I have a cell array, like so:
ID = {'g283', 'sah378', '2938349dgdgf', 'g283'};
I also have some data that corresponds to these IDs.
Data = {'data1', 'data2', 'data3', 'data4'};
Let's say my current ID is g283, and I want to extract Data that matches this ID.
I do strfind(ID, 'g283') and get a result like so:
result = {[1], [], [], [1]}
I now want to extract the data from data and get this:
new_data = ['data1', 'datat4'] or equivalent.
However, cell arrays cannot be subindexed into, so I am wondering if there is an easy method to do this without looping. Thank you!
Let the input variables be defined as
ID = {'g283', 'sah378', '2938349dgdgf', 'g283'}; % ID
Data = {'data1', 'data2', 'data3', 'data4'}; % data
s = 'g283'; % current ID
You only need to apply isempty to test if each result of strfind contains a match or not. This can be done via cellfun, for example as follows:
ind = cellfun(#(x) ~isempty(strfind(x, s)), ID);
new_data = Data(ind);
If you are looking for the whole string (as opposed to a partial match), a simpler alternative is to use ismember:
ind = ismember(ID, s);
new_data = Data(ind);
Related
I have a set of data in a Google spreadsheet in two columns. One column is a list of article titles and the other is the ID of a hotel that is in that article. Call it list1.
Example data
I would like returned a new list with article titles in one column, and an array of the hotel IDs in that article in the other column. Call it list2.
Example data
There are thousands of lines that this needs to be done for, and so my hope was to use Google Apps Script to help perform this task. My original thinking was to
Create column 1 of list2 which has the unique article titles (no script here, just the G-sheets =unique() formula.
Iterate through the titles in list2, looking for a match in first column of the list1
If there is a match:
retrieve its corresponding value in column 2
push it to an empty array in column two of list2
move onto next row in list1
if no longer a match, loop back to step 2.
I've written the following code. I am currently getting a type error (TypeError: Cannot read property '0' of undefined (line 13, file "Code")), however, I wanted to ask whether this is even a valid approach to the problem?
function getHotelIds() {
var outputSheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('list2');
var lastRow = outputSheet.getLastRow();
var data = outputSheet.getRange(2,1,lastRow,2).getValues();
var workingSheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('list1');
var lastActiveRow = workingSheet.getLastRow();
var itemIDS = [];
for (var i=1; i<=data.length; i++) {
var currentArticle = data[i][0];
var lookupArticle = workingSheet[i][0];
if (currentArticle === lookupArticle) {
var tempValue = [workingSheet[i][1]];
itemIDS.push(tempValue);
}
}
}
Use a simple google sheets formula:
You can use a very simple formula to achieve your goal instead of using long and complicated scripts.
Use =unique(list1!A2:A) in cell A2 of list2 sheet to get the unique hotels.
and then use this formula to all the unique hotels by dragging it down in column B.
=JOIN(",",filter(list1!B:B,list1!A:A=A2))
You got the idea right, but the logic needed some tweaking. The "undefined" error is caused by the workingSheet[i][0]. WorkingSheet is a Sheet object, not an array of data. Also, is not necessary to get the data from list2 (output), it is rather the opposite. You have to get the data from the list1 (source) sheet instead, and iterate over it.
I added a new variable, oldHotel, which will be used to compare each line with the current hotel. If it's different, it means we have reached a different Hotel and the data should be written in list2.
function getHotelIds() {
var outputSheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('list2');
var outLastRow = outputSheet.getLastRow();
var workingSheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('list1');
var lastActiveRow = workingSheet.getLastRow();
var sourceValues = workingSheet.getRange("A2:B" + lastActiveRow).getValues();
var itemIDS = [];
var oldHotel = sourceValues[0][0]; //first hotel of the list
for (var i = 0; i < sourceValues.length; i++) {
if (sourceValues[i][0] == oldHotel) {
itemIDS.push(sourceValues[i][1]);
/*When we reach the end of the list, the oldHotel variable will never be different. So the next if condition is needed. Otherwise it wouldn't write down the last Hotel.
*/
if (i == sourceValues.length - 1) {
outputSheet.getRange(outLastRow + 1, 1, 1, 2).setValues([
[sourceValues[i][0], itemIDS.toString()]
]);
}
} else {
outputSheet.getRange(outLastRow + 1, 1, 1, 2).setValues([
[sourceValues[i - 1][0], itemIDS.toString()]
]);
oldHotel = sourceValues[i][0]; //new Hotel will be compared
outLastRow = outputSheet.getLastRow(); //lastrow has updated
itemIDS = []; //clears the array to include the next codes
}
}
}
I also converted the itemIDS array to a String each time, so it's written down in a single cell without issues.
Make sure each column of the Sheet is set to "Plain text" from Format > Number > Plain Text
References
getRange
setValues
toString()
I have a set of documents in Firestore in this format. Questions array will 10 questions.
