I am using Identityserver4 as an OIDC Athentication Server using both clientCredentials flow and OIDC Implicit flow. My Setup is this
Client Website (Needs a JWT for some front-end decisions)
IdentityServer4 Authentication Server
API (Needs a JWT for back-end Authorization)
When someone first visits the client website a call is made to IdentityServer using the clientCredentials flow. This allows the user (Name: GUEST, user_id= null) limited access to the API (including adding items to a basket).
When the user logs in, they get a new token from IdentityServer along with new user claims (Name: BOB, user_id=1) which is fine.
My question is, how does the API know that the logged in user BOB was GUEST.
I have tried many things with IdentityServer including
1) Client Website: Add acrValue = client session.id but i can't figure out how to read this in Indentityserver and set it as a claim
2) Client Website: Add IdTokenHint = client session.id but, again, don't know how to read this in IdentityServer and set it as a Claim
3) Enabled 'IncludeJwtId' on my client configuration. When doing this a 'jti' claim is returned after a clientCredentials call but is missing after an implicit grant flow.
4) After an Implicit Grant flow the returned JWT has an 'sid' but is useless as it wasn't included in the original JWT from the clientCredentials flow.
I guess i would like to send a client sessionId as part of the clientCredentitals flow and also when the user logs in using the implicit flow. This way i could store the id in the JWT in both cases.
I feel like i'm missing something obvious. Does anyone know how i can maintain a sessionId across the clientCredentials flow and the implicit flow?
Thanks in advance.
My question is, how does the API know that the logged in user BOB was
GUEST.
I'm afraid that's up to your client app/API business logic.
I guess i would like to send a client sessionId as part of the
clientCredentitals flow and also when the user logs in using the
implicit flow. This way i could store the id in the JWT in both cases.
And this is simple if you involve delegation.
Related
I'm working on an MVC web project which is using IdentityServer4 to authenticate users, the web app then uses an access token provided to a user by IdentityServer (authorization code flow) to call an API. The IdentityServer has been configured to use Azure AD as an external identity provider, which is the primary mechanism for users to login. That's all working great.
Once authenticated, I need to query the web app's database to determine:
If the user account is authorised to login
Retrieve claims about the user specific to the application
The IdentityServer docs (http://docs.identityserver.io/en/latest/reference/profileservice.html) suggest implementing the IProfileService interface for this, which I've done. I want the ProfileService to call the web app's API to retrieve the information about the user to avoid forcing the IdentityServer to need to know about/directly access the database. My problem however, is that calling the API though needs an access token.
Is it possible to retrieve the token for the current user inside the ProfileService's IsActiveAsync / GetProfileDataAsync methods? I can't find solid documentation that identifies if the token is even generated at that point. I'm also a total noob when it comes to authentication/authorization, it's a massive topic!
I had the idea of using the client credentials flow inside the ProfileService to call the API, just to populate that initial token. However, I don't know whether or not that's an absolutely terrible idea... or if there are any better concepts someone could refer me to that I could investigate.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Have a look at ITokenCreationService that is part of identityserver4. You can inject that service into your IProfileService implementation and then create a new bearer token with any claims you like.
For example:
protected readonly ITokenCreationService _tokenCreationService;
...
var token = new Token
{
AccessTokenType = AccessTokenType.Jwt,
Issuer = "https://my.identityserver.com",
Lifetime = (int)TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5).TotalSeconds,
Claims = GetClaimsNeededForApiCall()
};
string myToken = await _tokenCreationService.CreateTokenAsync(token);
...
This is not possible to retrieve the access_token for a user within ProfileService.
The profile service is called whenever IdentityServer needs to return claims about a user. This means if you try to generate a token for the user within ProfileService it will call the ProfileService again.
I am integrating the security aspect of webapplication. I have decided to use OAuth,
so we have a REST WebApi in AspNet Core 3.0, the client which is a SPA created in React, and the Identity Server 4.0 app which is also in AspNet Core 3.0.
I read that OAuth is created for Authorization and not for Authentication.
For Authentication, seems that exists something else called OpenIDConnect, so the first question that comes to my mind, and on which I cannot find an easy answer is: are OAuth, OpenIDConnect and IdentityServer related technology?
