I am just learning redux and this is my first time using it in a project. I am trying to update a certain value in an array of objects. The structure of my object is:
students: {
loading: false,
error: null,
data: [{
id: 1,
name: "Bob",
email: 'whatever#gmail.com',
status: 'out'
}]
}
Below are my actions for this and the data it gets back is the id of the student that it needs to update. These work fine.
export const studentCheckInStart = student => ({
type: "STUDENT_CHECK_IN_START",
student
})
export const studentCheckIn = (id) => {
return dispatch => {
dispatch(studentCheckInStart())
return axios.put('http://localhost:8080/studentList/'+id)
.then((response) => {
dispatch(studentCheckInSuccess(response.data))
}).catch(err => {
dispatch(studentCheckInError(err))
})
}
}
export const studentCheckInSuccess = (data) => {
return {
type: STUDENT_CHECK_IN_SUCCESS,
payload: data
}
}
export const studentCheckInError = (error) => {
return {
type: STUDENT_CHECK_IN_ERROR,
error
}
}
Where I'm having the issue is in the reducer
case "STUDENT_CHECK_IN_SUCCESS":
let updatedStudent = state.students.data.findIndex((student) => {
return student.id === action.payload
})
console.log(updatedStudent)
return {
...state,
students: {
...state.students[updatedStudent],
data: {
status:'in'
}
}
};
break;
case "STUDENT_CHECK_IN_START":
return {
...state,
students: {
...state.students,
loading: true
}
}
break;
case "STUDENT_CHECK_IN_ERROR":
return {
...state,
students: {
...state.students,
error: action.payload,
loading: false
}
}
break;
I'm trying to target the specific student object using the id to find the index of the student I want to target. Then change just the status of that object to "in". I know what I have in the STUDENT_CHECK_IN_SUCCESS is incorrect, I'm just not sure how to do it.
Your state seems a little bit complex. Why do you need loading or error in your students object? What other parts do you have in your state beside students? This is one possible way I can think of at this situation (just the related part) :
let updatedStudent = state.students.data.findIndex(
student => student.id === action.payload
);
const newData = [ ...state.students.data ];
newData[ updatedStudent ] = { ...newData[ updatedStudent ], status: "in" }
return { ...state, students: { ...state.students, data: newData } };
I will edit my answer if I think a better way.
It looks like your action doesn't really need all that payload, just an id of the student who checked in. So if you change that, I think you could return this from your reducer action:
return {
...state,
students: {
...state.students,
data: state.students.data.map(s => {
if (s.id === action.id) {
return { ...s, status: 'in' };
}
return s;
}
}
};
The idea is that you need to return everything unchanged except the data array. By using map, we can return a modified version of the data array where the student whose id matches the one supplied in the action will have their status changed to in, but the rest of the students in the data array remain unchanged.
Related
I am trying to create a reducer to update a property in object, but i cant be able to update and store the new state information
Reducer
export default function hideCardNumber(state = INITIAL_STATE, action: Action) {
if (action.type === 'HIDE_CARDNUMBER') {
return {
...state,
data: {...state.data, action }}
}
else
return state
}
Action
export const toggleViewNumberCard = (cardId: number, hideCardNumber: boolean) => {
return {
type: 'HIDE_CARDNUMBER',
cardId,
hideCardNumber,
}
}
dispatch to action
function handleToggleViewCardNumber() {
cards.map((card: Card) => {
if (card.cardId === props.activeCard ) {
dispatch(toggleViewNumberCard(
card.cardId,
!card.hideCardNumber,
))
}
})
}
Initial State
export const INITIAL_STATE = {
activeCard: 0,
data: [
{
cardId: 0,
cardName: 'Card',
cardUsername: 'Name',
cardNumber: '1234 1234 1234 1234',
hideCardNumber: false, <-- Trying to replace this property when reducer update
},
]
}
You need to update reducer like this:
const {hideCardNumber, cardId} = action;
return {
...state,
data: state.data.map(item => item.cardId === cardId ? {...item, hideCardNumber} : item )
}
In real-world scenarios, cardID will be a hash. Also to easily maintain the store data when the application grows INITIAL_STATE should be like this.
