I'm lately struggling with complex HOC and how I can pass through only the new props defined in it and not any other.
More precisely, suppose my HOC makes use of other HOCs which extends its properties, for instance
const withSession = (WrappedComponent) => {
class SessionProvider extends React.PureComponent {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
login() {
console.log('login'); // this will dispatch some action
// this.props.dispatch...
}
render() {
return (
<WrappedComponent
doLogin={this.login}
{...this.props}
/>
);
}
}
const mapStateToProps = null;
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return {
dispatch,
};
}
const withConnect = connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps);
return compose(
withConnect,
withRouter,
)(injectIntl(SessionProvider));
};
Here the SessionProvider makes use of dispatch and injectIntl which attach properties to its props. However, I don't want to pass those props down to the wrapped component. The idea is to have a SessionProvider HOC which has some API call but only extends the wrapped component with login.
I noticed that if keep {...this.props}, the wrapped component will also get all the props used by the HOC which I don't want to pass through.
So I thought to explicitly define which properties to pass through by decomposing this.props by changing the HOC render method:
render() {
const { dispatch, intl, ...otherProps } = this.props;
return <WrappedComponent doLogin={this.login} { ...otherProps} />;
}
However what happens with this is that if the WrappedComponent itself has dispach or intl props, those are not passed-through the HOC.
Is there anything wrong in what I'm doing? Any better approach? Am I missing anything?
There's nothing wrong in what you're doing. Prop name conflicts is a known issue when using HOCs. So, as far as I can tell, the best alternative you could use is Render Props pattern, which helps to keep components render as declarative as possible. For your case, consider something like this:
class Session extends React.PureComponent {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
login() {
console.log("login"); // this will dispatch some action
// this.props.dispatch...
}
// ...
render() {
return (
<React.Fragment>
{this.props.children({
doLogin: this.login
doLogout: this.logout
// ...
})}
</React.Fragment>
);
}
}
// ...
return compose(
withConnect,
withRouter
)(injectIntl(Session));
And use it from another components:
// ...
render() {
return (
<Session>
{({ doLogin, doLogout }) => (
<React.Fragment>
<SomeComponent doLogin={doLogin} />
<button onClick={doLogout}>Logout</button>
</React.Fragment>
)}
</Session>
)
}
UPDATE:
There's a pretty promising Hooks Proposal available in v16.7.0-alpha. I'm not quite familiar with them yet, but they tend to solve components reusability more efficiently.
You need to copy static properties, for that i use below code.. you can add more properties as per your need
export const REACT_STATICS = {
childContextTypes: true,
contextTypes: true,
defaultProps: true,
displayName: true,
getDefaultProps: true,
mixins: true,
propTypes: true,
type: true
};
export const KNOWN_STATICS = {
name: true,
length: true,
prototype: true,
caller: true,
arguments: true,
arity: true
};
export function hoistStatics(targetComponent, sourceComponent) {
var keys = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(sourceComponent);
for (var i = 0; i < keys.length; ++i) {
const key = keys[i];
if (!REACT_STATICS[key] && !KNOWN_STATICS[key]) {
try {
targetComponent[key] = sourceComponent[key];
} catch (error) {}
}
}
return targetComponent;
}
// in HOC
const hoistedSessionProvider = hoistStatics(SessionProvider, WrappedComponent);
// use hoistedSessionProvider in compose
Related
Currently I have this code from my AppContext.js file
import React, { Component, createContext } from 'react';
export const AppContext = createContext();
export class AppProvider extends Component {
state = {
test: '',
};
getEntries() {
console.log('FIRED');
this.setState({test: 'HELLO'});
}
render() {
return (
<AppContext.Provider
value={{
...this.state,
getEntries: this.getEntries
}}
>
{this.props.children}
</AppContext.Provider>
);
}
}
I'm calling the getEntries function and its displaying message from the console successfully but the this.setState is not working it says TypeError: this.setState is not a function
The problem here is this is not bound to the right context.
The simplest workaround is probably to use this syntax:
getEntries = () => {
...
}
There are several ways in React to bind this to the class context: check this article for other ways.
getEntries function needs to be bind to the component. The simple way to do it is to use arrow function as shown below.
getEntries = () => {
console.log('FIRED');
this.setState({test: 'HELLO'});
}
The second way to bind getEnteries method to the component is
constructor(props) {
super(props);
// This binding is necessary to make `this` work in the callback
this.getEntries = this.getEntries.bind(this);
}
Sorry if this question displays a lack of understanding of the react paradigm which I suspect it does however I am very new to the tech.