Which is the best solution for authentication, considering that I would like to create users in a SqlServer Database, and if it's possible I would like to use Entity Framework for the porpose?
The flow for my authentication would be:
User writes Username and Password, if they are right he receive the JWT Token, without redirecting him/her to the authorization page.
At this point the problem are:
which is the right endpoint to do this flow:
is it the /authorize or the /token endpoint?
I have a lot of confusion for the questions above.
The second thing, what is the best way to retrieve the user informations?
For example if my endpoint needs to understand from the logged in user what are his data, I think that or I retrieve from the endpoint or from the JWT token.
Even here I have no clue on which is the best.
I read that OAuth is created for Authorization and not for Authentication. For Authentication, seems that exists something else called OpenIDConnect, so the first question that comes to my mind, and on which I cannot find an easy answer is: are OAuth, OpenIDConnect and IdentityServer related technology?
That's right. OAuth was the first one introduced and allows the person requesting it access to the resources (its handing out access tokens). OIDC (OpenID Connect) on the other-side extends this concept by an identity, the authentication part.
The identity token verifies the identity of the person to your application. Instead of providing identity via username + password (i.e. user creating an account on your website), they get redirected to your authentication provider/app and enter their login there and you get an identity token in return (and/or an access token, depending on the flow and scopes you request).
The identity token is an JWT token (or reference token). The JWT token contains all of the users identity information required for your application (user id, email, displayname, age, etc.) and is cryptographically signed. Only the Identity Server knows the key used to sign it up and you can verify it with the public key from the OIDC (IdSrv here) provider.
Reference token works similar, but claims are requested on the server side and cached.
With identity token you can not access the users resources. Example: Facebook.
When you sign in your application with an facebook account, most page will only request identity token to verify that its the same user (instead of using a username / password combination). But with that one, the application can't access your facebook posts or do posts in your name.
If the application requests an access token (token scope), then also an access token will be returned (if the application is allowed to via allowed scopes). You will be asked to grant the permissions to the resources which the application requests.
With that token, the application can read your posts or post in your name.
Which is the best solution for authentication, considering that I would like to create users in a SqlServer Database, and if it's possible I would like to use Entity Framework for the porpose?
Doesn't really matter. Either one can be used, all you really need is the "sid" (subject id) claim and associate that one with your user.
Identity Server can issue both, depending on what the client asks (if client asks for id_token response type, it will receive an identity token, if it asks for token an access token. Both can be specified or just one).
At this point the problem are: which is the right endpoint to do this flow: is it the /authorize or the /token endpoint? I have a lot of confusion for the questions above.
/authorize is used to authorize the user (have him login, and send back to your website). Its used for so called interactive flows, where the user enters credentials
/token endpoint you can only retrieve a token (resource owner flow (username + password), client credentials (for machine to machine authentication), refresh token (to get a new access token by using an refresh token (if you asked for offline_access scope, which gives and refresh token)
The second thing, what is the best way to retrieve the user informations?
the /userinfo endpoint, see docs: http://docs.identityserver.io/en/latest/endpoints/userinfo.html
As the doc says to access that, the client needs to request the openid scope.
For example if my endpoint needs to understand from the logged in user what are his data, I think that or I retrieve from the endpoint or from the JWT token.
Yes you can retrieve it from JWT token, if you use JWT token. If you use reference token, its just an ID.
And last but not least the /introspection endpoint can be used to validate the token (if your consuming application has no libraries to decrypt and validate signature of the token.
If you can, its best to use the Identity Server client libraries (i.e. IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation package for ASP.NET Core or oidc-client for npm/javascript based applications) which should be picking up the correct endpoints, so you don't have to worry about it
We have several API's that we'd like to grant access to a client via client credentials flow. The flow would go something like this.
Client gets a token from is4 based on some scope
Client hits first API with token
Client needs to hit second API with same token.
Authorization of the token at the API endpoint seems to only work when the APIResource matches the APIName in the authentication parameters.
How do you set up APIResource/Scopes such that this scenario can be accommodated?
OK I had the chance to play a bit with your case and have a solution.
So, as you know, the client credentials flow, works based on (except the clientid and client secret) ApiResoirces/Scopes.
Your API's, in their authentication configuration, have:
ApiName - for .NET Core API
RequiredScopes - for .NET Framework API
Depending on your case, you have to set them.
