When conducting a hit test on an ARSCNView containing SCNNodes with SCNText geometry, it appears that the hit test will only be successful if the point tested lies inside a letter in the SCNText.
This is not optimal, as it makes the nodes harder to tap. Is there a way to change the "hit box" so that the hit test will be successful if the tested point lies anywhere inside the bounds of the SCNNode? I am trying to avoid the case where the hit test is unsuccessful if the user's tap lies in-between two letters in the SCNText.
I resolved my problem by setting the SCNHitTestOption.boundingBoxOnly option to true. This will conduct the hit test ignoring the node's geometry.
let hitTestResults = sceneView.hitTest(tapPoint, options: [.boundingBoxOnly: true])
Related
My initial logic of checking if an edge is present and creating an edge needs to query. Im trying to verify and create an edge in one instruction.
This query does not seem to work
ipdb> prop = self._graph.V('pppp').outE('friend').hasId('testEdge').as_('e').inV()
.hasId('dddd').select('e').
coalesce(__.property('testedder', 1111).fold().unfold(),
__.V('dddd'). as_('to_a').V('pppp').addE('friend').to('to_a')).
toList()
1) The first part of the coalesce - updating the property of Edges work fine
2) The second part of the coalesce is either not being called or not working. It is working as an independent query. Does 'as' not work in anonymous traversals?
PS: Im using AWS Neptune
You had the right idea but you needed some simplification. I'll try to do it in steps. First, whenever I see labelled steps, I try to see if there is a way to avoid using them. In this case, they can be factored out:
g.V('pppp').outE('friend').
filter(hasId('testEdge').inV().hasId('dddd')).
coalesce(__.property('testedder', 1111).fold().unfold(),
__.V('dddd'). as_('to_a').V('pppp').addE('friend').to('to_a'))
Readability of the traversal improves on those first two lines because the reader can immediately see that you want to find an edge given some criteria which was only implied by the step labeling approach. Next, I looked at coalesce(). As it stands, if filter() returns no edges then coalesce() will never get a chance to execute and that's why the second part of coalesce() never has an opportunity to work for you. So, let's clean that part up:
g.V(1).outE('knows').
filter(hasId(6).inV().hasId(2)).
fold().
coalesce(unfold().property('testedder', 1111),
V('dddd').as_('to_a').V('pppp').addE('friend').to('to_a'))
If it's not clear why the fold() and unfold() are where they are, you should check out my detailed explanation of the approach here. So, with fold() and unfold() where they should be, the coalesce() should now trigger both conditions depending on whether or not an edge passes the filter(). The first part of the coalesce() is fine, but the second could still use a bit of work as I'd again like to factor out the step labels if the aren't necessary:
g.V('pppp').outE('friend').
filter(hasId('testEdge').inV().hasId('dddd')).
fold().
coalesce(unfold().property('testedder', 1111),
addE('friend').from(V('pppp')).to(V('dddd')))
The above Gremlin assumes that you know "pppp" vertex exists. If you do not then you might try (as suggested by Daniel Kuppitz):
g.V('pppp').
not_(outE('friend').hasId('testEdge').
filter(inV().hasId('dddd')).
property('testedder', 1111)).as('p').
V('dddd').
addE('friend').from('p')
I am building a UI using Openlayers 4. The request I have received is to not allow the user to double click to complete the current .Draw interaction. I have manages this on the LineString by using the maxPoints option and only allowing the user to draw straight lines (as per my requirements).
I need to do the same thing with the Polygon but cannot get it to work. I have tried using the finishCondition but this does not help.
Is this something that can be done in Openlayers?
JS Fiddle is throwing massive errors on my machine at the minute, I'll add an example as soon as I can.
EDIT
Here is a basic jsfiddle. You can toggle the return boolean from finishCondition, when set to true the single and double click end the polygon drawing. When set to false the drawing cannot end.
I need to find the codtion that will allow me to return false if the user double clicks and true otherwise.
Ok, after a bit of further investigation I have found a solution, shown in this jsfiddle.
