I would like to use Identity Server to authenticate an application against Azure Active Directory. Our company's infrastructure is managed by a contractor. What piece of information do I need to get from them in order for Identity Server to authenticate? Is it an Url that I need? Is it the client that looks like a Guid? That contractor won't give me the information I need unless I'm asking the right question. Also is there an example that's already doing this?
Related
I have a specific problem to which I couldn't find any answer online.
The situation is the following:
We created a Canvas app that connects to the Azure SQL database. We set the connection type to be AAD integrated.
Users that are members of the AD can see the data in the app, but guest users, even though we gave them all the rights and PowerApps plan, cannot see the data. they recieve the same authorization window as members, but when they click on allow, the app starts but no data is being pulled from the SQL database.
When we try to connect directly to the Azure SQL database with the guest user email and credentials (via SQL server management studio), everything works as expected and the guest can see all the tables.
When we use implicitly shared connection (with SQL server authentification), guests can see the data, but we need to use AAD integrated due to its security.
So far we tried:
Changing PA environment from sandbox to production
Adding special permissions in SQL database like database owner etc
Trying out different AAD guest user settings, eq- setting that guest users have the same privileges as members (picture below).
Nothing seems to work. I would be more than happy if you could tell me how to make this work or even push me in the right direction.
I've reproduced your problem in my side. Here's my experience.
After assigning powerapp license(I use O365 E5 here) to guest account and share the app to this account, I can visit the app but can't see the data in the table. I assume that it resulted from the connector hasn't been shared, but it's true that this connector can't be shared because of no 'share button'.
Then I tried to add access policy to my guest account with these two sql:
CREATE USER [tiny-wa_outlook.com#EXT##xx.onmicrosoft.com] FROM EXTERNAL PROVIDER;
GRANT SELECT ON dbo.tinyTest TO [tiny-wa_outlook.com#EXT##xx.onmicrosoft.com];
Pls note here, I used the User Principal Name here(can find the principal name in azure ad->users), I also tested to use 'tiny-wa#outlook.com' in the sql but after executing successfully, it didn't work.
So I think you can try to use the sql above to add your guests accounts and make them can access the powerapp.
Here's some related docs:
create contained users mapped to azure ad identities
Share app resources
add table permission to user
==========================UPDATE==========================
Share my experience of this troubleshot.
First I need to create a power app but I found that after creating the connector with sql server azure ad authentication, it can't connect to the sql server, the error message is like 'Credentials are missing or not valid. inner exception: The credentials provided for the SQL source are invalid', solution is add my admin account as sql server instance Active Directory Admin.
Then I choose a table and successfully create a sample app. With the creating account, I can visit the app but other accounts can't. Here needs to share the app and it's related connectors to other users. But other accounts still can't reach the app because of no license. Because sql server connector is premium connector, so I assign O365 E3 license here. I met an error when assign license, the user's 'Usage location' can't be null or it can't assign license in M365 admin center.
Then I met similar error with Op, the difference is that both member account and guest account can't see the data in app. I try to find the way to share the connector to these uses but failed, I haven't made sure if those connectors without share button can be shared to others. So I have no options to study if this kind of connectors are authenticated in other ways so they don't need to be shared at all.
Next actions is using the account which used to create the sql server and database to sign in database and execute the sqls above.
Then the member account can see data in the power app while the guest account can't see. The reason is I used xx#outlook.com as the parameter in the sql, when I used xx_outlook.com#EXT##xx.onmicrosoft.com, it worked finally.
Hope this can also help you.
===================================================
For creating my demo app: First, I'm sure my environment isn't a sandbox(the environment in the screenshot below). And I think it's easy to create a demo app, and my app is simple, just choose to create an app from data and then select sql server as the connector, next I choose auzre ad auth and click the connector, enter server name and database name then choose a table, after that my app has created. That table has one row of data so when I signed in the app with the creating account, I see it in the screen while other accounts(member or guests) can't.
My sql server instance and database are created long time ago, but I'm sure I followed this tutorial to create them.
