define function with pointer input - c

I don't fully understand how to work with pointers.
Inside the function is where I need to write code to return the length of input string.
int mystrlen (const char *s)
{
char *s[1000], i;
for(i = 0; s[i] != '\0'; ++i);
printf("Length of string: %d, i");
return 0;
}
Could you tell me how to make it work?
Thank you!!

Remove char *s[1000], declare int i instead of char i, and return i rather than 0:
You need to remove the s inside the function body because it is "shadowing the variable" s that is a function parameter, meaning the s function parameter cannot be read at all.
Changing char i to int i will likely increase the range of possible values to return. If you pass a string with 128 characters in it, char i would result in returning -128 if it is a signed 8-bit type. int is guaranteed to be 16-bit, allowing for strings up to 32767 characters (more than enough for most common uses of a string length function).
You return i because otherwise the function is pointless; even if you print the value, you'd need a way to use the string length, and you can't do that if you don't return it from the function.
Corrected code with example:
#include <stdio.h>
int mystrlen(const char *s)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; s[i] != '\0'; ++i);
return i;
}
int main(void)
{
const char *s = "Hello world!";
int len = mystrlen(s);
printf("Length of string: %d\n", len);
return 0;
}

First of all, using pointers, as the number says, consist in using a reference instead of the actual variable, so if you pass a reference by parameter, you are not passing the actual value of it, just an address to it!
The correct code is:
#include <stdio.h>
int mystrlen (const char *s)
{
int i;
for( i = 0; s[i] != '\0'; ++i);
printf("Length of string: %d\n", i);
return 0;
}
void main(){
char *string = "Hello World";
mystrlen(string);
}
Another thing to point out is that you're trying to declare a const variable and change it. When you declare a const variable it should not change.

Related

C: reverse string function not affecting pointer

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int reverse(char *, int);
main()
{
char *word = "Thanks for your help";
reverse(word, strlen(word));
printf("%s", word);
getchar();
}
int reverse(char *line, int len)
{
int i, j;
char *newline = malloc(strlen(line));
for (i = len - 1, j = 0 ; i >= 0; i--, j++)
{
newline[j] = line[i];
}
newline[j] = '\0';
line = &newline;
}
Hey folks. I've got a simple C question that I can't seem to solve.
The program above is meant to take in a string and print it out backwards. Reverse is the function by which this is done.
The issue, specifically, is that when I print word in main(), the string appears unchanged. I've attempted to make the address of line the address of newline, but it doesn't have any effect.
int reverse(char *line, int len)
{
int i, j;
char *newline = malloc(strlen(line));
for (i = len - 1, j = 0 ; i >= 0; i--, j++)
{
newline[j] = line[i];
}
newline[j] = '\0';
line = &newline; // Your problem is here
}
You're merely assigning to the local line pointer. This has no effect on the calling function whatsoever.
Consider instead:
char *reverse(char *line, int len)
{
// ...
return newline;
}
Additional advice:
Turn on compiler warnings, and heed them. You've got lots of little things wrong (e.g. reverse isn't currently returning anything, but is declared as returning int).
Given that the first argument of reverse is a pointer to a C string (NUL-terminated), there's no need to take a length argument as well.
A reverse function doesn't necessarily need to be defined as returning a copy of the string, reversed. It could instead reverse a string in-place. Note that you cannot pass a string literal to a function like this, as they are read-only.
Here's how I would write this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
void reverse(char *str)
{
size_t i, j;
for (i = strlen(str) - 1, j = 0 ; i > j; i--, j++)
{
// Swap characters
char c = str[i];
str[i] = str[j];
str[j] = c;
}
}
int main(void)
{
// Mutable string allocated on the stack;
// we cannot just pass a string literal to reverse().
char str[] = "Here is a test string";
reverse(str);
printf("Result: \"%s\"\n", str);
return 0;
}
Note that the for loop condition is i > j, because we want each to only traverse half the array, and not swap each character twice.
Result:
$ ./a.exe
Result: "gnirts tset a si ereH"
Take a look at the code below:
void addOne(int a) {
int newA = a + 1;
a = newA;
}
int main() {
int num = 5;
addOne(num);
printf("%d\n", num);
}
Do you see why that will print 5, and not 6? It's because when you pass num to addOne, you actually make a copy of num. When addOne changes a to newA, it is changing the copy (called a), not the original variable, num. C has pass-by-value semantics.
Your code suffers from the same problem (and a couple other things). When you call reverse, a copy of word is made (not a copy of the string, but a copy of the character pointer, which points to the string). When you change line to point to your new string, newLine, you are not actually changing the passed-in pointer; you are changing the copy of the pointer.
So, how should you implement reverse? It depends: there are a couple options.
reverse could return a newly allocated string containing the original string, reversed. In this case, your function signature would be char *reverse, instead of int reverse.
reverse could modify the original string in place. That is, you never allocate a new string, and simply move the characters of the original string around. This works, in general, but not in your case because char pointers initialized with string literals do not necessarily point to writable memory.
reverse could actually change the passed-in pointer to point at a new string (what you are trying to do in your current code). To do this, you'd have to write a function void reverse(char **pointerToString). Then you could assign *pointerToString = newLine;. But this is not great practice. The original passed-in argument is now inaccessible, and if it was malloc'd, it can't be freed.

