I'm using 'ui.bootstrap.contextMenu' to build a context menu. When I right click a field, I need to pass in a unique ID, to the controller, and return a list of choices based on the ID. Each list could be different. If I use hardcoded list, it works fine, but I can't seem to generate the list dynamically. What am I missing? Example Code:
`<div>
<textarea ng-model="ctrl.status" context-menu="ctrl.menuOptions (ctrl.id)"></div>
</div>
vm.menuOptions = function(id) = {
var listArray = $scope.list; // array of possible list items based on ID
angular.forEach(listArray, function(value, key) {
if (id === value.id) {
return [
[value.id, function ($itemScope) {
return value.textName;
}],
]
}
}
}`
I'm assuming you're referring to this implementation: https://github.com/Templarian/ui.bootstrap.contextMenu
The function to generate the context menu is passed three things:
$cmScope - the scope of the context menu
event - the event object that triggered the opening of the context menu
modelValue - the value of the ng-model attached to the current object
So, in your example, you can use:
vm.menuOptions = function($cmScope, event, modelValue) = {
var listArray = $scope.list; // array of possible list items based on ID
// ^ Assuming that the $scope here is the scope of the container, not the contextmenu
angular.forEach(listArray, function(value, key) {
if (modelValue === value.id) {
return [
[value.id, function ($itemScope) {
return value.textName;
}],
]
}
}
}
Related
I create a grid and a toolbar with Two Menu of menuCheckItem. When i check the menuCheckItem the grid filters even with multiple values and multiple columns.
This working fine, as I have created grid 1st and then the toolbar
this.up('') // Used Instead of Ext.getCmp()
Working FIDDLE - https://fiddle.sencha.com/#view/editor&fiddle/2lop
Now I am trying to create same toolbar along with Menu separately on top 1st and then create grid at below. But while doing this, nly Multiple values is working.
I am trying to filter grid with multiple values as well as multiple columns.
Few things i tried -
// Only Filters One Value at a time with each Columns
store.queryBy(function(record,id){
return (record.get('name') == someValue && record.get('phone') == otherValue);
});
and
// Filters Many Columns with Single Value
filter.add(
property : name, phone
value : "somevalue"
operator : "OR"
);
Is there any way to implement Toolbar 1st and then grid ? And Filter grid with many values and columns simultaneously ?
In this FIDDLE i remade a function(checkchange), which is universal , can be put separately and you'll be able to attach it to every menucheckitem you create. The only thing is that if you add new menucheckitem filter you should name the menucheckitem id with the name of the columnDataIndex-Menu and add this columnDataIndex in menuFilters and thats all.
checkchange: function (checkbox, checked, eOpts) {
var menuFilters = ['name', 'phone'];
var getChecked = function (m) {
var checkedItems = [];
m.items.items.forEach(function (c) {
if (c.checked) {
checkedItems.push(c.text);
}
});
return checkedItems;
};
//
var menus = new Map();
menuFilters.forEach(function (e) {
menus.set(e, Ext.getCmp(e + '-Menu'));
});
//
var fieldValues = [];
menuFilters.forEach(function (e) {
fieldValues.push([e, getChecked(menus.get(e))]);
});
//
var store = checkbox.up('grid').store;
store.clearFilter();
//
if (fieldValues.length > 0) {
store.filterBy(function (record) {
var fV = this.fieldValues;
for (var i = 0; i < fV.length; i++) {
if (fV[i][1].length > 0) {
if (fV[i][1].indexOf(record.get(fV[i][0])) === -1) {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}, {
fieldValues: fieldValues
});
}
}
I am very new to angular and, I am not sure how to control the behavior of my filters.
In the app, I have two different single-select drop down controls that filter the results of my data set and fill a table. However, even though these filters work, the results are dependent of both controls and if both are not being used , the empty set is returned. So, my question is: How can I use these filters optionally? So, the app returns every result when the filters are not used or returns the filtered results by one of the controls or both?