This appears to still be a limitation to access to Azure SQL via PA connector for guest users:
https://powerusers.microsoft.com/t5/Power-Apps-Ideas/Azure-SQL-to-PowerApps-Connector-AAD-doesn-t-work-for-guest/idi-p/1637817
If the "guest" does NOT have a PowerApps Per-App/Per-User plan, they cannot use your PowerApps with SQL data source (Note: SQL is a premium connector).
Determine exactly which type of license the guest has. Then, either your organization or the guest (or guest's org) must purchase one of these licenses. $5/$10/$20 per month depending on your use case.
REF
This is a single tenant Active Directory scenario. I have created a User Assigned Managed Identity (UAMI) in a subscription A and and made it as owner of an Azure SQL Server resource which exists in subscription B. Now considering this, is there a PowerShell example template somewhere that can allow me to verify that I am able to access SQL Server using the UAMI. It could be something basic like listing databases or anything like that.
Can someone help me understand the difference between the Service Principal created when I create an App Registration in AAD and the Managed Identity that gets created when I enable "System Assigned" on the Identity blade of an App Service?
We have an App Service that we are developing that we have created an App Registration for and we have also enabled the System Assigned identity. When we go into Enterprise Applications under AAD and search for our app, it comes up with 2 entries. One for the Managed Identity and one for the Service Principal created as part of the App Registration. We are trying to understand which one we would use to give the app permissions to write to an Azure SQL DB.
Managed Identities are essentially service principals wrapped with Microsoft logic to make accessing resources simpler. Although, sometimes adding more layers may complicate things, the idea is to make it easier, simpler, and less consumer interactive.
For your scenario, you'll want to think about what you would like to do. Would you like to have more control and implement your own logic with an Azure SQL DB protected by AAD, or try utilizing Microsoft's Managed Identity to protect/access the Azure SQL DB resource. (Ideally the Managed Identity path should be less work)
The tutorial for using Managed Identities to access an azure SQL db from an app service can be found here :
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/app-service-web-tutorial-connect-msi
The docs for protecting an Azure SQL DB using Azure AD can be found here :
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-aad-authentication
Furthermore Managed Identities are explained in the official Microsoft documentation here :
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/managed-identities-azure-resources/overview
It's important to note that there are two kinds of Managed Identities.
From the documentation:
A system-assigned managed identity is enabled directly on an Azure
service instance. When the identity is enabled, Azure creates an
identity for the instance in the Azure AD tenant that's trusted by the
subscription of the instance. After the identity is created, the
credentials are provisioned onto the instance. The lifecycle of a
system-assigned identity is directly tied to the Azure service
instance that it's enabled on. If the instance is deleted, Azure
automatically cleans up the credentials and the identity in Azure AD.
A user-assigned managed identity is created as a standalone Azure
resource. Through a create process, Azure creates an identity in the
Azure AD tenant that's trusted by the subscription in use. After the
identity is created, the identity can be assigned to one or more Azure
service instances. The lifecycle of a user-assigned identity is
managed separately from the lifecycle of the Azure service instances
to which it's assigned.
The picture from the official docs also gives a good example of a VM using MSI(Managed Service Identity).
This is Provided below:
In addition to that, the App Service Managed Identity documentation can be found here :
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/overview-managed-identity
I would like to elaborate a little further as the topic around service principals and app registrations in Azure can be confusing.
As you noticed, a service principal will get created in your AAD tenant when you turn on system-assigned managed identity for a resource in Azure. This service principal is tied to the lifecycle of your resource or in other words: If you delete your App Service, Azure will delete the service principal for you [2].
Beside service principals, there are other object types that live inside a tenant: User principals and application objects. As the name suggests, user principals identify a user while a service principal can be used to either identify a resource in Azure or an application object. To both types of principals you can assign roles, as you mentioned you can create a new user in your database and use the system-assigned identity (Service Principal 1 in the image below) to let Azure SQL know that your App Service has permissions to access the database [3]. This is marked in red in the image.
When you create an app registration, two objects are created: An application object and a service principal in your tenant (this is "Service Principal 2") [4]. You could now use this service principal as well to give it permissions to access the database (marked in orange in the image) but this service principal is not tied to your Azure App Service and doesn't represent it. In other words, if you want to use Service Principal 2 in your App Service, beside creating a user for this service principal in your database you'd additionally also need to get an access token for this service principal whenever you create a new SQL connection to the database in your application. It's possible but a bit more inconvenient and the beauty of using system-assigned identities is that your App Service knows about its service principal already and you don't have to manage it on your own (e.g., delete it when your App Service gets deleted).