I have used the on drawstart event to calculate and set the coordinate of the first point in the polygon, in the finishCondition I find the current pixel it is at, then using that to see if it is within 10px of the clicked point, if it is end the polygon if not then keep drawing.
I am happy if anyone out there can show me a more elegant way to do this, but for now this seems to do the trick.
Had a look go with this aswell, and you can return whether or not the the finish coordinate of the interaction
finishCondition: event => {
return this.interaction.finishCoordinate_ === this.interaction.sketchCoords_[0][0];
};
UPDATE
I've tried to make a standalone version here: https://codepen.io/neezer/pen/pPRJar
It doesn't work quite like my local copy, but I'm hoping it similar enough that you can see where I'm trying to go.
I'm not getting quite the same behavior as well because I changed the listener target to document, which seemed to help some.
Also, I'm using RxJS v5 and the latest version of React.
Still getting the hang of RxJS...
I have two Observables: one subscribed to mouseover x coordinates on a table to show a resize column, and the other to allow the user to drag on that column.
Roughly speaking, the first one looks like this (all of the below defined in a componentDidUpdate lifecycle method in a React component):
Rx.DOM.mouseover(tableEl)
.map(/* some complicated x coordinate checking */)
.distinctUntilChanged()
.subscribe(/* setState call */)
That works great, and gives me this:
So now I want to provide the actual "drag" behavior, and I tried setting up a new Observable like so
// `resizerEl` is the black element that appears on hover
// from the previous observable; it's just a div that gets
// repositioned and conditionally created
Rx.DOM.mousedown(resizerEl)
.flatMap(md => {
md.preventDefault()
return Rx.DOM.mousemove(tableEl)
.map(mm => mm.x - md.x)
.takeUntil(Rx.DOM.mouseup(document))
})
.subscribe(/* do column resizing stuff */)
There are three problems with that:
Once I've done my first "drag", I can't do any more. My understanding is that takeUntil completes the Observable, and I'm not sure how I can "restart" it.
The mousemove from the first observable is still active while I'm dragging, so my black div will disappear once my x position changes enough to trigger that behavior.
The binding on the second Observable doesn't always seem to trigger (it's unreliable). I think there might be a race condition or something happening here because sometimes I'll refresh the page and I'll get the drag once (from #1), and other times I won't get it at all.
Note at first after a clean refresh I can't drag the handle (#3), then I refresh, and I can't drag the handle past the bounds setup from the first Observable--and the black resizer bar disappears and reappears as my mouse's x coordinate enters and leaves that envelope (#2).
I've been head-banging on this for quite some time now and would really appreciate any insight as to what I'm doing wrong here. In short, I want
the first Observable to "pause" when I'm dragging, then resume when I'm done dragging
the second Observable to not "complete" (or "restart") once a drag is done
the second Observable to reliably work
As I mentioned earlier, I currently have this logic setup in a React component's componentDidUpdate lifecycle method, the shape of which looks roughly like this:
componentWillUpdate() {
// bail if we don't have the ref to our table
if (!tableEl) {
return;
}
// try not to have a new Observable defined on each component update
if (!this.resizerDrag$ && this.resizer) {
this.resizerDrag$ = // second Observable from above
}
// try not to have a new Observable defined on each component update
if (!this.resizerPos$) {
this.resizerPos$ = // first Observable from above
}
}
I've played around with this a bit now, I don't think this answer will be complete, but I'd like to share my insights. Hopefully a more advanced RxJS mind will chime in, and we can all work together to figure it out :).
I recreated a "lite-er" version of this in CodePen, using some light jQuery manipulation as opposed to React. Here's what I have so far:
"the first Observable to "pause" when I'm dragging, then resume when I'm done dragging"
Solving the first point helps with the other two. Based on what I had to do to get my resizerEl, I get the feeling it is rendered in the render method of the component based on something in this.state. If this is true, that means that when the first observable still has the ability to create and destroy resizerEl even while the second observable is listening. This means that resizerEl will no longer be able to generate any events, even though the observable doesn't complete until you've moused up.
