The main idea is to receive the TLS key, SSID and password to esp8266 by light.
I implemented some simple protocol with a clock signal and data signal.
I can read the data and write it to serial to see what is going on.
But the main problem is that data can be the different length and my C lang knowledge is not enough to provide the storing this data in the variable. The data will be the JSON string.
LOCAL void ICACHE_FLASH_ATTR beam_intr_handler(void)
{
if (GPIO_REG_READ(GPIO_STATUS_ADDRESS) & BIT(BUTTON_PIN))
{
//disable interrupt
gpio_pin_intr_state_set(GPIO_ID_PIN(BUTTON_PIN), GPIO_PIN_INTR_DISABLE);
//clear interrupt status
GPIO_REG_WRITE(GPIO_STATUS_W1TC_ADDRESS, GPIO_REG_READ(GPIO_STATUS_ADDRESS) & BIT(BUTTON_PIN));
os_printf("tick %d \r\n", system_get_time());
os_printf("sensor states %d\r\n", ((GPIO_REG_READ(GPIO_IN_ADDRESS) & (BIT(SENSOR_PIN1))) != 0));
}
}
Related
I'm trying to understand how the STM32F091VB manages the send of data via serial protocol with the function HAL_UART_Transmit_IT()
At the moment I've a function called in the main() that creates the packet and send it via serial; it is something like this:
tx1[0] = STX;
tx1[1] = 0xFF;
tx1[2] = 0x80;
tx1[3] = 0x80;
DE_TAST_HIGH;
HAL_UART_Transmit_IT(&huart3, tx1, 8);
Now, the data I'm sending is quite small so the code run pretty fast and I'm trying to understand what's going to happen if I try to send a huge packet via serial protocol.
For istance, if my tx1[] is 100byte the HAL_UART_Transmit_IT() function block the CPU waiting while the full packet is sent to the serial port or it works more like a separate process where I tell the micro to send that packet and, while sending it it also process the remaining part of my code/main function?
I've tried to search on the micro datasheet to see if there was something about this process but I had no luck. I've read the stm32f0xx_hal_uart.c and it confirms that it is sent via interrupt in a non blocking mode but I would like to have some more in depth documentation about it
First of all you need to understand how the HAL_UART_Transmit_IT is meant to be used. We can get some help from STM FAQ.
The function is "non blocking" because when you call it it will do some configuration of the interrupts and then return. The buffer will not be transmitted during the call to your function, instead the heavy lifting is deferred to a later stage.
We can further have a look at the source code, to get a proof from what I said (note I kept only the juicy parts).
Blocking
HAL_StatusTypeDef HAL_UART_Transmit(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart, uint8_t *pData, uint16_t Size, uint32_t Timeout)
{
uint16_t* tmp;
uint32_t tickstart = 0U;
// [ ... ]
huart->TxXferSize = Size;
huart->TxXferCount = Size;
while(huart->TxXferCount > 0U)
{
// [ ... ]
// This is were the actual HW regs are accessed, starting the transfer
huart->Instance->DR = (*pData++ & (uint8_t)0xFF);
}
}
// [ ... ]
return HAL_OK
}
Non Blocking
HAL_StatusTypeDef HAL_UART_Transmit_IT(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart, uint8_t *pData, uint16_t Size)
{
huart->pTxBuffPtr = pData;
huart->TxXferSize = Size;
huart->TxXferCount = Size;
/* Enable the UART Transmit data register empty Interrupt */
// This is the only part were HW regs are accessed. What is happening here??
SET_BIT(huart->Instance->CR1, USART_CR1_TXEIE);
return HAL_OK;
}
The _IT function only activates one interrupt, based also on the datasheet:
This means we will receive an interrupt whenever the TX buffer is free. Who is actually sending the data then?
