I am creating a DevExpress XtraReport - report.
I have a grouped table with similar values to this:
Model | Passed | Failed | Total |
Test1 | 4 | 5 | 9
Test3 | 2 | 1 | 3
Now I want to convert this data to a PieChart.
What I want to do is Create two labels, named Passing and failing. And bind my data to each of these. But that seems to be impossible.
XRChart will only allow me to create static Labels with no option to bind to it, or create a series with dynamically selected labels based on the grouping instead of the columns.
Meaning I can easily get
Test1.Total vs Test3.Total
But not Test1.Passed vs Test1.Failed and Test3.Passed vs Test3.Failed
How can this even be hard, I must be missing something.
Assuming that you want to display separate Pie with test results for every row in your data source collection ("Test1", "Test2"), you will need to change the data structure to make it compatible with the "Series Template" feature supported by the DevExpress charting component (see the https://documentation.devexpress.com/XtraReports/4575/Examples/Use-Charts-Grids-and-Custom-Controls/How-to-Create-a-Report-with-a-Chart-Bound-to-Data-Using-Series-Templates article for additional information). For instance, the following data schema will allow you to generate two Pie charts:
SeriesDataMember ArgumentDataMember ValueDataMembers (see the XRChart.SeriesDataMember, XRChart.SeriesTemplate.ArgumentDataMember and XRChart.SeriesTemplate.ValueDataMembers properties)
Test1 Passed 4
Test1 Failed 5
Test2 Passed 2
Test2 Failed 1
See also: https://documentation.devexpress.com/WindowsForms/6063/Controls-and-Libraries/Chart-Control/Examples/Creating-Charts/Data-Representation/How-to-Change-the-Display-Format-for-Series-Labels-of-a-Pie-Chart.
You can also contact DevExpress Support Team directly by submitting a ticket using their Support Center portal.
Related
I have created a Powerapp which is used to audit schools and the data saves to my SQL database. I have designed a report in SSRS to display the findings of the audit. The SQL table, shown below, stores the items in each room that were audited (i.e. desks, pcs, shelves etc) plus the name of the room and whether any actions need to take place. I need my report to display one table per room with the items down the left hand side and the name of the room as a title. This should be repeated for each room. There may be a different number of rooms in each report so this will be varied. I've included a screenshot of what the table needs to look like. When I create the table, I can only get the room names down the left hand side in one table and the items across the top. Please help.
Too long for a comment so I'll have to reply here.
Your data is not a a format that is particularly suited to this. I can't see how you can determine 'Compliant' from the data you have shown in your screen shots although it maybe that you have not shown everything you have available.
However, I would start by looking into the t-sql UNPIVOT function to get your data into a more normalised format. Using UNPIVOT you could turn your data into something like..
AuditID | Room | Item | Present
------------------------------------------
3019 | Reception | PC | True
3019 | Reception | Desks | True
3019 | Class 1 | PC | False
3019 | Class 1 | Desks | True
You can obviously extend this to include all pertinent data.
Once you have your data in this format, create tablix with 'item' and 'present' columns only. You will have a 'detail' rowgroup at this point. Right-click the rowgroup and add a parent group, set this group to be grouped by Room.
This will give you the basic layout, from there you can add some padding or blank rows to the room group or even page breaks.
If you cannot get past the UNPIVOT function then I suggest you post a new question specifically on that topic then return here once you have the data in the correct format
I have a 2 column table on one google sheet.
|user| count |
| a | 1 |
| b | 3 |
I connect the google sheet to a new google data studio project, and it creates 2 dimensions.
When I add a piechart, i cannot get the labels from column "user" to be shown, and it just shows the counts.
The google sheet contains multiple tabs that i will use like tables. Im using the created dimensions to populate the piechart.
Any help with this? Im very new to google datastudio.
For the pie chart select user as dimension and count as metric in the DATA panel:
You can then, in the STYLE tab, change the labels to label instead of value:
Or, if you want to keep the count, just leave value as labels and add a legend:
I'm building a Excel-like table into web browser with React.js using only <div> not <table>.
Number of columns are about 90, rows are about 24000.
As we know, it is impossible to load whole data into HTML at single web page due to performance issue.
So I decided to show partial data to user using scrolling.
The main concept is simple, build HTML near user's viewport.
Guess if user is seeing 1800th to 1900th data in single viewport. I'will load only about 1750th ~ 1950th data into HTML. If user scroll up, I'll load HTML for 1700th ~ 1750th data and remove 1900th ~ 1950th data.
I think I need to manually manipulate scroll offset for getting pos where user is at. If each row's height is same as 40px and height of viewport is 1000px, then user will see 25 items at single viewport, so I need to load about 25(front) + 25(currently seeing) + 25(end) data and if user go upside or downside, I'll load additional data and remove data which far away from user.
However, I found that, requirement for my table is not matched with this situations. Here's my situation.
First, Each row's height is not same. Basically my table will show rows of row as single row. What I mean is, table single row can be looks like below,
| Photo| ProductName | Size Pool | Stock |
.... // Below are single row
+------+---------------+-------------------+------------+
| | Boots | 110-120 | 24 | // Row header (Shows Summary of child row)
+ +---------------+-------------------+------------+
| | Boots | 110 | 16 | // Row's row #1
+ +---------------+-------------------+------------+
| | Boots | 120 | 8 | // Row's row #2
+------+------------------------------------------------+
...
+------+---------------+-------------------+------------+
| |Leather Shoe | 120 | 8 | // Row can come with no header row, only single
+------+---------------+-------------------+------------+
...
Like above, if product has more than 2 options, then it merge into rows of single row and show with summary header. And if not a option product, it shows only it's row. And if content inside the row is big, it will stretch to fit the content inside
All data came from remote DataBase which retrieve data via REST API.
