How do I make a directive run a function like the other built in directives in angular?
In example:
<div ng-repeat="someId in myList" my-directive="runFunctionInScope(someId, divHtmlElement)" />
myApp.directive('myDirective', function ()
{
return function (scope, element, attrs)
{
//??
}
}
You can try something like the below code snippet. Also please check this plunker for working example of your given scenario.
Template:
<div ng-repeat="someId in myList" my-method='theMethodToBeCalled' my-id='someId.id' />
Controller:
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.myList=[{
id: 1,
value: 'One'
}, {
id: 2,
value: 'Two'
}];
$scope.theMethodToBeCalled = function(id) {
alert(id);
};
});
Directive:
app.directive("myMethod",function($parse) {
var directiveDefinitionObject = {
restrict: 'A',
scope: {
method:'&myMethod',
id: '=myId'
},
link: function(scope,element,attrs) {
var expressionHandler = scope.method();
expressionHandler(scope.id);
}
};
return directiveDefinitionObject;
});
Related
I am new in angular and stuck in a conceptual problem. I am not able to access "game" service in "helloWorld" directive.
expected = Name : WarCraft
Actual = Name :
Here is my js and html file :
JS code :
var app = angular.module("app",[]);
app.provider("game", function () {
var type;
return {
setType: function (value) {
type = value;
},
$get: function () {
return {
title: type + "Craft"
};
}
};
});
app.config(function (gameProvider) {
gameProvider.setType("War");
});
app.controller("AppCtrl", function ($scope,game) {
$scope.title = game.title;
});
app.directive('helloWorld', ["game",function (game) {
return {
template: 'Name : {{game.title}}'
};
}])
HTML :
<title>Services</title>
<script src="angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="my-file.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-app="app">
<div ng-controller="AppCtrl">{{title}} </div>
<hello-world></hello-world>
</body>
something like this:
app.directive('helloWorld', ["game",function (game) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {},
link: function (scope, elem, attrs, ctrl) {
scope.title = game.title;
},
template: 'Name : {{title}}'
};
}])
Access your game service in controller, which will be available in your template. If you need it only in template, inject it only in controller... your link or other function need not know.
app.directive('helloWorld', function () {
return {
controller: function($scope, game) {
$scope.game = game;
},
template: 'Name : {{game.title}}'
};
}])
Here is solution on plunker, to play around.
Just put define variable which will be used by view and set to it needed value.
app.directive('helloWorld', ["game", function(game) {
return {
template: 'Name : {{game.title}}',
link: function(scope) {
scope.game = game;
}
};
}])
I have a directive which loads a image data template.
The problem is that It doesn't update the image date after the service which retrieve the img information is called.
This is my code:
Controller method:
$scope.watchImage = function(file_id){
FileService.getFile(file_id)
.then(
function(data){
if(data.file){
$scope.img = data.file;
console.log('Service called');
}
}
);
}
Directive:
app.directive('imageDetails', function() {
return {
scope: {
img: '='
},
restrict: 'E',
link: function($scope, element, attrs){
$scope.$watch(function() {
return $scope.img;
}, function() {
console.log($scope.img);
});
},
template: 'IMG: {img}'
};
});
HTML:
<div class="ui container">
<h2 class="ui dividing header">Images</h2>
</div>
<div ng-view></div>
<image-details img="img"></image-details>
</div>
Log result:
undefined
Service called
Any idea how to solve it ?
Thanks!
First of all, thank you to everyone for your replies. All of them help me in the solution.
Finally this is my working code.
Directive:
app.directive('imageDetails', function() {
return {
scope: {
img: '='
},
restrict: 'E',
template: 'IMG: {{img}}'
};
});
And I added the directive to my template (I was adding it outside ngview).
you have some mistake in template and in link function.
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('mainCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.img = {id: 1, title: "avatar.jpeg", slug: "avatar.jpeg", filesize: 24875, created_at: "2016-03-10 11:44:59"};
})
app.directive('imageDetails', function() {
return {
scope: {
img: '='
},
restrict: 'E',
link: function(scope, element, attrs){
scope.$evalAsync(function() {
return scope.img;
});
},
template: 'IMG: {{img}}'
};
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="mainCtrl">
<image-details img="img"></image-details>
</div>
I think your directive should be Like :
app.directive('imageDetails', function() {
return {
scope: {
img: '='
},
restrict: 'E',
link: function(scope, element, attrs){
scope.$watch('img',function(image) {
return image;
}, function() {
console.log(image);
});
},
template: 'IMG: {img}'
};
});
First of all use a controller instead of link function because you don't need that. Link function is deprecated for simple components like this in angular 1.5.
