As i am a novice of netty .here is my problem.
client side made of netty4 tcp communication and server module created by apache camel netty.
and in the middle of this communication,we have a load balancer L4.
this is our picture.
client and server picture
client config :10.10.10.1:8501
server config :
from (10.10.10.1:8501....
from (10.10.10.1:8502....
how can i make a client config file?
If I understood your problem, you can set your two address in your client, justo do it:
.loadBalance().roundRobin().to(ExchangePattern.InOut, "address1", "address2")
But I didn't understand about your config file, for me you are talking about properties, right?
If you are talking about properties you can take ir in your routeBuilder with a Properties, like this:
Properties property = new Properties();
property.load(new FileInputStream("YourProperties.properties"));
String propA = property.getProperty("propA");
Or set it in your blueprint/spring and get it in your route.
Here you can find more explanations about it
http://camel.apache.org/using-propertyplaceholder.html
Related
Using Java DSL, I have a route in which I poll a file in an SFTP server using the file name set in the message headers
from("direct:download")
.pollEnrich()
.simple("sftp://my.host:22/folder/?username=foo&fileName=${header.CamelFileName}")
.to("file://state/downloaded");
The sftp endpoint needs to have set a private key. Usually something like this suffices:
endpoint("sftp://my.host:22/folder/?username=foo&fileName=my_file_explicitly_written_here", SftpEndpoint.class).getConfiguration().setPrivateKey(getSshPrivateKey());
However, I see no way to "mix" dynamic fields in the URI (${header.CamelFileName}) in the pollEnrich().simple()) with endpoint configuration.
Any suggestion on this?
You can reference privateKey as bean from registry.
.pollEnrich()
.simple("sftp://my.host:22/folder/?username=foo&privateKey=#myKeyInRegistry&fileName=${header.CamelFileName}")
Binding bean to registry depends on platform and Camel version you are using.
For an IoT project I am working on I am researching a next, enhanced, version of our “Socket Handler” which is over 5 years of age and has evolved in a big beast doing apart from handling socket connections with IoT devices also in thread processing that has become a real pain to manage.
For my total rewrite I am looking into Apache Camel as a routing and transformation toolkit and understand how this can help us split processing steps into micro-services, loosely coupled through message queues.
One thing that I have trouble understanding however is how I can implement the following logic “the Apache Camel way”:
An IoT device sends an initial message which contains its id, some extra headers and a message payload.
Apart from extracting the message payload and routing it to a channel, I also need to use the device Id to check a message queue, named after the device id, for any commands that have to go to the device over the same socket connection that received the initial message.
Although it seems that Netty4, which is included in Camel, can deal with synchronous duplex comms, I cannot see how the above logic can be implemented in the Camel Netty4 component. Camel Routing seems to be one way only.
Is there a correct way to do this or should I forget about using camel for this and just use Netty4 bare?
It is possible to reproduce a full duplex communication by using two Camel routes :
thanks by using reuseChannel property
As this full duplex communication will be realised thanks to two different Camel routes, sync property must be set to false.
Here the first route:
from("netty4:tcp://{{tcpAddress}}:{{tcpPort}}?decoders=#length-decoder,#string-decoder&encoders=#length-encoder,#bytearray-encoder&sync=false&reuseChannel=true") .bean("myMessageService", "receiveFromTCP").to("jms:queue:<name>")
This first route will create a TCP/IP consumer thanks to a server socket (it is also possible to use a client socket thanks to property clientMode)
As we want to reuse the just created connection, it is important to initialize decoders but also encoders that will be used later thanks to a bean (see further). This bean will be responsible of sending data by using the Channel created in this first route (Netty Channel contains a pipeline for decoding / encoding messages before receiving from / sending to TCP/IP.