These are the APIResources/Scopes, that your IDS client should have, in its allowed scopes/api resources (Client.AllowedScopes).
Then, when requesting the client credentials, from the token client, you should pass as scope, a string, containing the both scopes/apiresources separated with interval (tokenClient.RequestClientCredentialsAsync("api1 api2");)
Then the access token, that you receive in the response, will be valid for calls for both of your api's.
You also have the second option, in which both your api's use one and the same scope/apiresource, but I don't think that this is a good approach at all.
I'm in the process of implementing AAD single sign on in our application and we will be using the adal.js/adal-angular.js library with our MEAN stack application. Part of initializing the library is to call init() and provide the tenant and clientId
adalProvider.init(
{
tenant: "mycompany.onmicrosoft.com",
clientId: "05bdd8d7-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-5f2769f8b9b6"
},
$httpProvider
);
for example.
If someone views the source and takes the tenant and clientId can they use that somehow in their own application maliciously?
Does AzureAD check the URL the request came from and block it if it's not the configured login url?
Seems as though the clientId is more like a public key but if the only 2 things needed for an app to trigger authentication with AzureAD is the tenant and clientId and those are exposed client side in source code that someone could use them to create a phishing site X or to grab id_tokens if the request is redirected back to their site X rather than the original site
Does Azure rely on the configured settings in the application setup and protect against this?
I'm still getting a grasp on the OpenID Connect and OAUTH 2.0 finer points so forgive me if this question has an obvious answer.
Adal.js uses the Implicit flow (as per OpenID connect / oAuth 2 specifications) and exposing the ClientID (and tenant id of AAD) doesn't pose any security risk.
While registering the Clients in Azure AD administration panel, we specify a Redirect URI for the client. This is the Application URL for which users will get redirected after successful authentication.
So even if a malicious client tries to use your clientid and tenant id, the users will be redirected back to the registered URI(which is your app) after authentication and not to the malicious site
In implicit flow the application doesn't collect any username / password, IDP/OP (i.e AAD) manages this part - so user credentials won't be compromised as well
**For other flow types (Authorization code, Client credentials,etc) we have something called client-password along with ClientID. This shouldn't be exposed to public clients.
I want to build small application. There will be some users. I don't want to make my own user system. I want to integrate my application with oauth/oauth2.0.
There is no problem in integration of my front-end application and oauth 2.0. There are so many helpful articles, how to do this, even on stackoverflow.com. For example this post is very helpful.
But. What should I do after successful authorization on front-end? Of course, I can just have flag on client, which says "okay, mate, user is authenticated", but how I should interact with my backend now? I can not just make some requests. Back-end - some application, which provides API functions. EVERYONE can access this api.
So, I need some auth system anyway between my FE and BE. How this system should work?
ps I have some problems with English and may be I can not just correctly 'ask google' about it. Can you provide correct question, please :) or at least give some articles about my question.
UPD
I am looking for concept. I don't want to find some solution for my current problem. I don't think it is matters which FE and BE I use (anyway I will
provide information about it below)
FE and BE will use JSON for communication. FE will make requests, BE will send JSON responses. My application will have this structure (probably):
Frontend - probably AngularJS
Backend - probably Laravel (laravel will implement logic, also there is database in structure)
Maybe "service provider" like google.com, vk.com, twitter.com etc remembers state of user? And after successful auth on FE, I can just ask about user state from BE?
We have 3 main security concerns when creating an API.
Authentication: An identify provider like Google is only a partial solution. Because you don't want to prompt the user to login / confirm their identity for each API request, you must implement authentication for subsequent requests yourself. You must store, accessible to backend:
A user's ID. (taken from the identity provider, for example: email)
A user token. (A temporary token that you generate, and can verify from the API code)
Authorization: Your backend must implement rules based on the user ID (that's your own business).
Transport security: HTTPS and expiring cookies are secure and not replayable by others. (HTTPS is encrypting traffic, so defeats man-in-the-middle attacks, and expiring cookies defeats replay attacks later in time)
So your API / backend has a lookup table of emails to random strings. Now, you don't have to expose the user's ID. The token is meaningless and temporary.
