I get network errors running on android. These do not appear in simulator or ios builds. The errors appears about 75% of the time and then will work correctly for one time. I did some debugging and the network call returns a 0 for response code and null for response content.
I've attached the call below for my get command. This code has not changed in many years (3?). I tried 2 different applications now and both exhibit the same behavior.
I've tried going back to older builds but my 'pro' license only allows me to go back to 1 latest???
I know its not the server as it works for iOS and simulator and 2 different application. I have been unable to figure this out.
An suggestions? I tried to use the new Rest, but it doesn't find the class (i went to latest).
public int doGet(final String url) {
if ( Display.getInstance().isEdt() ){
Log.e("*** Performing a GET network call on the EDT");
}
final ConnectionRequest request = new ConnectionRequest() {
#Override
protected void handleException(Exception err) {
if (Dialog.show("Connection error",
"Check your internet connection", "Retry", "Exit")) {
Display.getInstance().exitApplication();
} else {
retry();
}
}
};
request.setUrl(url);
request.setPost(false);
request.setFollowRedirects(false);
request.setReadResponseForErrors(true);
request.setSilentRetryCount(1);
request.addResponseCodeListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent evt) {
Log.d("Response code ResponseCodeListener, setting to -1");
responseCode = -1;
}
});
request.addResponseListener(new ActionListener() {
#Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent evt) {
Log.e("Response listener action for GET performed " );
ConnectionRequest cr = (ConnectionRequest) evt.getSource();
responseCode = cr.getResponseCode();
Log.e("Response listener action for GET performed: " + cr.getResponseCode() );
if (cr.getResponseCode() == 200) {
responseData = new String(cr.getResponseData());
} else {
Log.e("Response code: " + cr.getResponseCode() + " of " + cr.getUrl() );
}
}
});
// request will be handled asynchronously
NetworkManager.getInstance().setTimeout(15000);
synchronized (lock) {
depth++;
}
try {
request.setDuplicateSupported(true);
NetworkManager.getInstance().addToQueueAndWait(request);
} finally {
synchronized (lock) {
depth--;
}
}
Log.d("Response: {0} {1}", responseCode, responseData);
return responseCode;
}
Log entries:
02-11 10:08:26.932 20250-20326/? D/Word Time: [Thread-18] 0:0:2,486 - Get: /jgame/game/6647?tkn=08F0D0B4E7EE80370B982DBEA261500ADB53266C1847175152-1461100
02-11 10:08:26.933 20250-20326/? D/Word Time: [Thread-18] 0:0:2,488 - Calling: GET http://server.wordtimelive.xyz/jgame/game/6647?tkn=08F0D0B4E7EE80370B982DBEA261500ADB53266C1847175152-1461100
02-11 10:08:26.934 20250-20326/? D/Word Time: [Thread-18] 0:0:2,489 - Get: http://server.wordtimelive.xyz/jgame/game/6647?tkn=08F0D0B4E7EE80370B982DBEA261500ADB53266C1847175152-1461100
02-11 10:08:27.207 20250-20326/? D/Word Time: [Thread-18] 0:0:2,762 - Response: 0 null
02-11 10:08:27.209 20250-20326/? D/Word Time: [Thread-18] 0:0:2,763 - content null of GET: http://server.wordtimelive.xyz/jgame/game/6647?tkn=08F0D0B4E7EE80370B982DBEA261500ADB53266C1847175152-1461100
Thanks for the help in tracking this. Steve fixed the concurrent modification exception in this commit https://github.com/codenameone/CodenameOne/commit/685172518e00a7b846993bbc35967cf49a0bc611
Based on the description it sounds like this is indeed the problem you were experiencing. It will be in the servers tomorrow (Friday February 16th 2018) and you can verify it.
Related
I have used itfoxtec's SAML2 library to implement an SP in my ASP.NET MVC app. I am testing using samltest.id as the IdP. The IdP-initiated workflow works perfectly, but the SP-initiated workflow always gets a 400 error back from samltest.id. I have attempted to look through samltest.id's log to see if an error is being recorded there for my request, but I cannot seem to find anything there.
