Deleting Elements from an Array based on their Position every 3 Elements - c
I created an array called elements_n which has the elements 0 to N-1 where N is 2. The below numbers are the elements of the array called elements_n:
0 1
I have another array called Arr which has the following elements:
0 1 3 1 2 4
If any of the first 3 elements of the array Arr are equal to the first element of elements_n which is 0, I would like to delete that element from the array called Arr. I then repeat the same process for the next 3 elements of the array Arr. So to explain myself better, I will use the following example:
Compare the first 3 elements of array Arr which are 0, 1, 3 to the first element of elements_n which is 0. Since Arr[0] == elements_n[0]. I delete Arr[0] from the array Arr.
Compare the next 3 elements of array Arr which are 1, 2, 4 to the second element of elements_n which is 1. Since Arr[3] == elements_n[1]. I delete Arr[3] from the array Arr. So the elements that should be left in the array Arr are:
1 3 2 4
When I implemented it myself in C programming with the code found below the end result is coming:
1 3 3 2 2 4
Rather than:
1 3 2 4
This is the code I implemented:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define N 2
int main() {
unsigned *elements_n = malloc(N * sizeof(unsigned));
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
elements_n[i] = i; //Created an array which has the elements 0 to N-1
}
printf("\n");
unsigned Arr[6] = { 0, 1, 3, 1, 2, 4 };
unsigned position_indices[2] = { 3, 3 }; //Moving every 3 elements in the Arr array.
int count = 0;
int index = 0;
unsigned *ptr_Arr = &Arr[0];
do {
for (int i = 0; i < position_indices[count]; i++) {
if (ptr_Arr[i] == elements_n[count]) {
index = i + 1; //Index of the Arr element that has the same value as the element in the array elements_n
for (int j = index - 1; j < position_indices[count] - 1; j++) {
ptr_Arr[j] = ptr_Arr[j + 1];
}
}
}
printf("\n");
ptr_Arr += position_indices[count] - 1;
count++;
} while (count < 2);
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
printf("%d\t", Arr[i]);
}
printf("\n");
free(elements_n);
return 0;
}
You might try something like this (not tested).
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define N 2
int main()
{
unsigned *elements_n = malloc(N * sizeof(unsigned));
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
elements_n[i] = i; //Created an array which has the elements 0 to N-1
}
unsigned Arr[6] = { 0, 1, 3, 1, 2, 4 };
int dest_index = 0;
int src_index = 0;
int count = sizeof(Arr)/sizeof(Arr[0]);
for ( ; src_index < count; src_index++)
{
int group = src_index / 3;
if (Arr[src_index] != elements_n[group])
{
Arr[dest_index++] = Arr[src_index];
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < dest_index; i++)
{
printf("%d\t", Arr[i]);
}
printf("\n");
free(elements_n);
return 0;
}
You need to keep track of how many elements you removed from the array.
My solution:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
size_t fancy_delete_3(const int elems[], size_t elemssize, int arr[], size_t arrsize)
{
assert(elems != NULL);
assert(arr != NULL);
assert(arrsize%3 == 0);
assert(elemssize*3 == arrsize);
// we need to count the removed elements, to know how much we need to shift left
size_t removed = 0;
// for each element in elems
for (size_t i = 0; i < elemssize; ++i) {
// check the three correponding elements in arr
for (size_t j = i*3; j < (i+1)*3; ++j) {
assert(j >= removed);
const size_t pos = j - removed;
// if elems[i] matches any of the corresponding element in arr
if (elems[i] == arr[pos]) {
// remove element at position pos
assert(arrsize >= pos + 1);
// I don't think this can ever overflow
memmove(&arr[pos], &arr[pos + 1], (arrsize - pos - 1) * sizeof(int));
++removed;
// array is one element shorter, so we can just decrease the array size
assert(arrsize > 0);
--arrsize;
}
}
}
// we return the new size of the array
return arrsize;
}
#define __arraycount(x) sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])
int main()
{
int elements_n[] = {0,1};
int arr[] = {0,1,3, 1,2,4};
size_t newsize = fancy_delete_3(elements_n, __arraycount(elements_n), arr, __arraycount(arr));
printf("arr size=%zu {", newsize);
for (size_t i = 0; i < newsize; ++i)
printf("%d,", arr[i]);
printf("}\n");
return 0;
}
You have several related problems around how you perform deletions. In the first place, it's not clear that you understand that you cannot actually delete anything from a C array. The closest you can come is to overwrite it with something else. Often, pseudo-deletion from an array is implemented by moving each of the elements following the deleted one one position forward, and reducing the logical length of the array.* You seem to have chosen this alternative, but (problem 1) you miss maintaining or updating a logical array length.