Then, for using $watch, you need to specify what variable you want to watch, and only after what to do when it's change.
$watch('varToWatch', function(newValue) {...});
That said, if you use a controller instead of the link function, you probably use also a "Controller as" syntax. When you use it, you need to specify the "view name" of the variable you want to watch. For example:
app.directive('imageDetails', function() {
return {
scope: {
img: '='
},
restrict: 'E',
controllerAs: '$ctrl',
controller: function($scope){
$scope.$watch('$ctrl.img', function(newVal) {
console.log(newVal);
// if you want you can assign new value to your variable
// $scope.img = newVal;
});
},
template: 'IMG: {img}'
};
});
Try that and tell me if it's works for you ;)
This is a clear case of when the scope is affected outside the module. For those cases the lifecycle will not do the digest of the scope as you will expect.
You have to manually $digest or $apply when you want to notify your app that the scope have changed inside your directive
I have an element directive (e-dir) and an attribute directive (a-dir) on the same element:
<e-dir a-dir attr="msg"></e-dir>
I pass msg into e-dir's isolate scope via the attr attribute:
app.directive('eDir', function eDir($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
attr: '='
}
};
});
In this way, msg is bound (two-ways) with $scope.attr (in EDirCtrl) or scope.attr (in e-dir's link function).
Is there a simple way I can achieve the same two-way data-binding inside a-dir's directive? Or would you recommend another, simpler approach?
The closest thing I've been able to come up with is to set eDirCtrl.attr = $scope.attr; inside e-dir's controller (EDirCtrl):
app.directive('eDir', function eDir($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
attr: '='
},
controller: function EDirCtrl($scope) {
var eDirCtrl = this;
eDirCtrl.attr = $scope.attr;
},
controllerAs: 'eDirCtrl'
};
});
Then, have a-dir require e-dir, and access attr via e-dir's controller (eDirCtrl.attr):
app.directive('aDir', function aDir($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
require: 'eDir',
link: linkFn
};
function linkFn(scope, element, attrs, eDirCtrl) {
eDirCtrl.attr = 'eDirCtrl.attr';
}
});
But, it's not bound two-ways. As you can see this code snippet:
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.controller('Ctrl', function Ctrl($scope) {
$scope.msg = 'initial message';
})
app.directive('eDir', function eDir($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
attr: '='
},
template: '<div>$scope.attr: {{attr}}</div>'+
'<div>eDirCtrl.attr: {{eDirCtrl.attr}}</div>',
controller: function EDirCtrl($scope) {
var eDirCtrl = this;
eDirCtrl.attr = $scope.attr;
$timeout(function() {
$scope.attr = 'changing $scope.attr also changes msg';
}, 2000);
},
controllerAs: 'eDirCtrl'
};
});
app.directive('aDir', function aDir($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
require: 'eDir',
link: linkFn
};
function linkFn(scope, element, attrs, eDirCtrl) {
$timeout(function() {
eDirCtrl.attr = 'changing eDirCtrl.attr does not effect $scope.attr or msg';
}, 4000);
}
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app="app" ng-controller="Ctrl">
msg: <input type="text" ng-model="msg"><br>
<e-dir a-dir attr="msg"></e-dir>
</div>
The reason the two-way binding isn't working is that attr is being bound to a string rather than an object. In JavaScript, primitives (booleans, numbers, strings) are immutable, so when you change one, the previous instance is discarded and a new one is used. This breaks Angular's two-way binding and any changes to scope.msg are not propagated through attr into the directive.
You can get this to work as expected by setting msg on an object e.g. scope.test.msg and binding attr to test (the object) rather than msg (a string).
