When I authenticate my single page app to my SFDC org using user-agent flow I am getting an access token and an openID token.
I need to use one of them (not sure which) to authenticate and get access to another system (Again, via API).
My understanding that I need to use the OpenID token in this case, as the other system will have no idea how to validate the access token. While the Open ID token signature can be validated using the same certificate used to sign it (the one in my SFDC org) and the user can be authenticated based on that. Something doesn't sound to be right, can anyone help explaining how I can use one token received from one system (and IDP) to access another system
This is a common problem faced with token usage. Here is a link for a similar question with Google oAuth
In short, id token is intended for the client. Client consumes the id token and and authenticate the end user by validating it. On the other hand, access token is to grant authorisation. It allows client to access protected resources, representing the end user. In this manner, answer to your question is to use access token.
To validate an access token and obtain end user details, you can use use userinfo endpoint. SalesForce expose this endpoinr through url,
https://login.salesforce.com/services/oauth2/userinfo
This endpoint consumes access tokens, validate them. If valid, it return information about end user to which the access token was issued. This way you validate access token and receive. Read more from this article
Related
I've been provided with a REST API which has authentication type bearer (Security Scheme Type: API Key, Header parameter name: Authorization) and which i use to authenticate the user and then fetch other data (i will only create the front end using react).
As a first step the user logs in and i sent his/her username-password to the prementioned REST API and get back an access and a refresh token.
Is anything wrong with storing these 2 tokens in a cookie in order to use them in subsequent requests? How does JWT comes into play regarding these 2 tokens? Is JWT of any use to me in this situation?
There's nothing wrong in storing the tokens in cookies, but if you're planning to have a Single Page Application with React it should be enough to store these tokens in memory. Once the user refreshes the page you can either make them sign in again or perform a silent login in the background to get a new set of tokens. In both cases the session kept on the Authorization Server should kick in and you should get new tokens without the need of user interaction.
Your tokens will be much safer if you don't keep them in cookies.
JWTs are not a requirement for access and refresh tokens. If you don't have to use them I would recommend going with opaque tokens. That said, since you do not have control over the API you might be limited to the format required by the API. If you don't want to be limited by this format you can set up your own gateway which you can use to perform token exchange or introspection and forward requests to the API with proper tokens (something which is called a Phantom Token pattern.
From my understanding of the question, you are using an identity provider which provides you with access token and refresh token for the users. That means it is a authentication as a service REST API at works here.
The REST API requires an authorisation header to be passed along with the username-password to exchange for access token and refresh token for the users. (correct me if I'm wrong) In this case, you might want to keep the authorisation header away from the users (consult the authentication as a service documentation).
You call the REST API with payloads (the user-password) along with headers like this:
Authorization: ACCESS_TOKEN
However the ACCESS_TOKEN is the one provided by the vendor for you to use the REST API. On success call of the REST API, it should return you with a set of access token and refresh token. You can then use this access token and refresh token to safe guard your own API, API that you control to provide service to your users.
The access token and refresh token might just be JWT tokens (again consult the vendor documentation).
Also if you are using an authentication as a service REST API, check the documentation if they provide a client sdk. In that case, it should show you the best practise of handling the access token and refresh token it returned.
I am integrating the security aspect of webapplication. I have decided to use OAuth,
so we have a REST WebApi in AspNet Core 3.0, the client which is a SPA created in React, and the Identity Server 4.0 app which is also in AspNet Core 3.0.
I read that OAuth is created for Authorization and not for Authentication.
For Authentication, seems that exists something else called OpenIDConnect, so the first question that comes to my mind, and on which I cannot find an easy answer is: are OAuth, OpenIDConnect and IdentityServer related technology?
Which is the best solution for authentication, considering that I would like to create users in a SqlServer Database, and if it's possible I would like to use Entity Framework for the porpose?
The flow for my authentication would be:
User writes Username and Password, if they are right he receive the JWT Token, without redirecting him/her to the authorization page.
At this point the problem are:
which is the right endpoint to do this flow:
is it the /authorize or the /token endpoint?
I have a lot of confusion for the questions above.