This is the Action that handles the URL that he user would go to when initiating SSO:
public ActionResult SSOLogin() {
LogManager logger = new LogManager("SSOLogin");
string hostname = this.GetHostname();
SchoolSettings settings = this.GetClientSettings();
if (settings.UseSAMLSSO) {
Saml2Configuration samlConfig = null;
try {
samlConfig = SamlConfigLoader.GetSaml2Config(HttpContext, settings, this.IsSandbox());
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.exception($"loading Saml2Configuration for {hostname}", e);
}
if (samlConfig != null) {
try {
var binding = new Saml2RedirectBinding();
binding.SetRelayStateQuery(new Dictionary<string, string> { { "Home/Index", Url.Content("~/") } });
return binding.Bind(new Saml2AuthnRequest(samlConfig) {
}).ToActionResult();
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error($"Exception redirecting to IdP. {e.GetType().ToString()}: {e.Message}\n{e.StackTrace}");
ViewBag.ssoerror = $"Error redirecting to IdP for {hostname}";
}
} else {
logger.critical($"Could not load SAML2 configuration for {hostname}");
ViewBag.ssoerror = $"Could not load SAML2 configuration for {hostname}";
}
} else {
ViewBag.ssoerror = "SSO is not configured for this client. Please contact Support";
}
return Redirect("/Home/SSOError");
}
The method that loads a client-specific metadata looks like this:
public static Saml2Configuration GetSaml2Config(HttpContextBase context, SchoolSettings forSchool, bool forSandbox) {
LogManager log = new LogManager("getSaml2Config");
Saml2Configuration config = new Saml2Configuration();
if (!forSandbox) {
config.Issuer = _saml2Issuer;
} else {
config.Issuer = _saml2IssuerSandbox;
}
config.SignatureAlgorithm = _saml2SignatureAlgo;
config.CertificateValidationMode = X509CertificateValidationMode.None;
config.RevocationMode = (X509RevocationMode)Enum.Parse(typeof(X509RevocationMode), ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Saml2:RevocationMode"]);
config.AllowedAudienceUris.Add(config.Issuer);
var entityDescriptor = new EntityDescriptor();
if (forSchool.SAMLMetadataLocationIsUrl) {
try {
entityDescriptor.ReadIdPSsoDescriptorFromUrl(new Uri(forSchool.SAMLMetadataLocation));
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error($"Exception caught loading metadata from school {forSchool.Hostname} at URL {forSchool.SAMLMetadataLocation}\n Exception {e.GetType().ToString()}: {e.Message}\n{e.StackTrace}");
entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor = null;
}
} else {
var schoolMetadataPath = context.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data/SAMLMetadata/" + forSchool.SAMLMetadataLocation);
log.info($"Loading metadata for school {forSchool.Hostname} from file {schoolMetadataPath}");
try {
entityDescriptor.ReadIdPSsoDescriptorFromFile(schoolMetadataPath);
} catch (IOException ioe) {
log.error($"IOException caught loading metadata for school {forSchool.Hostname} from file {schoolMetadataPath}: {ioe.Message}\n{ioe.StackTrace}");
entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor = null;
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error($"Exception caught loading metadata for school {forSchool.Hostname} from file {schoolMetadataPath}\n Exception {e.GetType().ToString()}: {e.Message}\n{e.StackTrace}");
entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor = null;
}
}
if (entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor != null) {
if (entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SingleSignOnServices.Count() > 0) {
config.SingleSignOnDestination = entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SingleSignOnServices.First().Location;
} else {
log.error($"WARNING: metadata for {forSchool.Hostname} does not have any SingleSignOnServices that could be parsed.");
}
if (entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SingleLogoutServices.Count() > 0) {
config.SingleLogoutDestination = entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SingleLogoutServices.First().Location;
} else {
log.error($"WARNING: metadata for {forSchool.Hostname} does not have any SingleLogoutServices that could be parsed.");
}
if (entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SigningCertificates.Count() > 0) {
config.SignatureValidationCertificates.AddRange(entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SigningCertificates);
} else {
log.error($"WARNING: metadata for {forSchool.Hostname} does not have any SigningCertificates that could be parsed.");
}
} else {
throw new Exception("IdPSsoDescriptor not loaded from metadata.");
}
return config;
}
If it would help to clarify the situation, I can add the code for the AssertionConsumerService Action which works perfectly in an IdP-initiated scenario.
