I would like to implement a page like this
I have the following folder structure:
-root/
--root.controller.js
--root.module.js
--root.routes.js
--root.html
--filters/
----filters.controller.js
----filters.module.js
----filters.routes.js
----filters.html
--tableData/
----tableData.controller.js
----tableData.module.js
----tableData.routes.js
----tableData.html
--graph/
----graph.controller.js
----graph.module.js
----graph.routes.js
----graph.html
I would like to know the best approach in order to manage call from each controller in the best way.
I mean, from filters, I can change selection on dropdown or update other fields values, and then I would update data on tabledata. And if I change selection on tabledata I would update graph.
Root url is '/root/{itemId}' and I cannot add some other value on querystring.
How can I manage internal variables and methods?
thanks a lot
From my understanding, it's better to go for events $emit , $broadcast & on to achieve the same.
As I can see, you are having independent controllers with no relationship with most of the the other controllers.
Few suggestions to implement it:
use $rootScope.$emit and $rootScope.on if they controllers have no relationship. Make sure you are removing it manually though (can be ignored if the app is not too heavy but should be kept in mind). This link will be surely helpful . Eg:
If the filter is changed, an event filter-changed will be triggered. The graph.controller and table.controller will be informed and will render the UI accordingly.
Create a messaging service from where the controllers will subscribe and unsubscribe the events. That will keep numbers of events in check. You'll be aware of how many events have actually been created in the application.
Related
In my angular application I have a global sidebar navigation directive which among other things provides a global search for the user (with bunch of criteria, not just a text field).
Upon searching I'd like to show a page with the search results.
Now, the sidebar is defined in the main app html, what is the best way of sharing the search results data?
Should the sidebar be in charge of performing the search? If so how do I share it's data to the specific page results?
Or on the other hand, perhaps the specific search results page should be in charge of this data? If so how do I connect it with the sidebar search parameters when performing a search?
Any best practices of this scenario are appreciated.
Steps to make your future bright:
Separate your search module in 3 modules: main, sidebar, results
Translate data between each of them with one major SearchResultsService that will:
a) acquire collection of sidebar filters with true or false for each key (key as name for GET param that will be used for passing to search API of your back-end);
b) serialize or deserialize data depending on results module approach;
c) do some pagination;
d) hold or even cache data if you need (for infinite scroll functionality);
sidebar and results will be views of main (child modules), so you will be able to share main controller methods if needed (noob way)
When I was facing implementation of such module I've used black magic to escape $watch and $on event system. If you are young - then use $on that will allow you to notify each of modules about something important (such pagination change, item selection, etc.) and keep them separated same time.
You are free to place your existing sidebar in main module but I'd moved from directive to view with own controller and template.
Directives are used for reusable items either for pasting functionality. But dat sidebar obviously should be defined as separate part of app (aka module) but not as directive.
P.S. Keep your controllers simple.
Google list:
Multiply satisfection
Your golden chest
Root of AngularJS evil
Angular services are substitutable objects that are wired together using dependency injection (DI). You can use services to organize and share code across your app.
https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/services
I've inherited a codebase that follows the format of: a router sets a controller, the controller fetches the collection/model needed, then the controller set/passes the view the collection/model.
The current View I'm working on loads a collection, and now I need to build in a feature where I fetch a single model after the view has rendered, based on an id clicked (note the model is from a different collection).
I only want to load the model when/if they click a button. So my question is, can I setup the model/fetch in the View, or should I be doing that in the controller? Is there a backbone best practice when adopting a controller/view setup like this?
I primarily ask because it seems easier for me to add this new feature right in the View. But is that a bad practice? I thought so, so I started down the path of triggering an event in the View for the controller to the fetch the model, and then somehow pass that back to the View (but I'm not sure really how to even do that)...it seems like a lot of unnecessary hoop jumping?
Its OK to fetch collection via views. As 'plain' backbone does not Controller, View in charge of it responsibilities.
But imho fetch collections via controller is better practice, its easier to scale and support and test.
The only difficulty is to set communication between Controller and View context event. One of the approach is trigger Message Bus event on context event like
events: {
'click .some': function() {
this.trigger('someHappend', { some: data })
}
}
and listen to this event in Controller
this.on(someViewInstance, 'someHappend', function() {
// do something in controller
})
If you already inherited code with structure you described you'd better follow it. Also you might be interested in MarionetteJS as significant improvement. Also highly recommend you to checkout BackboneRails, screencasts not free but very usefull, especially in large scale app maintain
What I did is:
When a menu item is clicked, a action will be done, like deleting a user, sending emails to a group, etc. To this end, for each menu item, I define a ui-router state, and use the state url to activate the state via sref. I thought that a menu action is just a UI component for user to let users to do something, which is just a state of UI.
I was advised that I was using ui-router in a wrong way as a state url can not identify an action. For example, to delete a group of users, the state url can not tell you what group of users have been deleted.