I want to dispatch an action from my 'actions' code which should ultimately call a function on a nested component. Up to now I have been simply modifying state by dispatching actions and catching them in the reducer which works fine.
I am working on a portlet as part of a wider framework and I can capture an onExport() message in the actions. From here I have no idea of the best way to call the nested component (I need access to the inner ag-grid in the nested component to export it).
I have considered introducing some new 'exportRequested' state flag and setting this in the reducer then using componentDidReceiveProps in the nested component. I have also been studying the 'connect' idea and this seems right in so far as it would allow me to expose the function and connect it to the store but I can't seem to join the dots and figure out how to invoke it from the reducer. Is there some way to sort of dispatch an action and catch it directly in the nested component?
some code:
Container:
import {initData} from '/actions';
export class MainComponent extends PureComponent {
static propTypes = {
initData: func.isRequired,
data: array.isRequired,
};
static defaultProps = {
data: [],
};
componentDidMount() {
this.props.initData();
}
render() {
const { data } = this.props;
return (
<div>
<ChildGrid data={data} />
</div>
);
}
}
export default connect(
state => ({
data: getData(state),
}),
{ initData }
)(MainComponent);
Nested Grid:
export class ChildGrid extends PureComponent {
static propTypes = {
data: array.isRequired,
};
static defaultProps = {
data: [],
};
exportData() {
// HOW TO MESSAGE THIS FROM ACTIONS. I want to call DataGrid.gridApi.exportAsCsv()
}
render() {
const { data } = this.props;
return (
<div>
<DataGrid
rowData={data}
/>
</div>
);
}
}
You thought of the correct solution to your problem, by creating a state flag in your redux store then listening to the change of that property in your nested component. Unfortunately in Redux we can't listen to specific events or specific state property changes of the Redux store.
The implementation of such a solution is as follows:
ChildGrid.jsx
class ChildGrid extends PureComponent {
static propTypes = {
data: array.isRequired,
};
static defaultProps = {
data: [],
};
componentWillReceiveProps(newProps) {
if (newProps.exportRequested) {
this.exportData();
}
}
exportData() {
DataGrid.gridApi.exportAsCsv();
}
render() {
const { data } = this.props;
return (
<div>
<DataGrid
rowData={data}
/>
</div>
);
}
}
const mapStateToProps = (state) => {
return {
reduxExportRequested: state.exportRequested
};
};
export default connect(mapStateToProps)(ChildGrid);
I'm new to React Router and trying to do a redirect from inside a provider using the new Conext API. basically my provider looks like this.
/* AuthContext.js */
class AuthProvider extends React.Component {
state = { isLoggedIn: false }
constructor() {
super()
this.login = this.login.bind(this)
this.logout = this.logout.bind(this)
}
login() {
this.setState({ isLoggedIn: true })
// Need to redirect to Dashboard Here
}
logout() {
this.setState({ isLoggedIn: false })
}
render() {
return (
<AuthContext.Provider
value={{
isLoggedIn: this.state.isLoggedIn,
login: this.login,
logout: this.logout
}}
>
{this.props.children}
</AuthContext.Provider>
)
}
}
const AuthConsumer = AuthContext.Consumer
export { AuthProvider, AuthConsumer }
I've read a lot about how to pass the history object using props and how to use a component but I can't see how these approaches would work here. My context provider sits at the top of the tree so it's not a child of the Router so I can't pass props. It's also not a standard component so I can't just insert a component, unless I've misunderstood something (which is very possible).
Edit: Looks like the way to go is withRouter, but how to export my AuthProvider in the code above so that history.push is available in my login function? As you can see I'm exporting multiple components wrapped in {} so can you wrap one of these in a HOC and do you have to explicitly pass history in or is it always available inside the component that's being wrapped?
use withRouter, sth like this to get access of history.
const AuthButton = withRouter( ({ history }) =>history.push("/"));
Try This:
import { Route } from "react-router-dom";
class AuthProvider extends React.Component {
yourFunction = () => {
doSomeAsyncAction(() =>
this.props.history.push('/dashboard')
)
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Form onSubmit={ this.yourFunction } />
</div>
)
}
}
export default withRouter(AuthProvider);
Best explanation can be found here: Programmatically navigate using react router
Using recompose is it possible to call a bound method of an enhaced component? For instance the onClick on the example below on "SomeOtherComponent"
class BaseComponent extends Component {
constructor (props) {
super(props)
this.myBoundMethod = this._myBoundMethod.bind(this)
}
_myBoundMethod () {
return this.something
}
render () {
return (<h1>{'Example'}</h1>)
}
}
const Enhaced = compose(
/* Any number of HOCs ...