Now, we want to send back some data to the parter connected to the consumer (from) endpoint of the first route. Since we are not able to do it thanks to classical producer endpoint (to), we use a bean object :
from("jsm:queue:<name>").bean("myMessageService", "sendToTCP");
Here the bean code :
public class MessageService {
private Channel openedChannel;
public void sendToTCP(final Exchange exchange) {
// opened channel will use encoders before writing on the socket already
// created in the first route
openedChannel.writeAndFlush(exchange.getIn().getBody());
}
public void receiveFromTCP(final Exchange exchange) {
// record the channel created in the first route.
this.openedChannel = exchange.getProperty(NettyConstants.NETTY_CHANNEL, Channel.class);
}
}
Of course,
the same bean instance is used in the two routes, you need to use a registry to do so :
SimpleRegistry simpleRegistry = new SimpleRegistry();
simpleRegistry.put("myMessageService", new MessageService());
Since the bean is used in two different asynchronous routes, you will have to deal with some unexected situations, by for example protecting the access of openedChannel member, or dealing with unexpected deconnexion.
This post helped me a lot to find this solution :
how-to-send-a-response-back-over-a-established-tcp-connection-in-async-mode-usin
reuseChannel property documentation
After end of camel route, exchange's body and headers will back to requester as response.
I am using amq+camel+smpp for working with SMSC. I used SMPP as camel coponent and use these endpoints in routes. I want to monitor on SMPP connection binding, logs every SMSC bind and unbind in separate file than activemq.log.
Kindly guide me in approaching the mentioned event scenario.
Have you tried configuring log4j - http://camel.apache.org/how-do-i-use-log4j.html
The need is to have a Camel (Mina/Netty) based TCP server running on a specific port, which allows multiple TCP clients to connect to it. The content to be streamed is available in files and the TCP server has to send each line in the text files to one of the connected clients (round robin).
Can someone help me with the outline of a camel route to achieve this?
Also it is possible to throttle the streaming speed for example 100 msg/sec per connected client?
Thanks in advance.
MK
I have done something like this. Well not quite exactly to what you want but I can make some suggestions on how to get started.
Lets use the MINA component for this route as I had some issues with the Netty component see this link Exception thrown from Apache Camel Netty Consumer When more than one client sends data. Apparently this has been fixed but as my project got cancelled I never tested it again.
So from your description this will be a text line based protocol a simple route for this would look like this in the DSL
<route>
<from uri="mina2:tcp://localhost:5555?textline=true"/>
<to uri="bean:fileProcessing"/>
</route>
This route will open a listening socket on the localhost on port 5555. The route is also setup to use a textline codec. A textline codec is essentially a line of text terminated end of line character i.e. \n. If you are going to be using some other protocol you will need to look into the following items:
ProtocolEncoder—The ProtocolEncoder handles the task of taking an input
payload and putting bytes onto the TCP channel.
ProtocolDecoder—The ProtocolDecoder interprets the custom
binary protocol message to something your application can understand.
ProtocolCodecFactory— This creates the encoder and decoder.
You could implement some logic in the fileProcessing bean to send the replies back. There is a catch however the clients will have to request when they are ready to get a new line. From my understanding this follows a request reply scenario. However from what I have seen the route is only active when there is a message coming in from the client to the server.
There might be a way to initiate the sending from the server but you will need to experiment with that by yourself on getting it done I have not done anything like that myself.
Critical reading would be the following.
Mina Documentation
Blog Entry On Using MINA
My suggestion is to start with a basic route like this and then expand your logic and then come back with problems you might encounter.
UPDATE:
So I did a little research on this and it does not appear possible to send events from the server to the client without following one of the following patterns InOnly and InOut.
Try just using MINA or Netty then.
I need one server to receive ip requests from clients(there are not in the same intranet), and I can
route all the response packets to a special gateway server, and then I send the response packages to
clients after some processing. it is like VPN, but I want to do some development based one
opensource project, so i can control it myself.
any suggestion? thanks!
There is OpenVPN which is as the name already suggests open source.
You could set up the server on the local one as a kind of proxy (or reverse-proxy depending on your viewpoint) and have the clients connect to it.
It depends what protocol you're using, maybe it has explicit proxy capability or you can get an existing proxy program, or just proxy it using a simple socket forwarder program.