Segmentation fault (11) when using malloc inside a function to form a string

I'm trying to use a function to assign space and fill that space (or at least some of it) with characters to form a string. Within the function I make a call to malloc, and within the same function I assign characters to the given space. The following code gives the general gist of what I'm doing:
#define INITIAL 10
int func(char **s);
int
main(int argc, char **argv) {
char *s;
int n;
n = func(&s);
printf("Done\n");
return 0;
}
int
func(char **s) {
int i;
*s = (char*)malloc(INITIAL*sizeof(char));
assert(*s);
for (i=0; i<5; i++) {
printf("i=%d\n", i);
*s[i] = 'a'; /*'a' is an arbitrary char for this example */
}
return i;
}
The output of this code is:
i=0
i=1
i=2
Segmentation fault: 11
The reason I have my function return an int is because I ultimately want the function to return the length of the string I have formed.
I'm completely unsure why I am getting a segmentation fault; it seems I have assigned enough space to fit the next char in. It also seems weird to me that it stops at i=2.
If anyone could identify the mistakes I have made I would greatly appreciate it!
Instead of
*s[i] = 'a';
you want
(*s)[i] = 'a';
*s[i] is equivalent to *(s[i]). That is, it treats s as an array of strings and gives you the first character of the string at index i.
*s[i] first calculate s[i], which won't be valid place for i!=0, then dereference it and try to put 'a' there. It may cause Segmentation Fault.
Try changing *s[i] to (*s)[i].
Postfix [] has higher precedence than unary *, so *s[i] is being parsed as *(s[i]), which isn't what you want; you want to dereference s and index into the result, so you need to explicitly group the * operator with s: (*s)[i].
You may want to use size_t instead of an int. Or ssize_t if you need the function to return a negative value:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define INITIAL 10
ssize_t func(char **);
int main(void)
{
char *s;
if((func(&s)) == -1)
{
printf("An error occurred\n");
return 1;
}
printf("Done\n");
free(s);
return 0;
}
ssize_t func(char **s)
{
size_t i = 0;
if ( INITIAL < 1 )
return -1;
if (!(*s = malloc(INITIAL*sizeof(char))))
return -1;
for (i=0; i< 5; i++) {
printf("i=%zu\n", i);
(*s)[i] = 'a';; /*'a' is an arbitrary char for this example */
}
return i;
}