The second thing, what is the best way to retrieve the user informations?
For example if my endpoint needs to understand from the logged in user what are his data, I think that or I retrieve from the endpoint or from the JWT token.
Even here I have no clue on which is the best.
I read that OAuth is created for Authorization and not for Authentication. For Authentication, seems that exists something else called OpenIDConnect, so the first question that comes to my mind, and on which I cannot find an easy answer is: are OAuth, OpenIDConnect and IdentityServer related technology?
That's right. OAuth was the first one introduced and allows the person requesting it access to the resources (its handing out access tokens). OIDC (OpenID Connect) on the other-side extends this concept by an identity, the authentication part.
The identity token verifies the identity of the person to your application. Instead of providing identity via username + password (i.e. user creating an account on your website), they get redirected to your authentication provider/app and enter their login there and you get an identity token in return (and/or an access token, depending on the flow and scopes you request).
The identity token is an JWT token (or reference token). The JWT token contains all of the users identity information required for your application (user id, email, displayname, age, etc.) and is cryptographically signed. Only the Identity Server knows the key used to sign it up and you can verify it with the public key from the OIDC (IdSrv here) provider.
Reference token works similar, but claims are requested on the server side and cached.
With identity token you can not access the users resources. Example: Facebook.
When you sign in your application with an facebook account, most page will only request identity token to verify that its the same user (instead of using a username / password combination). But with that one, the application can't access your facebook posts or do posts in your name.
If the application requests an access token (token scope), then also an access token will be returned (if the application is allowed to via allowed scopes). You will be asked to grant the permissions to the resources which the application requests.
With that token, the application can read your posts or post in your name.
Which is the best solution for authentication, considering that I would like to create users in a SqlServer Database, and if it's possible I would like to use Entity Framework for the porpose?
Doesn't really matter. Either one can be used, all you really need is the "sid" (subject id) claim and associate that one with your user.
Identity Server can issue both, depending on what the client asks (if client asks for id_token response type, it will receive an identity token, if it asks for token an access token. Both can be specified or just one).
At this point the problem are: which is the right endpoint to do this flow: is it the /authorize or the /token endpoint? I have a lot of confusion for the questions above.
/authorize is used to authorize the user (have him login, and send back to your website). Its used for so called interactive flows, where the user enters credentials
/token endpoint you can only retrieve a token (resource owner flow (username + password), client credentials (for machine to machine authentication), refresh token (to get a new access token by using an refresh token (if you asked for offline_access scope, which gives and refresh token)
The second thing, what is the best way to retrieve the user informations?
the /userinfo endpoint, see docs: http://docs.identityserver.io/en/latest/endpoints/userinfo.html
As the doc says to access that, the client needs to request the openid scope.
For example if my endpoint needs to understand from the logged in user what are his data, I think that or I retrieve from the endpoint or from the JWT token.
Yes you can retrieve it from JWT token, if you use JWT token. If you use reference token, its just an ID.
And last but not least the /introspection endpoint can be used to validate the token (if your consuming application has no libraries to decrypt and validate signature of the token.
If you can, its best to use the Identity Server client libraries (i.e. IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation package for ASP.NET Core or oidc-client for npm/javascript based applications) which should be picking up the correct endpoints, so you don't have to worry about it
I have a multi-tenant (AAD + personal Microsoft Accounts) single page application that uses the MSAL library to log in a user and then acquire tokens.
When I call acquireTokenSilent for a logged-in AAD user, the accessToken provided in the AuthResponse object is a valid JWT. Moreover, that JWT appears to properly contain all the scopes I requested in my acquireToken call.
When I do the same thing for a personal MSA account, the accessToken provided does not appear to be a valid JWT. It kind of looks like one, what with all it's alphanumerics, but it can't be decoded by any normal JWT decoder.
Should the accessToken for a personal MSA account be a valid JWT? If not, what is it?
Thanks!
While testing your client application with a personal account, you may find that the access token received by your client is an opaque string. This is because the resource being accessed has requested legacy MSA (Microsoft account) tickets that are encrypted and can't be understood by the client.
