How do I get the name of the pre test condition "Background" tag in a Feature using Specflow + Nunit in C #?
I can get the name of the "Feature" like this:
return FeatureContext.Current.FeatureInfo.Title;
And the name of the "Scenario" like this:
return ScenarioContext.Current.ScenarioInfo.Title;
I also need to get the name of the "Background", or check if it exists.
Feature: FeatureTest
Description Feature...
Background: Get Background name or check it exists (Return It)
...Given, And
Scenario: Scenario Test
...Given, And
TL;DR
The reason you can't access the Background, is because the steps contained within it are duplicated at runtime across all of the scenarios within a feature, effectively removing the background.
The Answer:
Generally speaking, Backgrounds do not have a title:
Ability: Adding and Removing items from the basket
As a customer,
I want the ability to add and remove items from my basket
In order to choose the items that I want to purchase from the site
Background:
Given I have logged in as a customer
And I visit the "Clothing" page
Scenario: Adding items to my basket
When I add "Black Jeans" to my basket in size "M"
Then the total should be "£9.99"
Scenario: Removing items from the basket
Given I have added an item of clothing to my basket
When I empty my basket
Then the total should be "£0.00"
The Background steps get duplicated across the scenarios within the feature, meaning that the scenarios in my example are effectively:
Scenario: Adding items to my basket
Given I have logged in as a customer
And I visit the "Clothing" page
When I add "Black Jeans" to my basket in size "M"
Then the total should be "£9.99"
Scenario: Removing items from the basket
Given I have logged in as a customer
And I visit the "Clothing" page
Given I have added an item of clothing to my basket
When I empty my basket
Then the total should be "£0.00"
Why would you need to access the Background description, if what you're actually testing is covered by the Scenario description?
That is why currently they do not offer this as a feature. It's additional information within a file that allow ease of reading and understanding of what is actually being tested - but if your steps are descriptive enough, do you need a description for the setup for a test?
This information is currently not available at runtime in SpecFlow. Please open an issue on GitHub for this, that we can potentially add this in later versions.
But generally it is bad practice to depend on such fragile (potential often changing magic strings).
Better way would be to check for a tag on Scenario or Feature level.
Also be aware, that you don't know at runtime, that you are currently executing parts of the background. There is no difference between these Given steps and the Given steps of your scenario.
Related
I'm managing a company website, where we have to display our products. We however do not want to handle the admin edit for this CPT, nor offer the ability to access to the form. But we have to read some product data form the admin edit page. All has to be created or updated via our CRM platform automatically.
For this matter, I already setup a CPT (wprc_pr) and registered 6 custom hierarchical terms: 1 generic for the types (wprc_pr_type) and 5 targeting each types available: wprc_pr_rb, wprc_pr_sp, wprc_pr_pe, wprc_pr_ce and wprc_pr_pr. All those taxonomies are required for filtering purposes (was the old way of working, maybe not the best, opened to suggestions here). We happen to come out with archive pages links looking like site.tld/generic/specific-parent/specific-child/ which is what is desired here.
I have a internal tool, nodeJS based, to batch create products from our CRM. The job is simple: get all products not yet pushed to the website, format a new post, push it to the WP REST API, wait for response, updated CRM data in consequence, and proceed to next product. Handle about 1600 products today on trialn each gone fine
The issue for now is that in order for me to put the correct terms to the new post, I have to compute for each product the generic type and specific type children.
I handled that by creating 6 files, one for each taxonomy. Each file is basically a giant JS object with the id from the CRM as a key, and the term id as a value. My script handles the category assertion like that:
wp_taxonomy = [jsTaxonomyMapper[crm_id1][crm_id2]] // or [] if not found
I have to say it is working pretty well, and that I could stop here. But I will have to take that computing to the wp_after_insert_post hook, in order to reaffect the post to the desired category on updated if something changed on the CRM.
Not quite difficult, but if I happen to add category on the CRM, I'll have to manually edit my mappers to add the new terms, and believe me that's a hassle.