Your problem is made a bit more complicated by the fact that you logically subdivide your array into segments, and you seem not to appreciate that your segments are variable-length in that, as described, they shrink when you delete an element. This follows from the fact that deleting an element from one group does not change the assignments of elements to other groups. You do have a mechanism in position_groups that apparently serves to track the sizes of the groups, and in that sense its name seems ill-fitting. In the same way that you need to track and update the logical length of the overall array, you'll need to track and update the lengths of the groups.
Finally, you appear to have an off-by-one error here:
for (int j = index - 1; j < position_indices[count]-1; j++)
that would be clearer if position_indices were better named (see above), but recognizing that what it actually contains is the size of each group, and that index and j represent indices within the group, it follows that the boundary condition for the iteration should instead be just j < position_indices[count]. That's moot, however, because you're going to need a somewhat different approach here anyway.
Suggestion, then:
When you delete an element from a group, move up the entire tail of the array, not just the tail of the group.
In service to that, update both group size and logical array size when you perform a deletion, remembering that that affects also where each subsequent group starts.
When you examine or output the result, remember to disregard array elements past the logical end of the array.
* "Logical array size" means the number of (leading) elements that contain meaningful data. In your case, the logical array size is initially the same as the physical array size, but each time you delete an element (and therefore move up the tail) you reduce the logical size by one.
You never really "deleted" any element, you just shifted-down the
second and third elements from each 3-group. And then, when
printing, you iterated over the whole array.
Arrays are just continuous blocks of memory, so you need a
different strategy. You could traverse the original array with
two indexes, one as the general index counter and other as
the index for the shifted slot. If the current element is
different from the corresponding elements_n item, copy it to
the secondary index and increase it.
In case nothing is equal to the elements_n item, you would just
reassign the array elements to themselves. However, as soon as
one is equal you will be shifting them with the advantage of
keeping track of the new size.
Also, calculating the corresponding elements_n item is a simple
matter of dividing the current index by 3, so you don't even need
an extra variable to that.
#include <stdio.h>
#define N 2
int main()
{
unsigned elements_n[N] = { 0, 1 };
unsigned Arr[N*3] = { 0, 1, 3, 1, 2, 4 };
int i, j;
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < N*3; i++)
if (Arr[i] != elements_n[i/3])
Arr[j++] = Arr[i];
for (i = 0; i < j; i++)
printf(" %d", Arr[i]);
printf("\n");
return 0;
}
Related
Find the most frequent elements in an array of Integers
I have to find all of the elements which have the maximum frequency. For example, if array a={1,2,3,1,2,4}, I have to print as 1, also 2. My code prints only 2. How to print the second one? #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<string.h> #define n 6 int main(){ int a[n]={1,2,3,1,2,4}; int counter=0,mostFreq=-1,maxcnt=0; for(int i=0;i<n;i++){ for(int j=i+1;j<n;j++){ if(a[i]==a[j]){ counter++; } } if(counter>maxcnt){ maxcnt=counter; mostFreq=a[i]; } } printf("The most frequent element is: %d",mostFreq); }
How to print the second one? The goal it not only to print a potential 2nd one, but all the all of the elements which have the maximum frequency. OP already has code that determines the maximum frequency. Let us build on that. Save it as int target = mostFreq;. Instead of printing mostFreq, a simple (still O(n*n)) approach would perform the same 2-nested for() loops again. Replace this 2nd: if(counter>maxcnt){ maxcnt=counter; mostFreq=a[i]; } With: if(counter == target){ ; // TBD code: print the a[i] and counter. } For large n, a more efficient approach would sort a[] (research qsort()). Then walk the sorted a[] twice, first time finding the maximum frequency and the 2nd time printing values that match this frequency. This is O(n* log n) in time and O(n) in memory (if a copy of the original array needed to preserve the original). If also works well with negative values or if we change the type of a[] from int to long long, double, etc.
The standard student solution to such problems would be this: Make a second array called frequency, of the same size as the maximum value occurring in your data. Init this array to zero. Each time you encounter a value in the data, use that value as an index to access the frequency array, then increment the corresponding frequency by 1. For example freq[value]++;. When done, search through the frequency array for the largest number(s). Optionally, you could sort it.
