Related to this question, but a different error: Other Question
I have tried both the Swift 3 as well as the Swift 4 code from this question:
Shuffle Link
I am using Swift 3.2, and when using the Swift 3 code it yelled at me for not using SwapAt, so I've included the Swift 4 code, but I tried both, with the same result.
When using the shuffle() method, I get the error Variable 'offerCardsShuffled' inferred to have type '()', which may be unexpected, and the obvious error afterwards, Value of tuple type '()' has no member 'enumerated'
I'm not sure what would be causing this, as other people using this code don't seem to be having that problem. Why are my shuffled arrays coming up as empty tuples?
Note I am fairly new to Swift development so a thorough explanation is definitely helpful.
func displayOfferCards() -> Void {
//let offerCardsr = allOfferCards().reversed()
var offerCards = allOfferCards()
var offerCardsShuffled = offerCards.shuffle()
for (index, offerCard) in offerCardsShuffled.enumerated() {
let delay = Double(index) * 0.2
offerCard.display(delay: delay)
}
}
}
func allOfferCards() -> [OfferCard]{
guard dataSource != nil else {
return []
}
let numberOfCards = self.dataSource!.kolodaNumberOfCards(self)
var offerCards = [OfferCard]()
for i in 0..<numberOfCards {
let offerCard = viewForCard(at: i)
if let offerCard = offerCard {
offerCards.append(offerCard as! OfferCard)
}
}
return offerCards
}
extension MutableCollection {
/// Shuffles the contents of this collection.
mutating func shuffle() {
let c = count
guard c > 1 else { return }
for (firstUnshuffled, unshuffledCount) in zip(indices, stride(from: c, to: 1, by: -1)) {
let d: IndexDistance = numericCast(arc4random_uniform(numericCast(unshuffledCount)))
let i = index(firstUnshuffled, offsetBy: d)
swapAt(firstUnshuffled, i)
}
}
}
extension Sequence {
/// Returns an array with the contents of this sequence, shuffled.
func shuffled() -> [Element] {
var result = Array(self)
result.shuffle()
return result
}
}
Your shuffle method modifies the original collection, it does not return a new collection.
Change:
var offerCardsShuffled = offerCards.shuffle()
to:
offerCards.shuffle()
and replace the use of offerCardsShuffled with offerCards in the remaining code.
How can a swift array be extended to access members of a particular type?
This is relevant if an array contains instances of multiple classes which inherit from the same superclass. Ideally it would enforce type checking appropriately.
Some thoughts and things that don't quite work:
Using the filter(_:) method works fine, but does enforce type safety. For example:
protocol MyProtocol { }
struct TypeA: MyProtocol { }
struct TypeB: MyProtocol { }
let myStructs:[MyProtocol] = [ TypeA(), TypeA(), TypeB() ]
let filteredArray = myStructs.filter({ $0 is TypeA })
the filteredArray contains the correct values, but the type remains [MyProtocol] not [TypeA]. I would expect replacing the last with let filteredArray = myStructs.filter({ $0 is TypeA }) as! [TypeA] would resolve that, but the project fails with EXEC_BAD_INSTRUCTION which I do not understand. Perhaps type casting arrays is not possible?
Ideally this behavior could be wrapped up in an array extension. The following doesn't compile:
extension Array {
func objectsOfType<T:Element>(type:T.Type) -> [T] {
return filter { $0 is T } as! [T]
}
}
Here there seem to be at least two problems: the type constraint T:Element doesn't seem to work. I'm not sure what the correct way to add a constraint based on a generic type. My intention here is to say T is a subtype of Element. Additionally there are compile time errors on line 3, but this could just be the same error propagating.
SequenceType has a flatMap() method which acts as an "optional filter":
extension SequenceType {
/// Return an `Array` containing the non-nil results of mapping
/// `transform` over `self`.
///
/// - Complexity: O(*M* + *N*), where *M* is the length of `self`
/// and *N* is the length of the result.
#warn_unused_result
#rethrows public func flatMap<T>(#noescape transform: (Self.Generator.Element) throws -> T?) rethrows -> [T]
}
Combined with matt's suggestion to use as? instead of is you
can use it as
let myStructs:[MyProtocol] = [ TypeA(), TypeA(), TypeB() ]
let filteredArray = myStructs.flatMap { $0 as? TypeA }
Now the type of filteredArray is inferred as [TypeA].
As an extension method it would be
extension Array {
func objectsOfType<T>(type:T.Type) -> [T] {
return flatMap { $0 as? T }
}
}
let filteredArray = myStructs.objectsOfType(TypeA.self)
Note: For Swift >= 4.1, replace flatMap by compactMap.
