I have two dates. I want to check that created_at is existed or not between two dates that I will provide.
$form_date = 08/07/2018 // ('m/d/Y')
$to_date = 08/014/2018 // ('m/d/Y')
I have tired
Model::whereBetween('created_at', [$form_date, $to_date])->get();
But it returns empty.
you can solve this by do the following:
$form_date = Carbon::createFromFormat('d/m/Y',$request['form_date'])->format('d-m-Y');
$to_date = Carbon::createFromFormat('d/m/Y',$request['to_date'])->format('d-m-Y');
Model::whereBetween('created_at', [$form_date, $to_date])->get();
Try putting your boundary dates into an ISO format which MySQL can directly use:
$from_date = '2018-08-07';
$to_date = '2018-08-14';
Model::whereBetween('created_at',
[new Carbon($from_date), new Carbon($to_date)])->get();
Related
I am working with an API that returns Dates in the format 2022-03-01T11:32:37
Created: {this.props.proposal.OPENWHEN}
Created: 2022-03-01T11:32:37
How do i format this into DD/MM/YYY 24:00:00 ?
Thanks In Advance
Something like the following should be enough:
// Example expected argument: 2022-03-01T11:32:37
function prettifyDateTime (str) {
// Splitting the string between date and time
const [date, time] = str.split("T");
// Assuming 03 is the month and 01 is the day – otherwise, those could be swapped
const [year, month, day] = date.split("-")
// Added slashes and the space before the time
return `${day}/${month}/${year} ${time}`
}
prettifyDateTime("2022-03-01T11:32:37") // '01/03/2022 11:32:37'
Otherwise, I recommend using a date library like date-fns, dayJS, or moment.
You can use the Date object to accomplish what you want. It'll also accept other date formats. Here is one place to find Date description. You also get the benefit of rejecting invalid date formats
function prettifyDateTime(str) {
let date = new Date(str);
// There's other ways of formatting this return
return date.toLocaleDateString() + ' ' + date.toLocaleTimeString();
}
I'm trying to create a table using react-table that would display data that matches today's date as the top result. For instance, today is 18 August 2021, so I would like any data entry that matches 08/18/2021 (mm/dd/yyyy format) to be displayed as the topmost entry in my table.
My current table looks like this
To give an example, I have already sorted my table in chronological order (from earliest to latest in mm/dd/yyyy format). However, I want any entry/entries in the table above with today's date (eg. Date of Operation: 08/18/2021) to be displayed at the top of the table. Thereafter, entries that do not match today's date will continue to be sorted in chronological order.
Can someone please let me know how this can be done? Thank you.
Without getting into the code details, you should be able to do this by supplying a custom sort function in the column definition API docs. We don't do this specific sort but we do have multiple custom sort functions, and I got the most help in writing them by reading the sortTypes.js file from the library source.
Here's a simple date sort function. You basically get two rows and a columnId and return -1, 0, or 1.
const prevDate = new Date(prev.original[columnId])
const prevIsDate = ...
const currDate = new Date(curr.original[columnId])
const currIsDate = ...
if (prevIsDate && currIsDate) {
return prevDate > currDate ? 1 : -1
} else {
if (!prevIsDate) {
return !currIsDate ? 0 : 1
} else {
return 1
}
}
}
I am using "moment": "2.22.2" in my React application
and I have two strings dates, when i convert them using
moment().toISOString() one of them are return null.
null is return for all dates newer than 13.11.2019
for exam: 14.11.2019 & 15.11.2019 &16.11.2019 ...
const date1 = '12.11.2019 23:55';
const date2 = '13.11.2019 23:55';
moment(date1).toISOString() // => 2019-12-11T22:55:00.000Z
moment(date2).toISOString() // => null
is it something wrong locally in my application ? or it is an error because of moment library ?