DataBase scheme is like below, 2 table as example.
Table #1 ProductInfo
+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+
| GroupNumber |ProductName | Size | Stock |
+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+
| 1 | Boots | 110 | 16 |
+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+
| 1 | Boots | 120 | 8 |
+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+
| 2 |Leather Shoe| 120 | 8 |
+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+
Table #2 GroupInfo
+-----------+------------+--------------+
|GroupNumber| SizePool | ImageURL |
+-----------+------------+--------------+
| 1 | 110-120 | https://abc |
+-----------+------------+--------------+
| 2 | 120 | https://def |
+-----------+------------+--------------+
And future requirements are below, (And most of them are implemented)
Sort by each columns, multi-pivot sort by row of row OR row (Handled via SQL)
Filter data by expression (Handled by client)
Hiding, resizing, change order of column(s) (Handled by client)
Interactable component inside cell like DatePicker, Pop-up etc... (Handled by client)
I succeed to create such table with page based method. But I need scrolling viewport table.
The table contains lots of dependent value column like sum, average which are not in stored in DB except for special reason (Like performance). (Most of them are handled by DB View or Procedure including sorting, calculations etc). So overall performance is really important.
I considered few questions and way to handle this, Can you check and give me a advice?
Q1. How can I decide when data should be loaded and removed and it's amount?
Data height is not consistent, so I think I cannot use scroll offset or data number as measurement criteria. (Is it possible with predictable way?)
Is it possible to archive by accessing DOM element? I'm new to Web dev. Sorry.
Q2. I can get a data from DB in 2 different ways.
Getting ProductInfo And GroupInfo seperately [<ProductInfo>,...] And [<GroupInfo>,...]
Getting Single group which object like this { group:<GroupINfo>, values:[<ProductInfo>,...] }
which is better for performance in this case in typical situations?
Q3. If I got a data like { group:<GroupINfo>, values:[<ProductInfo>,...] }, is there any problems with performance?
Like query overhead (I need to use query joined 6 times with maximum 6 depth nested SELECT query with 30 calculated columns for single data retrieval attempt. -- Pre-calculated view or table can have problems because I have many user to use it and update frequently. So I need to worry about Mutual Exclusive at least on updating.
I'm sure that above query's performance is sufficient for cropping if I got data like [<ProductInfo>,...] And [<GroupInfo>,...]. But I think later one is better. so I need to change interface if possible.
Q4. If I crop whole data from DB and structurize at the beginning, and load and remove data only for DOM, Can it be a good way?
Of course, Q1 is my primary matter, but this also seems good except for data sync with DB (Cause other user can update value while client contain outdated data)
I considered of using Infinite-Scrolling, but this is not for my case, I need perform load data and remove data at the same time. But infinite-scrolling seems dose not support removing data from viewport. Also inconsistent row height may be a problem.
I found react-virtualized and it works.
It also support dynamic resizing of row and it greatly helped
I am building an eCommerce site and I have about 10 different custom post types. For each custom post type, I have about 20 custom fields (with a single meta_value assigned to each meta_key).
What I was thinking about doing is grouping all 20 custom fields into a single custom field so that I'll have 20 meta_values (array) assigned to a single meta_key. This would essentially reduce the number of rows inside the database table from 20 rows down to a single row for each custom post type.
For example, let's say I have post type "book".
Currently my post_meta table for this post type might look like this:
meta_key | meta_value
_________________________
chapters | 5
_________________________
paragraphs | 10
_________________________
author | john_smith
_________________________
price | 19
_________________________
If I convert it to this:
meta_key | meta_value
____________________________
book_detail | [chapters:5 ,paragraphs:10, author:john_smith, price:19]
____________________________
Would doing something like this optimize WordPress query speed or would I just be wasting time?
The tables should be kept as normalized as possible. Storing the CSV or any delimited values is not recommended.
Also, in case you need to query a specific aspect of a post such as only chapters, then normalized data comes handy where you just need to put a simple predicate:
where metakey = 'chapters';
I have an Excel document with 10000 rows of data in two sheets, the thing is one of these sheets have the product costs, and the other has category and other information. These two are imported automatically from the sql server so I don't want to move it to Access but still I want to link the product codes so that when I merge the product tables as product name and cost on the same table, I can be sure that I'm getting the right information.
For example:
Code | name | category
------------------------------
1 | mouse | OEM
4 | keyboard | OEM
2 | monitor | screen
Code | cost |
------------------------------
1 | 123 |
4 | 1234 |
2 | 1232 |
7 | 587 |
Let's say my two sheets have tables like these, as you can see the next one has one that doesn't exist on the other- I put it there because in reality one has a few more, preventing a perfect match. Therefore I couldn't just sort both tables to A-Z and get the costs that way- as I said there are more than 10000 products in that database and I wouldn't want to risk a slight shift of costs -with those extra entries on the other table- that would ruin the whole table.
So what would be a good solution to get the entry from another sheet and inserting it to the right row when merging? Linking two tables with field name??... checking field and trying to match it with the other sheet??... Anything at all.
Note: When I use Access I would make relationships and when I would run a query it would match them automatically... I was wondering if there's a way to do that in excel too.
Why not use a vlookup? If there is a match, it will list the cost. Assuming the top is sheet1 and the other sheet2 and they both start on cell A1. You just need this in cell D2.
=VLOOKUP(A2,Sheet2!A:B,2,0)
You can then drag it down. Easiest way to fill all your 10000 rows is to hover over the bottom left corner of the cell with your cursor. It will turn from a white plus sign into a thin black one. Then simply double click.
Just use VLOOKUP - you can add a row to your first sheet, and find the cost based on code in the other sheet.