export const INITIAL_STATE = {
activeCard: 0,
data: {
123456: {
cardId: 123456,
cardName: 'Card',
cardUsername: 'Name',
cardNumber: '1234 1234 1234 1234',
hideCardNumber: false,
},
}
}
Then the Reducer will be like this.
export default function hideCardNumber(state = INITIAL_STATE, action) {
if (action.type === 'HIDE_CARDNUMBER') {
return {
...state,
data: {
...state.data,
[action.cardId]: {
...state.data[action.cardId],
hideCardNumber: action.hideCardNumber
}
}
}
}
else
return state
}
If the activeCard matches one of the IDs in the cards, the code will work perfectly.
first of all it's better to put you data in payload like:
export const toggleViewNumberCard = (cardId: number, hideCardNumber: boolean) => {
return {
type: 'HIDE_CARDNUMBER',
payload : {
cardId,
hideCardNumber,
}
}
}
looks like you have array of cards ,first of all you must have find your current card that you wanna replace using cardid like this:
const index = state.data.findIndex(
(card) => cardId === action.payload.cardId
);
then copy your old array :
const newArray = [...state.data];
then replace that index of newarray with your new hideCardNumber value like this:
newArray[index] = {
...newArray[index],
action.payload.hideCardNumber
};
return {
...state,
data: newArray,
};
i hope it would help you
I'm working on react app with redux. I want to delete multiple item from array. I write below code in my reducer which delete single item from array but i want to delete multiple item.
case DELETE_LINK:
let dltLink = state.filter(item => {
return item._id !== action.data._id
})
return {
...state,
parentFolderlinks: dltLink
};
It seems you want to filter links from state.parentFolderlinks, say you have the ids in action.data.ids, you could
case DELETE_LINK:
const parentFolderlinks = state.parentFolderlinks.filter(item => {
return !action.data.ids.includes(item._id);
});
return {
...state,
parentFolderlinks
};
On what basis would you like to filter items? I assume that multiple items will not have the same id.
Below example shows how we can filter multiple items in redux. In this case, foods state with items that has type as fruit and removes everything else.
// initial state with all types of foods
const initialState = {
"foods": [
{
name: "apple",
type: "fruit"
},
{
name: "orange",
type: "fruit"
},
{
name: "broccoli",
type: "vegetable"
},
{
name: "spinach",
type: "vegetable"
},
]
}
// sample reducer that shows how to delete multiple items
export default (state = initialState, { type, payload }) => {
switch (type) {
// delete multiple items that does not have type fruit
// i.e both brocolli and spinach are removed because they have type vegetable
case DELETE_ITEMS_WITHOUT_TYPE_FRUIT:
const onlyFruits = state.foods.filter(food => food.type === "fruit");
return {
...state,
foods: onlyFruits
}
}
}
you could map over the state and run it through a function that works out if you want to keep it or not (I don't know what your logic is for that) then return the array at the end
const keepThisItem =(item) => {
return item.keep
}
case DELETE_LINK:
let itemsToKeep = []
let dltLink = state.map(item => {
if(keepThisItem(item){
itemsToKeep.push(item)
}
return itemsToKeep
})
Intended for this reduce function to add new message into a list of messages with a variable key userId.
let state = {
data: {
user1: ["message1", "message2"],
user2: ["message3", "message4"],
},
};
This is what I've got so far:
case types.MESSAGE_FETCHED:
return {
...state,
data: {
...state.data,
[payload.userId]: [...state.data[payload.userId], payload.message],
},
};
The error I'm getting this error:
TypeError: state.data[payload.userId] is not iterable
I found that, I have to initialize an empty array first.
case types.MESSAGE_FETCHED:
if (!(payload.userId in state.data)) {
state.data[payload.userId] = [];
}
return {
...state,
data: {
...state.data,
[payload.userId]: [...state.data[payload.userId], payload.message],
}
}
I'm new to Redux and am having some difficulty composing a working reducer for my situation.
My current state looks like this
export const userData = {
userID: '12345678',
userDetails: {
firstName: 'Joe',
surname: 'Bloggs'
},
currentGames: [
{
gameId: 'G-00000001',
gameSelections: [
{
subgameId: '',
selection: ''
}
]
}
]
};
My action looks like this
function selectWinner (gameId, subgameId, selection) {
return {
type: SELECT_WINNER,
gameId,
subgameId,
selection
}
}
The aim is to be able to add/update the objects in the gameSelections array.