With the help of the FAQs and reading the source code, we find that void HAL_UART_IRQHandler(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart) does something like this:
/* UART in mode Transmitter ------------------------------------------------*/
if(((isrflags & USART_SR_TXE) != RESET) && ((cr1its & USART_CR1_TXEIE) != RESET))
{
UART_Transmit_IT(huart);
return;
}
Which in turn calls the UART_Transmit_IT
static HAL_StatusTypeDef UART_Transmit_IT(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart)
{
uint16_t* tmp;
/* Check that a Tx process is ongoing */
if(huart->gState == HAL_UART_STATE_BUSY_TX)
{
huart->Instance->DR = (uint8_t)(*huart->pTxBuffPtr++ & (uint8_t)0x00FF);
if(--huart->TxXferCount == 0U)
{
/* Disable the UART Transmit Complete Interrupt */
CLEAR_BIT(huart->Instance->CR1, USART_CR1_TXEIE);
/* Enable the UART Transmit Complete Interrupt */
SET_BIT(huart->Instance->CR1, USART_CR1_TCIE);
}
return HAL_OK;
}
else
{
return HAL_BUSY;
}
}
This function transmits only one byte! It then decrements the counter for the transmission (remember, all the information was set into the uart handler) and if it reaches 0, finally the complete interrupt is called.
Interrupts
Note that StmCube does the peripheral initialization and interrupt linking for you, but if you program from scratch you need to remember to write and register UART_IRQ_Handler
You can find here the code navigator to review my snippets and investigate further.
Please help! I am using FSMC to connect a STM32F407 MCU with AD7606 to sample voltage value. MCU would send sampled values to PC using USB HS port after 1024 conversions. But when I inspect the values from PC, I found that readings from channel 0 occasionally contains data from other channels. For example, if connect channel 0 to 5v, connect channel 8 to 3.3v, connect other channels to ground. Then the printed value from channel 0 would contain 5v, 0v, 3.3v. The basic setup is as follows:
A 200KHZ PWM single is generated by TIM10 to act as CONVST signal for AD7606.
7606 will then issue a BUSY signal which I used as an external interrupt source.
In the Interrupt handler, An DMA request would be issued to read 8 16bit data
from FSMC address space to memory space. TIM10 PWM would be stopped if 1024
conversions has been done.
In the DMA XFER_CPLT call back, if 1024 conversions has been done, the converted
data would be sent out by USB HS port, and TIM10 PWM would be enabled again.
Some code blocks:
void HAL_GPIO_EXTI_Callback(uint16_t GPIO_Pin)
{
if(GPIO_Pin == GPIO_PIN_7)
{
// DMA data from FSMC to memory
HAL_DMA_Start_IT(&hdma_memtomem_dma2_stream0, 0x6C000000, (uint32_t)(adc_data + adc_data_idx) , 8);
adc_data_idx += 8;
if (adc_data_idx >= ADC_DATA_SIZE)
HAL_TIM_PWM_Stop(&htim10, TIM_CHANNEL_1);
}
}
void dma_done(DMA_HandleTypeDef *_hdma)
{
int i;
int ret;
// adc_data[adc_data_idx] would always contain data from
// channel 1, led1 wouldn't light if every thing is fine.
if (adc_data[adc_data_idx] < 0x7f00 )
HAL_GPIO_WritePin(led1_GPIO_Port, led1_Pin, GPIO_PIN_SET);
if (adc_data_idx >= ADC_DATA_SIZE)
{
if(hUsbDeviceHS.dev_state == USBD_STATE_CONFIGURED)
{
// if I don't call CDC_Transmit_HS, everything is fine.
ret = CDC_Transmit_HS((uint8_t *)(adc_data), ADC_DATA_SIZE * 2 );
if (ret != USBD_OK)
{
HAL_GPIO_WritePin(led1_GPIO_Port, led2_Pin, GPIO_PIN_SET);
}
}
adc_data_idx = 0;
HAL_TIM_PWM_Start(&htim10, TIM_CHANNEL_1);
}
}
It seems that a single USB transaction would take longer than 5us(one conversion time), so I stopped PWM signal to stop conversion...
If I only send the second half of the data buffer, there is no data mixture. It's very strange.
According to your description, I think the processing is correct, and the problem is at the CDC_Transmit_HS(); I have met the problem on the CDC_Transmit_FS(), which can't transmit more than 64 bytes data for original code, and need to modify some code, otherwise the some error occurs. Did you check the number of received data is correct?
Reference:
I can't receive more than 64 bytes on custom USB CDC class based STM32 device
I'm not sure your ADC_DATA_SIZE size; if it's larger than 64 bytes, maybe you can modify to smaller than 64 bytes and try again and check whether or not the data is correct. I am not sure if it is affected by this problem, but I think you can give it a try.
