Hello there Salesforce experts,
I have an Object Monthly_cc__c where there are records flowing in for each country every month.
Below are the fields
ID is the record ID
Processing Date
Processing Year
Processing Month
Distributor__c is the Master-Detal relation ship with Account.
Operating Company (IND, AUS, GBR...)
Now for every record there are the below fields
Personal CC
Monthly CC
For each Operating company these results are being sent and for the same Processing date we have various records for different Operating companies.
I would like to sum up the Personal cc for January for us to not complicate our SQL query.
Please let us know a solution on how to accomplish this task.
Thank you.
The expected result would be
For January, 2017
Personal CC = sum(AUS,IND,GBR'S Personal CC)
Monthly CC = Sum(AUS,IND,GBR'S Monthly CC)
You have lots of options here and final result also depends on whether your company uses currency management (is CurrencyIsoCode field present on all objects?).
This should be what you're asking for:
SELECT Distributor__c, SUM(Personal_CC__c) personal, SUM(Monthly_CC__c) monthly
FROM Monthly_CC__c
WHERE Processing_Year__c = 2017 AND Processing_Month__c = 1
GROUP BY Distributor__c
LIMIT 200
This should be bit more flexible:
SELECT Distributor__c, Processing_Year__c, Processing_Month__c, SUM(Personal_CC__c) personal, SUM(Monthly_CC__c) monthly
FROM Monthly_CC__c
GROUP BY Distributor__c, Processing_Year__c, Processing_Month__c
LIMIT 200
Read up about SOQL, GROUP BY & aggregate functions, GROUP BY ROLLUP().
Your data looks to be bit artificially split into day-month-year. If you have real date fields there are ways to GROUP BY CALENDAR_MONTH().
And last but not least - if this query results will be processed in Apex - you need to read about AggregateResult.
P.S. You should work on your questions. We're not writing code for you. What have you tried, what part you're stuck on? If you're completely new to salesforce and don't even know what to experiment with - start with SQOL-related Trailheads
Related
I have created one measure in SSAS tabular called "Yesterday Sales by using max(date)-1", with this I am getting blanks if data is not present for max(date)-1. how to get the sales for the next available date.
for Example, my max(date) is 2019-11-25 and before that I have data for 2019-11-22. I don't have data for 23rd and 24th, in this case, I want to show "yesterday sales" for 2019-11-22. can you help to achieve this through Dax?
have you looked up LASTNONBLANK()?
https://exceleratorbi.com.au/lastnonblank-explained/
http://sqljason.com/2012/06/lastnonempty-in-tabular-mode-part-1.html
This should be simple so I think I am missing it. I have a simple line chart that shows Users per day over 28 days (X axis is date, Y axis is number of users). I am using hard-coded 28 days here just to get it to work.
I want to add a scorecard for average daily users over the 28 day time frame. I tried to use a calculated field AVG(Users) but this shows an error for re-aggregating an aggregated value. Then I tried Users/28, but the result oddly is the value of Users for today. The division seems to be completely ignored.
What is the best way to show average number of daily users over a time frame? Average daily users over 10 days, 20 day, etc.
Try to create a new metric that counts the dates eg
Count of Date = COUNT(Date) or
Count of Date = COUNT_DISTINCT(Date) in case you have duplicated dates
Then create another metric for average users
Users AVG = (Users / Count of Date)
The average depends on the timeframe you have selected. If you are selecting the last 28 days the average is for those 28 days (dates), if you filter 20 days the average is for those 20 days etc.
Hope that helps.
I have been able to do this in an extremely crude and ugly manner using Google Sheets as a means to do the calculation and serve as a data source for Data studio.
This may be useful for other people trying to do the same thing. This assumes you know how to work with GA data in Sheets and are starting with a Report Configuration. There must be a better way.
Example for Average Number of Daily Users over the last 7 days:
Edit the Report Configuration fields:
Report Name: create one report per day, in this case 7 reports. Name them (for example) Users-1 through Users-7. These are your Row 2 values. You'll have 7 columns, with the first report name in column B.
Start Date and End Date: use TODAY()-X where X is the number of days previous to define the start and end dates for each report. Each report will contain the user count for one day. Report Users-1 will use TODAY()-1 for start and end, etc.
Metrics: enter the metrics e.g. ga:users and ga:new users
Create the reports
Use 'Run reports' to have the result sheets created and populated.
Create a sheet for an interim data set you will use as the basis for the average calculation. The first column is date, the remaining columns are for the metrics, in this case Users and New Users.
Populate the interim data set with the dates and values. You will reference the Report Configuration to get the dates, and you will pull the metrics from each of the individual reports. At this stage you have a sheet with date in first columns and values in subsequent columns with a row for each day's values. Be sure to use a header.