We can (potentially) save some effort in an approach with unsorted data by creating an array of boolean flags to determine whether we need to count an element at all. For the array {1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4} we do have nested for loops, so O(n) complexity, but we can avoid the inner loop entirely for repeated numbers. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> int main(void) { int arr[] = {1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4}; size_t arr_size = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(*arr); bool checked[arr_size]; for (size_t i = 0; i < arr_size; i++) checked[i] = false; unsigned int counts[arr_size]; for (size_t i = 0; i < arr_size; i++) counts[i] = 0; for (size_t i = 0; i < arr_size; i++) { if (!checked[i]) { checked[i] = true; counts[i]++; for (size_t j = i+1; j < arr_size; j++) { if (arr[i] == arr[j]) { checked[j] = true; counts[i]++; } } } } unsigned int max = 0; for (size_t i = 0; i < arr_size; i++) { if (counts[i] > max) max = counts[i]; } for (size_t i = 0; i < arr_size; i++) { if (counts[i] == max) printf("%d\n", arr[i]); } return 0; }
Arrays in C programming
I was working on the following 2d-array program to output this result shown in picture: I can't seem to get the min value for the result and get it displayed in array form. The code is below: #include<stdio.h> #define NUMROWS 2 #define NUMCOLS 3 //accessing elements of 2D array using pointers int main(void){ const int table[NUMROWS][NUMCOLS]={{1,2,3},{5,6,7}}; int minvals[NUMROWS]; int i, j; int *ptr = &table; //accessing the elements of 2D array using ptr printf("table values: min value\n"); for(int i=0;i<NUMROWS;i++){ for(int j=0;j<NUMCOLS;j++) printf("%d ",*((ptr+i*NUMCOLS)+j)); printf("\n"); } for(int i=0;i<NUMROWS;i++){ for(int j=0;j<NUMCOLS;j++) printf("%d ",*((ptr+i*NUMCOLS)+j)<minvals[i]); } return 0; }
The existence of minvals would imply that you are expected to calculate the minimum value of each 'row' of table before then moving on to printing. As it stands, had your program properly calculated the minimum values of each array, your printing would be rather out of order. There's no need to do any tricky, manual pointer manipulation. Simple array subscription is much clearer. Let's start simple and return to basics by looking at the way we find the minimum value in a one dimensional array, as it is the core of this problem. To find the minimum value in an array we need a few things to start: An array The length of the array An initial value to compare against The array itself is obviously each subarray of table, and the length in this case is known to be NUMCOLS. Our initial value should either be INT_MAX (or another type-appropriate maximum constant found <limits.h>), such that every element in the array is equal to or less than our initial value, or a value from the array itself. Often times we opt for the second option here, choosing the first element in the array as our initial value, and comparing it to the second and onward elements. As such, finding the minimum value in a single 'row' would look like this const int row[NUMCOLS] = { 9, 2, 5 }; int min = row[0]; for (int i = 1; i < NUMCOLS; i++) if (row[i] < min) min = row[i]; but since we want to find and record the minimum value of each 'row' in table, we're going to use a nested loop. Instead of the min variable from before, we store each value in the associated index of our minvals array. for (i = 0; i < NUMROWS; i++) { minvals[i] = table[i][0]; for (j = 1; j < NUMCOLS; j++) if (table[i][j] < minvals[i]) minvals[i] = table[i][j]; } When it comes time to print, we're going to repeat our nested loop. Our inner loop prints each element of each 'row' of table, and we end each iteration of the outer loop by printing the value found in minvals with the same index of our 'row'. for (i = 0; i < NUMROWS; i++) { for (j = 0; j < NUMCOLS; j++) printf("%6d", table[i][j]); printf(":%6d\n", minvals[i]); } Here's a working example. #include <stdio.h> #define NUMROWS 2 #define NUMCOLS 3 int main(void) { const int table[NUMROWS][NUMCOLS] = { { 9, 2, 5 }, { 3, -4, -12 } }; int minvals[NUMROWS]; int i, j; for (i = 0; i < NUMROWS; i++) { minvals[i] = table[i][0]; for (j = 1; j < NUMCOLS; j++) if (table[i][j] < minvals[i]) minvals[i] = table[i][j]; } puts("Table value: minimum values"); for (i = 0; i < NUMROWS; i++) { for (j = 0; j < NUMCOLS; j++) printf("%6d", table[i][j]); printf(":%6d\n", minvals[i]); } } A good further exercise for you would be to compose the logic of the inner loop for finding minimum values into a more generic function. Its function signature would look like int min(int *array, size_t length); allowing it to work on arrays of varying sizes. Then our outer loop could be as simple as: for (i = 0; i < NUMROWS; i++) minvals[i] = min(table[i], NUMCOLS);
The line int *ptr = &table; is wrong, because &table is of type int (*)[2][3] (i.e. a pointer to the entire table), whereas ptr is a pointer to a single element. Also, your pointer is non-const, so it cannot point be made to point into a const array. If you want ptr to point to a single int value, then you should declare it the following way: const int *ptr = &table[0][0]; Also, you are reading the contents of the array minvals, although that array contains uninitialized data. This does not make sense and causes undefined behavior. Instead of doing complex pointer arithmetic with the expression *((ptr+i*NUMCOLS)+j)) you can simply write the following: table[i][j] That way, you do not need the pointer ptr and your code is simpler.