Use pointer math instead of array indexing

I'm trying to solve a problem found on my C programming book.
#include <stdio.h>
char *f (char s[], char t[], char out[]);
int main(void)
{
char s[] = "ISBN-978-8884981431";
char t[] = "ISBN-978-8863720181";
char out[10];
printf ("%s\n", f(s,t,out));
return 0;
}
char *f (char s[], char t[], char out[]) {
int i;
for (i=0; s[i] == t[i]; i++)
out[i] = s[i];
out[i] = '\0';
return &out[0];
}
As you can see from the code, this code uses as return value &out[0]: does this means that the complete array is used as return value?
char *f (char s[], char t[], char out[]);
int main(void)
{
char s[] = "ISBN-978-8884981431";
char t[] = "ISBN-978-8863720181";
char out[10];
printf ("%s\n", f(s,t,out));
return 0;
}
char *f (char s[], char t[], char out[]) {
for (; *(s+=1) == *(t+=1);)
*(out+=1) = *s;
*(out+1) = '\0';
return out;
}
This is my proposed solution, but while the proposed code returns "ISBN-978-88", mine only returns "8".
The array is smaller than the lenght of the string, how the proposed code can work without any kind of overflow?
Thanks for your responses.
Your code is too aggressive on side effects: the += 1 operation (which is more commonly denoted simply as ++) should be applied after the copy to the output has been made, not after the comparison.
In addition, you need to save the value of the out buffer before incrementing the pointer, so that you could return a pointer to the beginning of the copied string.
char *orig = out;
for ( ; *s == *t ; s++, t++)
*out++ = *s;
*out = '\0';
return orig;
Demo on ideone.
Your code is returning a pointer to the end of the out array. Not the start. You need to stash the initial value of out and return that.
As an aside, the fact that you can do assignments inside a comparison doesn't mean it's a good idea. That code is going to be very hard to maintain.
&out[0] is equivalent to out. Since arrays in C are passed by reference, in a sense, yes it does return the entire array.
Your solution only prints "8" because you're returning a pointer into the middle of the array. When it tries to print the string, it has no way of knowing that it's in the middle of the array/string, thus you only get a substring printed.

Returning arrays and pointers in C?

I'm relatively a beginner in programming in C and am getting super confused with arrays and pointers.
Basically what I'm trying to do is extend a string that contains binary to the designated length len; (i.e. len=8 for num[]=101 would produce "00000101").
Can someone help me understand what's wrong with this?
const char * extendBinary(char num[], int len) {
char *number = &num;
int length = len;
int difference;
if(strlen(*num)<len) {
difference = len-strlen(num);
while(difference>0)
{
&number = strcat("0", &number);
difference--;
}
}
return number;
}
Your problems start with your specification. If I understand you correctly, you want to have a function where you pass an array of characters and a length. The size of your array of input characters will be between 1 and len? However, your function has no way of knowing what the size of your array num is. If you wanted this to work, you would need to define your function as
const char * extendBinary(char *num, size_t num_len, int len);
so that your function doesn't overrun your buffer pointed to by num. Note that I replaced char num[] with char *num as this is the common mechanism for passing a pointer. You cant pass pointers to arrays and then dereference that pointer and get back the original type (that includes its size) -- that's just one thing that C doesn't let you do, so just use a normal pointer and a separate size variable.
Finally, you'll have to deal with memory allocation unless you want a memory leak. Thus, you could simply say that whom ever calls extendBinary should free it's return value when done with it.
const char * extendBinary(char *num, size_t num_len, int len) {
char *ret = malloc(len + 1);
int i;
memset(ret, '0', len);
ret[len] = 0;
strncpy(&ret[len - num_len], num, num_len);
return ret;
}
int main(void) {
char arr[] = {'1', '0', '1'};
const char *formatted = extendBinary(arr, sizeof(arr), 8);
printf("%s\n", formatted);
free(formatted);
return 0;
}
this is wrong.
strcat("0", &number);
A weird way to fix you code would be this:
char temp[32] = {};
...
...
while(difference>0)
{
strncat(temp, "0", 31 - strlen(temp));
difference--;
}
strncat(temp, num, 31 - strlen(temp));
strncpy(num, temp, len);
Note, I am writing this code just to help you understand how strcat() works, there is much better ways to do what you are trying to do.
You cannot concatenate something to a const string, you must have entire control of what is happening into you code, and where your code is writing. Do you know where is the pointer to "0" in your source?
How do you set up num? If it's really an array of characters rather than a string, there's no requirement that it be null terminated, unless it's a global/static. If you set it up like so in a function:
char str[10];
str[0] = '1';
str[1] = '0';
str[2] = '1';
than your strlen will get whatever, depending upon whatever junk happens to be in num.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
//case 1: for num[9]="101";
char *extendBinary1(char num[], int len) {
int num_len = strlen(num);
memmove(num + (len - num_len), num, num_len);
memset(num, '0', (len - num_len));
return num;
}
//case 2: for "101";//pointer to const char
char *extendBinary2(const char num[], int len) {
int num_len = strlen(num);
char *number = calloc(len + 1, sizeof(char));
memset(number, '0', (len - num_len));
return strcat(number, num);
}
int main(void){
char num[9] = "101";
char *number = extendBinary2("101", 8);//dynamic allocate
printf("%s\n", extendBinary1(num, 8));
printf("%s\n", number);//free(number);
return 0;
}