Instead of testing (with is) how about casting (with as)?
let myStructs:[MyProtocol] = [ TypeA(), TypeA(), TypeB() ]
var filteredArray = [TypeA]()
for case let t as TypeA in myStructs {filteredArray.append(t)}
Casting arrays does not work in Swift. This is because arrays in Swift use generics, just like you can't cast a custom class, where only the type T changes. (class Custom<T>, Custom<Int>() as! Custom<String>).
What you can do is create an extension method to Array, where you define a method like this:
extension Array {
func cast<TOut>() -> [TOut] {
var result: [TOut] = []
for item in self where item is TOut {
result.append(item as! TOut)
}
return result
}
}
I think the canonical FP answer would be to use filter, as you are, in combination with map:
let filteredArray = myStructs.filter({ $0 is TypeA }).map({ $0 as! TypeA })
alternatively, you can use reduce:
let filtered2 = myStructs.reduce([TypeA]()) {
if let item = $1 as? TypeA {
return $0 + [item]
} else {
return $0
}
}
or, somewhat less FP friendly since it mutates an array:
let filtered3 = myStructs.reduce([TypeA]()) { ( var array, value ) in
if let item = value as? TypeA {
array.append(item)
}
return array
}
which can actually be shortened into the once again FP friendly flatMap:
let filtered4 = myStructs.flatMap { $0 as? TypeA }
And put it in an extension as:
extension Array {
func elementsWithType<T>() -> [T] {
return flatMap { $0 as? T }
}
}
let filtered5 : [TypeA] = myStructs.elementsWithType()
This question already has answers here:
Is it possible to add type constraints to a Swift protocol conformance extension?
(2 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
In swift 2 I want to extend Array type. I have a JSONDecodable protocol. What i want to say to compiler is conform Arrayto protocol JSONDecodable if elements of Array are also JSONDecodable. Here is the code:
public protocol JSONDecodable {
static func createFromJSON(json: [String: AnyObject]) throws -> Self
}
extension Array: JSONDecodable where Element: JSONDecodable {
}
But compiler gives the error: "Extension of type Array with constraints cannot have an inheritance clause"
So is there any other way to accomplish this kind of behavior?
how about little type erasure? It should do the tick
protocol JSONDecodable {
init(json: JSON) throws
}
While Swift 3 doesn't allow do like extension
extension Array: JSONDecodable where Element: JSONDecodable
but its possible to do:
extension Array: JSONDecodable {
init(json: JSON) throws {
guard let jsonArray = json.array,
let decodable = Element.self as? JSONDecodable.Type else {
throw JSONDecodableError.undecodable
}
self = jsonArray.flatMap { json in
let result: Element? = (try? decodable.init(json: json)) as? Element
return result
}
}
}
I think the hint you found on Twitter means something like that:
protocol X {
var xxx: String { get }
}
// This is a wrapper struct
struct XArray: X {
let array: Array<X>
var xxx: String {
return "[\(array.map({ $0.xxx }).joinWithSeparator(", "))]"
}
}
// Just for this demo
extension String: X {
var xxx: String {
return "x\(self)"
}
}
let xs = XArray(array: ["a", "b", "c"])
print(xs.array) // ["a", "b", "c"]
print(xs.xxx) // [xa, xb, xc]
In Swift, how can I check if an element exists in an array? Xcode does not have any suggestions for contain, include, or has, and a quick search through the book turned up nothing. Any idea how to check for this? I know that there is a method find that returns the index number, but is there a method that returns a boolean like ruby's #include??
Example of what I need:
var elements = [1,2,3,4,5]
if elements.contains(5) {
//do something
}
Swift 2, 3, 4, 5:
let elements = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
if elements.contains(5) {
print("yes")
}
contains() is a protocol extension method of SequenceType (for sequences of Equatable elements) and not a global method as in
earlier releases.
Remarks:
This contains() method requires that the sequence elements
adopt the Equatable protocol, compare e.g. Andrews's answer.
If the sequence elements are instances of a NSObject subclass
then you have to override isEqual:, see NSObject subclass in Swift: hash vs hashValue, isEqual vs ==.
There is another – more general – contains() method which does not require the elements to be equatable and takes a predicate as an
argument, see e.g. Shorthand to test if an object exists in an array for Swift?.