A question regarding making ordered pairs from every element in an array
I was curious about how I could possibly iterate through an array, and keep track of every single possible ordered pair. To create a problem to illustrate this; lets say I have a function that takes in an input array, the length of that array and a "target" which is the product of 2 values, and outputs an array consisting of the indices of the input array that you need to multiply in order to get the "target". int* multipairs(int* inputarray, int arraysize, int target){ /code } For example: Given an array, arr = [2, 5, 1, 9, 1, 0, 10, 2], and target = 50 It should return output = [1,6]. In my mind, I would iterate through the arrays as follow; (0,1) -> (0,2) -> (0,3) -> (0,4).... In the second pass I would do: (1,2) -> (1,3) -> (1,4)... . . . and so on I have the idea of what I want to do, but I am unfamiliar with C programming, and have no idea how to make a proper for loop. Please help me figure this out.
Your description of the algorithm is complete - as you say, the first item in the pair is iterating over all the array indices. For each of those, you want to iterate over all the pairs that follow that in the array. for (int i = 0, i < arraysize; i++) { for (int j = i + 1; j < arraysize; j++) { // operate on pair array[i] and array[j] } }
You can use nested for-loops to solve your problem. int* multipairs(int* inputarray, int arraysize, int target){ int i, j, k = -1; /* Maximum number of such pairs can be arraysize*(arraysize-1)/2 Since, for each pair we store two indices (0-indexed), maximum size of output array will be arraysize*(arraysize-1) */ int maxsize = arraysize*(arraysize-1); int *output = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int)*maxsize); for (i = 0, i < arraysize; i++){ for (j = i + 1; j < arraysize; j++){ if(inputarray[i] * inputarray[j] == target){ output[++k] = i; output[++k] = j; } } } return output; }
Reordering the rows in a matrix in a specific order
I am successfully storing the calculated subsets in a 2-D array matrix in C language.Now I want to print the subsets in an order desired. For eg. 2-D array matrix is 10 7 3 2 1 10 7 5 1 7 6 5 3 2 10 6 5 2 10 7 6 Desired Output 10 7 6 10 7 5 1 10 7 3 2 1 10 6 5 2 7 6 5 3 2 How quick sort can be applied to sort/order these rows?
