React Router Invariant Violation test fails with <Link> outside <Router> [duplicate] - reactjs

Question

I'm using jest to test a component with a <Link> from react-router v4.
I get a warning that <Link /> requires the context from a react-router <Router /> component.
How can I mock or provide a router context in my test? (Basically how do I resolve this warning?)
Link.test.js
import React from 'react';
import renderer from 'react-test-renderer';
import { Link } from 'react-router-dom';
test('Link matches snapshot', () => {
const component = renderer.create(
<Link to="#" />
);
let tree = component.toJSON();
expect(tree).toMatchSnapshot();
});
The warning when the test is run:
Warning: Failed context type: The context `router` is marked
as required in `Link`, but its value is `undefined`.

Answer 1

You can wrap your component in the test with the StaticRouter to get the router context into your component:
import React from 'react';
import renderer from 'react-test-renderer';
import { Link } from 'react-router-dom';
import { StaticRouter } from 'react-router'
test('Link matches snapshot', () => {
const component = renderer.create(
<StaticRouter location="someLocation" context={context}>
<Link to="#" />
</StaticRouter>
);
let tree = component.toJSON();
expect(tree).toMatchSnapshot();
});
Have a look at the react router docs about testing

Answer 2

I had the same issue and using StaticRouter would still require the context which needed more configuration to have it available in my test, so I ended up using the MemoryRouter which worked very well and without any issues.
import React from 'react';
import renderer from 'react-test-renderer';
import { MemoryRouter } from 'react-router-dom';
// SampleComponent imports Link internally
import SampleComponent from '../SampleComponent';
describe('SampleComponent', () => {
test('should render', () => {
const component = renderer
.create(
<MemoryRouter>
<SampleComponent />
</MemoryRouter>
)
.toJSON();
expect(component).toMatchSnapshot();
});
});

Answer 3

The answer of #Mahdi worked for me! In 2023 if you want to test a component that includes <Link> or <NavLink>, we just need to wrap it with the <MemoryRouter> in the test file:
// App.test.js
import { render, screen } from "#testing-library/react";
import MyComponent from "./components/MyComponent";
import { MemoryRouter } from "react-router-dom"; // <-- Import MemoryRouter
test("My test description", () => {
render(
<MemoryRouter> // <-- Wrap!
<MyComponent />
</MemoryRouter>
);
});

Answer 4

my test like this:
import * as React from 'react'
import DataBaseAccout from '../database-account/database-account.component'
import { mount } from 'enzyme'
import { expect } from 'chai'
import { createStore } from 'redux'
import reducers from '../../../reducer/reducer'
import { MemoryRouter } from 'react-router'
let store = createStore(reducers)
describe('mount database-account', () => {
let wrapper
beforeEach(() => {
wrapper = mount(
< MemoryRouter >
<DataBaseAccout store={store} />
</MemoryRouter >
)
})
afterEach(() => {
wrapper.unmount()
wrapper = null
})
})
but I don't konw why MemoryRouter can solve this。

Answer 5

Above solutions have a common default defact:
Can't access your component's instance! Because the MemoryRouter or StaticRouter component wrapped your component.
So the best to solve this problem is mock a router context, code as follows:
import { configure, mount } from 'enzyme';
import Adapter from 'enzyme-adapter-react-16';
describe('YourComponent', () => {
test('test component with react router', () => {
// mock react-router context to avoid violation error
const context = {
childContextTypes: {
router: () => void 0,
},
context: {
router: {
history: createMemoryHistory(),
route: {
location: {
hash: '',
pathname: '',
search: '',
state: '',
},
match: { params: {}, isExact: false, path: '', url: '' },
}
}
}
};
// mount component with router context and get component's instance
const wrapper = mount(<YourComponent/>, context);
// access your component as you wish
console.log(wrapper.props(), wrapper.state())
});
beforeAll(() => {
configure({ adapter: new Adapter() });
});
});