Actually i want to read emails one by one in junk folder of "outlook:live" and mark emails "Not spam".
emails = WebDriverWait(driver, 5).until(EC.element_to_be_clickable((By.XPATH,"//div[#class = 'xoCOIP8PzdTVy0T6q_uG6']")))
This xpath matches 400 instances. I want to make a loop to select one email at a time like select first email, click on the div and perform action and then 2nd email and so on. I'm trying this
emails = WebDriverWait(driver,
5).until(EC.element_to_be_clickable((By.XPATH,"//div[#class =
'xoCOIP8PzdTVy0T6q_uG6']")))
for count in range(0,len(emails)):
(emails)[count+1].click()
Please help me know where im doing wrong. Thanks in advance
It appears that the function you're using to return the clickable elements is only returning a single element, so you'll have to use a different function, make a change in your logic, etc.
For instance, you could use Selenium's find_elements_by_xpath("//div[#class = 'xoCOIP8PzdTVy0T6q_uG6']") which will return a list of WebElement object(s) if the element(s) are found, or an empty list if the element(s) is not found. This will, of course, not take into consideration the possibility of the elements not being completely loaded on the page. In my experience, just slapping a time.sleep(10) after you open the page is "'good enough".
I recommend making sure your elements can be discovered and interacted with first to make sure this isn't all in vain, if you haven't already.
Another option is to add another function, something like a elements_to_be_clickable() function, to the Expected Conditions source code.
From the Expected Condition documentation, I've done some research and it looks like the element_to_be_clickable() function only returns a single element. Moreover, from the source code, said function mainly makes use of the visibility_of_element_located() function. I believe you could follow similar logic to the element_to_be_clickable() function, but instead use the visibility_of_all_elements_located() function, in order to return multiple WebElements (since visibiilty_of_all_elements_located() returns a list of WebElements).
Related
I am still a bit new to the robot framework but please rest assured I am constantly reading its User Guide. I am a bit stuck now with one test case.
I do have a list of individual words, that I need to verify on a page, mostly German translations of field labels if they appear correctly or are found in an element at all.
I have created a list variable as follows:
#{GERMAN_WORDS} | Benutzer | Passwort | Sendung | Transaktionen | Notiz
I have the following locator that contains the text labels on the webpage, and the one I need to verify:
${GENERAL_GERMAN_BOARD} |
xpath=//*[#id="generalAndIncidents:generalAndIncidentsPanel"]
I would like to check every single word one by one from the list variable, whether they are present in the locator above.
I did create the following keyword for this purpose, however I might be missing something because it calls the entire content of my list variable, instead of checking the words from it one by one:
Block Text Verification
[Arguments] ${text_list_variable} ${locator_to_check}
Wait Until Element is Visible ${locator_to_check}
FOR ${label} IN ${text_list_variable}
${labelTostring} Convert to String ${label}
${isMatching} = Run Keyword and Return Status Element Should Contain ${locator_to_check} ${labelTostring}
Log ${label}
Log ${isMatching}
Exit For Loop If '${isMatching}' == 'False'
END
I am getting the following output for this:
Element
'xpath=//*[#id="generalAndIncidents:generalAndIncidentsPanel"]' should
have contained text '['Benutzer', 'Passwort', 'Sendung',
'Transaktionen', 'Notiz']' but its text was.... (and it lists all the
text from my locator)
So, it is basically not checking the words one by one.
Am I doing something wrong here? Is this a bad approach I am trying to do here?
I would be grateful if anyone could provide me some hint on what I should do here instead!
Thank you very much!
You've made one small but crucial mistake - the variable in this line here:
FOR ${label} IN ${text_list_variable}
, should be accessed with #:
FOR ${label} IN #{text_list_variable}
The for-in loops in RF expect 1 or more arguments of the looped over values, and the # expands a list variable to its members.
I want to create an experiment in PsychoPy Builder that conditionally shows a second routine to participants based on their keyboard response.
In the task, I have a loop that first goes through a routine where participants have three options to respond ('left','right','down') and only if they select 'left', regardless of the correct answer, should they see a second routine that asks a follow-up question to respond to. The loop should then restart with routine 1 each time.
I've tried using bits of code in the "begin experiment" section as such:
if response.key=='left':
continueRoutine=True
elif response.key!='left':
continueRoutine=False
But here I get an error saying response.key is not defined.
Assuming your keyboard component is actually called response, the attribute you are looking for is called response.keys. It is pluralised as it returns a list rather than a single value. This is because it is capable of storing multiple keypresses. Even if you only specify a single response, it will still be returned as a list containing just that single response (e.g. ['left'] rather than 'left'). So you either need to extract just one element from that list (e.g. response.keys[0]) and test against that, or use a construction like if 'left' in response.keys to check inside the list.
Secondly, you don't need to have a check that assigns True to continueRoutine, as it defaults to being True at the beginning of a routine. So it is only setting it to False that results in any action. So you could simply do something like this:
if not 'left' in response.keys:
continueRoutine = False
Lastly, for PsychoPy-specific questions, you might get better support via the dedicated forum at https://discourse.psychopy.org as it allows for more to-and-fro discussion than the single question/answer structure here at SO.