Thank you
Here is the code:
AngularJS
The filters for each control. They look very similar:
.filter('byField', function () {
return function (results, options) {
var items = { options: options, out: [] };
angular.forEach(results, function (value, key) {
for (var i in this.options) {
if ((options[i].value === value.fieldId &&
options[i].name === "Field" &&
options[i].ticked === true)) {
this.out.push(value);
}
}
}, items);
return items.out;
};
})
.filter('byClass', function () {
return function (results, options) {
var items = { options: options, out: [] };
angular.forEach(results, function (value, key) {
for (var i in this.options) {
if ((options[i].value === value.documentClass &&
options[i].name === "Class" &&
options[i].ticked === true)) {
this.out.push(value);
}
}
}, items);
return items.out;
};
})
HTML
This is what I am doing to populate the rows of the table:
<tr ng-repeat="result in results | byField:outputFields | byClass:outputClasses">
<td>{{result.documentId}}</td>
...
</tr>
Dorado7.1 in all event listeners provides a view implicit variable pointing to the current event host's view, the variable can completely replace the use of this scenario.
Well, as I imagined the answer was more related to set theory than to angular.
I just made an union between the empty set and every result, and it worked.
.filter('byField', function () {
return function (results, options) {
var items = { options: options, out: [] };
angular.forEach(results, function (value, key) {
if (options.length) {
for (var i in this.options) {
if ((options[i].value === value.fieldId &&
options[i].name === "Field" &&
options[i].ticked === true)) {
this.out.push(value);
}
}
} else {
this.out = results.slice();
}
}, items);
return items.out;
};
})
I'm working on this codepen. The data comes from an array of objects, and I need to make a filter only by name and amount.
I have this code, but if you type a character in the search box, it only search by amount, and not by name too. In other words, if the you type 'warren' or '37.47' it has to return the same result, but doesn't works.
var filterFilter = $filter('filter');
$scope.filter = {
condition: ""
};
$scope.$watch('filter.condition',function(condition){
$scope.filteredlist = filterFilter($scope.expenses,{name:condition} && {amount:condition});
$scope.setPage();
});
You want to create a custom filter for your app.
directiveApp.filter("myFilter", function () {
return function (input, searchText) {
var filteredList = [];
angular.forEach(input, function (val) {
// Match exact name
if (val.name == searchText) {
filteredList.push(val);
}
// Match exact amount
else if (val.amount == searchText) {
filteredList.push(val);
}
});
input = filteredList;
return input;
};
});
You can write your logic in this filter and now use this filter to filter your list.
Update
You can just implement this filter to your custom filter pagination.
Here is the new version of your code. Codepen
List of updates on your code
Added new filter parameter to your ng-repeat attribute
ng-repeat="expense in filteredlist | pagination: pagination.currentPage : numPerPage : filter.condition"
...
Well, finally (based in the idea of Abhilash P A and reading the docs), I solved my question in this way:
var filterFilter = $filter('filter');
$scope.filter = {
condition: ""
};
$scope.$watch('filter.condition',function(condition){
$scope.filteredlist = filterFilter($scope.expenses,function(value, index, array){
if (value.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(condition.toLowerCase()) >= 0 ) {
return array;
}
else if (value.amount.indexOf(condition) >= 0 ) {
return array;
}
});
$scope.setPage();
});
The final codepen ! (awsome)
If I apply groupField property in the grid and store, extjs will automatically sort records by groupField.
For example: http://dev.sencha.com/deploy/ext-4.0.0/examples/grid/group-summary-grid.html, it used 'project' as groupField.
My Question is How can I add an extra row, which does not belong to any group, into a grid with groupField. (Like this: http://i59.tinypic.com/30s973l.jpg)
By default group is made for each value from groupField, also for empty groupField (but it appears first). If it is enough for you then you don't have to do anything.
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/tme462tj/
When you want to have behavior like on attached image, then some work has to be done.
To put empty value at the end, you can create convert function for model field (eg: convert: function(v) { return v ? v : defaultDepartment; }). If you want to hide header and summary for this empty group, you can attach event listener to viewready event and hide them using styles:
viewready: function() {
var els = this.getEl().query('.x-grid-group-hd');
els = Ext.Array.filter(els, function(e) { return e.textContent.trim() == defaultDepartment; });
if (els.length !== 1) {
return;
}
var header = Ext.fly(els[0]);
header.setStyle('display', 'none');
var summary = header.up('.x-group-hd-container').down('.x-grid-row-summary');
if (summary) {
summary.setStyle('display', 'none');
}
}
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/hdyokgnx/1/
As per my comment on the accepted solution, this revision makes the grouping header hide permanently for the duration of that grid view.