Finally, create a sheet that averages the values in the interim data set. This sheet will have a column for each metric, with one value per column. The one value is calculated from the series in the interim data set, for example =AVG(interim_sheet_reference:range) or any other calculation you'd like to do.
At last, you can use Data Studio to connect to this data source and use the values. For counts of users such as this example, you would use Sum as the aggregation field type when you are creating the data source.
It's super ugly but it works.
I am creating some db model for rental invoice generation.
The invoice consists of N booking time ranges.
Each booking belongs to a price model. A price model is a set of rules which determine a final price (base price + season price + quantity discout + ...).
That means the final price for the N bookings within an invoice can be a complex calculation, and of course I want to keep track of every aspect of the final price calculation for later review of an invoice.
The problem is, that a price model can change in the future. So upon invoice generation, there are two possibilities:
(a) Never change a price model. Just make it immutable by versioning it and refer to a concrete version from an invoice.
(b) Put all the price information, discounts and extras into the invoice. That would mean alot of data, as an invoice contains N bookings which may be partly in the range of a season price.
Basically, I would break down each booking into its days and for each day I would have N rows calculating the base price, discounts and extra fees.
Possible table model:
Invoice
id: int
InvoiceBooking # Each booking. One invoice has N bookings
id: int
invoiceId: int
(other data, e.g. guest information)
InvoiceBookingDay # Days of a booking. Each booking has N days
id: int
invoiceBookingId: id
date: date
InvoiceBookingDayPriceItem # Concrete discounts, etc. One days has many items
id: int
invoiceBookingDayId: int
price: decimal
title: string
My question is, which way should I prefer and why.
My considerations:
With solution (a), the invoice would be re-calculated using the price model information each time the data is viewed. I don't like this, as algorithms can change. It does not feel natural for the "read-only" nature of an invoice.
Also the version handling of price models is not a trivial task and the user needs to know about the version concept, which adds application complexity.
With solution (b), I generate a bunch of nested data and it adds alot of complexity to the schema.
Which way would you prefer? Am I missing something?
Thank you
There is a third option which I recommend. I call it temporal (time) versioning and the layout of the table is really quite simple. You don't describe your pricing data so I'll just show a simple example.
Table: DailyPricing
ID EffDate Price ...
A 01/01/2015 17.50 ...
B 01/01/2015 20.00 ...
C 01/01/2015 22.50 ...
B 01/01/2016 19.50 ...
C 07/01/2016 24.00 ...
This shows that all three price schedules (A, B and C just represent whatever method you use to distinguish between price levels) were given a price on Jan 1, 2015. On Jan 1, 2016, the price of plan B was reduced. In July, the price of plan C was increased.
To get the current price of a plan, the query is this:
select dp.Price
from DailyPricing dp
where dp.ID = 'A'
and dp.Effdate =(
select Max( dp2.EffDate )
from DailyPricing dp2
where dp2.ID = dp.ID
and dp2.EffDate >= :DateOfInterest);
The DateOfInterest variable would be loaded with the current date/time. This query returns the one price that is currently in effect. In this case, the price set Jan 1, 2015 as that has never changed since taking effect. If the search had been for plan B, the price set on Jan 1, 2016 would have been returned and for plan C, the price set on July 1, 2016. These are the latest prices set for each plan; that is, the current prices.
Such a query would more likely be in a join with probably the invoice table so you could perform the price calculation.
select ...
from Invoices i
join DailyPricing dp
on dp.ID = i.ID
and dp.Effdate =(
select Max( dp2.EffDate )
from DailyPricing dp2
where dp2.ID = dp.ID
and dp2.EffDate >= i.InvoiceDate )
where i.ID = 1234;
This is a little more complex than a simple query but you are asking for more complex data (or, rather, a more complex view of the data). However, this calculation is probably only executed once and the final price stored back in to the invoice data or elsewhere.
It would be calculated again only if the customer made some changes or you were going through an audit, rechecking the calculation for accuracy.
Notice something, however, that is subtle but very important. If the query above were being executed for an invoice that had just been created, the InvoiceDate would be the current date and the price returned would be the current price. If, however, the query was being run as a verification on an invoice that was two years old, the InvoiceDate would be two years ago and the price returned would be the price that was in effect two years ago.
In other words, the query to return current data and the query to return past data is the same query.
That is because current data and past data remain in the same table, differentiated only by the date the data takes effect. This, I think, is about the simplest solution to what you want to do.
How about A and B?
It's not best practice to re-calculate any component of an invoice, especially if the component was printed. An invoice and invoice details should be immutable, and you should be able to reproduce it without re-calculating.
If you ever have a problem with figuring out how you got to a certain amount, or if there is a bug in your program, you'll be glad you have the details, especially if the calculations are complex.
Also, it's a good idea to keep a history of your pricing models so you can validate how you got to a certain price. You can make this simple to your users. They don't have to see the history -- but you should record their changes in the history log.