I have an array with a few items in it. Every x seconds, I receive a new array with the latest data. I check if the data has changed, and if it has, I replace the old one with the new one:
if (currentList != responseFromHttpCall) {
currentList = responseFromHttpCall;
}
This messes up the classes provided by ng-animate, as it acts like I replaced all of the items -- well, I do actually, but I don't know how to not.
These changes can occur in the list:
There's one (or more) new item(s) in the list - not necessaryly at the end of the list though.
One (or more) items in the list might be gone (deleted).
One (or more) items might be changed.
Two (or more) items might have been swapped.
Can anyone help me in getting ng-animate to understand what classes to show? I made a small "illustation" of my problem, found here: http://plnkr.co/edit/TS401ra58dgJS18ydsG1?p=preview
Thanks a lot!
To achieve what you want, you will need to modify existing list on controller (vm.list) on every action. I have one solution that may work for your particular example.
you would need to compare 2 lists (loop through first) similar to:
vm.list.forEach((val, index)=>{
// some code to check against array that's coming from ajax call
});
in case of adding you would need to loop against other list (in your case newList):
newList.forEach((val, index)=>{
// some code to check array on controller
});
I'm not saying this is the best solution but it works and will work in your case. Keep in mind - to properly test you will need to click reset after each action since you are looking at same global original list which will persist same data throughout the app cycle since we don't change it - if you want to change it just add before end of each function:
original = angular.copy(vm.list);
You could also make this more generic and put everything on one function, but for example, here's plnkr:
http://plnkr.co/edit/sr5CHji6DbiiknlgFdNm?p=preview
Hope it helps.
For instance, is it possible to define:
#FindBy(By.id("id1") OR By.id("form1:id1"))
public WebElement button
So that button having either "id1" or "form1:id1" should work fine?
You can use the #FindBys annotation, the syntax is:
#FindBys({#FindBy(id = "foo"),
#FindBy(className = "bar")})
The JavaDoc describes it here:
http://selenium.googlecode.com/git/docs/api/java/org/openqa/selenium/support/FindBys.html
Well,
use whathever you want, as long as it works
Personally I would use #FindBy(By.id("id1")) but it is just point of choice.
Also, there is no value added in referring same element twice with two different methods. It will only cause mess in your code
EDIT
As I understood your comment, there is element on the page which constantly changes its ID. If you need to refer to such elements, try using xPath See for example this xpath tutorial
The idea is that you will point to some place in the DOM rather than to specific ID
Use Xpath or CSS selector to do that. Or Java to store the ID name in String and then you can fill it to your Id.
I am trying to get forward and backwards pagination working for a query I have on my app.
I have started with the example at: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/ndb/queries#cursors
I would expect that example to do a typical forward/back pagination to create cursors that you can pass to your template in order to be used in a subsequent request for the page after/before the current one. But what it is doing is getting cursors for the same page, one from the beginning and the other from the end (if I have understood correctly).
What I want is a cursor to the beginning of the following page, and a cursor to the beginning of the previous page, to use in my UI.
I have managed to almost get that with the following code, based on the mentioned example:
curs = Cursor(urlsafe=self.request.get('cur'))
q = MyModel.query(MyModel.usett == usett_key)
q_forward = q.order(-MyModel.sugerida)
q_reverse = q.order(MyModel.sugerida)
ofus, next_curs, more = q_forward.fetch_page(num_items_page,
start_cursor=curs)
rev_cursor = curs.reversed()
ofus1, prev_curs, more1 = q_reverse.fetch_page(num_items_page,
start_cursor=rev_cursor)
context = {}
if more and next_curs:
context['next_curs'] = next_curs.urlsafe()
if more1 and prev_curs:
context['prev_curs'] = prev_curs.reversed().urlsafe()
The problem, and the point of this question, is that I use more and more1 to see if there is a next page. And that is not working in the backwards sense. For the first page, more1 is True, in the second page more1 is False, and subsequent pages give True.
I would need something that gives False for the first page and True for every other page. It seems like this more return value is the thing to use, but maybe I have a bad Query setup, or any other thing wrong.
Thanks everyone!
Edit: Since I didn't find a simple solution for this, I switched to using ndbpager.
There's no such thing.
You know thats theres (at least) one page before the current page if you started the query with a cursor (the first page usualy dosnt have a cursor).
A common trick to access the previous page is inverting the sort-order.
If you have a list, sorted by creationdate desc, you could take the creationdate of the first element of your current page, query for elements with creationdate < this creationdate using inverted sort order. This will return the oldest elements which are newer then the given creationdate. Flip the list of retrived elements (to bring them into the correct order again) and there you have the elements of the page before, without using a cursor.
Note: this requires the values of your sortorder beeing distinct.
In some cases, its also possible to use a prebuild index allowing random-access to different pages, see https://bitbucket.org/viur/server/src/98de79b91778bb9b16e520acb28e257b21091790/indexes.py for more.
I have a workaround and not the best solution. it is baiscally redirecting back to the previous page.
Previous
I think PagedQuery has the capability but still waiting for someone to post a more comprehensive tutorial about it.