I discovered the problem. It comes down to this line of code in the GetSaml2Config method:
config.SingleSignOnDestination = entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SingleSignOnServices.First().Location;
This naively takes the first SingleSignOnService element in the metadata and decides that it is the correct one to use, but that was not always the case that this assumption was true. What I really wanted was to get a SingleSignOnService element for and HTTP-POST binding:
config.SingleSignOnDestination = entityDescriptor.IdPSsoDescriptor.SingleSignOnServices.Where(s => s.Binding.ToString().IndexOf("HTTP-POST") > 0).FirstOrDefault()?.Location;
This works well for all of the cases that I have found since.
Your code looks correct.
It is probably an integration issue but very hard to find if the IdP do not log an error message.
What error status message do you get back instead of success, maybe that tells you something.
Maybe the IdP do not accept the SAML 2.0 Authn Response, here is something to look for:
The config.SingleSignOnDestination probably is required
Meybe the IdP requere the request to be signed
It is also possible to add other attributes in the request, do the IdP documentation describe any requirements?
I wrote:
private RequestBuilder getPostRequest(String api) {
return Rest.post(url + api)
.jsonContent()
.header("wsc-access-key", WowzaAccount.getAccessKey())
.header("wsc-api-key", WowzaAccount.getRestKey());
}
getPostRequest("live_streams").body(json).fetchAsJsonMap(new OnComplete<Response<Map>>() {
#Override
public void completed(Response<Map> v) {
if (v.getResponseCode() == 201) {
// success
Map<String, Object> response = v.getResponseData();
name = (String) response.get("name");
id = (String) response.get("id");
connection_code = (String) response.get("connection_code");
Log.p("WowzaLiveStream -> (Code 201) Successfully created live stream with name " + name, Log.DEBUG);
onComplete.completed(instance);
} else if (v.getResponseCode() == 401) {
Log.p("WowzaLiveStream -> (Code 401) Unauthorized, failed to create live stream with name " + params.name.get(), Log.DEBUG);
onFail.run();
} else if (v.getResponseCode() == 422) {
Log.p("WowzaLiveStream -> (Code 422) Unprocessable Entity, failed to create live stream with name " + params.name.get(), Log.DEBUG);
onFail.run();
} else {
Log.p("WowzaLiveStream -> Unknow response with code " + v.getResponseCode() + ", failed to create live stream with name " + params.name.get(), Log.DEBUG);
onFail.run();
}
}
});
The problem is that when I get a 422 response code my onFail callback is not called. Instead a Dialog appears. I suppose that this dialog is invoked by the default addNetworkErrorListener code in the init(). However... I cannot (and I don't want to) disable the default addNetworkErrorListener code, because I'm writing a new CN1Lib. Instead I need that in this case, and only in this case, the network error listener should not be invoked and instead the failure callback that I wrote should be run.
It's more appropriate, in this case, to call the network error listener only if the Internet connection is lost.
Thank you
You need to explicitly catch the error code callback as the callback might have a different format than the main JSON:
private RequestBuilder getPostRequest(String api) {
return Rest.post(url + api)
.jsonContent()
.header("wsc-access-key", WowzaAccount.getAccessKey())
.header("wsc-api-key", WowzaAccount.getRestKey())
.onErrorCodeJSON(map -> {
// process error response
});
}
I have a process that must check the INBOX on GMail for a failure message, it's working except for the problem of the time it takes to connect and check the message, it takes about 1 minute, that is too much time.