I think you should parse your strings using a custom format since without it moment thinks 12.11 is the 11 of december (in the form [month].[day]).
use this form instead:
const date1 = '12.11.2019 23:55';
const date2 = '13.11.2019 23:55';
moment(date1,'DD.MM.YYYY HH:mm').toISOString()
moment(date2,'DD.MM.YYYY HH:mm').toISOString()
See docs here (https://momentjs.com/docs/#/parsing/string-format/)
I have a cell array that I call "Table", as in the code below (but my array has more lines). Column 1 contains dates in string format. I want to add an additional column that contains the dates in datetime format. I did the following, which works, but it is VERY slow. What are the alternatives?
% Table that I have:
Table{1,1} = 'Stringdate';
Table{2,1} = '01.01.1999';
Table{3,1} = '02.01.1999';
Table{4,1} = '03.01.1999';
Table{5,1} = '04.01.1999';
% What I want to add:
Table{1, size(Table,2)+1} = 'Datetime';
for index = 2:length(Table)
Table{index, size(Table,2)} = datetime(Table{index, 1});
end
You can apply datetime to all of them in one-go and use just num2cell and indexing to achieve the same result as that of your loop.
Table(2:end,2) = num2cell(datetime(Table(2:end,1)));
%You might need to specify the InputFormat as well i.e.
%Table(2:end,2) = num2cell(datetime(Table(2:end,1),'InputFormat','dd.MM.yyyy'));
I'm building an application that needs to allow the user to filter a data table according to different filters. So, the user will have three different filter posibilites but he might use only one, or two or the three of them at the same tame.
So, let's say I have the following columns on the table:
ID (int) PK
Sede (int)
Programa (int)
Estado (int)
All of those columns will store numbers, integers. The "ID" column is the primary key, "Sede" stores 1 or 2, "Programa" is any number between 1 and 15, and "Estado" will store numbers between 1 and 13.
The user may filter the data stored in the table using any of those filters (Sede, Programa or Estado). But the might, as well, use two filters, or the three of them at the same time.
The idea is that this application works like the data filters on Excel. I created a simulated table on excel to show what I want to achieve:
This first image shows the whole table, without applying any filter.
Here, the user selected a filter for "Sede" and "Programa" but leaved the "Estado" filter empty. So the query returns the values that are equal to the filter, but leaves the "Estado" filter open, and brings all the records, filering only by "Sede" (1) and "Programa" (6).
In this image, the user only selected the "Estado" filter (5), so it brings all the records that match this criteria, it doesn't matter if "Sede" or "Programa" are empty.
If I use a SELECT clasuse with a WHERE on it, it will work, but only if the three filters have a value:
DECLARE #sede int
DECLARE #programa int
DECLARE #estado int
SET #sede = '1'
SET #programa = '5'
SET #estado = '12'
SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Inscripciones]
WHERE
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] = #sede)
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] = #programa)
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] = #estado)
I also tryed changing the "AND" for a "OR", but I can't get the desired result.
Any help will be highly appreciated!! Thanks!
common problem: try using coalesce on the variable and for the 2nd value use the field name you're comparing to. Be careful though; Ensure it's NULL and not empty string being passed!
What this does is take the first non-null value of the variable passed in or the value you're comparing to.. Thus if the value passed in is null the comparison will always return true.
WHERE
[dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] = coalesce(#sede, [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede])
AND
[dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] = coalesce(#programa, [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa])
AND
[dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] = coalesce(#estado, [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado])
If sede is null and programa and estado are populated the compare would look like...
?=? (or 1=1)
?=programa variable passed in
?=Estado variable passed in
Boa Sorte!
Thank you all for your anwers. After reading the article posted in the comments by #SeanLange I was finally able to achieve what was needed. Using a CASE clause in the WHERE statement solves the deal. Here's the code:
SELECT
*
FROM [dbo].[Inscripciones]
WHERE
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] = (CASE WHEN #sede = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Sede] ELSE #sede END))
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] = (CASE WHEN #programa = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Programa] ELSE #programa END))
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] = (CASE WHEN #estado = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[Estado] ELSE #estado END))
AND
([dbo].[Inscripciones].[TipoIngreso] = (CASE WHEN #tipoingreso = '' THEN [dbo].[Inscripciones].[TipoIngreso] ELSE #tipoingreso END))
Thanks again!!