In my case, I noticed that if you moved the mouse fast enough to go outside of width of what you were trying to drag, it would eliminate resizerEl, which is of what we want, but not while we're trying to drag something!
My solution: I introduced another variable to the "state" of the "component". This would set to true when we moused down on resizerEl, and then false when we moused up again.
Then we use switchMap.
Rx.DOM.mousemove(tableEl)
.switchMap(function(event) {
return this.state.mouseIsDown ? Rx.Observable.never() : Rx.Observable.of(event);
})
.map(...
There's probably a better way to do it rather than just sticking event back in an Observable, but this was the last part of it I worked on and my brain is kind of fried hehe. The key here is switching to Observable.never while the mouse is down, that way we don't go any further down the operator chain.
Actually, one nice thing is that this may not even need to be put in this.state, since that would cause a re-render. You can probably just use an instance variable, since the variable is only essential to the Observables functionality, and not any rendering. So, using this.mouseIsDown would be just as good.
How do we handle the mouse being down or up?
Part 1:
...
Rx.DOM.mousedown(resizerEl)
.do(() => this.mouseIsDown = true)
Better to abstract this to a function of course, but this is the gist of what it does.
Part 2:
...
return Rx.DOM.mousemove(tableEl)
.map(mm => mm.x - md.x)
.takeUntil(Rx.DOM.mouseup(document))
.doOnCompleted(() => this.mouseIsDown = false)
Here we take advantage of doOnComplete to perform this side-effect once the observable has completed, which in this case, would be on mouseup.
"the second Observable to not "complete" (or "restart") once a drag is done"
Now here's the tricky one, I never ran into this problem. You see, every time Rx.DOM.mousedown(resizerEl) emits an event, inside of flatMap, a new Observable is created each time with return Rx.DOM.mousemove(tableEl).... I used RxJS 4.1 when making this, so it's possible that there could be behavioral differences, but I found that just because the inner observable completed didn't mean the outer one would complete as well.
So what could be happening? Well, I'm thinking that since you're using React, that resizerEl is being created/destroyed respectively when the component is rendering. I haven't seen the rest of your code of course, but please correct me if I'm wrong about this assumption.
This wasn't a problem for me because, for the sake of simplicity, I simply re-used the same element as a dragger, only hiding it when I wasn't hovering over a draggable element.
So the important question is: how is resizerEl being defined and used in your component? I'm assuming the actual reference to it is made using, well, a ref. But if it that DOM element is ever destroyed or recreated, then the Rx.Dom binding needs to be repeated all over again.
I see you're doing this with componentDidUpdate. However, the Rx.Dom.mousedown event may still be bound to an old copy of the ref to resizerEl. Even if the component destroys the resizer in the DOM, and sets the ref (I assume that is this.resizer) to null or undefined, that does not destroy the Observable that is bound to that element. In fact, I don't even think it removes it from memory, even if it's removed from the DOM! That means that this.resizerDrag$ will never evaluate to false/null, and it will still be listening to an element that is no longer in the DOM.
If that is the case, something like this in componentWillUpdate might help:
if (!this.resizerDrag$ && this.resizer) {
this.resizerDrag$ = // second Observable from above
}
else if (!this.resizer && this.resizerDrag$) {
this.resizerDrag$ = null;
}
This will remove the Observable if the resizer object ceases to exist, that way we can properly reinitialise it upon it's return. There's a better to way to do with Subjects, keeping the subscription to one subject and just subscribing the subject to different mousedown streams once they become available, but let's keep this simple :).
This is something where we'd have to see the rest of your code (for this component) tell what's going on, and figure how to address it. But, my hypothesis is that you'd need to intentionally destroy the Observable if this.resizer is ever removed.
the second Observable to reliably work
Pretty sure that once the above two issues work, this one goes away. Nice and easy!
The CodePen
Here is the very naive mockup I made of this problem:
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/KmapYZ
Drag the blue circles back and forth along the X axis. (Has some little problems and bugs unrelated to the scope of this question, so I'm not worried about them.)