On the other hand, it may also be necessary to GND the ADC IN pins not used by AD7606 to avoid interference between channels.
Or you can try other communication (I2C, SPI, UART...etc) to send the data.
If there is no problem with other communication methods, there is a high chance that it is a problem with CDC_Transmit_HS(). If there are problems with other transmission methods, you may have to check whether there is a conflict between the ADC conversion time or the transmission time.
I'm more of a high level software guy but have been working on some embedded projects lately so I'm sure there's something obvious I'm missing here, though I have spent over a week trying to debug this and every 'MSP' related link in google is purple at this point...
I currently have an MSP430F5529 set up as an I2C slave device whose only responsibility currently is to receive packets from a master device. The master uses industry grade I2C and has been heavily tested and ruled out as the source of my problem here. I'm using Code composer as my IDE using the TI v15.12.3.LTS compiler.
What is currently happening is the master queries how many packets (of size 62 bytes) the slave can hold, then sends over a few packets which the MSP is just currently discarding. This is happening every 100ms on the master side and for the minimal example below the MSP will always just send back 63 when asked how many packets it can hold. I have tested the master with a Total Phase Aardvark and everything is working fine with that so I'm sure it's a problem on the MSP side. The problem is as follows:
The program will work for 15-20 minutes, sending over tens of thousands of packets. At some point the slave starts to hold the clock line low and when paused in debug mode, is shown to be stuck in the start interrupt. The same sequence of events is happening every single time to cause this.
1) Master queries how many packets the MSP can hold.
2) A packet is sent successfully
3) Another packet is attempted but < 62 bytes are received by the MSP (counted by logging how many Rx interrupts I receive). No stop condition is sent so master times out.
4) Another packet is attempted. A single byte is sent before the stop condition is sent.
5) Another packet is attempted to be sent. A start interrupt, then a Tx interrupt happens and the device hangs.
Ignoring the fact that I'm not handling the timeout errors on the master side, something very strange is happening to cause that sequence of events, but that's what happens every single time.
Below is the minimal working example which is reproducing the problem. My particular concern is with the SetUpRx and SetUpTx functions. The examples that the Code Composer Resource Explorer gives only has examples of Rx or Tx, I'm not sure if I'm combining them in the right way. I also tried removing the SetUpRx completely, putting the device into transmit mode and replacing all calls to SetUpTx/Rx with mode = TX_MODE/RX_MODE, which did work but still eventually holds the clock line low. Ultimately I'm not 100% sure on how to set this up to receive both Rx and Tx requests.
#include "driverlib.h"
#define SLAVE_ADDRESS (0x48)
// During main loop, set mode to either RX_MODE or TX_MODE
// When I2C is finished, OR mode with I2C_DONE, hence upon exit mdoe will be one of I2C_RX_DONE or I2C_TX_DONE
#define RX_MODE (0x01)
#define TX_MODE (0x02)
#define I2C_DONE (0x04)
#define I2C_RX_DONE (RX_MODE | I2C_DONE)
#define I2C_TX_DONE (TX_MODE | I2C_DONE)
/**
* I2C message ids
*/
#define MESSAGE_ADD_PACKET (3)
#define MESSAGE_GET_NUM_SLOTS (5)
static volatile uint8_t mode = RX_MODE; // current mode, TX or RX
static volatile uint8_t rx_buff[64] = {0}; // where to write rx data
static volatile uint8_t* rx_data = rx_buff; // used in rx interrupt
static volatile uint8_t tx_len = 0; // number of bytes to reply with
static inline void SetUpRx(void) {
// Specify receive mode
USCI_B_I2C_setMode(USCI_B0_BASE, USCI_B_I2C_RECEIVE_MODE);
// Enable I2C Module to start operations
USCI_B_I2C_enable(USCI_B0_BASE);
// Enable interrupts
USCI_B_I2C_clearInterrupt(USCI_B0_BASE, USCI_B_I2C_TRANSMIT_INTERRUPT);
USCI_B_I2C_enableInterrupt(USCI_B0_BASE, USCI_B_I2C_START_INTERRUPT + USCI_B_I2C_RECEIVE_INTERRUPT + USCI_B_I2C_STOP_INTERRUPT);
mode = RX_MODE;
}
static inline void SetUpTx(void) {
//Set in transmit mode
USCI_B_I2C_setMode(USCI_B0_BASE, USCI_B_I2C_TRANSMIT_MODE);
//Enable I2C Module to start operations
USCI_B_I2C_enable(USCI_B0_BASE);
//Enable master trasmit interrupt
USCI_B_I2C_clearInterrupt(USCI_B0_BASE, USCI_B_I2C_RECEIVE_INTERRUPT);
USCI_B_I2C_enableInterrupt(USCI_B0_BASE, USCI_B_I2C_START_INTERRUPT + USCI_B_I2C_TRANSMIT_INTERRUPT + USCI_B_I2C_STOP_INTERRUPT);
mode = TX_MODE;
}
/**
* Parse the incoming message and set up the tx_data pointer and tx_len for I2C reply
*
* In most cases, tx_buff is filled with data as the replies that require it either aren't used frequently or use few bytes.