Swift older versions:
let elements = [1,2,3,4,5]
if contains(elements, 5) {
println("yes")
}
For those who came here looking for a find and remove an object from an array:
Swift 1
if let index = find(itemList, item) {
itemList.removeAtIndex(index)
}
Swift 2
if let index = itemList.indexOf(item) {
itemList.removeAtIndex(index)
}
Swift 3, 4
if let index = itemList.index(of: item) {
itemList.remove(at: index)
}
Swift 5.2
if let index = itemList.firstIndex(of: item) {
itemList.remove(at: index)
}
Updated for Swift 2+
Note that as of Swift 3 (or even 2), the extension below is no longer necessary as the global contains function has been made into a pair of extension method on Array, which allow you to do either of:
let a = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
a.contains(2) // => true, only usable if Element : Equatable
a.contains { $0 < 1 } // => false
Historical Answer for Swift 1:
Use this extension: (updated to Swift 5.2)
extension Array {
func contains<T>(obj: T) -> Bool where T: Equatable {
return !self.filter({$0 as? T == obj}).isEmpty
}
}
Use as:
array.contains(1)
If you are checking if an instance of a custom class or struct is contained in an array, you'll need to implement the Equatable protocol before you can use .contains(myObject).
For example:
struct Cup: Equatable {
let filled:Bool
}
static func ==(lhs:Cup, rhs:Cup) -> Bool { // Implement Equatable
return lhs.filled == rhs.filled
}
then you can do:
cupArray.contains(myCup)
Tip: The == override should be at the global level, not within your class/struct
I used filter.
let results = elements.filter { el in el == 5 }
if results.count > 0 {
// any matching items are in results
} else {
// not found
}
If you want, you can compress that to
if elements.filter({ el in el == 5 }).count > 0 {
}
Hope that helps.
Update for Swift 2
Hurray for default implementations!
if elements.contains(5) {
// any matching items are in results
} else {
// not found
}
(Swift 3)
Check if an element exists in an array (fulfilling some criteria), and if so, proceed working with the first such element
If the intent is:
To check whether an element exist in an array (/fulfils some boolean criteria, not necessarily equality testing),
And if so, proceed and work with the first such element,
Then an alternative to contains(_:) as blueprinted Sequence is to first(where:) of Sequence:
let elements = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
if let firstSuchElement = elements.first(where: { $0 == 4 }) {
print(firstSuchElement) // 4
// ...
}
In this contrived example, its usage might seem silly, but it's very useful if querying arrays of non-fundamental element types for existence of any elements fulfilling some condition. E.g.
struct Person {
let age: Int
let name: String
init(_ age: Int, _ name: String) {
self.age = age
self.name = name
}
}
let persons = [Person(17, "Fred"), Person(16, "Susan"),
Person(19, "Hannah"), Person(18, "Sarah"),
Person(23, "Sam"), Person(18, "Jane")]
if let eligableDriver = persons.first(where: { $0.age >= 18 }) {
print("\(eligableDriver.name) can possibly drive the rental car in Sweden.")
// ...
} // Hannah can possibly drive the rental car in Sweden.
let daniel = Person(18, "Daniel")
if let sameAgeAsDaniel = persons.first(where: { $0.age == daniel.age }) {
print("\(sameAgeAsDaniel.name) is the same age as \(daniel.name).")
// ...
} // Sarah is the same age as Daniel.
Any chained operations using .filter { ... some condition }.first can favourably be replaced with first(where:). The latter shows intent better, and have performance advantages over possible non-lazy appliances of .filter, as these will pass the full array prior to extracting the (possible) first element passing the filter.
Check if an element exists in an array (fulfilling some criteria), and if so, remove the first such element
A comment below queries:
How can I remove the firstSuchElement from the array?
A similar use case to the one above is to remove the first element that fulfils a given predicate. To do so, the index(where:) method of Collection (which is readily available to array collection) may be used to find the index of the first element fulfilling the predicate, whereafter the index can be used with the remove(at:) method of Array to (possible; given that it exists) remove that element.
var elements = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
if let indexOfFirstSuchElement = elements.index(where: { $0 == "c" }) {
elements.remove(at: indexOfFirstSuchElement)
print(elements) // ["a", "b", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
}
Or, if you'd like to remove the element from the array and work with, apply Optional:s map(_:) method to conditionally (for .some(...) return from index(where:)) use the result from index(where:) to remove and capture the removed element from the array (within an optional binding clause).
var elements = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
if let firstSuchElement = elements.index(where: { $0 == "c" })
.map({ elements.remove(at: $0) }) {
// if we enter here, the first such element have now been
// remove from the array
print(elements) // ["a", "b", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
// and we may work with it
print(firstSuchElement) // c
}
Note that in the contrived example above the array members are simple value types (String instances), so using a predicate to find a given member is somewhat over-kill, as we might simply test for equality using the simpler index(of:) method as shown in #DogCoffee's answer. If applying the find-and-remove approach above to the Person example, however, using index(where:) with a predicate is appropriate (since we no longer test for equality but for fulfilling a supplied predicate).