I made some slight changes of course just to keep it in-step with the more dumb downed approach I used. But all the concepts are there, as well as most of the code you wrote, modified to match this approach.
As I mentioned before, I didn't encounter the problem of the dragging only working once, so this better demonstrates the solution to pausing the first Observable. I re-use the dragging element, which I assume is why I didn't run into the 'drag-only-once' problem.
I hope that you or anyone else can comment with some improvements to this approach, or just show us a better (potentially more idiomatic) approach.
As the title states, I have a Leaflet (version 1.02) map that breaks if I try to zoom in after calling a flyTo() action. Oddly, if I zoom out first, I can then zoom freely, in or out without the map breaking. Panning also works after the flyTo(), but zooming in will still break the map unless I first call a zoomOut action.
I am not at max zoom, and this happens in multiple maps with different sets of markers. If, at zoomend of the flyTo(), I setZoom at the current level, I can then zoom freely, in or out, but this causes the map to flicker after the flyTo() and is very unappealing.
Any thoughts about this?
Thanks in advance!
I know this post is somewhat old at this point, but if anyone runs into a situation where they're using leaflet with the flyTo() function and getting subsequent weird behaviour with zooming then the issue may be what format you're passing your arguments to flyTo().
Make sure the lat, lon are cast to float and zoom is cast to int. I ran into this issue and it turned out to be due to my parameters being passed in a strings. flyTo() seems to operate fine with strings as parameters but subsequent zoom operations act erratically.
I also ran into that bug and I manage to find out a workaround, assuming that the 'zoom' function in 'flyTo' was somehow corrupting the following zoom in action made by clicking on the "+" icon.
I decided to make the flyTo immediately followed by a setZoom action. Here's the code :
map.flyTo(latlong, zoom, {animate: true, duration: 3});
setTimeout(function(){ map.setZoom(zoom);}, 3000);
Options make the flyTo sequence last for 3 seconds
Next line waits 3 second, i.e. exact time for the flyTo to end end and then performs a setZoom, thus canceling any mysterious action of the flyTo that breaks the zoomIn action of the user.
Then it works.
I ran into the same problem. After a .flyTo() call pressing the Zoom + button caused the map to go to maximum zoom, but pressing the Zoom - first meant everything worked OK.
After reading dageshi above, that proved to be the issue.
Make sure the lat, lon are cast to float and zoom is cast to int.
Adding a parseInt() to the value passed to .flyTo() fixed it straight away.
Thanks dageshi
My UIPageViewController was working fine in iOS 5. But when iOS 6 came along, I wanted to use the new scroll transition style (UIPageViewControllerTransitionStyleScroll) instead of the page curl style. This caused my UIPageViewController to break.
It works fine except right after I've called setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion:. After that, the next time the user scrolls manually by one page, we get the wrong page. What's wrong here?
My workaround of this bug was to create a block when finished that was setting the same viewcontroller but without animation
__weak YourSelfClass *blocksafeSelf = self;
[self.pageViewController setViewControllers:viewControllers direction:UIPageViewControllerNavigationDirectionForward animated:YES completion:^(BOOL finished){
if(finished)
{
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
[blocksafeSelf.pageViewController setViewControllers:viewControllers direction:UIPageViewControllerNavigationDirectionForward animated:NO completion:NULL];// bug fix for uipageview controller
});
}
}];
This is actually a bug in UIPageViewController. It occurs only with the scroll style (UIPageViewControllerTransitionStyleScroll) and only after calling setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion: with animated:YES. Thus there are two workarounds:
Don't use UIPageViewControllerTransitionStyleScroll.
Or, if you call setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion:, use only animated:NO.
To see the bug clearly, call setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion: and then, in the interface (as user), navigate left (back) to the preceding page manually. You will navigate back to the wrong page: not the preceding page at all, but the page you were on when setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion: was called.
The reason for the bug appears to be that, when using the scroll style, UIPageViewController does some sort of internal caching. Thus, after the call to setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion:, it fails to clear its internal cache. It thinks it knows what the preceding page is. Thus, when the user navigates leftward to the preceding page, UIPageViewController fails to call the dataSource method pageViewController:viewControllerBeforeViewController:, or calls it with the wrong current view controller.