This solves my problem of needing a grouping grid but with one group that does not have a group header row.
store.load
({
params :
{
arg1 : 1
,arg2 : '2'
}
,callback : function( records, operation, success )
{
var els = me.theGrid.getEl().query('.x-grid-group-hd');
els = Ext.Array.filter( els, function(e)
{
return e.textContent.trim().includes( "*** A SUBSTRING IN GROUPING FIELD ***" );
});
if (els.length !== 1)
{
return;
}
var header = Ext.fly(els[0]);
header.setStyle('display', 'none');
var summary = header.up('.x-group-hd-container').down('.x-grid-row-summary');
if (summary)
{
summary.setStyle('display', 'none');
}
}
});
Here's the fiddle
I have a tree structure of clients that I'm binding to an unordered list, and each client may or may not have a SubClient. I've added the ability to select an item in the list but now I cannot figure out how to loop through the tree and get an array of all the selected items.
In particular, this beast is where I'm having problems:
cp.GetSelectedClientsArray = function (clients) {
var selected = [];
ko.utils.arrayForEach(clients, function (item) {
if (item.IsSelected()) {
selected.push(item.ClientName());
}
ko.utils.arrayForEach(item.SubClient(), function (subItem) {
if (subItem.IsSelected()) {
selected.push(subItem.ClientName());
}
cp.GetSelectedClientsArray(subItem);
});
});
console.log(selected);
return selected;
};
After I toggle the IsSelected() observable I'd like to loop through the list and get an array with only the selected items.
I've written and re-written this more than a few times, and could really use some help. I'm not even sure how to write a recursive function that would work, because every time I call the function from within, it wipes out my "selected" array and setting it as a global variable keeps any item that has ever been selected in the array.
Any help is appreciated
Here's recursive version
cp.GetSelectedClientsArray = function (clients) {
var result = [];
function GetSelected(clients){
for (var i in clients){
if(clients[i].IsSelected()){
result.push(clients[i].ClientName());
}
GetSelected(clients[i].SubClient());
}
}
GetSelected(clients);
console.log(result);
return result;
};
See jsfiddle
If I understand correctly what you are trying to do, why not try something like this?
_self.SelectedClient = ko.observableArray();
_self.ToggleSelectedUser = function (data, event) {
var toggle = !data.IsSelected();
data.IsSelected(toggle);
if(toggle === true)
{
_self.SelectedClient.push(data.ClientName());
}
else
{
_self.SelectedClient.remove(data.ClientName());
}
Why walk on the clients list recursively when you can simply create a SelectedClients field on the View-Model, and remove/add to it upon toggling?
For example:
_self.SelectedClients = ko.observableArray([]);
_self.ToggleSelectedUser = function (data, event) {
var toggle = !data.IsSelected();
data.IsSelected(toggle);
if (toggle)
_self.SelectedClients.push(data.ClientName());
else
_self.SelectedClients.remove(data.ClientName());
};
See Fiddle.
Update:
As per your comment, when you do need to walk recursively on the tree, you can try something like this:
function AggregateSelectedClients(clients, results)
{
results = results || [];
if (!clients || !clients.length) return results;
ko.unwrap(clients).forEach(function(v, i)
{
var selected = ko.unwrap(v.IsSelected);
var subClients = ko.unwrap(v.SubClient);
if (selected)
results.push(ko.unwrap(v.ClientName));
if (subClients && subClients.length)
AggregateSelectedClients(subClients, results);
});
return results;
}
The selected children have to be added to the parent selection.
ko.utils.arrayForEach(item.SubClient(), function (subItem) {
if (subItem.IsSelected()) {
selected.push(subItem.ClientName());
}
//cp.GetSelectedClientsArray(subItem);
selected.push.apply(selected, cp.GetSelectedClientsArray(subItem));
});
See fiddle
I hope it helps.