As #chqrlie noted, this can be easily solved with qsort. Depending on the way the matrix is declared (is it an array of pointers to arrays of ints? do all arrays have the same length? is it a global array of fixed size?) the code will have to do slightly different things. So, assuming the array is a global variable and all rows have same length (padded with 0s): MWE: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> /* Compare 2 integers returns: -1 if *i1 < *i2 +1 if *i1 > *i2 0 if *i1 == *i2 */ int intcmp(const int *i1, const int *i2) { return (*i2 < *i1) - (*i1 < *i2); } #define ROWS 5 #define COLS 5 /* Assumes rows already sorted in descending order NOTE: qsort calls the comparison function with pointers to elements so this function has to be tweaked in case the matrix is an array of pointers. In that case the function's declaration would be: int rowcmp(int **pr1, int **pr2) { const int *r1 = *pr1; const int *r2 = *pr2; // the rest is the same } */ int rowcmp(const int *r1, const int *r2) { int i = 0, cmp; do { cmp = intcmp(&r1[i], &r2[i]); i++; } while (i < COLS && cmp == 0); return -cmp; /* return -cmp to sort in descending order */ } int data[5][5] = { {10,7,3,2,1}, {10,7,5,1,0}, { 7,6,5,3,2}, {10,6,5,2,0}, {10,7,6,0,0} }; void printmatrix() { int i, j; for (i = 0; i < ROWS; i++) { for (j = 0; j < COLS; j++) { printf("%d ", data[i][j]); /* leaves a trailing space in each row */ } printf("\n"); } } int main() { printmatrix(); qsort(data, 5, sizeof(data[0]), (int (*)(const void *, const void *))rowcmp); printf("\n"); printmatrix(); return 0; } For the most flexible solution, I would define struct row { size_t len; int *elems; }; struct matrix { struct row *rows; size_t nrows; }; and change the code accordingly. NOTE: code not thoroughly tested, use with caution ;)
First of all, are you sure that the 1 on row 3,col 5 should be there and not on the last line? Anyway, an efficient way to achieve what you want is: compute the frequency array declare a new matrix go from the highest element (10 in your case) from frequency array and put in your matrix using your desired format. It is time-efficient because you don't use any sorting algorithm, thus you don't waste time there. It is NOT space-efficient because you use 2 matrices and 1 array, instead of only 1 matrix as suggested in other posts, but this should not be a problem, unless you use matrices of millions of rows and columns C code for frequency array: int freq[11] = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}; for(int i=0; i<NO_ROWS; i++) { for(int j=0; j<NO_COLS; j++) { if(MATRIX[i][j]!=null && MATRIX[i][j]>0 && MATRIX[i][j]<11) { freq[MATRIX[i][j]]++; } } } C code for computing the new matrix dimensions (assuming you want to keep the number of rows) OUTPUT_MATRIX[100][100] /*I declared it statically, but I would advise to make it dinamically */ /* first, compute the number columns. To do so, we need the number of elements (we get them by simply summing up frequency array's elements) */ int s=0; for(int i=0; i<11; i++) { s+=frequency[i]; } int addOne = 0 /* boolean value to check if we will have to add one extra column for safety */ if(s % NO_ROWS) { addOne = 1; /* division is not even, so we will have to add extra column */ } NO_COLS = s/NO_ROWS + addOne; Now, final part, assigning the values from frequency array to the OUTPUT_MATRIX int k=0; int currentNumber = 10; /* assigning starts from 10 */ for(int i=0; i<NO_ROWS; i++) { for(int j=0; j<NO_COLS; j++) { if(currentNumber>0) { if(frequency[currentNumber]==0 || k>=frequency[currentNumber]) { currentNumber--; k=0; } OUTPUT_MATRIX[i][j] = frequency[currentNumber]; k++; } else {/*here, you can assign the rest of the value with whatever you want I will just put 0's */ OUTPUTMATRIX[i][j] = 0; } } } Hope this helps!
This is what I do in C++ to reorder a matrix: // b is the matrix and p is an array of integer containing the desired order of rows for(i=0; i<n; i++){ if( p[i]==i ) continue; b[i].swap(b[p[i]]); j = p[i]; // New row i position // Update row i position to new one for(int k=i+1; k<n; k++){ if( p[k] == i ) p[k] = j; } printRow( b[i] ); }
You need to define an array of pointers of the data type you use and then you can reorder your matrix. for example your matrix is: arr[5][10], and you want to print line 4 before line 3: int *[5] arr2; arr2[0] = &arr[0][0]; arr2[1] = &arr[1][0]; arr2[2] = &arr[2][0]; arr2[3] = &arr[4][0]; arr2[4] = &arr[3][0]; in regard to how will the ordering algorithm work, i would suggest placing a header in the start of each array in the matrix which will tell you how many elements it has(basically the first element of each array can be a counter of the total elements) afterwards you can order the strings by comparing the header, and if it is equal comparing the first element and so on. this can be done in a loop that iterates as many times as there are elements in the array, when the elements are not equal, break out of the loop. hope this helps.
