens, but I need to have it set that way to prevent unwanted touch registers like scrolling.
I also noticed that for mouse clicks, you can select a card by clicking outside the card and dragging into it and releasing the click. I guess since the event is onPointerUp that would make sense. Although this effect is undesirable, users will only use touching in my app so it's not something I have to worry about. Regardless, I would like to understand the right way to approach this and how to achieve my desired effects.
How can I prevent the showing of the Next or Done buttons of the Android VKB in a Codename One app?
Currently, for my app, they are a mess: the next button of the VKB doesn't focus the next field, but the previous. After tons of trials, I didn't find a way to make them working correctly (but there are fine on iOS and on the Simulator). I also tried to override the Layout.overridesTabIndices(com.codename1.ui.Container) and Layout.getChildrenInTraversalOrder(com.codename1.ui.Container) methods in the Form, but nothing changed on Android.
I supposed two possible causes: the use of a Form inside a Form or, more probably, the fact that I replace all the TextFields and Pickers in the same Form (and other components). Maybe the fact that the inner Form is deeply changed results in a confusion for the Android mapping of the "next" button.
That's why my request: because I didn't find a way to make the "next" button useful, I'm asking how I can avoid that it's been shown.
Thank you
Nesting forms would probably mess with the focus traversal/tab order.
Normally you should be able to override public TabIterator getTabIterator(Component start) to return a blank iterator. I'd suggest doing the same for both the parent and child form to disable the "next" feature.
I'm making an accessible web application. One of the feature is a button that allows users to scroll to a certain section of the page. I'm using window.scrollTo(x,y) for this functionality.
Now testing my application using the built-in Mac VoicerOver, I found that although I can click on the button and scroll with no problem, after scrolling, VoiceOver doesn't read anything. Instead I have to click on the mouse one, or use the keyboard equivalents to make it read the content that's on the screen after scrolling.
I'm afraid that some users may not realize that they need another click after clicking on the button. I have two possible solutions:
When the screen reader read the button, it also tells the user that if they want to go to the livechat, they need to click again after clicking on the button. I know how to implement this one, but it looks verbose and dumb.
Change my code so that VoiceOver will read the content after scrolling. I don't know how to implement this one.
The content I would like the screen reader to read is wrapped in a tag.
If you are only scrolling the page, then most screen reader users will not care that you scrolled. With limited or no vision, whether the screen scrolls or not does not matter because the screen cannot be seen.
However, if you are scrolling the page in order to put a certain element into view, then that would benefit screen reader users too.
It sounds like you're trying to do the latter:
allow users to scroll to a certain section of the page
In that case, you also need to put the keyboard focus on that element via the focus() javascript call. Moving the focus will cause VoiceOver to read that content. But to move the focus to a natively non-focusable element (such as an <h2> or a <section> or <p>), the receiving element will need tabindex="-1".
<h2 tabindex="-1" id="myh2">some heading</h2>
and then somewhere you'd have this javascript:
var element = document.getElementById("myh2");
element.focus();
On a given form, we replace one component with another.
The original component is a series of TextFields, and the new form is some informational text and a button. We hide the first one, and show the second one (the UI designer has both Containers within the form).
I tried using scrollRectToVisible with various values but it didn't seem to make any difference with the scrolling.
continueButtonContainer.setHidden(false);
f.forceRevalidate();
Button continueButton =
(Button)StateMachine.GetInstance().findByName("ButtonContinue", f);
f.scrollComponentToVisible(continueButtonContainer);
f.scrollComponentToVisible(continueButton);
I'm expecting the continue button to be near the top of the screen.
If the screen was scrolled before displaying the continue button, the button ends up right at the bottom of the screen (it was below the bottom of the screen before I put in the scrollComponentToVisible line(s).
After the user scrolls the screen, the button goes up to where it needs to be, and stays there.
If the screen is not scrolled, the button appears where it should be.
I know I can probably add some invisible containers underneath the button and force them onto the screen, but I would rather have a slightly more robust solution.
There are a few issues with this. First you are using forceRevalidate which should be used in very rare cases.
Second it seems that you are invoking this on a Form, this is a bit misleading. While it seems that:
f.add(myCmp);
Adds a component to the form it is really a synonym to:
f.getContentPane().add(myCmp);
That's important because you need to invoke the scrollComponentToVisible on the scrollable container which will actually do the work and ideally be the direct parent of said component. I'm assuming it's the content pane in your case but it depends on layout etc.
The last part is letting the layout do its job. If you are invoking this before the form is showing this might not work. Notice that doing it after a call to show is meaningless as the form might take time with transitions. You can use a show listener or override the laidOut callback method to perform things like this.
I'm trying to show a context menu when I left-click a NotifyIcon. Just calling NotifyIcon.ContextMenuStrip.Show() doesn't work very well. A solution has been posted here before that calls a secret method using Reflection:
Dim mi As System.Reflection.MethodInfo = GetType(NotifyIcon).GetMethod("ShowContextMenu", Reflection.BindingFlags.Instance Or Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic)
mi.Invoke(Icon, Nothing)
This works great, except that I also need to control where the menu is shown. I want to wait for the SystemInformation.DoubleClickTime to elapse between receiving the NotifyIcon.MouseUp event and displaying the menu, so that I can handle single-clicks and double-clicks separately. But invoking the ShowContextMenu method displays the menu at the current mouse position when ShowContextMenu is called, not when the icon was actually clicked. Which means that if the mouse moved during the DoubleClickTime, the menu will be displayed in a different part of the screen. So if I can control where the menu is shown, I can just save the mouse coordinates when I receive the MouseUp event, and then I can ensure that the menu is displayed near the icon. Is there a way to do this?
Thanks in advance.
Well, I just discovered that there are existing programs that exhibit this same behavior. I just went through all the icons in my system tray and about half of them do it. If you left-click the icon and then move the mouse during the delay before the menu appears, the menu will appear at the last mouse location, wherever that is on the screen. Snagit is one application that does this. Outlook is the only program in my tray that always shows the menu where I clicked the icon. But Snagit looks like it's using a .NET ContextMenuStrip, while Outlook is probably using a native menu.
So either this is standard behavior, or it's a problem that no one else has been able to solve either. And as a user, I've never noticed this behavior until yesterday when I was testing my own application. So I guess it's not that big of a deal and I won't worry about it.