I need to measure the SQL Azure DB performance using DTA, is it possible or not, if not what is the workaround to consume a workload file (.trc)??
Database Engine Tuning Advisor does not support Azure SQL Database. It is also not possible to create a trace file from an Azure SQL Database using SQL Server Profiler.
SQL Azure automates the creation of indexes that may improve performance of your workload with a feature named automatic tuning. Automatic Tuning on Azure SQL also drops redundant indexes and uses the best execution plan for queries
Alberto is correct - there are features within SQL Azure which help watch and improve the performance of your database queries automatically in some cases. Profiler trace + DTA are not currently supported in SQL Azure. The DTA (Database Tuning Advisor) feature in SQL Server is very good for taking traces and trying to replay them on a different server to simulate possible index and partitioning changes which could improve your performance. The automatic tuning feature does that for you without having to use DTA today yourself.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-automatic-tuning
If all you want to do is explore the performance of your database, then you can use the query store in SQL Azure (and SQL Server 2016+) to do this kind of analysis.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/query-store-a-flight-data-recorder-for-your-database/
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/performance/monitoring-performance-by-using-the-query-store?view=sql-server-2017
If you have not tried this using a recent release of SQL Server Management Studio(SSMS), then I highly suggest you download this and try it. You can see top N queries by different metrics, plan changes over time, and other metrics which give you faster insight into the performance profile of your database + application.
There is no way to take a .trc file today and examine it in the query store, but you can enable query store in an on-premises SQL Server (2016+) and then record your production workload for awhile to see how it is behaving. Please understand there is an overhead to running with the query store on - usually it is modest, but for highly ad hoc OLTP query workloads you may see larger overhead. There are some knobs to tune this, so please just go through normal due diligence before modifying a production system. If you have problems, turn it back off and re-examine until you have the right settings to help capture the relevant data from your workload to help make tuning decisions.
Hope that helps!
Sincerely,
Conor Cunningham
Architect, SQL
Related
I am having trouble finding documentation regarding column statistics on a Microsoft Azure SQL Server database. I noticed recently that query plans had warnings in SSMS due to missing column statistics. Further investigation revealed that 'Auto Create Statistics' and 'Auto Update Statistics' were turned off for our database.
I understand that with our local SQL databases statistics are important to performance in that they let the query analyzer make educated guesses about the cardinality of results. Are statistics still important in an Azure SQL database? Is there any documentation about best practices here? Are there cases where automatic statistics should be turned off?
There is no difference between statistics in SQL Server and Azure SQL Database. Azure SQL Database is just a manged, and automatically-updated flavor of SQL Server. Here's the doc page: Statistics
Are there cases where automatic statistics should be turned off?
Rare cases. The vast majority of SQL Server databases rely on automatic creation and updates of statistic, perhaps augmented by scheduled index maintence.
Automatic statistics are created when needed, and will be created before the query that needs them can be optimized. Sometimes this can cause an unacceptable delay, so you would set them to create asynchronously, and let the query proceed without them, or rely on a manual process review and create needed indexes and statistics.
SQL Server Enterprise Edition's query optimizer will use indices from a view to increase performance of a query even if the view is not explicitly referenced in the query, if applicable. Question: does Azure Database do the same thing? I know SQL Server Express does not do this, for example. I want to ensure I can still get the performance I need from the query optimizer when doing a sort on a joined table with a few million users (works great on enterprise edition but takes several seconds on express - bottle neck at the sort).
Sometime last year (2012) Microsoft announced that the engine was the same between SQL Server and SQL Azure (now called Windows Azure SQL Database :/). So you will likely get the same behavior. Same performance may be another question. Windows Azure SQL Database is also keeping replicas in place in the event of hardware failure. You get the benefit of the secondary coming online in a fashion that is seamless to you. But, This does have a bit of a performance cost. Also, the SQL running in Windows Azure is running in a shared environment. It is pretty well documented that the performance is not the same as a local dedicated multi-processor machine with fast storage. It is a bit of an unfair comparison multi-user, multi-instance vs. dedicated. For many applications this is fast enough, but not all.
I just realized that my application was needlessly making 50+ database calls per user request due to some hidden coding -- hidden in the sense that between LINQ, persistence frameworks and events it just so turned out that a huge number of calls were being made without me being aware.