Here's how the flow works, in this system:
User-Agent IdentityProvider (Google/Twitter) Front-End Back-End
|-----------------"https://your.app.com"---------->|
|---cookies-->|
your backend knows the user or not.
if backend recognizes cookie,
user is authenticated and can use your API
ELSE:
if the user is unknown:
|<--"unknown"-|
|<----"your/login.js"----------+
"Do you Authorize this app?"
|<------------------+
|--------"yes"----->|
+----------auth token--------->|
|<---------/your/moreinfo.js---|
|-------access_token ---------->|
1. verify access token
2. save new user info, or update existing user
3. generate expiring, random string as your own API token
+----------->|
|<-------------- set cookie: your API token --------------------|
NOW, the user can directly use your API:
|--------------- some API request, with cookie ---------------->|
|<-------------- some reply, depends on your logic, rules ------|
EDIT
Based on discussion - adding that the backend can authenticate a user by verifying the access token with the identity provider:
For example, Google exposes this endpoint to check a token XYZ123:
https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/tokeninfo?id_token=XYZ123
I read through all the answers very carefully, and more than half the people who responded are missing the question completely. OP is asking for the INITIAL connection between FE & BE, after the OAuth token has been issued by the Service Provider.
How does your backend know that the OAuth token is valid? Well keep in mind that your BE can send a request to the Service Provider & confirm the validity of the OAuth token, which was first received by your FE. This OAuth key can be decrypted by the Service Provider only because only they have the secret key. Once they decrypt the key, they usually will respond with information such as username, email and such.
In summary:
Your FE receives OAuth token from Service Provider after user gives authorization. FE passes OAuth token to BE. BE sends OAuth token to Service Provider to validate the OAuth token. Service Provider responds to BE with username/email information. You can then use the username/email to create an account.
Then after your BE creates the account, your BE should generate its own implementation of an OAuth token. Then you send your FE this OAuth token, and on every request, your FE would send this token in the header to your BE. Since only your BE has the secret key to validate this token, your application will be very safe. You could even refresh your BE's OAuth token on every request, giving your FE a new key each time. In case someone steals the OAuth token from your FE, that token would be quickly invalidated, since your BE would have already created a new OAuth token for your FE.
There's more info on how your BE can validate the OAuth token. How to validate an OAuth 2.0 access token for a resource server?
let's use OAuth concept to begin,FE here is Client , BE here is Resource Server.
Since your client already authorized, Authorization server should grant
Access token to the client.
Client make request to the resource server with the Access token
Resource server validate the Access token， if valid, handle the request.
You may ask, what is the Access token, Access token was issued by authorization server, grant to client, and recognized by resource server.
Access token is a string indicate the authorization information(e.g. user info, permission scope， expires time...).
Access token may encrypted for security, and you should make sure resource server can decrypt it.
for more details, please read OAuth2.0 specification https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749.
Well you don'y need User-System on your Front End side.
The front end is just a way to interact with your server and ask for token by valid user and password.
Your server supposed to manage users and the permissions.
User login scenario
User asking for token by entering his username and password.
The server-API accept the request because it's anonymous method (everyone can call this method without care if he's logged in or not.
The server check the DB (Or some storage) and compare the user details to the details he has.
In case that the details matches, the server will return token to the user.
From now, the user should set this token with any request so the server will recognize the user.
The token actually hold the user roles, timestamp, etc...
When the user request for data by API, it fetch the user token from the header, and check if the user is allowed to access that method.
That's how it works in generally.
I based on .NET in my answer. But the most of the BE libaries works like that.
As am doing a project for SSO and based on my understanding to your question, I can suggest that you create an end-point in your back-end to generate sessions, once the client -frontend- has successfully been authorized by the account owner, and got the user information from the provider, you post that information to the back-end endpoint, the back-end endpoint generates a session and stores that information, and send back the session ID -frequently named jSessionId- with a cookie back to the client -frontend- so the browser can save it for you and every request after that to the back-end considered an authenticated user.
to logout, simply create another endpoint in the back-end to accepts a session ID so the back-end can remove it.
I hope this be helpful for you.
You need to store the token in the state of your app and then pass it to the backend with each request. Passing to backend can be done in headers, cookies or as params - depends on how backend is implemented.
Follow the code to see a good example of all the pieces in action (not my code)
This example sets the Authorization: Bearer TOKEN header
https://github.com/cornflourblue/angular-registration-login-example