Not waiting for a full solution here, but a way to work the thing. Maybe a way to computed those mappers and store their values in the options table maybe, or have a mapper class, I don't know at all.
Additional information:
Data from the CRM comes as integers (ids corresponding to a label) and the mappers today consist of 6 arrays (nested or not), about 600 total entries.
If you have something for me, or even suggestions to simplify the process, I'll go with it.
Thanks.
EDIT :
Went with another approach, see comment below.
I need to show the Product's Name in the Menu, I think image says it all:
Click here to see the image
I have a menu, with two options, and the first show a text with a variable, but {!Product} don't works, there is a way of this work?
When I put {!Product} in Message or Question, this works normal...
I didn't find any solution for showing the variable in the title dialog, my solution was to change the message to "Know more about this product", I left a generic message.
Old topic but the answer might help someone.
There's a great article explaining how to get some dynamic information https://www.infallibletechie.com/2021/11/how-to-create-case-from-einstein-bot.html
In your case, I guess you need to
Query your products (the out-of-the-box Einstein Bot query is simple and has a limit of 3 items but you could call a flow or apex to get better granularity on the filter/logic and control le size)
Store the query result in a Custom record list Variable
Query data with a flow
Use a dynamic question and merge fields to display what you want
Top configuration of the dynamic question
Down configuration of the dynamic question
I am extending Kiwi TCMS for my team and trying to display the Product on the Search Test Cases page. The Product is tied to the Category field and I am not sure how to extract that field within the testcases/static/js/seach.js file.
I have traced it back to jsonrpc.js but am missing something, not sure what it is I am not seeing.
I added the Product field in the search.html file and the data is moved 1 column to the left since the array does not contain the Product field. I have tried "product" and "product_id" in the columns[] section of search.js.
Thanks
I have traced it back to jsonrpc.js but am missing something, not sure what it is I am not seeing.
JSON RPC is a communications protocol. The spec is very simple, you can find it at https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification. The jsonRPC function in Kiwi TCMS is a wrapper for that.
FK relationship between models are represented with a field called ..._id. For example Category has a field product_id. At the same time the Product model has a reverse relationship to Category - this is something that the underlying web framework adds automatically. The field is called Product.category.
Checkout how to make queries here:
https://kiwitcms.readthedocs.io/en/latest/modules/tcms.rpc.api.html#module-tcms.rpc.api
If you have test_case.category_id then you can send another API request to Product.filter method filtering on the category field with the respective value.
Inside the browser console you can do something like:
jsonRPC('Product.filter', {category: 1630}, console.log)
and see the results you get.
I added the Product field in the search.html file and the data is moved 1 column to the left since the array does not contain the Product field. I have tried "product" and "product_id" in the columns[] section of search.js.
You will have to modify the entire page (which includes search, the callback, the HTML template and the function rendering the returned data) for this to work.
It sounds like either
you need more information shown in the search table: there isn't much space available, OTOH there is a filter per Product so if you teach users to filter by product everything they see will be related to that product so they won't need additional column for that information
you need a more flexible mechanism for extension - it is mostly doable and possible to design pages in Kiwi TCMS to be arbitrarily extensible, however we haven't thought in this direction and we need more information about the intended use-case to figure out the underlying architecture.
you can design an entirely separate search page, using the upstream code as your base. Then bundle that into a plugin and just install your plugin into Kiwi TCMS. That actually sounds like the best option in this case and you will have full control over that page, see https://kiwitcms.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins/index.html.
I have the next issue.
I have a custom object called 'Application', and I have this requirement:
"Show all Contacts related to an Application. Create a field on Application object, must be read only".
I solve it with apex code. 'Application' has a lookup to Opportunity, Opportunity to Account, and all my contacts have AccountId, so this way, I get all the contacts using apex code in a trigger.
But, I've been ask to change this to a Formula field in Application object.
So, my issue is next. I'm not able to get all contacts with advance formula editor, because they're not part of any object. I have no master-detail relationship.
Does any one know how can I achieve this using configuration? I should not use apex code for this req.