lifecycle,
withProps,
withStateHandlers
*/
)(BaseComponent)
class SomeOtherComponent extends Component {
constructor (props) {
super(props)
this.handleClick = this._handleClick.bind(this)
}
_handleClick () {
console.log(this._enhacedComponent.myBoundMethod())
}
render () {
<div>
<Enhaced ref={(c) => {this._enhacedComponent = c}} />
<button onClick={this.handleClick}>Click</Button>
</div>
}
}
I'm aware of hoistStatics but I don't know how to make it for a bound method.
hoistStatics only hoists static properties, but what you need is instance methods.
Here is a way to achieve what you want in Recompose. First, rename ref callback to, for example, forwardedRef:
<Enhaced fowardedRef={(c) => { this._enhacedComponent = c }} />
Then, use withProps as the last HOC to rename fowardedRef to ref:
const Enhaced = compose(
/* ... other HOCs ... */
withProps(({ fowardedRef }) => ({ ref: fowardedRef }))
)(BaseComponent)
Now, the ref callback is passed to BaseComponent.
The whole running example is here https://codesandbox.io/s/6y0513xpxk
I have a scenario where I want to create an HOC that detects mouse events (e.g. mouseenter, mouseleave) when they occur on the HOC's WrappedComponent, then pass the WrappedComponent a special prop (e.g. componentIsHovered). I got this working by using a ref callback to get the wrapped component instance, then adding event listeners to the wrapped instance in my HOC.
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom'
export default (WrappedComponent) => {
return class DetectHover extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.handleMouseEnter = this.handleMouseEnter.bind(this)
this.handleMouseLeave = this.handleMouseLeave.bind(this)
this.bindListeners = this.bindListeners.bind(this)
this.state = {componentIsHovered: false}
this.wrappedComponent = null
}
componentWillUnmount() {
if (this.wrappedComponent) {
this.wrappedComponent.removeEventListener('mouseenter', this.handleMouseEnter)
this.wrappedComponent.removeEventListener('mouseleave', this.handleMouseLeave)
}
}
handleMouseEnter() {
this.setState({componentIsHovered: true})
}
handleMouseLeave() {
this.setState({componentIsHovered: false})
}
bindListeners(wrappedComponentInstance) {
console.log('wrappedComponentInstance', wrappedComponentInstance)
if (!wrappedComponentInstance) {
return
}
this.wrappedComponent = ReactDOM.findDOMNode(wrappedComponentInstance)
this.wrappedComponent.addEventListener('mouseenter', this.handleMouseEnter)
this.wrappedComponent.addEventListener('mouseleave', this.handleMouseLeave)
}
render() {
const props = Object.assign({}, this.props, {ref: this.bindListeners})
return (
<WrappedComponent
componentIsHovered={this.state.componentIsHovered}
{...props}
/>
)
}
}
}
The problem is that this only seems to work when WrappedComponent is a class component — with functional components the ref is always null. I would just as soon place the WrappedComponent inside <div></div> tags in my HOC and carry out the event detection on that div wrapper, but the problem is that even plain div tags will style the WrappedComponent as a block element, which doesn’t work in my use case where the HOC should work on inline elements, too. Any suggestions are appreciated!
You can pass the css selector and the specific styles you need to the Higher Order Component like this:
import React, {Component} from 'react';
const Hoverable = (WrappedComponent, wrapperClass = '', hoveredStyle=
{}, unhoveredStyle={}) => {
class HoverableComponent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
hovered: false,
}
}
onMouseEnter = () => {
this.setState({hovered: true});
};
onMouseLeave = () => {
this.setState({hovered: false});
};
render() {
return(
<div
className={wrapperClass}
onMouseEnter= { this.onMouseEnter }
onMouseLeave= { this.onMouseLeave }
>
<WrappedComponent
{...this.props}
hovered={this.state.hovered}
/>
</div>
);
}
}
return HoverableComponent;
};
export default Hoverable;
And use Fragment instead of div to wrap your component:
class SomeComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
return(
<Fragment>
<h1>My content</h1>
</Fragment>
)
}
And then wrap it like this
const HoverableSomeComponent = Hoverable(SomeComponent, 'css-selector');