C simple string program does not compile

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
char Jones(char, char);
int main() {
char name[]="Andrew";
char surname[]="Jones";
char result[80];
result=Jones(name, surname);
puts(result);
return 0;
}
char Jones(char name, char surname)
{
char result[80];
int length;
length = strlen(surname);
for (int i=0; i<50; i++)
{
result[length+i] = name[i];
}
return result;
}
The program does not compile and i dont know why. It is supposed to read two strings and swap their places. It should display eg. "Jones Andrew".
Here's one problem:
char name[]="Andrew";
char surname[]="Jones";
char result[80];
wynik=Jones(name, surname);
This calls Jones() with character arrays (which will decay to character pointers), but the function is declared to accept single characters only.
You should change the function to take char *name, char *surname, since it really does seem to expect strings.
Further, you can't return a character array like you're doing in Jones(), you need to read up quite a bit on how to work with strings in C.
Also, wynik looks undeclared, that'll also make it fail to build.
There's a few errors:
char Jones(char, char);
This takes just a single char, not a char * which you need for a string.
result=Jones(name, surname);
Here result is an array. In C, you cannot assign to an array.
char Jones(char name, char surname)
{ char result[80];
...
return result;
}
Here you return result which is a local variable. But to return a string, you'd need to return a char*. But that char* would point to a local variable within the Jones function, which is no longer valid when the function ends. One solution is to pass in a buffer where you write the result that the caller owns.
Your algorithm for combining the surename and name is also wrong, you never do anything with the surename.
You'll need to do this:
char *Jones(char*, char* , char *);
int main() {
char name[]="Andrew";
char surname[]="Jones";
char result[80];
char *p;
p = Jones(name, surname, result);
puts(p);
return 0;
}
char *Jones(char *name, char *surname, char *result)
{
int length;
int i,k;
length = strlen(surname);
for (i=0; i<length ; i++)
{
result[i] = surname[i];
}
result[i++] = ' '; //add a space
length = strlen(name);
for (k=0; k<length ; k++, i++)
{
result[i] = name[k];
}
result[i] = 0; //add nul terminator to end the string
return result;
}
The conatenation could be simplified in many ways, e.g. to
strcpy(result, surename);
strcat(result, " ");
strcat(result, name);
or the Jones function could just do:
sprintf(result, "%s %s", surename, name);
In all cases, the function is rather fragile, as it's easy to overflow the result buffer if you pass in something else that does not fit within the result buffer.
1) The name and surname are char array and not single char so you have to change the input parameters types of your function Jones() the input parameters types should be char name[] (char array) or char *name (pointer to array of char)
2) You can not return an array defined locally and statically in the function. and if you want to return a string from the function, the string should be constant or it should be a buffer allocated dynamically (with malloc, calloc, realloc) into the function And for both cases the function type should be char *Jonas() and not char Jonas()
Or you can pass the result array via input parametr. and in this case you can fill it into the function.
void Jones(char *name, char *surname, char *result)
and in the main:
char result[80];
Jones(names, surname, result);
3) The following for loop is missing some thing
for (int i=0; i<50; i++)
{
result[length+i] = name[i];
}
The result elements from element 0 to element length are containing garbage because the result array is not initiated. so when you printf the result array you will get garbages printed. You have to initiate elements between 0 to length in the result array
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
char* Jones(char*, char*);
int main() {
char name[]="Andrew";
char surname[]="Jones";
puts(Jones(name,surname));
return 0;
}
char* Jones(char *name, char *surname)
{
strcat(surname," ");
strcat(surname,name);
return surname;
}

Resources