Thank in advance guys.
I don't think you can do it.
In formulas / merge fields syntax there's no way to go "up, up then down" (Application -> Opportunity -> Account -> down to Contacts related list). There's also nothing that would let you loop through Contacts (and display what? Ids? Names? Emails?). Roughly speaking you can only go up through dots.
You might want to explore path of "cross object workflow" rules but I imagine that when I add a new Contact to Account it should somehow "spread itself" to all related Applications? There's no straight way to fire a workflow on delete too - so you'd eventually end up with inaccurate list.
I'd say trigger was a good solution. Maybe it ws unoptimized but if it has to be in a field - tough.
There might be a fairly simple way of achieving that by embedding a visualforce page within Application page layout.
This should be doable with pure Visualforce (so technically there will be no Apex code ;))
Something as simple as
<apex:relatedList list="Contacts" subject="Application__c.Opportunity__r.AccountId" />
would be a good start (if you want your own layout and not a rel. list - you should be still able to pull it off with <apex:repeat> or <apex:pageBlockTable>.
There's one BUT here: it's not a field, just a display trick. Forget about using it in reports, mobile applications etc.
Another way - would it be acceptable to be 1 click away from these contacts? You could make a report "Account with Contacts", filter it by Id of one Account and later use "URL hacking" to change the filter depending on from which Application you'll click it. This link could be either a formula field or a real custom button/link. Technically - it's pure config, no apex & VF.
You can read more about URL hacking at Ray Dehler's excellent post and specifically about dynamic Reports here or here.
So I'm not a programmer, but my friend is. He's trying to help me develop a web/phone app but we are stuck because I'm having trouble communicating to him an idea and he is having trouble understanding. One or both of us is a moron ;) Part of the problem is that I don't even know where to search for the answer cuz I don't know the specific search terms...believe me I've tried...and I've searched stack overflow as well. Here is the problem:
Short Question:
Websites (like hotel search) allow you to search for rooms by selecting checkboxes in certain categories (i.e. smoking/nonsmoking, stars, size of bed, near downtown, etc.). Certainly these sites are referencing a large database of hotels in a city.
How can you create a site so that as you check boxes (narrow your search), other options which are no longer available are dynamically "grayed out" or disabled on the fly so you cannot check those boxes. So if I were to check 4 stars and that excluded all smoking rooms based on the database, then the option to check "smoking" would be disabled.
The key to this is that the site is querying a database as you click boxes, then based on the results of that query (which is presumably many rows of data (a subset)), it is analysing that subset of data to determine whether checkbox options should be on/off, then dynamically "graying out" specific options that are no longer available. Once you got to only a single possible result, then the site would pop up the website for that hotel (or some other action).
What is this called? Where can I get more information on this. Any pointing toward the right direction would be tremendously appreciated.
Thanks so much in advance!
Roy
HERE IS AN EDIT TO ORIGINAL QUESTION...HERE IS AN EXAMPLE:
So here is my sample database. Each Column (i.e. AA, AB, AC) represents a checkbox. '1'= True, '0'= False, and '2'= Either. Therefore, if you click checkbox AA, then only the top three rows would meet the criteria of AA=True. So query would return the top three rows. The '2's could be either True/False so since they don't affect outcome, those checkboxes should be disabled and only the checkboxes CA,CB, & CC should remain choosable. If you then click checkbox CB, then result ZYX would be output.
Conceptually, How do you go from the initial click to the point where the database is queried and the results are used to dynamically change the menu. People have suggested javascript but i am not looking for a language. I am more looking for the concept. I was thinking that the query would return a new "temp" array with just the top three rows. Then each column of this "temp" array would be queried to see if it contained a '1' in any of the rows. If it did, then that button would be turned "ON". If it didn't then that button would be turned "OFF". Is this confusing? Am I asking for too much ;)
This sounds like javascript could help. For example, using jQuery, you can dynamically send queries to databases based on whatever you click on checkboxes, and then reload a particular section of the webpage. Javascript can also dynamically disable checkboxes.