* Straight pointer assignment is likely better but that means everything will have to be volatile which seems overkill for this
*/
static void DecodeRx(void) {
static uint8_t message_id = 0;
message_id = (*rx_buff);
rx_data = rx_buff;
switch (message_id) {
case MESSAGE_ADD_PACKET: // Add some data...
// do nothing for now
tx_len = 0;
break;
case MESSAGE_GET_NUM_SLOTS: // How many packets can we send to device
tx_len = 1;
break;
default:
tx_len = 0;
break;
}
}
void main(void) {
//Stop WDT
WDT_A_hold(WDT_A_BASE);
//Assign I2C pins to USCI_B0
GPIO_setAsPeripheralModuleFunctionInputPin(GPIO_PORT_P3, GPIO_PIN0 + GPIO_PIN1);
//Initialize I2C as a slave device
USCI_B_I2C_initSlave(USCI_B0_BASE, SLAVE_ADDRESS);
// go into listening mode
SetUpRx();
while(1) {
__bis_SR_register(LPM4_bits + GIE);
// Message received over I2C, check if we have anything to transmit
switch (mode) {
case I2C_RX_DONE:
DecodeRx();
if (tx_len > 0) {
// start a reply
SetUpTx();
} else {
// nothing to do, back to listening
mode = RX_MODE;
}
break;
case I2C_TX_DONE:
// go back to listening
SetUpRx();
break;
default:
break;
}
}
}
/**
* I2C interrupt routine
*/
#pragma vector=USCI_B0_VECTOR
__interrupt void USCI_B0_ISR(void) {
switch(__even_in_range(UCB0IV,12)) {
case USCI_I2C_UCSTTIFG:
break;
case USCI_I2C_UCRXIFG:
*rx_data = USCI_B_I2C_slaveGetData(USCI_B0_BASE);
++rx_data;
break;
case USCI_I2C_UCTXIFG:
if (tx_len > 0) {
USCI_B_I2C_slavePutData(USCI_B0_BASE, 63);
--tx_len;
}
break;
case USCI_I2C_UCSTPIFG:
// OR'ing mode will let it be flagged in the main loop
mode |= I2C_DONE;
__bic_SR_register_on_exit(LPM4_bits);
break;
}
}
Any help on this would be much appreciated!
Thank you!
I'm struggling with, probably, a very simple problem.
I have a Cypress CY8 controller acting as SPI master, which should communicate with a PIC32mx in slave mode to exchange data packets.
However i cannot even fix simple transmission of multiple bytes from the master to the slave. I've set up the cypress to transmit a char of increasing value (0-255) with a pause (and slave select toggle) in between. The pic should read the incoming byte and then print it over uart to my pc (the uart connection works).
But the pic only prints the first character it receives continuously instead of it being updated.
If i check my logic sniffer, the cypress does send incrementing values and the pic relays them back over the MISO line (looks like the shift buffer isn't cleared).
What could this be?