Is there a recommended way to analyze individual transactions going to my SQL 2008 database, preferably with some integration to my Visual Studio 2010 environment? I want to be able to 'spy' on individual transactions being made, but only for certain pieces of my code, and without making serious changes to either the code or database.
I addition to SQL Server Profiler, there are a number of performance counters you can look at to see both a real time evaluation and a historic trend:
Batch Requests/sec: Effectively measures the number of actual calls made to the SQL Server
Transactions/sec: Number of transactions in each database.
Connection resets/sec: number of new connections started from the connection pool by your site.
There are many more performance counters you can monitor, specially if you want to measure performance, but going through is besides the scope here. A good starting point is Monitoring Resource Usage.
You can use the SQL Profiler tool that comes with SQL Server Management Studio.
Microsoft SQL Server Profiler is a graphical user interface to SQL Trace for monitoring an instance of the Database Engine or Analysis Services. You can capture and save data about each event to a file or table to analyze later. For example, you can monitor a production environment to see which stored procedures are affecting performance by executing too slowly.
As mentioned, SQL Profiler is userful at the SQL Server level. It is not available in SQL Server SSMS Express however.
At the .NET level, LINQ to SQL and the Entity Framework both support logging. See Logging every data change with Entity Framework, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg490349.aspx, http://peterkellner.net/2008/12/04/linq-debug-output-vs2008/.
in my previous workplace we used oracle enterprise manager for viewing statistics and bottlenecks of queries that are running against oracle10g. In my new workplace we use Microsoft SQL Server (2005). Is there any tool like enterprise manager of oracle in SQL Server - I need to see all the jdbc SQL queries i make and how long they are taking in the db..
thanks
Use SQL Server Profiler for tracing DB queries and such.
If you are looking for costs of queries and how they break down, you should use the Query Analyzer that is built into SSMS.
For SQL 2005 SP2 and later, you can download the Performance Dashboard Reports from MS (free).
Quote:
Common performance problems that the
dashboard reports may help to resolve
include:
- CPU bottlenecks (and what queries are consuming the most CPU)
- IO bottlenecks (and what queries are performing the most IO).
- Index recommendations generated by the query optimizer (missing indexes)
- Blocking
- Latch contention
The information shown in the reports is from the dynamic management views which you could query yourself if you didn't want to download this addon.
A combination of 'SQL Server Profiler', 'SQL Server Management Studio' and 'Database Engine Tuning Advisor' will be your friend. Have a look at showing the estimated and actual execution plans using SSMS, or create trace files with SQL Server Profiler (using the Tuning template) to feed to the Database Engine Tuning Advisor
I'm using Qure Analyser (free) which I've found very useful. It works by analysing a SQL Server trace file (.trc) and showing you which queries take up most CPU time, cause the most IO, or are called most often. Useful for spotting problems in the application code which may cause it to abuse the database.
Are there any performance benefits of using SQL Server 2008 over SQL Server 2005?
Moving a single database from SQL Server 2005-2008 will not notice a difference really. However, there are new tools and options available in SQL Server 2008 that you MIGHT be able to leverage to provider better performance later on in your application.
One item that comes to mind is filtered indexes. Allowing to create an index on a subset of information.
There may be new features in the engine which execute queries in different ways. This includes changes to the optimiser.
Therefore, the only way you can POSSIBLY tell, is to gather detailed performance data from your application on MSSQL2005, and then repeat the experiment on the same (production-quality) hardware with SQL2008.
You will need to make sure your application works correctly- such a migration can't be done lightly as any change could introduce bugs.
Also, the new version of the database could have performance regressions - which you need to be very careful about.
So in summary:
Benchmark YOUR application on SQL2005
Benchmark it on SQL2008
Use the same production-grade test hardware in your lab both times
Don't run VMs (unless that's what you do in production)
Don't change other parameters
This may not be easy if your application is big / complicated.
Yes. You can compress data in SQL 2008 which can have drastic impact on backup and data transfer times.
Actually SQL2008 has built-in compression that you can enable out of the box which could definately improve performance, but it may depend on what is being returned. I would try this option and benchmark to see if you feel its a worthy change.