I want to get the data of questions field: one row for one question
I do I code in the appscript to perform this
This is my code so far (for one document only)
function test(){
const firestore = getFirestore();
var query = firestore.getDocument("QuestionCollection/test").fields;
var data = {};
data.subject = query.subject;
data.questions= query.questions;
const sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
for(i = 0 ; i < 10 (no. of question); i++){
const row = [data.questions[i].answer, data.questions[i].difficulty];
sheet.appendRow(row);
}
}
Error:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'answer' of undefined
Modification points:
When I saw your sample data in the image, it seems that the array length of questions is 2. But at the for loop, the end index of loop is 9. I think that by them, such error occurs.
When you want to put the value of "Serial", it is required to add the value for putting to Spreadsheet.
In your script, appendRow is used in a loop. In this case, the process cost becomes high.
When above points are reflected to your script, it becomes as follows.
Modified script:
Your for loop is modified as follows.
From:
for(i = 0 ; i < 10 (no. of question); i++){
const row = [data.questions[i].answer, data.questions[i].difficulty];
sheet.appendRow(row);
}
To:
var values = [];
for (var i = 0; i < data.questions.length; i++) {
const row = [i + 1, data.questions[i].answer, data.questions[i].difficulty];
values.push(row);
}
sheet.getRange(sheet.getLastRow() + 1, 1, values.length, values[0].length).setValues(values);
For the end index of loop, the array length is used.
Reference:
setValues(values)
You shouldn't query the .fields property directly (because your data isn't converted properly). Assuming you're using v28+ of the library, your code should look something like this:
function test(){
const firestore = getFirestore();
const query = firestore.getDocument("QuestionCollection/test").obj; // Don't use .fields here
const sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
const values = [["Serial", "Answer", "Difficulty"]]; // Init 2D array with Header row
// Loop through each question in the array and extract necessary values to construct Data rows
for (const question of query.questions){
values.push([query.questions.indexOf(question) + 1, question.answer, question.difficulty]);
}
// Replace 1, 1 below with coords of "Serial" header cell
const range = sheet.getRange(1, 1, values.length, values[0].length);
range.setValues(values);
// sheet.getRange(subjRow, subjCol).setValue(query.subject); // Add location for Subject data
}
I saw that you wanted "Serial" to represent "Question number", so I added that column to the header and data rows.
As Tanaike mentioned, there's a huge performance hit for writing to the spreadsheet in a loop, so it's better if you set up a 2D array of values to write all at once using range.setValues(array2D). Ideally, you'll want to minimize the calls to the Spreadsheet API.
Disclaimer: I'm an active contributor to the FirestoreGoogleAppsScript library.
The problem with the ECMA standard for sort of Object.keys() is known:
Object.keys() handle all keys with integer (example: 168), including integer as strings (example: "168"), as a integer. The result is, both are the same (168 === "168"), and overwrite itself.
var object = {};
object["168"] = 'x';
object[168] = 'y';
Object.keys(object); // Array [ "168" ]
object[Object.keys(object)]; // "y"
Interestingly, all keys (including pure integer keys) are returned as a string.
The ecma262 wrote about this: All keys will be handle as a integer, expect the key is a String but is not an array index.
https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ordinaryownpropertykeys
That should tell us: 168 === "168". A toString() do not solve the problem.
var object = {};
object[[3].toString()] = 'z';
object[[1].toString()] = 'x';
object[[2].toString()] = 'y';
Object.keys(object);
// Array(3) [ "1", "2", "3" ]
Paradoxically, in this case, only integer apply as "enumerable" (it's ignoring array.sort(), that sort also strings with letters.).
My question about this is simple: How can i prevent the sort function in Object.keys()? I have testet the Object.defineProperties(object, 1, {value: "a", enumerable: true/false}), but that mean not realy enumerable in the case of integer or string or integer-like string. It means only should it be counted with or not. It means "counted" like omit (if it false), not "enumerabled" like ascending or descending.
A answere like that is not a good answer: Please use only letters [a-zA-Z] or leastwise a letter at the first position of keyword.
What I want: That the keys are not sorted, but output in the order in which they were entered, whether integer, string or symbol.
Disclaimer: Please solutions only in JavaScript.
Javascript Objects are unordered by their nature. If you need an ordered object-like variable I would suggest using a map.
To achieve what you're looking for with a map instead of object you'd do something like the below:
var map1 = new Map();
map1.set("123", "c");
map1.set(123, "b");
var iterator1 = map1.keys();
var myarray = [];
for (var i = 0; i < map1.size; i++) {
myarray.push(iterator1.next().value);
}
console.log(myarray);
// Array ["123", 123]
Unfortunately it's not compatible with IE and I'm not sure how else you could achieve what you need without it. A quick Google did return something about jQuery maps, though.