The cypress without the pic attached gives proper output:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3264324/Schermafdruk%202015-07-28%2015.43.28.png
With the pic attached it relays the data over MISO:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3264324/Schermafdruk%202015-07-28%2015.43.45.png
And this is my (now) extremely basic code to test it:
TRISBbits.TRISB2 = 1; // make Ra2 pin input (SDI)
TRISBbits.TRISB5 = 0; // make Ra2 pin output (SDO)
TRISBbits.TRISB15 = 1; //make RB14 output (SCK)
ANSELA = 0; // all ports digital
ANSELB = 0; // all ports digital
SYSKEY = 0x00000000;
SYSKEY = 0xAA996655;
SYSKEY = 0x556699AA;
CFGCONbits.IOLOCK=0; // unlock configuration
CFGCONbits.PMDLOCK=0;
SDI2R = 0b0100; //SDI2 on pin RB2
SS2R = 0b0011; //SS2 on pin rb10
RPB5R = 0b0100; //SDO2 on pin RB5
// SCLK is connected to pin RB14 (SCK) by default
SYSKEY = 0x00000000;
SPI2CON = 0; // Stops and resets the SPI1.
rData=SPI2BUF; // clears the receive buffer
SPI2BRG=207; // use FPB/4 clock frequency <-- not important in slave mode right?
SPI2STATCLR=0x40; // clear the Overflo
SPI2CON=0x8180;
unsigned char t;
while(1){
t = SpiChnReadC(2);
//t = SPI2BUF; <== i've tried this also
sendData(t); <== uart routine
}
As i do receive a character and the spi data is relayed back to the cypress constantly i think something goed wrong with reading/clearing the spi data structure in the PIC. But i can't figure out why.
As i read in the datasheet, reading from SPI2BUFF gives me the received data, and clears the read flags so new data can be received, but it looks like that doesn't happen...
Can someone shine a light on this for me?
Thanks in advance
Timberleek
You should try making you SPI handler ISR driven to keep you from constantly polling, can also help the debugging since you'll only get notifications when the SPI is actually transacting.
NOTE: I'm bringing this from my FreeRTOS impl, so my ISR definition is not XC32 exactly...
/* Open SPI */
SPI1CON = 0;
spi_flags = SPICON_MODE32 | SPICON_ON;
SpiChnOpen(1,spi_flags,BRG_VAL);
SpiChnGetRov(1,TRUE);
mSPI1ClearAllIntFlags();
mSPI1SetIntPriority(priority + 1);
mSPI1SetIntSubPriority(0);
mSPI1RXIntEnable(1);
void vSPI1InterruptHandler(void)
{
unsigned long data;
if (IFS0bits.SPI1EIF == 1)
{
mSPI1EClearIntFlag();
}
if (IFS0bits.SPI1RXIF == 1)
{
data = SPI1BUF;
//sendData(data);
}
mSPI1RXClearIntFlag();
}
I know that this topic (DMA & SPI) has already been talked about on numerous threads in the microchip forum, actually i've read all the 15 pages in result of the search with keyword "dma" and read all the topics about dma & spi.
And I am still stuck with my problem I hope someone can help me :)
Here is the problem.
My chip is a PIC32MX775F512H.
I am trying to receive (only receive) data using SPI via DMA.
Since you cannot "just" receive in SPI, and that the SPI core starts toggling the SPI clock only if you write into the SPIBUF (SPI1ABUF for me) I am trying to receive my data using 2 DMA channels.
DMA_CHANNEL1 for the transmitting part.
DMA_CHANNEL2 for the receiving part.
I copy pasted the code from http://www.microchip.com/forums/tm.aspx?tree=true&high=&m=562453&mpage=1#
And tried to make it work without any luck. It only receives several bytes (5 or 6).
I've set the Event Enable Flags to DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE for both dma channels, no interrupt occurs.
Do you have any idea ?