My code:
public static SendResult sendingSuccess(final String email) {
SendResult result = new SendResult();
try {
Properties props = new Properties();
props.setProperty("mail.store.protocol", "imaps");
props.setProperty("mail.imap.com", "993");
props.setProperty("mail.imap.connectiontimeout", "5000");
props.setProperty("mail.imap.timeout", "5000");
Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props);
Store store = session.getStore("imaps");
store.connect("imap.googlemail.com", 993, GMAIL_USER, GMAIL_PASSWORD);
// Select and open folder
Folder inbox = store.getFolder("INBOX");
inbox.open(Folder.READ_WRITE);
// What to search for
SearchTerm searchTerm = new SearchTerm() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -7187666524976851520L;
public boolean match(Message message) {
try {
String content = getContent(message);
boolean daemon = (message.getFrom()[0].toString()).contains("mailer-daemon#googlemail.com");
boolean failure = message.getSubject().contains("Failure");
boolean foundWarning = content.contains(email);
if (daemon && failure && foundWarning) {
return true;
}
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
return false;
}
};
// Fetch unseen messages from inbox folder
Message[] messages = inbox.search(searchTerm);
// If there is no message then it's OK
result.setStatus(messages.length == 0);
result.setMessage(result.isStatus() ? "No failure message found for " + email : "Failure message found for " + email);
// Flag message as DELETED
for (Message message : messages) {
message.setFlag(Flags.Flag.DELETED, true);
}
// disconnect and close
inbox.close(false);
store.close();
} catch (Exception ex) {
result.setMessage(ex.getMessage());
ex.printStackTrace();
}
return result;
}
When I run this code to query the failure message it takes more than 1 minute to return the result to me.
======= Checking Gmail account for message failure! =====
Start...: 09:00:33
Finish..: 09:01:01
Result..: SendResult [status=true, message=No failure found for wrong.user#gmxexexex.net]
Is there any way to reduce this time?
The problem is most likely because you've written your own search term. JavaMail doesn't know how to translate your search term into an IMAP SEARCH request so it executes the search on the client, which requires downloading all the messages to the client to search there. Try this instead:
SearchTerm searchTerm = new AndTerm(new SearchTerm[] {
new FromStringTerm("mailer-daemon#googlemail.com"),
new SubjectTerm("Failure"),
new BodyTerm(email)
});
That will allow the search to be done by the IMAP server.
I am working around with Salesforce and force.com API and metadata API, version 36.
I can create a custom field in a Lead object but by default I can see it's hidden and this means I cannot create a new Lead with these custom fields because it returns a bad request (400 status code).
Is there any way by Code to set the custom field Visible?
public boolean createCustomExtTextField(String name, LoginResult metadataLoginResult, int length) {
boolean success = false;
CustomField cs = new CustomField();
cs.setFullName("Lead."+name+"__c");
cs.setLabel("Custom"+name+"Field");
cs.setType(FieldType.LongTextArea);
cs.setLength(length);
cs.setVisibleLines(50); // max 50
try {
MetadataConnection metadataConnection = createMetadataConnection(metadataLoginResult);
SaveResult[] results = metadataConnection.createMetadata(new Metadata[] { cs });
for (SaveResult r : results) {
if (r.isSuccess()) {
success = true;
} else {
System.out.println("Errors were encountered while creating " + r.getFullName());
for (com.sforce.soap.metadata.Error e : r.getErrors()) {
System.out.println("Error message: " + e.getMessage());
System.out.println("Status code: " + e.getStatusCode());
}
}
}
} catch (ConnectionException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return success;
}
I am googling a lot and don't find something that actually helped. So, any hints are welcomed. Thank you.
Finally found a solution to this. I final one for me was to make all custom fields REQUIRED.