If you don't want to use jQuery and still need to support IE some points are below:
Is there anything stopping you using an array rather than JS object to store the data you need? This will retain the order per your requirements unlike objects. You could have an object entry in each iteration which represents the key then use a traditional foreach to obtain them as an array. I.e.
The array:
var test_array = [
{key: 123, value: 'a value here'},
{key: "123", value: 'another value here'}
];
// console.log(test_array);
Getting the keys:
var test_array_keys = [];
test_array.forEach(function(obj) { test_array_keys.push(obj['key']); } );
// console.log(test_array_keys);
Then if you needed to check whether the key exists before adding a new entry (to prevent duplicates) you could do:
function key_exists(key, array)
{
return array.indexOf(key) !== -1;
}
if(key_exists('12345', test_array_keys))
{
// won't get here, this is just for example
console.log('Key 12345 exists in array');
}
else if(key_exists('123', test_array_keys))
{
console.log('Key 123 exists in array');
}
Would that work? If not then the only other suggestion would be keeping a separate array alongside the object which tracks the keys and is updated when an entry is added or removed to/from the object.
Object Keys sorted and store in array
First Creating student Object. then sort by key in object,last keys to store in array
const student={tamil:100, english:55, sci:85,soc:57}
const sortobj =Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(student).sort())
console.log(Object.keys(sortobj))
use map instead of an object.
let map = new Map()
map.set("a", 5)
map.set("d", 6)
map.set("b", 12)
to sort the keys (for example, to update a chart data)
let newMap = new Map([...map.entries()].sort())
let keys = Array.from(newMap.keys()) // ['a','b','d']
let values = Array.from(newMap.values()) // [5,12,6]
Let's say I have an array of strings and I want to get a list with objects that match, such as:
var locales=Locale.getAvailableLocales()
val filtered = locales.filter { l-> l.language=="en" }
except, instead of a single value I want to compare it with another list, like:
val lang = listOf("en", "fr", "es")
How do I do that? I'm looking for a one-liner solution without any loops. Thanks!
Like this
var locales = Locale.getAvailableLocales()
val filtered = locales.filter { l -> lang.contains(l.language)}
As pointed out in comments, you can skip naming the parameter to the lambda, and use it keyword to have either of the following:
val filtered1 = locales.filter{ lang.contains(it.language) }
val filtered2 = locales.filter{ it.language in lang }
Just remember to have a suitable data structure for the languages, so that the contains() method has low time complexity like a Set.
i have a struct array that i want "break up" into smaller arrays that can be called as needed or at least figure out how i can map the items needed off one text value.
the struct:
struct CollectionStruct {
var name : String
var description : String
var title : String
var image : PFFile
var id: String
}
and the array made from the struct
var collectionArray = [CollectionStruct]()
var i = 0
for item in collectionArray {
print(collectionArray[i].name)
i += 1
}
printing partArray[i].name gives the following result:
pk00_pt01
pk00_pt02
pk00_pt03
pk01_pt01
pk01_pt02
pk01_pt03
pk01_pt04
pk01_pt05
pk01_pt06
pk01_pt07
pk01_pt08
this is just some test values but there could be thousands of entries here so i wanted to filter the entire array just by the first 4 characters of [i].name i can achieve this by looping through as above but is this achievable using something like .map?
I wanted to filter the entire array just by the first 4 characters of
[i].name
You can achieve this by filtering the array based on the substring value of the name, as follows:
let filteredArray = collectionArray.filter {
$0.name.substring(to: $0.name.index($0.name.startIndex, offsetBy: 4)).lowercased() == "pk00"
// or instead of "pk00", add the first 4 characters you want to compare
}
filteredArray will be filled based on what is the compared string.
Hope this helped.
If you want to group all data automatically by their name prefix. You could use a reducer to generate a dictionary of grouped items. Something like this:
let groupedData = array.reduce([String: [String]]()) { (dictionary, myStruct) in
let grouper = myStruct.name.substring(to: myStruct.name.index(myStruct.name.startIndex, offsetBy: 4))
var newDictionart = dictionary
if let collectionStructs = newDictionart[grouper] {
newDictionart[grouper] = collectionStructs + [myStruct.name]
} else {
newDictionart[grouper] = [myStruct.name]
}
return newDictionart
}
This will produce a dictionary like this:
[
"pk00": ["pk00_pt01", "pk00_pt02", "pk00_pt03"],
"pk01": ["pk01_pt01", "pk01_pt02", "pk01_pt03", "pk01_pt04", "pk01_pt05", "pk01_pt06", "pk01_pt07"],
"pk02": ["pk02_pt08"]
]
Not sure if i am understanding you correctly but it sounds like you are looking for this...
To create a new array named partArray from an already existing array named collectionArray (that is of type CollectionStruct) you would do...
var partArray = collectionArray.map{$0.name}