An array that contains a property that equals to
yourArray.contains(where: {$0.propertyToCheck == value })
Returns boolean.
The simplest way to accomplish this is to use filter on the array.
let result = elements.filter { $0==5 }
result will have the found element if it exists and will be empty if the element does not exist. So simply checking if result is empty will tell you whether the element exists in the array. I would use the following:
if result.isEmpty {
// element does not exist in array
} else {
// element exists
}
Swift 4/5
Another way to achieve this is with the filter function
var elements = [1,2,3,4,5]
if let object = elements.filter({ $0 == 5 }).first {
print("found")
} else {
print("not found")
}
As of Swift 2.1 NSArrays have containsObjectthat can be used like so:
if myArray.containsObject(objectImCheckingFor){
//myArray has the objectImCheckingFor
}
Array
let elements = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5]
Check elements presence
elements.contains(5) // true
Get elements index
elements.firstIndex(of: 5) // 4
elements.firstIndex(of: 10) // nil
Get element count
let results = elements.filter { element in element == 5 }
results.count // 2
Just in case anybody is trying to find if an indexPath is among the selected ones (like in a UICollectionView or UITableView cellForItemAtIndexPath functions):
var isSelectedItem = false
if let selectedIndexPaths = collectionView.indexPathsForSelectedItems() as? [NSIndexPath]{
if contains(selectedIndexPaths, indexPath) {
isSelectedItem = true
}
}
if user find particular array elements then use below code same as integer value.
var arrelemnts = ["sachin", "test", "test1", "test3"]
if arrelemnts.contains("test"){
print("found") }else{
print("not found") }
Here is my little extension I just wrote to check if my delegate array contains a delegate object or not (Swift 2). :) It Also works with value types like a charm.
extension Array
{
func containsObject(object: Any) -> Bool
{
if let anObject: AnyObject = object as? AnyObject
{
for obj in self
{
if let anObj: AnyObject = obj as? AnyObject
{
if anObj === anObject { return true }
}
}
}
return false
}
}
If you have an idea how to optimize this code, than just let me know.
Swift
If you are not using object then you can user this code for contains.
let elements = [ 10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
if elements.contains(50) {
print("true")
}
If you are using NSObject Class in swift. This variables is according to my requirement. you can modify for your requirement.
var cliectScreenList = [ATModelLeadInfo]()
var cliectScreenSelectedObject: ATModelLeadInfo!
This is for a same data type.
{ $0.user_id == cliectScreenSelectedObject.user_id }
If you want to AnyObject type.
{ "\($0.user_id)" == "\(cliectScreenSelectedObject.user_id)" }
Full condition
if cliectScreenSelected.contains( { $0.user_id == cliectScreenSelectedObject.user_id } ) == false {
cliectScreenSelected.append(cliectScreenSelectedObject)
print("Object Added")
} else {
print("Object already exists")
}
what about using a hash table for the job, like this?
first, creating a "hash map" generic function, extending the Sequence protocol.
extension Sequence where Element: Hashable {
func hashMap() -> [Element: Int] {
var dict: [Element: Int] = [:]
for (i, value) in self.enumerated() {
dict[value] = i
}
return dict
}
}
This extension will work as long as the items in the array conform to Hashable, like integers or strings, here is the usage...
let numbers = Array(0...50)
let hashMappedNumbers = numbers.hashMap()
let numToDetect = 35
let indexOfnumToDetect = hashMappedNumbers[numToDetect] // returns the index of the item and if all the elements in the array are different, it will work to get the index of the object!
print(indexOfnumToDetect) // prints 35
But for now, let's just focus in check if the element is in the array.
let numExists = indexOfnumToDetect != nil // if the key does not exist
means the number is not contained in the collection.
print(numExists) // prints true
Swift 4.2 +
You can easily verify your instance is an array or not by the following function.
func verifyIsObjectOfAnArray<T>(_ object: T) -> Bool {
if let _ = object as? [T] {
return true
}
return false
}
Even you can access it as follows. You will receive nil if the object wouldn't be an array.
func verifyIsObjectOfAnArray<T>(_ object: T) -> [T]? {
if let array = object as? [T] {
return array
}
return nil
}
You can add an extension for Array as such:
extension Array {
func contains<T>(_ object: T) -> Bool where T: Equatable {
!self.filter {$0 as? T == object }.isEmpty
}
}
This can be used as:
if myArray.contains(myItem) {
// code here
}