Long story short: Use the system-assigned managed identity in your use case.
[2] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/managed-identities-azure-resources/overview#managed-identity-types
[3] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/app-service-web-tutorial-connect-msi#grant-permissions-to-managed-identity
[4] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/app-objects-and-service-principals
You can only use the managed identity that you have enabled in your App Service for authentication to AAD which eventually allows you to access your Azure SQL instance based on roles/permissions. I'd tried using the service principal/Enterprise Application created as part of App Registration process for authentication and it didn't work.
The way I see it is that the App Service is what runs/hosts your application and only this managed identity/SP is available to your running application for authentication to AAD.
The Service principal/Enterprise Application is being used internally for some other purpose and, it is not available to our application for authentication to AAD.
Just a wee note. App Registration may live without Service Principal. App Registration may represent an application that is consumed, not necessarily the consumer.
Managed Identity is solely a client-based identity.
E.g. Your App Service is acting as a client, when accessing Azure SQL. In this case you don't need an app registration and its service principal at all. You will only need a Managed Identity (which is a Service Principal).
When your App Service (A) is opposed to access another App Service (B) then again your App Service (A) does not need an app registration. But App Service B needs to have an app registration.
Imo when you want to use the credential-less approach in Azure, an app registration is acting as the server part and a Managed Identity (system - or user-assigned) is considered to be the client part.
I have to implement Single Sign on with following user case:
We have three kinds of users:
1) Corporate employees [Stored in Active directory]
2) Clients can access our application
3) We have hosted separate application for each client and clients employees can access this application [hosted on our server] and number of employees can be have million.
So we cannot store use credentials in active directory because we need per user license to use.
Please help me to find better solutions
ADFS only works with AD. The next version of ADFS will work against LDAP so that's a possibility.
I would look at Azure Active Directory (you could use something like AAD Sync. to migrate your existing AD users) or something like OpenAM or PingFederate (both of which are Java based) which you have to pay for or something like shibboleth (Java based but open source). These all support LDAP.
Or if you want to go the SQL Server route, look at thinktecture's identityserver.
I have been trying to add a "virtual" claim provider (SAML 2.0 Identity Provider) in ADFS, I have another claim provider with same certicate. I get this error on ADFS2.0 in windows Server 2012
MSIS7600 Each Signing Certificate value for a claims provider Trust must be unique across all claims provider trusts in ADFS 2.0 configuration
Is there any workaround to avoid this issue?
No, I got the same thing here. Appearantly it must be unique. I tried to add 2 tenants (2 customers) coming from Windows Azure Active Directory where all claims of all tenants are signed with the same certificate.
The first one works perfectly but on the second one the MSIS7600 refuses to let me add the second Claims Party.
We had the same thing here and solved it by using this trick
We created a new Azure AD with the purpose that this is the one we are going to add in ADFS.
For each customer tenant we want users to be able to login, we asked asked for read permissions to this tenant; this way it it added in your own subscription. We then selected the users from the customer tenant and added it to the Azure AD we are going to use in ADFS.
We connected ADFS to this Azure AD
All our customers can now login to the ADFS using their own credentials. The only thing we have to do is adding the existing Azure AD users from their own tenant to our Azure AD.
This way it let's you to add as many customers or external Ad's if you want and also not "showing" all tenants in the list of the ADFS page. Because there is only one tenant in ADFS there is no complain of the error MSIS 7600 and you don't have to update all tenants seperately.
Philippe is right. You can use AzureAD B2B feature that allows you to login in any Azure AD user in any tenant to be able to login. This is done by invite. This feature is in preview. This is the simplest choice. However, from an ADFS perspective, policy is on only a single entity. Home realm discovery can be a little more tedious.
We've also fixed ADFS 2016 to relax this constraint for a few reasons. We now constraint it on "Cert + claims-provider-identifier". In this world you will be able to add any # of Azure AD tenants distinctly. This fix will be out in the next preview (should be out soon).