It's not an JWT token so it can't be decoded by any normal JWT decoder. But you can decode the ID token for logged-in user information.
See details here. (the Important tip)
An access token's format is only relevant to the API you call with the token.
I've noticed tokens are different in some scenarios like the one you mentioned, with Graph API.
If the token is not meant for you, you don't need to worry about the format.
Just send it with the request :)
I would like some clarification on how to use ID tokens and access tokens in an implicit grant flow.
I have an Angular SPA using MSAL.js for Angular package and a Web API. The API does NOT call any external services, like MSFT Graph. The back end uses role claims from JWT to establish RBAC authorization to our API functionality only.
This doc says:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/id-tokens
id_tokens are sent to the client application as part of an OpenID Connect flow. They can be sent along side or instead of an access token, and are used by the client to authenticate the user.
ID Tokens should be used to validate that a user is who they claim to be and get additional useful information about them - it shouldn't be used for authorization in place of an access token.
This doc shows an authentication flow where a web API is called with an ID token instead of an access token:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/v2-oauth2-implicit-grant-flow
This sample code sends ID token too (calling own Web API sample):
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/active-directory-javascript-singlepageapp-dotnet-webapi-v2
The sample back end validates ID token audience against Client ID of the app that issued it.
Given our API is the only consumer of tokens, should we use ID tokens or access tokens?
Generally speaking, when securing your API with the Microsoft Identity platform, clients should be using the access token when making API requests, not the ID token.
check this part
It first calls acquireTokenSlient, which gets a token from the cache if available if not
it calls acquireTokenPopUp which will get an acces token for the specific scope, I am not sure if it would open up a popup window or will get a token in the background with hidden iframe. But it would fetch an access token for sure. API can never be accessed with ID token.
check https://learn.microsoft.com/bs-latn-ba/azure/active-directory/develop/scenario-spa-acquire-token for more clarification
I want to build small application. There will be some users. I don't want to make my own user system. I want to integrate my application with oauth/oauth2.0.
There is no problem in integration of my front-end application and oauth 2.0. There are so many helpful articles, how to do this, even on stackoverflow.com. For example this post is very helpful.
But. What should I do after successful authorization on front-end? Of course, I can just have flag on client, which says "okay, mate, user is authenticated", but how I should interact with my backend now? I can not just make some requests. Back-end - some application, which provides API functions. EVERYONE can access this api.
So, I need some auth system anyway between my FE and BE. How this system should work?
ps I have some problems with English and may be I can not just correctly 'ask google' about it. Can you provide correct question, please :) or at least give some articles about my question.
UPD
I am looking for concept. I don't want to find some solution for my current problem. I don't think it is matters which FE and BE I use (anyway I will
provide information about it below)
FE and BE will use JSON for communication. FE will make requests, BE will send JSON responses. My application will have this structure (probably):
Frontend - probably AngularJS
Backend - probably Laravel (laravel will implement logic, also there is database in structure)
Maybe "service provider" like google.com, vk.com, twitter.com etc remembers state of user? And after successful auth on FE, I can just ask about user state from BE?
We have 3 main security concerns when creating an API.
Authentication: An identify provider like Google is only a partial solution. Because you don't want to prompt the user to login / confirm their identity for each API request, you must implement authentication for subsequent requests yourself. You must store, accessible to backend:
A user's ID. (taken from the identity provider, for example: email)
A user token. (A temporary token that you generate, and can verify from the API code)
Authorization: Your backend must implement rules based on the user ID (that's your own business).
Transport security: HTTPS and expiring cookies are secure and not replayable by others. (HTTPS is encrypting traffic, so defeats man-in-the-middle attacks, and expiring cookies defeats replay attacks later in time)
So your API / backend has a lookup table of emails to random strings. Now, you don't have to expose the user's ID. The token is meaningless and temporary.