Here is the code I am using :
int Spi_recv_via_DMA(SPI_simple_master_class* SPI_Port, int8u *in_bytes, int16u num_bytes2)
{
DmaChannel dmaTxChn=DMA_CHANNEL1;
DmaChannel dmaRxChn=DMA_CHANNEL2;
SpiChannel spiTxChn=SPI_Port->channel;
int8u dummy_input;
DmaChnOpen(dmaTxChn, DMA_CHN_PRI3, DMA_OPEN_DEFAULT);
DmaChnOpen(dmaRxChn, DMA_CHN_PRI3, DMA_OPEN_DEFAULT);
DmaChnSetEventControl(dmaTxChn, DMA_EV_START_IRQ_EN | DMA_EV_START_IRQ(_SPI1A_RX_IRQ));
DmaChnSetEventControl(dmaRxChn, DMA_EV_START_IRQ_EN | DMA_EV_START_IRQ(_SPI1A_RX_IRQ));
DmaChnClrEvFlags(dmaTxChn, DMA_EV_ALL_EVNTS);
DmaChnClrEvFlags(dmaRxChn, DMA_EV_ALL_EVNTS);
DmaChnSetEvEnableFlags(dmaRxChn, DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE);
DmaChnSetEvEnableFlags(dmaTxChn, DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE);
//SpiChnClrTxIntFlag(spiTxChn);
//SpiChnClrRxIntFlag(spiTxChn);
DmaChnSetTxfer(dmaTxChn, tx_dummy_buffer, (void *)&SPI1ABUF, num_bytes2, 1, 1);
DmaChnSetTxfer(dmaRxChn, (void *)&SPI1ABUF, in_bytes, 1, num_bytes2, 1);
while ( (SPI1ASTAT & SPIRBE) == 0)
dummy_input = SPI1ABUF;
SPI1ASTAT &= ~SPIROV;
DmaRxIntFlag = 0;
DmaChnEnable(dmaRxChn);
DmaChnStartTxfer(dmaTxChn, DMA_WAIT_NOT, 0);
while(!DmaRxIntFlag);
return 1;
}
with those two interrupt handlers :
// handler for the DMA channel 1 interrupt
void __ISR(_DMA1_VECTOR, ipl5) DmaHandler1(void)
{
int evFlags; // event flags when getting the interrupt
//LED_On(LED_CFG);
INTClearFlag(INT_SOURCE_DMA(DMA_CHANNEL1)); // acknowledge the INT controller, we're servicing int
evFlags=DmaChnGetEvFlags(DMA_CHANNEL1); // get the event flags
if(evFlags&DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE)
{ // just a sanity check. we enabled just the DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE transfer done interrupt
DmaTxIntFlag = 1;
DmaChnClrEvFlags(DMA_CHANNEL1, DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE);
}
// LED_Off(LED_CFG);
}
void __ISR(_DMA2_VECTOR, ipl5) DmaHandler2(void)
{
int evFlags; // event flags when getting the interrupt
INTClearFlag(INT_SOURCE_DMA(DMA_CHANNEL2)); // acknowledge the INT controller, we're servicing int
evFlags=DmaChnGetEvFlags(DMA_CHANNEL2); // get the event flags
if(evFlags&DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE)
{ // just a sanity check. we enabled just the DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE transfer done interrupt
DmaRxIntFlag = 1;
DmaChnClrEvFlags(DMA_CHANNEL2, DMA_EV_BLOCK_DONE);
}
}
So I end up waiting forever at the line : while(!DmaRxIntFlag);
I have put breakpoints in the interrupt vectors, they are never called.
This is the state of several registers during the ever lasting wait :
DMACON 0x0000C800
DMASTAT 0x00000001
I am using SPI1A port, so SPI1ABUF and _SPI1A_RX_IRQ
DCH1SPTR 0x5
DCH1SSIZ 0x2B
DCH2DPTR 0x6
DCH2DSIZ 0x2B
DCH2CON 0x00008083
DCH2ECON 0x1B10
DCH2INT 0x00800C4
DCH2SSA 0x1F805820
DCH2DSA 0x00000620
Channel 1 is used to transmit
Channel 2 is used to receive
You are missing these:
INTEnable(INT_SOURCE_DMA(dmaTxChn), INT_ENABLED); // Tx
INTEnable(INT_SOURCE_DMA(dmaRxChn), INT_ENABLED); // Rx
rigth before
DmaRxIntFlag = 0;
DmaChnEnable(dmaRxChn);
DmaChnStartTxfer(dmaTxChn, DMA_WAIT_NOT, 0);
Good luck!
Are you using the SPI in slave mode? or you are on master mode, trying to read some response for a command?
Have you check the silicon errata for this chip? The dspic 33fj family had an issue where SPI slave mode simply didn't work.
Other than that, I don't think it is a good idea to busy wait for DmaRxIntFlag change. You should configure the DMA transfer and continue with your main loop. The DMA will trigger the interrupt handler.
Hope this helps.