I've updated your code snippet to do this:
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.controller('Ctrl', function Ctrl($scope) {
$scope.test = {msg : 'initial message'};
})
app.directive('eDir', function eDir($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
attr: '='
},
template: '<div>$scope.attr: {{attr.msg}}</div>'+
'<div>eDirCtrl.attr: {{eDirCtrl.attr.msg}}</div>',
controller: function EDirCtrl($scope) {
var eDirCtrl = this;
eDirCtrl.attr = $scope.attr;
$timeout(function() {
$scope.attr.msg = 'changing $scope.attr also changes msg';
}, 2000);
},
controllerAs: 'eDirCtrl'
};
});
app.directive('aDir', function aDir($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
require: 'eDir',
link: linkFn
};
function linkFn(scope, element, attrs, eDirCtrl) {
$timeout(function() {
eDirCtrl.attr.msg = 'changing eDirCtrl.attr does not effect $scope.attr or msg';
}, 4000);
}
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app="app" ng-controller="Ctrl">
msg: <input type="text" ng-model="test.msg"><br>
<e-dir a-dir attr="test"></e-dir>
</div>
I'm a bit stuck on an directive which add attributes and recompile the element.
If I had a scope on the directive ng-change is not triggered anymore (without it it works). I based my test on this answer
The HTML
<div ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller='testController'>
<div ng-repeat="field in fields">
<input type="text" ng-model="ngModel[field.fieldName]" property="{{formParams.getProperties(field.fieldName)}}" update-attr ng-change="test()" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
The directive:
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('testController', function ($scope) {
$scope.properties = {
"something": {
"style": "float:left;"
},
"something2": {
"style": "float:right;"
}
};
$scope.ngModel = {};
$scope.fields = [{
fieldName: 'something'
}, {
fieldName: 'something2'
}];
$scope.test = function () {
alert('i dont get triggered');
};
$scope.formParams = {
getProperties: function (fieldName) {
return $scope.properties[fieldName];
}
};
})
.directive('updateAttr', function ($compile) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
replace: true,
terminate: true,
scope: {
ngModel : '='
},
link: function (scope, elem, attrs) {
if (angular.isDefined(attrs['property']) && attrs['property'].lenght != 0) {
var json = JSON.parse(attrs['property']);
angular.forEach(json, function (value, key) {
elem.attr(key, value);
});
elem.removeAttr('property');
var $e = $compile(elem[0].outerHTML)(scope);
elem.replaceWith($e);
}
}
};
});
Here a fork of the fiddle to test with a scope on the directive: fiddle
Do you have any suggestion ?
I found why ng-change was not trigger so I share the answer:
When we add scope attribute on the directive, a new scope is created. So we have to use $scope.$parent for the compilation. I have updated the fiddle with the correction.
If there is a directive defined can the scope passed to it through attributes, defined on it, be used inside this directive to get needed results for usage in template? i.e. I have such directive
var carAuction = angular.module('carAuction');
carAuction
.controller('mainCtrl', function($scope)
{
var car = {
comments: []
};
car.comments.push({
comment: 'Ok car',
rating: 1
});
car.comments.push({
comment: 'Nice car.',
rating: 2
});
car.comments.push({
comment: 'Awesome car!',
rating: 3
});
$scope.car = car;
})
.directive('carCommentRaiting', function()
{
return
{
restrict: 'E',
templateUrl: 'path/to/template.html',
scope:
{
value: '=value',
maxValue: '=max-value'
}
};
})
.filter('range', function()
{
return function(input, total)
{
total = parseInt(total);
for (var i=1; i<=total; i++)
{
input.push(i);
}
return input;
};
});
In html part I have
<div>
<div ng-repeat="comment in car.comments">
Rating: <car-comment-raiting value="comment.rating" max-value="10"></car-comment-raiting>
</div>
</div>
template.html
<div>
<ul class="list-inline">
<li ng-repeat="n in [] | range:value"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-star"></span></li>
</ul>
</div>
And I want to pass additional value to the template which should be calculated as maxValue - value. Haven't found any example describing that. Thought about using link property, but description tells, that it is used for other purpose.
UPD:
I was able to fix it with
return {
restrict: 'E',
templateUrl: 'path/to/template.html',
scope:
{
value: '=',
maxValue: '='
},
controller: function($scope)
{
$scope.calculated = $scope.maxValue - $scope.value;
}
};
but for some reason it doesn't work all the time. One time it works and the other time calculated variable is null.
All calculations must be done inside a direcitve link function or in controller.
Here is example with directive:
.directive('carCommentRaiting', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
template: 'path/to/template.html',
scope: {
value: '=value',
maxValue: '=max-value'
},
link : function(scope, element, attr) {
scope.calculated = scope.maxValue - scope.value;
/// watch value to update calculated on value update:
scope.$watch('value', function(newValue){
scope.calculated = scope.maxValue - newValue;
});
}
};
});