I have posted a movie that clearly demonstrates how to see the bug:
http://www.apeth.com/PageViewControllerBug.mov
EDIT This bug will probably be fixed in iOS 8.
EDIT For another interesting workaround for this bug, see this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/21624169/341994
Here is a "rough" gist I put together. It contains a UIPageViewController alternative that suffers from Alzheimer (ie: it doesn't have the internal caching of the Apple implementation).
This class isn't complete but it works in my situation (namely: horizontal scroll).
As of iOS 12 the problem described in the original question seems to be almost fixed. I came to this question because I experienced it in my particular setup, in which it does still happen, hence the word "almost" here.
The setup I experienced this issue was:
1) the app was opened via a deep link
2) based on the link the app had to switch to a particular tab and open a given item there via push
3) described issue happened only when the target tab was not previously selected by user (so that UIPageViewController was supposed to animate to that tab) and only when setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion: had animated = true
4) after the push returning back to the view controller containing the UIPageViewController, the latter was found to be a big mess - it was presenting completely wrong view controllers, even though debugging showed everything was fine on the logic level
I supposed that the root of the problem was that I was pushing view controller very quick after setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion: called, so that the UIPageViewController had no chance to finish something (maybe animation, or caching, or something else).
Simply giving UIPageViewController some spare time by delaying my programmatic navigation in UI via
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: DispatchTime.now() + 1) { ... }
fixed the issue for me. And it also made the programmatic opening of the linked item more user friendly visually.
Hope this helps someone in similar situation.
Because pageviewVC call multi childVC when swipe it. But we just need last page that visible.
In my case, I need to change index for segmented control when change pageView.
Hope this help someone :)
extension ViewController: UIPageViewControllerDelegate {
func pageViewController(_ pageViewController: UIPageViewController, didFinishAnimating finished: Bool, previousViewControllers: [UIViewController], transitionCompleted completed: Bool) {
guard let pageView = pageViewController.viewControllers?.first as? ChildViewController else { return }
segmentedControl.set(pageView.index)
}
}
This bug still exists in iOS9. I am using the same workaround that George Tsifrikas posted above, but a Swift version:
pageViewController.setViewControllers([page], direction: direction, animated: true) { done in
if done {
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue()) {
self.pageViewController.setViewControllers([page], direction: direction, animated: false, completion: {done in })
}
}
}
Another simple workaround in Swift: Just reset the UIPageViewController's datasource. This apparently clears its cache and works around the bug. Here's a method to go directly to a page without breaking subsequent swipes. In the following, m_pages is an array of your view controllers. I show how to find currPage (the index of the current page) below.
func goToPage(_ index: Int, animated: Bool)
{
if m_pages.count > 0 && index >= 0 && index < m_pages.count && index != currPage
{
var dir: UIPageViewController.NavigationDirection
if index < currPage
{
dir = UIPageViewController.NavigationDirection.reverse
}
else
{
dir = UIPageViewController.NavigationDirection.forward
}
m_pageViewController.setViewControllers([m_pages[index]], direction: dir, animated: animated, completion: nil)
delegate?.tabDisplayed(sender: self, index: index)
m_pageViewController.dataSource = self;
}
}
How to find the current page:
var currPage: Int
{
get
{
if let currController = m_pageViewController.viewControllers?[0]
{
return m_pages.index(of: currController as! AtomViewController) ?? 0
}
return 0
}
}
STATEMENT:
It seems that Apple has spotted that developers are using UIPageViewController in very different applications that go way beyond the
originally intended ones Apple based their design-choices on in the first place. Rather than using it in a gesture driven linear fashion
PVC is often used to programmatically jump to random
positions within a structured environment. So they have enhanced their implementation of UIPageViewController and the class is now calling both DataSource
callbacks
- (UIViewController *)pageViewController:(UIPageViewController *)pageViewController viewControllerBeforeViewController:(UIViewController *)viewController
- (UIViewController *)pageViewController:(UIPageViewController *)pageViewController viewControllerAfterViewController:(UIViewController *)viewController
after setting a new contentViewController on UIPageViewController with
[self.pageViewController setViewControllers:viewControllers direction:UIPageViewControllerNavigationDirectionForward animated:YES completion:nil];
even if an animated turn of pages rather suggests a linear progress in an e.g. page hierarchy like a book or PDF with consecutive pages. Although - I doubt that Apple from a HIG standpoint
is very fond of seeing PVC being used this way, but - it doesn't break backwards compatibility, it was an easy fix, so - they eventually did it. Actually it is just one more call of one of the two DataSource methods that is absolutely unnecessary in a linear environment where pages (ViewControllers) have already been cashed for later use.