In short, I agree with your manager while being an angular newbie myself. Angular routes are designed for managing different views of your app. I.e. define a route and corresponding view template for each view. If you add application logic into the routes, your application structure gets quickly a mess and difficult to keep clear.
To me it is much more natural that the views are managed by the routes, and each action in each view is handled by the controller of that view. If the actions grow "big", then it is worth refactoring parts of the controller into separate services. If you require some sort of "dynamic HTML" depending on the action, e.g. bootstrap modals are handy for doing that within the current view (see http://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/).
E.g. in my current project, I don't actually manually edit the routes at all but let yeoman angular generator to do that for me free of charge - i.e. I instantiate each new view in my dev.env using the following command (more info on this from https://github.com/yeoman/generator-angular)
yo angular:route myNewView
More info on angular philosophy can be read from angular documentation for developers: https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/concepts
You should probably be doing this actions via a method on $scope.
$scope.deleteItem = function (items) {
Service.delete(items);
};
// which is the same as:
$scope.deleteItem = Service.delete;
<a ng-click="deleteItem(item)">Delete This Item</a>
Having it in the URL just seems wrong. I mean what does that look like? www.mysite.com/delete/users?
What would you like to be able to do for example is:
I have an active state 'order.detail' in shell, in these details would provide a link in each product line that leads to 'product.detail' state that is also a state that can be displayed in the shell.
But this link should display the state ' product.detail' as a frame in a dialog without changing the current location and maintain active state in the shell intact.
Also the 'product.detail' state, to be used as a main view of the shell, and to allow their reuse, your template should be wrapped by 'div' template of dialogue.
What I mean is, allow consult the details of something without leaving the current screen, and do so using the same existing details screen, or simply allow the 'Drill down' by related data with existing views.
Sharing state in AngularJS
One of the great things about Angular is that's it quite easy to keep track of state via providers.
For example consider one index view containing a paged grid table with many filter options. Clicking on one of the entries will take you to details view of the entry. When the user goes back from the details to the index he/she will expect that the UI state of the grid will be exactly the way they left it: same page, same sort by, same filters applied, same everything. With traditional techniques you would have to fallback on cookies, query params and/or server side state(less) magic, which all feels (and actually is) very cumbersome and error prone.
Provider values are singletons in the world of Angular, so when we inject the instance in one of the controllers, it will always be the same instance. Controllers on the other hand will be recreated each time one is requested.
Example
Register an empty object to keep track of controllers:
myApp.value('formState', {});
Create a controller, inject the provider value and expose it on the scope:
myApp.controller('MyController', function($scope, formState) {
$scope.formState = formState;
});
Hook any property of the provider value to input elements via the ng-model directive.
<input type="text" ngModel="formState.searchFilter"/>
Now every time the user will leave and re-enters this view the state of the UI is kept intact. You can add as many data to the state as you see fit and maybe even share it among multiple controllers if needed.
Provider types
There are different ways to create provider values: factory, service, value, constant and provider. If you want more control over the state, eg state management, you could use one of the other options. More info can be found here.
To dialog or not to dialog
In traditional websites displaying the details in a dialog was a "cheap" trick to keep track of the state in the background. Of course this is still an option with Angular, but there's no need for it. From the UX view, dialogs are "not done" and should be avoided if possible, but it also introduces pains in the areas of responsiveness and printing.
Plunker examples
Some code examples sharing state among controllers/views.
http://plnkr.co/edit/MwJrk5?p=preview
http://plnkr.co/edit/bNJtOP?p=preview
There is chance that I might not be able to explain my problem properly. Let me try.
I am developing a single page application using angular. This app basically displays the episodes of an online novel series. There is a navigation bar, which has query menus (Like, latest episode, episode of a particular date, episodes with a particular tag, etc). For each of these queries, i want a separate url.
/latest - should display the latest episode
/tag/:tagname - should return all episodes with that tag.
For all these queries, the resultant view is the same (list of episodes). So I will be using the same partial for all routes.
My question is, Should I actually create a new controller for each query? like, LatestEpisodeController, TagController?
Is there anyway I can use the url to determine what the user wants and run that query from within the same controller?
Ofcourse you can use same controller in routing definition, the question is what is the purpose of that? It will be worse to debug it later, if you have a shared functionality it's better to turn it into a factory or service and then use in controllers.
But the answer is YES, you can use same controllers and implement different behaviour basing on i.e. $location.path()
yes you can use single controller for multiple routing..
you can create different functions in controller and in each function do the according job.
In my case I have created different html page for different url and registered same controller for the html pages and in the html page I have called controller method using ng-init in div portion.
You can use same controller and same views as you wish...
$location can help you to get current path or full url if you want and you can call your service depends on your path...
here I write a little example for you to get the idea
PLUNKER