Here's how the flow works, in this system:
User-Agent IdentityProvider (Google/Twitter) Front-End Back-End
|-----------------"https://your.app.com"---------->|
|---cookies-->|
your backend knows the user or not.
if backend recognizes cookie,
user is authenticated and can use your API
ELSE:
if the user is unknown:
|<--"unknown"-|
|<----"your/login.js"----------+
"Do you Authorize this app?"
|<------------------+
|--------"yes"----->|
+----------auth token--------->|
|<---------/your/moreinfo.js---|
|-------access_token ---------->|
1. verify access token
2. save new user info, or update existing user
3. generate expiring, random string as your own API token
+----------->|
|<-------------- set cookie: your API token --------------------|
NOW, the user can directly use your API:
|--------------- some API request, with cookie ---------------->|
|<-------------- some reply, depends on your logic, rules ------|
EDIT
Based on discussion - adding that the backend can authenticate a user by verifying the access token with the identity provider:
For example, Google exposes this endpoint to check a token XYZ123:
https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/tokeninfo?id_token=XYZ123
I read through all the answers very carefully, and more than half the people who responded are missing the question completely. OP is asking for the INITIAL connection between FE & BE, after the OAuth token has been issued by the Service Provider.
How does your backend know that the OAuth token is valid? Well keep in mind that your BE can send a request to the Service Provider & confirm the validity of the OAuth token, which was first received by your FE. This OAuth key can be decrypted by the Service Provider only because only they have the secret key. Once they decrypt the key, they usually will respond with information such as username, email and such.
In summary:
Your FE receives OAuth token from Service Provider after user gives authorization. FE passes OAuth token to BE. BE sends OAuth token to Service Provider to validate the OAuth token. Service Provider responds to BE with username/email information. You can then use the username/email to create an account.
Then after your BE creates the account, your BE should generate its own implementation of an OAuth token. Then you send your FE this OAuth token, and on every request, your FE would send this token in the header to your BE. Since only your BE has the secret key to validate this token, your application will be very safe. You could even refresh your BE's OAuth token on every request, giving your FE a new key each time. In case someone steals the OAuth token from your FE, that token would be quickly invalidated, since your BE would have already created a new OAuth token for your FE.
There's more info on how your BE can validate the OAuth token. How to validate an OAuth 2.0 access token for a resource server?
let's use OAuth concept to begin,FE here is Client , BE here is Resource Server.
Since your client already authorized, Authorization server should grant
Access token to the client.
Client make request to the resource server with the Access token
Resource server validate the Access token， if valid, handle the request.
You may ask, what is the Access token, Access token was issued by authorization server, grant to client, and recognized by resource server.
Access token is a string indicate the authorization information(e.g. user info, permission scope， expires time...).
Access token may encrypted for security, and you should make sure resource server can decrypt it.
for more details, please read OAuth2.0 specification https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749.
Well you don'y need User-System on your Front End side.
The front end is just a way to interact with your server and ask for token by valid user and password.
Your server supposed to manage users and the permissions.
User login scenario
User asking for token by entering his username and password.
The server-API accept the request because it's anonymous method (everyone can call this method without care if he's logged in or not.
The server check the DB (Or some storage) and compare the user details to the details he has.
In case that the details matches, the server will return token to the user.
From now, the user should set this token with any request so the server will recognize the user.
The token actually hold the user roles, timestamp, etc...
When the user request for data by API, it fetch the user token from the header, and check if the user is allowed to access that method.
That's how it works in generally.
I based on .NET in my answer. But the most of the BE libaries works like that.
As am doing a project for SSO and based on my understanding to your question, I can suggest that you create an end-point in your back-end to generate sessions, once the client -frontend- has successfully been authorized by the account owner, and got the user information from the provider, you post that information to the back-end endpoint, the back-end endpoint generates a session and stores that information, and send back the session ID -frequently named jSessionId- with a cookie back to the client -frontend- so the browser can save it for you and every request after that to the back-end considered an authenticated user.
to logout, simply create another endpoint in the back-end to accepts a session ID so the back-end can remove it.
I hope this be helpful for you.
You need to store the token in the state of your app and then pass it to the backend with each request. Passing to backend can be done in headers, cookies or as params - depends on how backend is implemented.
Follow the code to see a good example of all the pieces in action (not my code)
This example sets the Authorization: Bearer TOKEN header
https://github.com/cornflourblue/angular-registration-login-example