However, even if this enhancement might come in very handy for certain use-cases the initial behavior of the class is NOT to be considered a bug. The fact that a lot of developers do - also in other
posts on SO that accuse UIPageViewController of misbehavior - rather emphasizes a widely spread misconception of its design, purpose and functionality.
Without trying to offend any of my fellow developers here in this great facility I nonetheless decided not to remove my initial 'disquisition' that clearly explains to the OP the mechanics of PVC and why his assumption is wrong that he has to deal with a bug here.
This might also be of use for any other fellow developer too who struggles with some intricacies in the implementation of UIPageViewController!
ORIGINAL ANSWER:
After having read all the answers over and over again - included the
accepted one - there is just one more thing left to say...
The design of UIPageViewController is absolutely FLAWLESS and all the
hacks you submit in order to circumvent an alleged bug is nothing but
remedies for your own faulty assumptions because you goofed it up in the
first place!!!
THERE IS NO BUG AT ALL! You are just fighting the framework. I'll explain why!
There is so much talk about page numbers and indices! These are concepts the
controller knows NOTHING about! The only thing it knows is - it is showing
some content (btw. provided by you as a dataViewController) and that it can
do something like a right/left animation in order to imitate a page turn.
CURL or SCROLL...!!!
In the pageViewController's world there only exists a current SPACE (let's call
it just this way to avoid confusion with pages and indices).
When you initially set a pageViewController it only minds about this very SPACE.
Only when you start panning its view it starts asking its DataSource what it
eventually should display in case a left/right flip should happen. When you start
panning to the left the PVC asks first for the BEFORE-SPACE and then for the
AFTER-SPACE, in case you start to the right it does it the other way round.
After the completed animation (a new SPACE is displayed by the PVC's view) the
PVC considers this SPACE as its new center of the universe and while it is at it, it
asks the DataSource about the one it still does not know anything about. In case of
a completed turn to the right it wants to know about the new AFTER space and in
case of a completed turn to the left it asks for a new BEFORE space.
The old BEFORE space (from before the animation) is in case of a completed turn to
the right completely obsolete and gets deallocated as soon as possible. The old center
is now the new BEFORE and the former AFTER is the new center. Everything just
shifted one step to the right.
So - no talk of 'which page' or 'whatever index' - just simply - is there a BEFORE or
an AFTER space. If you return NIL to one of the DataSource callbacks the PVC just
assumes it is at one extreme of your range of SPACES. If you return NIL to both
callbacks it assumes it is showing the one and only SPACE there is and will never
ever again call a DataSource callback anymore! The logic is up to you! You define
pages and indices in your code! Not the PVC!!!
For the user of the class there are two means of interacting with the PVC.
A pan-gesture that indicates whether a turn to the BEFORE/AFTER space is desired
A method - namely setViewControllers:direction:animated:completion:
This method does exactly the same than the pan gesture is doing. You are indicating the
direction (e.g. UIPageViewControllerNavigationDirectionBackward/Forward)
for the animation - if there is one intended - which in other words just means -> going to
BEFORE or AFTER...
Again - no mentioning of indices, page-numbers etc....!!!
It is just a programmatically way of achieving the same a gesture would!