There may be more than one Object in the currentGames array also.
I've heard I should use .map but I'm not really sure how.
You're on the right track for using .map() to iterate over the array of objects. It also looks like your action-creator has all the necessary parameters to update your reducer state.
Your reducer can look something like this:
const userReducer = (state=userData, action) => {
switch(action.type){
case SELECT_WINNER:
return {
...state,
currentGames: [...state.currentGames].map((game) => {
if(game.gameId == action.gameId){
return {
...game,
gameSelections: [...game.gameSelections].map((gameSelection) => {
if(gameSelection.subgameId == action.subgameId){
return {
...gameSelection,
selection: action.selection
}
} else {
return gameSelection
}
})
}
} else {
return game
}
})
}
default:
return state
}
}
Kind of messy, but would get the job-done with a deeply nested state.
Add item to array:
case'ADD_ITEM':
return {
...state,
some_arr: [...state.some_arr, action.payload]
}
update spicific item in array:
case 'UPDATE_ITEM':
return {
...state,
some_arr: state. some_arr.map(
(item, index) => index === specific_index
? {...item, ...action.payload}
: content
)
}
Deep cloning of the state is required.
useful link-https://redux.js.org/recipes/structuring-reducers/immutable-update-patterns
const reducer = (state = userData, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case CASENAME:
return {
userID: state.userID,
userDetails: {
...state.userdetails
},
currentGames: [
{
gameId: action.gameId,
gameSelections: [
{
subgameId: action.subgameId,
selection: action.selection
}
]
}
]
};
}
}
I am currently making a sample project in AngularJs combined with Redux.
I am struggling to get the mappings from the reducer working.
I have a simple input where users can set a new name together with a drop down to select a 'company'.
<input type="text" ng-model="$ctrl.single.object.name">
<select ng-change="$ctrl.getProperties()"
ng-options="option.description as option.description for option in $ctrl.list.all"
ng-model="$ctrl.single.object.company">
When the user changes the company, new properties need to be fetched in order for the user to set these properties.
function FooController($ngRedux, FooActions, BarActions) {
this.$onInit = function () {
this.unsubscribeCompanies = $ngRedux.connect(this.mapStateToThis, BarActions)(this);
this.fetchCompanyList();
};
this.$onDestroy = function () {
this.unsubscribeCompanies();
};
this.fetchCompanyList = function () {
this.fetchCompanies().payload.then((response) => {
this.fetchCompaniesSuccess(response.data);
}, (error) => {
this.fetchCompaniesError(error.data);
});
};
this.getProperties = function () {
this.fetchCompanyProperties(this.single.object.company).payload.then((response) => {
this.fetchCompanyPropertiesSuccess(response.data);
}, (error) => {
this.fetchCompanyPropertiesError(error.data);
});
};
this.mapStateToThis = function (state) {
return {
list: state.bar.list,
single: state.bar.single
};
};
}
module.exports = {
template: require('./index.html'),
controller: ['$ngRedux', 'FooActions', 'BarActions', FooController]
}
The problem I get is that the name and the selected company are overwritten with empty values when the fetch for properties is successful. I get why the values are overwritten with empty values and I have found a way to get it working.