Find location of numbers in 2d array
I have two arrays. Array A and Array B. Now I need to get where in array B is sequence from array A located. I need to get location of last number and I don't know how. A[4]={6,3,3,2}; B[10][18]={ {5,3,6,5,6,1,6,1,4,4,5,4,4,6,3,3,1,3}, {6,2,3,6,3,3,2,4,3,1,5,5,3,4,4,1,6,5}, {6,4,3,1,6,2,2,5,3,4,3,2,6,4,5,5,1,4}, {5,3,5,6,6,4,3,2,6,5,1,2,5,6,5,2,3,1}, {1,2,5,2,6,3,1,5,4,6,4,4,4,2,2,2,3,3}, {4,1,4,2,3,2,3,6,4,1,6,2,3,4,4,1,1,4}, {5,3,3,2,6,2,5,2,3,1,2,6,5,1,6,4,1,3}, {4,5,2,1,2,5,2,6,4,3,3,2,3,3,3,1,5,1}, {1,3,5,5,2,1,3,3,3,1,3,3,6,3,3,3,6,5}, {4,5,2,4,2,3,4,2,5,6,5,2,6,3,5,4,5,2} }; For example: Sequence 6,3,3,2 start in second row and in forth column and ends in seventh column. I need to get location of number 2. My result should be: Row = 2, Column= 7 Sequence isn't always in row. It can be in column to. For example: 3,2,4,3 and I ned to know location of number 4. I know how to search one number in one dimensional array but in this case I don't have solution. Language is C.
You can compare blocks using memcmp: for (i = 0; i < rows; i++) { /* For each row */ for (j = 0; j < cols - size; j++) { /* For each col until cols - 4 */ if (memcmp(A, &B[i][j], sizeof(A)) == 0) { /* Compare entire block */ #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> int main(void) { int A[4] = {6,3,3,2}; int B[10][18] = { {5,3,6,5,6,1,6,1,4,4,5,4,4,6,3,3,1,3}, {6,2,3,6,3,3,2,4,3,1,5,5,3,4,4,1,6,5}, {6,4,3,1,6,2,2,5,3,4,3,2,6,4,5,5,1,4}, {5,3,5,6,6,4,3,2,6,5,1,2,5,6,5,2,3,1}, {1,2,5,2,6,3,1,5,4,6,4,4,4,2,2,2,3,3}, {4,1,4,2,3,2,3,6,4,1,6,2,3,4,4,1,1,4}, {5,3,3,2,6,2,5,2,3,1,2,6,5,1,6,4,1,3}, {4,5,2,1,2,5,2,6,4,3,3,2,3,3,3,1,5,1}, {1,3,5,5,2,1,3,3,3,1,3,3,6,3,3,3,6,5}, {4,5,2,4,2,3,4,2,5,6,5,2,6,3,5,4,5,2} }; size_t i, j, size, rows, cols; int founded = 0; size = sizeof(A) / sizeof(A[0]); rows = sizeof(B) / sizeof(B[0]); cols = sizeof(B[0]) / sizeof(B[0][0]); for (i = 0; i < rows; i++) { for (j = 0; j < cols - size; j++) { if (memcmp(A, &B[i][j], sizeof(A)) == 0) { founded = 1; break; } } if (founded) break; } if (founded) printf("Row: %zu Col: %zu\n", i + 1, j + size); return 0; }
The problem is not the language. The problem you face is you need to come out with the algorithm first. Actually this can be easily done by just looking at the first number of the 1D array. In your example it is 6 from (6,3,3,2). Look for 6 in your 2D array. Once 6 is found use a loop which loop 4 times (because there are 4 numbers to look for - (6,3,3,2). In the loop, check whether the subsequent numbers are 3,3,2. If it is, return the location Else continue the process to look for 6. Done! It will look like this: for(x=0; x<rows; x++) for(y=0; y<cols; y++) { if(matrix[x][y] == array1D[0]) for(z=1; z<array1DSize; z++){ if(matrix[x][y] != array1D[z]) break; location = y; } }
If you know how to do it with a one dimensional array, you can do it like that in C with multidimensional arrays too! For instance, say you have a two dimensional array like so: int array[5][5]; // 5x5 array of ints You can actually access it in linear fashion, by doing: (*array)[linear offset] So that means if you want to access the 2nd column of the 2nd row, you can do: (*array)[6] Because the 2nd row starts at index 5, and the second column is at index 1, so you would do (5+1) to get 6. Likewise, the 3rd row would start at index 10, so if you wanted the 2nd column in the third row, you can do (10+1). Knowing that, you can take your original algorithm and adapt it to access the multidimensional array in a linear fashion. This takes place of the "wrap around" possibility as well.