And the PVC is doing right by showing the old content again when moving back
to the left after having moved to the right in the first place. Remember
- it is just showing content (that you provide) in a structured way - which is a 'single page turn' by design!!!
That is the concept of a page turn - or BOOK, if you like that term better!
Just because you goof it up by submitting PAGE 8 after PAGE 1 doesn't mean the PVC
cares at all about your twisted opinion of how a book should work. And the user of your
apps neither. Flipping to the right and back to the left should definitely result in reaching
the original page - IF done with an animation. And it is up to YOU to correct the goof by
finding a solution for the disaster. Don't blame it on the UIPageViewController. It is doing
its job perfectly!
Just ask yourself - would you do the same thing with a PAGE-CURL animation? NO ?
Well, neither should you with a SCROLL animation!!! An animated page turn is a page turn and only a page turn!
In either mode!
And if you decide to tear out PAGE 2 to PAGE 7 of your BOOK that's perfectly fine!
But just don't expect UIPageViewController to invent a non-existing PAGE 7 when turning back to the recent page unless YOU tell it that things have changed...
If you really want to achieve an uncoordinated jump to elsewhere, well - do it without an
animation! In most cases this will not be very elegant but - it's possible... -
And the PVC even plays nicely along! When jumping to a new SPACE without animation
it will ask you further down the road for both - the BEFORE and AFTER controller. So your application-logic can keep up with the PVC...
But with an animation you are always conveying - move to the previous/next space (BEFORE -
AFTER). So logically there is no need at all for the PVC to ask again about a space it already
knows about when animating page turns!!!
If you wanna see PAGE 7 when flipping back to the left after having animated from PAGE 1
to the right - well, I would say - that's definitely your very own problem!
And just in case you are looking for a better solution than the 'completion-block' hack from
the accepted answer (because with it you are doing work beforehand for something that might
possibly not even get used further down the road) use the gesture recognizer delegate:
- (BOOL)gestureRecognizerShouldBegin:(UIGestureRecognizer *)gestureRecognizer
Set your PVC's DataViewController here (without animation) if you really intend to go back
left to PAGE 7 and the DataSource will be asked for BEFORE and AFTER and you can submit
whatever page you like! With a flag or ivar that you should have stashed away when doing your uncontrolled
jump from PAGE 1 to 8 this should be no problem...
And when people keep on complaining about a bug in the PVC - doing 2 page turns when it is
supposed to do 1 turn only - point them to this article.
Same problem - triggering an un-animated setViewControllers: method within the transition gesture
will cause exactly the same havoc. You think you set the new center - the DataSource is asked
for the new BEFORE - AFTER dataController - you reset your index count... - Well, that seems OK...
But - after all that business the PVC ends its transition/animation and wants to know about the
next (still unknown to it) dataViewController (BEFORE or AFTER) and also triggers the DataSource. That's totally justified ! It needs to know where in its small BEFORE - CENTER - AFTER
world it is and be prepared for the next turn.
But your program-logic adds another index++ count to its logic and suddenly got 2 page turns !!!
And that is one off from where you think you are.
And YOU have to account for that! Not UIPageViewController !!!
That is exactly the point of the DataSourceProtocol only having two methods! It wants to be as generic as possible - leaving you the space and freedom to define your own logic and not being stuck with somebody else's special ideas and use-cases! The logic is completely up to you. And only because you find functions like
- (DataViewController *)viewControllerAtIndex:(NSUInteger)index storyboard:(UIStoryboard *)storyboard position:(GSPositionOfDataViewController)position;
- (NSUInteger)indexOfViewController:(DataViewController *)viewController;
in all the copy/pasted sample applications in the cloud doesn't necessarily mean that you have to eat that pre-cook food! Extend them any way you like! Just look above - in my signature you will find a 'position:' argument! I extended this to know later on if a completed page turn was a right or a left turn. Because the delegate unfortunately just tells you whether your turn completed or not! It doesn't tell you about the direction! But this sometimes matters for index-counting, depending on your application's need...
Go crazy - they are your's...
HAPPY CODING !!!