export const GET_COMPANIES = 'GET_COMPANIES';
export const GET_COMPANIES_SUCCESS = 'GET_COMPANIES_SUCCESS';
export const GET_COMPANIES_ERROR = 'GET_COMPANIES_ERROR';
export const GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES = 'GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES';
export const GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_SUCCESS = 'GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_SUCCESS';
export const GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_ERROR = 'GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_ERROR';
export default function BarActions($http) {
function fetchCompanies() {
return {
type: GET_COMPANIES,
payload: $http.get('api/companies')
};
}
function fetchCompaniesSuccess(companies) {
return {
type: GET_COMPANIES_SUCCESS,
payload: companies
};
}
function fetchCompaniesError(error) {
return {
type: GET_COMPANIES_ERROR,
payload: error
};
}
function fetchCompanyProperties(company) {
return {
type: GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES,
payload: $http.get(`api/company/${company}/properties`)
};
}
function fetchCompanyPropertiesSuccess(properties) {
return {
type: GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_SUCCESS,
payload: properties
};
}
function fetchCompanyPropertiesError(error) {
return {
type: GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_ERROR,
payload: error
};
}
return {
fetchCompanies,
fetchCompaniesSuccess,
fetchCompaniesError,
fetchCompanyProperties,
fetchCompanyPropertiesSuccess,
fetchCompanyPropertiesError
}
}
The way I overwrite the values in the reducer is as follows:
import { GET_COMPANIES, GET_COMPANIES_SUCCESS, GET_COMPANIES_ERROR, GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES, GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_ERROR, GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_SUCCESS } from "../actions/bar.actions";
const all = [];
const initialState = {
list: {
all,
filtered: all,
error: null,
loading: false
},
single: {
object: {},
error: null,
loading: false
}
};
export function BarReducer(state = initialState, action) {
switch (action.type) {
case GET_COMPANIES:
return { ...state, list: { all: [], filtered: [], error: null, loading: true } };
case GET_COMPANIES_SUCCESS:
return { ...state, list: { all: action.payload, filtered: action.payload, error: null, loading: false } };
case GET_COMPANIES_ERROR:
return { ...state, list: { all: [], filtered: [], error: action.payload.innerException, loading: false } };
case GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES:
return { ...state, single: { ...state.single, object: { ...state.single.object }, error: null, loading: true } };
case GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_SUCCESS:
return { ...state, single: { ...state.single, object: { ...state.single.object, payloadValues: action.payload }, error: null, loading: false } };
case GET_COMPANIES_PROPERTIES_ERROR:
return { ...state, single: { object: null, error: action.payload.innerException, loading: false } };
default:
return state;
}
}
The way I now use the spread operator in order to overwrite the old state feels dirty. I was wondering if there are any rules or guidelines to handle this issue. So far I have searched a while on internet and in specific the Redux website but I did not come cross any other solutions.
The breakage is likely due to the structure of the reducer. It is concerned with too many different parts of state and has to operate on deep nested objects, making it easy to accidentally mutate state. The guidelines for reducer structure say that splitting reducer state into normalized slices is the best way to go.
Try splitting your one reducer into multiple smaller reducers. For example:
export const all = (initialAll = [], { type, companies }) => {
switch(type) {
case GET_COMPANIES_SUCCESS: return companies;
default: return initialAll;
}
}
export const error = (initialError = '', { type, error }) => {
switch(type) {
case GET_COMPANIES_ERROR: return error;
default: return initialError;
}
}
export const isFetching = (isFetching = false, { type }) => {
switch(type) {
case GET_COMPANIES: return true;
case GET_COMPANIES_SUCCESS: return false;
case GET_COMPANIES_ERROR: return false;
default: return isFetching;
}
}
Then, compose them into one reducer:
import { combineReducers } from 'redux';
export list = combineReducers({
all,
error,
isFetching
});
// ...
export rootReducer = combineReducers({
list,
single,
// ...
})
This way, each reducer is concerned with only one thing or set of things, and its reduction handlers can do simple operations on single-level state instead of complex operations on deep nested state.
Also, in your list substate, it looks like you are storing the same type of collection resources in both all and filtered with potential overlap. This leads to multiple sources of truth for the same data, which opens the door to data inconsistency. Instead, keep an array of filteredIds:
export const filteredIds = (initialIds = [], { type, filteredIds }) => {
switch(type) {
case SET_FILTERED_IDS: return filteredIds;
default: return initialIds;
}
}
Then, use a selector that filters all by the filteredIds to get your filtered items.
One option is to use Immutable, which would change your reducers to:
case GET_COMPANIES:
return state.setIn(['list', 'loading'], true);
// etc
See Using Immutable.JS with Redux for more information about this approach.
Another option is to use Lodash, as shown in this Issue, you can define the following function to make it similar to the immutable one:
import {clone, setWith, curry} from 'lodash/fp';
export const setIn = curry((path, value, obj) =>
setWith(clone, path, value, clone(obj)),
);
Then you can use setIn as follow:
case GET_COMPANIES:
return setIn(['list', 'loading'], true, state);
// etc
The Lodash approach is just working with plain object, so it might be easier to understand than Immutable.