I need to calculate how much a plan has cost the customer in a specific month.
Plans have floating billing cycles of a month's length - for example a billing cycle can run from '2014-04-16' to '2014-05-16'.
I know the start date of a plan, and the end date can either be a specific date or NULL if the plan is still running.
If the end date is not null, then the customer is charged for a whole month - not pro rated. Example: The billing cycle is going from the 4th to 4th each month, but the customer ends his plan on the 10th, he will still be charged until the 4th next month.
Can anyone help me? I feel like I've been going over this a million times, and just can't figure it out.
Variables I have:
#planStartDate [Plan's start date]
#planEndDate [Plan's end date - can be null]
#billStartDate [The bill's start date - example: 2015-02-01]
#billEndDate [One month after bill's start date - 2015-03-01]
#price [the plan's price per billing cycle]
Heres the best answer I can give based on the very small information you have given so far(btw, in the future, it would really help people answer your question faster/easier/more efficiently if you could specify a lot more info;tables involved, all columns, etc..):
"I need to calculate how much a plan has cost the customer in a specific month."
SELECT SUM(price), customerID(I assume you have a column of some sort in this table to distinguish between customers) FROM table_foo
where planStartDate BETWEEN = 'a specific date you specify'
Its a bit rough of a query, but thats the best I can give till you specify more clearly your variable (i.e. tables involved, ALL columns in table, etc etc.....)
I'm creating a DW that will contain data on financial securities such as bonds and loans. These securities are associated with payment schedules. For example, a bond could pay quarterly, while a mortgage would usually pay monthly (sometimes biweekly). The payment schedule is created when the security is traded and, in the majority of cases, will remain unchanged. However, the design would need to accommodate those cases where it does change.
I'm currently attempting to model this data and I'm having difficulty coming up with a workable design. One of the most commonly queried fields is "next payment date". Users often want to know when a security will pay next. Therefore, I want to make it as easy as possible for them to get the next payment date and amount for each security.
Also, users often run historical queries in which case they'd want the next payment date and amount as of a specific point in time. For example, they may want to look back at 1/31/09 and query the next payment dates (which would usually be in February 2009 for mortgages). It's also common that they want to query a security's entire payment schedule, which might consist of 360 records (30 year mortgage x 12 payments/year).
Since the next payment date and amount would be changing each month or even biweekly, these fields wouldn't seem to fit into a slow-changing dimension very well. It would probably make more sense to use a fact table, but I'm unsure of how to model it. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Next payment date is an example of a "fact-free fact table". There's no measure, just FK's between at least two dimensions: the security and time.
You can denormalize the security to have a type-1 SCD (overwritten with each load) that has a few important "next payment dates".
I think it's probably better, however, to carry a few important payment dates along with the facts. If you have a "current balance" fact table for loans, then you have an applicable date for this balance, and you can carry previous and next payment dates along with the balance, also.
For the whole payment schedule, you have a special fact-free fact table that just has applicable date and the sequence of payment dates on into the future. That way, when the schedule changes, you can pick the payment sequence as of some particular date.
I would use a table (securityid,startdate, paymentevery, period) it could also include enddate, paymentpershare
period would be 1 for days, 2 for weeks, 3 for months, 4 for years.
So for security 1 that started paying weekly on 3/1/2009, then the date changed to every 20 days on 4/2, then weekly after 5/1/2009, then to monthly on 7/1/2009, it would contain:
1,'3/1/2009',1,2
1,'4/2/2009',20,1
1,'5/1/2009',1,2
1,'7/1/2009',1,3
To get the actual dates, I'd use an algorithm like this:
To know the payment dates on security 1 from 3/5/2009 to 5/17/2008:
Find first entry before 3/5 = 3/1
Loop:
Get next date that's after 3/5 and before the next entry (4/2 - weekly) = 3/8
Get next date that's before next the entry (4/2) = 3/15
Get next date that's before next the entry (4/2) = 3/22
Get next date that's before next the entry (4/2) = 3/29
Next date >4/2 switch to next entry:
Loop:
Get next date that's after 4/2 and before the next entry (5/1 - every 20 days) = 4/22
Next date 5/12 is AFTER next entry 5/1, switch to next entry
Loop:
Get next date that's after 5/1 and before the lastdate (5/17 - weekly) = 5/8
Get next date that's before the lastdate = 5/15
Next date > 5/17
The dates between 3/5/2009 and 5/17/2008 would be 3/8,3/15,3/22,3/29,4/22,5/8,5/15
Why not store the next payment date as the amount of days from the date of the current payment?
Further clarification:
There would be a fact for every past payment linked to some date dimension. Each one of these facts will have a field next payment in which will be an integer. The idea is that the date of the current payment + next payment in will be the date of the next payment fact. This should be able to cater for everything.