CustomField cs = new CustomField();
cs.setFullName("Lead.YourCompanyName" + name + "__c");
cs.setLabel("YourCompanyName" + name);
cs.setRequired(true);
...
com.sforce.soap.enterprise.LoginResult metadataLoginResult = operations.loginToMetadata(username, password, "https://login.salesforce.com/services/Soap/c/36.0");
...
private boolean createFieldInMetadata(LoginResult metadataLoginResult, CustomField cs) {
boolean success = false;
try {
MetadataConnection metadataConnection = createMetadataConnection(metadataLoginResult);
SaveResult[] results = metadataConnection.createMetadata(new Metadata[] { cs });
for (SaveResult r : results) {
if (r.isSuccess()) {
success = true;
} else {
System.out.println("Errors were encountered while creating " + r.getFullName());
for (com.sforce.soap.metadata.Error e : r.getErrors()) {
System.out.println("Error message: " + e.getMessage());
System.out.println("Status code: " + e.getStatusCode());
}
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
}
return success;
}
And so it will appear in the page layout. Very important to know, a required field cannot have just an empty value set, it must be something. So if not all custom fields are required in your logic and you wanna avoid the entire process of unzipping page layout and zipping it back (however it may be done) just add "N/A" or any char at choice to the required by code but not your project custom fields.
I managed to make the custom Field Level Security visible for "Admin" profile but not Field Accessability to visible. The latter is untested.
I'm trying to get the count of unread email using google API, but not able. ANy help is highly appreciated. I'm not getting any error, but the count doesnt match the actual number shown in gmail.
try
{
String serviceAccountEmail = "xxx#developer.gserviceaccount.com";
var certificate = new X509Certificate2(#"C:\Projects\xxx\xyz\API Project-xxxxx.p12", "notasecret", X509KeyStorageFlags.Exportable);
ServiceAccountCredential credential = new ServiceAccountCredential(
new ServiceAccountCredential.Initializer(serviceAccountEmail)
{
User = "xxx#gmail.com",
Scopes = new[] { Google.Apis.Gmail.v1.GmailService.Scope.GmailReadonly }
}.FromCertificate(certificate));
var gmailservice = new Google.Apis.Gmail.v1.GmailService(new BaseClientService.Initializer()
{
HttpClientInitializer = credential,
ApplicationName = "GoogleApi3",
});
try
{
List<Message> lst = ListMessages(gmailservice, "xxx#gmail.com", "IN:INBOX IS:UNREAD");
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine("An error occurred: " + e.Message);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
Just do: labels.get(id="INBOX") and it has those types of stats (how many messages in that label, how many are unread, and same for threads).
https://developers.google.com/gmail/api/v1/reference/users/labels/get
You can use the ListMessages method from the API example (included for completeness) for searching:
private static List<Message> ListMessages(GmailService service, String userId, String query)
{
List<Message> result = new List<Message>();
UsersResource.MessagesResource.ListRequest request = service.Users.Messages.List(userId);
request.Q = query;
do
{
try
{
ListMessagesResponse response = request.Execute();
result.AddRange(response.Messages);
request.PageToken = response.NextPageToken;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine("An error occurred: " + e.Message);
}
} while (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(request.PageToken));
return result;
}
You can use this search method to find unread messages, for example like this:
List<Message> unreadMessageIDs = ListMessages(service, "me", "is:unread");
The q parameter (query) can be all kinds of stuff (it is the same as the gmail search bar on the top of the web interface), as documented here: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7190?hl=en.
Note that you only a few parameters of the Message objects are set. If you want to retreive the messages you'll have to use GetMessage method from the api:
public static Message GetMessage(GmailService service, String userId, String messageId)
{
try
{
return service.Users.Messages.Get(userId, messageId).Execute();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine("An error occurred: " + e.Message);
}
return null;
}
I agree that the API is not straight forward and misses a lot of functionality.
Solution for .Net:
// Get UNREAD messages
public void getUnreadEmails(GmailService service)
{
UsersResource.MessagesResource.ListRequest Req_messages = service.Users.Messages.List("me");
// Filter by labels
Req_messages.LabelIds = new List<String>() { "INBOX", "UNREAD" };
// Get message list
IList<Message> messages = Req_messages.Execute().Messages;
if ((messages != null) && (messages.Count > 0))
{
foreach (Message List_msg in messages)
{
// Get message content
UsersResource.MessagesResource.GetRequest MsgReq = service.Users.Messages.Get("me", List_msg.Id);
Message msg = MsgReq.Execute();
Console.WriteLine(msg.Snippet);
Console.WriteLine("----------------------");
}
}
Console.Read();
}